The videos found in this channel are for informational purposes only. You can think of this video series as my journey of discovery. If you want to follow me on my journey, then WELCOME to my channel. Many of the videos are about fractal geometry and fractal cosmology. There is also a series called "Understanding Ken Wheeler's Missing Secrets of Magnetism" where I attempt to explain magnets and magnetism by organizing and simplifying Ken Wheeler's language. The fractal paradigm also plays a key role in the understanding of magnetism since "magnets" have the property of self-similarity. Black holes also have the property of self-similarity in my opinion leading to the radical idea that "black holes" are "magnets" too. This leads to the next radical idea that Atoms are "magnets" and thus, Atoms are magnets too. I hope you enjoy my videos. The information here is action packed, so put thinking cap on. FractalWoman
Hi Lori, have you seen the study of the biphotons that look like your Ohm particle by the university of Ottawa? "Visualizing the mysterious dance: Quantum entanglement of photons captured in real-time". If not then you should search it, because it looks a LOT like your Ohm partice. I can not post a linque my comment was lost in hyperspace
The reason this is so slow is because I wrote the software the P5JS Editor so I could give the code away to my RU-vid subscribers. Not everyone has a fancy GPU so I targeted a platform that anyone could use. I do have a fancy GPU both on my laptop and on my desktop computer. That is where I do my real experiments. (FYI, I'm not a big fan of people that start their comments with the word Jeeze. It's a little bit rude. Don't you think?)
@@FractalWoman Thanks for the reply. No, as we are both Americans, I don't find it to be rude at all. Obviously I was being humorous and had no intention to be rude towards you. I presumed adding the word "Jeeze" would add some dialog and context of expression of how slow the graphics rendering was presented, something which reminds me of GPU processing during the 1990s. The animation rendering you've presented doesn't require a fancy GPU by all means; it will run perfectly to what is available to the majority of the users' device's built-in GPU component. I've subscribed to your channel and would never dare to use any code that requires GPU processing written in Python, JS, or P5JS (I've never heard of this language, and it sounds like it's excellent at slowing things down with great latency). I believe if you really want a broad range of subscribed audiences to utilize your code, it would be best if you made ChatGPT to write it in OpenCL (works on all CPUs and GPUs), OpenGL (works on all GPUs), Vulkan (works on all GPUs), or CUDA (works only on Nvidia stuff). If you are new to programming and program quite often with the requirement of AI to do most of the work, I highly recommend "Cursor AI" you can use ChatGPT-4o model with unlimited prompt requests for only $20 a month and its very productive. Your mathematical explanation of quantum spins are nice and easy to follow. (FYI, I'm not a great fan to folks who writes code which runs at the speed of a turtle and doesn't present GPU rendering the proper way using the proper GPU languages. Also, RU-vidrs do not like content creators who present their valuable videos at the Stone Age resolution of 480P, which you've happily presented here. After all, we are living in the 2024 era, and people in third-world countries are enjoying 1080P resolution). 😀
@@ShopperPlug First of all, I am not American. I am Canadian. We are the people who say sorry when someone bumps into US. We are super extra polite, except when someone rubs us the wrong way. Then all bets are off. FYI, I have been programming since the days of the punch cards. I have experience with all the iterations of computers including the Vic-20, Commodore-64, Atari-ST, the Amiga, 286, 382, 482, Pentium, Apple's Power PC, iMac, MacBook and many many Windows machines, too many to count. Computer graphics is my area of expertise. I work in the field of medical imaging where I develop high end graphical programs for use in the operating room. When I make my RU-vid videos, I am more interested in getting the information across and less interested in being too fancy. I think people like my "rough around the edges" approach as it is less intimidating IMHO. Also, 480P is not the stone age. I used to live in the stone age, so I can say with some certainty that this is not true. That said, I tend to render my videos in 720p which is fine for RU-vid videos in my opinion. I am using an old editing program that I really like called Camtasia and it can only do 480p or 720p. I could get something better for sure but then I would have to learn yet another piece of software and there are only so many hours in the day and so I have to pick and choose my battles. Hope you understand.
@@FractalWoman@FractalWoman Medical imaging sounds really interesting, it would be nice if you could share the theory and details on how it works and relates to GPU with possibility of AI involvement someday. Thanks. 😀
@@ShopperPlug Medical imaging actually relates very much to what I am trying to accomplish here regarding "the medium for the propagation of light". I have learned a lot about how ultrasound propagates through a medium (the body) for example which lead me to believe that light CAN also have a medium. MRI physics got me thinking about how small magnets behave in the vicinity of large magnets which let me to think that the medium might be made of tiny dipole moments. I don't think I will ever be making a video on ultrasound or MRI physics directly. There are already LOTS of videos out there that do a great job. I am on a journey of discovery and I make videos when "the universe" compels me to make a video. So I can't make any promises.
The deformation in my software IS a spinor. I am using quaternions in the 4x4 matrix implementation for my animations. And, since the special unitary group SU(2) is isomorphic to the unit quaternions, which means that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the elements of SU(2) and the unit quaternions, I don't see any reason to invoke the language of group theory when the language of matrices and matrix multiplication is so much simpler to understand. Time always goes forward. Phase can go forward or backward. Time and phase are not the same thing. This is an important point.
Hi there, SU(2) and SU(3) generator has been considered to advanced to quantum negative energy deflection system, and maybe we need some new geometric timemetrix models to emphasis on their density and flow.
@@OurCoreality I don't use spinors. I use quaternions. And, I convert everything from 2x2 complex matrices to 4x4 real matrices. This makes it easier to implement on the computer. I also use "row" convention as opposed to "column" convention in my code. In a previous video, I explained how I convert from the Pauli matrices to the quaternions. In the next video, I will explain how I do the kinematics for these animations. Long story short, I am using quaternions to generate a transformation matrix which I then transform the point through to get a new location. Then I extract the orientation of the object itself from the same quaternion matrix and orient the object (the box) accordingly.
@@linz8291 I am trying to do things in a straight forward way without invoking the symbolic language of group theory. That is why I am using quaternions in their natural form (as 4x4 real matrices) and not the 2x2 complex Pauli matrices which I show in a previous video to be quaternions in disguise. I am trying to develop a language that the average person with basic math skills can understand. SU(2) is an abstraction (symbolic term) that most people have never heard of before. But most people can add and multiply real numbers (except for Terrence Howard who thinks that 1x1=2, but I digress).
is it ok to think of this windings as electrons spdf orbitals? bc then I can understand why electrons disappear from existence while passing from one energy level to another. there are winded grids in-between. maybe this is why.
For sure, it is possible that the windings are associated with energy levels. We are still studying this so I can't say for sure but it kind of makes sense.
@@enkiorenlil Not sure. Isopotentials are static when the magnet is not in motion. There are actually two windings in this animation. One winding about the X-axis is static and the other winding, about the Y-axis is dynamic in that the phase changes over time. In the torus generators that I show in previous videos, I rotate a point about the Z-axis to create a circle, then shift the whole circle in the X direction, then I rotate the whole circle about the y-axis to create the torus. So the torus geometry is created in quite a different way than what I am doing in this video.
@@FractalWoman you know when you say this : For sure, it is possible that the windings are associated with energy levels. you are actually saying the difference between h atom and the Lead is only about : more or less windings? but ofc then it should be in fractal mode. so same windings in valance electrons spin orientation and same atoms nucleus quarks or whatever the particle is, has its own windings. small windings, bigger windings all similar to each other but in different orientations, oscillations, frequencies, intensities. this sounds like bits and pieces. where we gonna go from there?
Is there any momentum effect in the medium? For example, you can simulate something like water in various ways, such as with a function or particle system or something like a grid and a height field. They can all look realistic. But when the wave effects are simulated with something that has a bit of physicality, you can see ripples that look physically plausible as various changes happen to whatever forces are affecting the pattern. In the electron spin case, does the shape come from something instantaneous or is it a result of the medium elements rebalancing to distribute the tension between whatever the electron wants due to its current state and medium's current state at that position and the state of the mediums immediate neighborhood?
"Is there any momentum effect in the medium?" Yes. According to John Macken, there is angular momentum in this system. The next step would be to simulate this for real using using a spring-mass system (or something similar) with the properties of The Medium programmed in. This is a much bigger job unfortunately so I am not sure when I will be able to get to this.
@@FractalWoman thanks. Yeah, I can imagine it’s a lot. It’s a nice experimental lab that in addition to visualization can also be used for validation as well, especially as you build on what it can do, like double slit experiment etc. With regard to momentum, I wonder if the medium in conjunction with election motion implicitly end up creating the electron shell probability patterns as a result of the eddy currents that occur in cases where the electrons are still in orbit.
Before I can answer that question, we need to understand the difference between a wake and a wave. From ChatGPT: Me: What is the difference between a wake and a wave? ChatGPT: A wake and a wave are both disturbances in a fluid (such as water or air), but they differ in their origins, appearance, and behavior. Wake: A wake is the disturbance or pattern created in a fluid, typically behind a moving object (like a boat, ship, or airplane). It forms as the object moves through the fluid, displacing it and leaving a turbulent trail behind. The wake consists of a combination of waves and turbulence that spreads outward and trails the moving object. Wakes in water often have a V-shape pattern (called a Kelvin wake) that results from the interaction between surface waves created by the object. In air, a wake behind an aircraft can consist of turbulent vortices, sometimes referred to as "wake turbulence." Wave: A wave is a disturbance that travels through a fluid (or other medium) caused by external forces like wind, seismic activity, or displacement. Waves are typically more organized and periodic than wakes. Waves can occur naturally without an object moving through the fluid. Examples include ocean waves generated by wind or seismic waves from an earthquake. Waves propagate energy through the medium, often appearing as regular, repeating patterns (e.g., sinusoidal shapes on the surface of the water). Waves can exist in many forms, such as surface waves (in water), sound waves (in air), or electromagnetic waves (in space). In summary, a wake is a specific type of disturbance created by an object moving through a fluid, while a wave is a more general concept of a disturbance that can propagate through a medium due to various forces.
Blackhole event horizons fractal and quasi-blackhole are typically brings more academic discussions in recent years, whether it's as "gas cloud" in actual galaxy or in hyperspace among the 13-26 parallel trans-dimension structures. As this vlog has mentioned, if we seen blackhole is inner core and photon sphere as outer world around the squeezed magnetic field, there will have more contents of negative energy from natural anti-protonic system. So that many scholars has discussed the whitehole and neutron star by compared with natural blackhole structure, in particular when holographic dark matter is exists in these structures. If we assume there are many infinite length and wave-measured solide states, higher dimensions has more bimetrix models as modern applied physics had promote Lorentz traversable wormhole and quantum tunneling powered negative energy transformation into space industry. More widely, hyperspace gravitational waves in vacuum space even has seen as side effects of inertia variations and dark matter. That's some stunning fields...
Hi there, this metrices discuss is really awesome to think about 2*2 to 4*4 matrix version of Pauli Matrices to Quaternion Matrices. While when the 3 dimension spinor simulation has virtualized in standard model, more so-called spacetime engineering or say holographic symmetrical twin universe model has assumed reverse to paradox to observable vacuum hyperspace. Then from matrix transformation to spacetime engineering ds^=c^dt-(dx^+dy^+dz^), we'll get new spinor waveforms to gravitometrix and traversable principles, so these matrix transformation has brings larentz variation to hyperspace geometric engineering system. Some main higher dimension matrix has also considered sliptime functions to quantum timemetrix field, so more elastistic aether would interact in mathematics to spinor simulation. ...
Thank you, this presentation and course really wonderful and surprised to see your recommended papers - Polarizable-vacuum(PV) representation of general relativity, and A medium for the propagation of light revisited. We've been considered many "positive and negative energy(force)" as dipole or bimetrix models in magnetic or electronic or gravitonic system. Even though particle and quantum spin has pushing new theories and physical principles to new material analysis and research directions in compared with current main stream physics discussion and early-20th century(when general relativity and relativistic quantum physics has impacts on particle, nuclei, photon, and neutron,etc) to later holographic gravito-magnetic bimetrix models. As you have mentioned the speed of sound, speed of light equations in 3rd dimension, why not to think about holographic or hyperspace (5+ dimension) affected Variable speed of light(VSL) and faster than light conditions? Except for previous researchains has mentioned red or blue-shifts and moving aether would cause bimetrix time frame curved in vacuum magnetic strip, there are many dipole systems, from bigravity to timemetrix...
Hi Lori, great video as always . You mentioned that you are interested in modelling the Aether as a medium . If the medium is elastic , then every deformation of the medium would generate a response in the medium e.g. an equal and opposite force to the force of deformation which would be attempting to restore the original rest state e.g. any deformation activates the elastic memory of the medium ....could this tendency to restore the medium's elastic inertia be what we call Gravity E.g. the tendency of the deformed Aether to return to its natural undeformed inertial state? This natural tendency of an elastic medium to maintain inertia and resist deformation may account for the presence of an opposite wave as in John Macken's laser wave model ? Also, You are using a hexagonal model to account for the distribution of vortices in a superfluid or what I like to call a " non- quantized medium ''with the vorticial distribution representing its quantized mode e.g. pure superfluid = non- quantized medium, vorticial distribution = quantized mode of a non- quantized medium. ......Have you considered the possibility that the field may also have the capacity to assume a hexagonal re-entrant structure [ auxetic structure ] ? If both geometries coexist, then the medium would be extremely exotic as its structure could also oscillate between a hexagonal and re-entrant hexagonal structure.....I suspect it can , and that in its hexagonal mode it becomes magnetic like and that in its re-entrant structure it is di-electric like ? ....Would value any response that you may care to offer.
I found some auxetic structures that are 3D printable. So I downloaded one and am 3D printing it right now. It is going to take 8 hours to print, so I guess I will have to wait until morning to see it. This kind of structure would be a good choice for an elastic medium. They may also be useful for medical devices. Will have to study this further.
Hello, this principle is really stunning. We've been know many cosmic theories or principles about the beginning of universe and fabric material sources. Ancient symbol such as Tai-Chi or Yin-Yang came from a Sirius b couple, they were emphasized their positive and negative energy(force) and holographic twin universe model(DERN and DAL universe) in one form in 4th to 7the dimension model, it's not very fitted to 3-4th dimension on the earth but an accurate method to indicate how interplanetary system has impacts onland timemetrix and non-liner timeline from some events to traditional Astrology. So in modern astrophysics, that's means foreign(Sirius b system) Cosmology, a quite different than modern physics.
So the things we observe as point charges must actually be self-sustaining eather vortices. But what is driving the continuous dynamic such that we only observe continuous vibration (even down at the BEC)
The angular momentum of the large scale BEC is being dumped to the continuous motion small scale vortices. We see this in the actual BEC experiments. The real question is, "what is driving the continuous rotation of the universal BEC?" This is a similar question to "where did all the energy come from to drive the Big Bang?" We just don't know.
Nice, I've been considered when get through the hyperspace from 3d to 5-6d, moving another and group time has shifted in vacuum magnetic sphere. While if we don't add 13 to 26 parallel universe(multiverse bubble and transdimention impacts) as traveling condition, there are still stay in the 4the dimension.
Thoroughly enjoyed this great conversation, really made me happy, lots of huge nuggets, quite joyous you were, nice to see. Glad to find at the end that there'll be a follow-up. Brilliant.
So, in order to wave a wake, you need to have particles. Once we finish with modelling particles as standing waves (solitons), then we can see what happens when we move these solitons through The Medium. This is where we should start seeing wakes.
The fine structure constant (α≈1/137) is the fractal ratio of space-time. This fractal is created by mathematical constants: α = 1꞉ ᴾᴵ√ ̅̅ ̅̅ ̅̅(2⁴+5⁴)ᵠ · e⁵ ̅̅ ̅̅ ̅̅ α = 1/[(2^4+5^4)^φ*e^5]^(1/π) = 0,0072973525677660... φ = 1,6180339887... golden ratio, e = 2,7182818284... (Napier's constant, Euler's number) The singularity of black holes is the point of contact between a fractal and its self-similar fragment. This formula also explains why our Universe is filled with structures containing the golden ratio and Euler's number (e) on both the cosmic and subatomic scale. If we assume that the mass is the result of energy trapped in the fractal part of space, then from this formula we can easily find the shares of individual energy masses of the universe (visible baryonic matter, dark matter and dark energy). This formula shows that baryonic matter constitutes [(PI/3)-1]*100% of the total mass of the Universe (4.72%). To calculate what percentage the mass of baryonic matter constitutes in the total mass of matter (baryonic matter + dark matter), it is enough to substitute the formula [(PI/e)-1]*100% = 15.57%. 100%-15.57% = 84.43% (share of dark matter in the total mass of matter). 84.43% / 15.57% = 5.42 (There is over 5 times more dark matter than visible matter). 100%-4.72%-(5.42*4.72%) = 69.7% (the mass of dark energy in relation to the mass of the entire Universe. Baryonic mass 4.72%, dark matter 25.58%, dark energy 69.7%.These results agree with current data.
Gamma ray burst through super short how are you going to measure that accurately enough? The supernova happens over 3 months and the difference is only like up to four months
Yes, tired light is still a possibility in my mind. But I prefer Blair Macdonald's explanation of redshift in that we live in an ever evolving fractal universe. That makes more sense to me.
Is it possible that the aether could be at every point in space and at every moment in time a force expanding in all directions at the speed of light that moves all objects-wave/particles? Such as a 4D hypersphere interacting with our 3D world? This does explain gravity and the other quantum effects.
Aether is not a force. It is a medium. The only things that can exist in this medium are waves. Particles are standing waves (solitons) and light is a travelling wave. Standing waves can interact with other standing waves. This is what we perceive as charge on the small scale and at the large sale gravity. Light can interact with standing waves as well. Standing waves (solitons) can both absorb and emit travelling waves. Light cannot "interact" with light they can "interfere" with each other. I don't believe in 4D hyperspace as anything physical. It is merely mathematical concept that may not be necessary in describing the physical universe.
@@FractalWoman Yes, that was my original position as well! Possibly, "objects" are particle-like waves (excitations of underlyig field), but these "waves" could also be created when the expanding force from one location interacts and interferes with another expanding force at another location. Also, when a wave is slowed down, such as from a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) , and then when the wave leaves this BCE, the wave then resumes its original speed of motion. Where then is this "engine" for speed? Is not the momentum of a wave relying on some former cause, such as the big bang? In Ancient mystery schools and spiritual practices they "felt" that the underlying Source of the Universe is a one force of movement: a motion of oneness. Possibly a 4D force through which we experience all motions that are created by this unseen 4D force. This 4D expanding force moves everything, including our chemical-electrical signals that create our thoughts. The only thing that is "alive and moving" is this expanding force and not our bodies, thoughts, and objects. As well, this 4D force is creating a "geometrical" shape which we observe as gravity. Science has yet to discover what these quantum fields and fabric of space are made from. Science is relying on a reliable assumption that explains their observations, measurements, experiments, and laws. I postulate that possibly the fields and fabric of space are created by this 4D force. I think this could be testable.
@@FractalWoman This was my original position as well! The waves can also be created when the 4D expanding force from one location interacts and interferes with another 4D force from another location. What holds these solitons together and not to fade away and what are their compositions and abilities made from? What created this "fabric of space" and all 17 quantum fields? Easiest and simplist explanation is a 4D expanding force which could be testable and observable, similar to Flatland in which a 2D entity experiences 3D objects. Also, when a wave is slowed down in a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) and then leaves this BEC, the wave then resumes its original speed. Where is this speed located within the wave? Science assumes that its field is moving this wave. Thus your solitons must have some force that allows the waves to resume their original speed. Your solitons can be a 3D representation of this 4D expanding force. The universal scalable fractals of nature requires a universal source of force for all scalable levels! Possibly this 4D expanding force is this source for this scalable fractal nature of the universe.
@@stridedeck My analogy comes from the BEC experiments. In order to create a BEC, you must cool a material toward absolute zero. So that is where "my" universe begins. In the BEC experiments, when they try to spin the BEC, the BEC resists this spin. Instead, it dumps all of this angular momentum into tiny vortices (solitons). These solitons are very persistent. They do not fade away. As they spin-up the BEC, more solitons form. All of the angular momentum from the bulk of the BEC get dumped into a collection of tiny quantum scaled solitons. This is "my" medium for the propagation of light. These vortices are naturally repelled by each other and thus, the collection of vortices are in balance. At some point in the evolution of the BEC, there is a phase transition (at around 2.7K) where unbalanced vortices begin to appear in the bulk of the medium. This phase transition is what we perceive as the Big Bang. These unpaired vortices (solitons) are what we perceive as electrons and protons. This line of thinking does not need an imaginary fourth dimension. Solitons do not need "force" to persist. They persist because all of the angular momentum of the Original Medium (the BEC) was dumped into these tiny vortices. Long story short, the universe is spinning-up and as the universe spins up, more solitons are formed. These solitons are persistent because the angular momentum of the BIG universe is continuously being dumped into these TINY vortices. Question: Where did the energy come from to spin up the universe? Answer: Where did the energy come from to create the Big Bang? Yes, I answered a question with a question.
47:40 Of course the universe is fractal. The Mandelbrot set us throughout the universe. Frequency-energy-vibration on minimal surfaces sets the geometry of Space-time-energy. Flow transformations occur within levels-scales but the patterns are specific. It’s so specific that life itself goes through these transformations. For example the morphology of a caterpillar to a butterfly is a power of z difference. Michael Levin has said that morphology is not in the genome. There are mutations that can change the protein structures but each species morphology is not specifically determined in the genome. He can take the ion channels on the membrane of one species of flatworm and generate the morphology of a different species of flatworm without ever touching the genome.
This is awesome! But generalizing to 3d might be a bit different than just stacking 2d layers. One might expect that a 3d volume "winds" into a 4th (spatial, temproal or otherwise) the same as the 2d layer winds into a 3rd dimension. Also, keeping in mind that specifically doing so perpendicular to the 2d space, which is not necessarily the z axis of the 3rd spatial dimension. They are independent spaces, if 2d has basis vectors (x,y), 3d is not exactly (x,y,z) but rather (a,b,c) or some other arbitrary names like (a1,a2) and (b1,b2,b3). And these winding being perpendicular to their basis vectors so, you show (a1,a2) winding into a3 (may or may not be complex/imaginary-like). I wonder what it would be if (b1,b2,b3) wound into b4? Ie to clarify, I argue a3 is not b3 but rather b4 Not to discourage, just that this little difference would seem to matter for furthering this. Very good direction and is beautiful
well done But i think that the highest level of the pyramid already know all of this and hides it since early 60s One theory is Jesus is coming back to defeat them through "spirtual" energy, what is that energy ? no clue. but apparently you can't attain it without true care for beings and the cosmos , it's like a rite of passage to obtain this power place there by THE ALMIGHTY
Not sure. I am not familiar with that environment. But Chantal was able to convert from Unity to Javascript and I was able to convert her code to the P5JS platform. To run Unity, you need a particular setup but P5JS makes it easy for me to give away code.
One thing I have difficulty in my head with, is that when I think of waves, They need either be in some kind of container or they have to have several different intersecting sources to cause complex interference patterns. Like cymatics for example, without the dish that contains the vibrating fluid, the patterns would be far less complex... and neither a container or several different sources of the universal waves make intuitive sense to me.. Once you get further down the fractal scale, I can see how complexity comes about but how did the first interference pattern come about and what is did it interfere with... hmmm.... this hurts my brain...
The simplest model is space as a continuous, frictionless, non-elastic medium composed of cubes of Planck length sides. Now inject motion into this medium in the form of a "push" at any arbitrary point other than the center of a cube. Because the medium is continuous (no empty gaps), and non-elastic (the cubes don't distort) the motion will affect every cube. Because the push was offset from center, the cubes will gain angular momentum (they will spin), but the direction and amount of spin will not be uniform. Because the medium is frictionless, the motion will ripple through the medium forever, evolving with time. If you are familiar with cellular automaton (via Wolfram), then you can extrapolate how such a model might produce a universe such as ours. Note that this is just one of many plausible, mechanical models. I think it may be the simplest model of this sort, and for that reason I find it appealing, but I'm by no means endorsing it as "correct."
I bet we're not too far off A.I being able to reverse engineer 'wave interference patterns' needed to create complex matter. Show it an apple and ask it to come up with the 'source code'
It can happen in physical space if you want it to happen in physical space via "the belt trick". "square root of probability" is just the probabilistic way of looking at the problem. I prefer reality to probability. The animations that Chantal and I are working on are a physical implementation of "the belt trick".
@@FractalWoman But the minus sign of a wave function does not make any physical sense to me. There is no such thing as negative probability. We only measure the square of a wave function anyway. So I am not sure if it is reasonable to translate the doubling of angles to a physical space.
On the topic of scale, the micro and macro etc (and a tangent).. It was pointed out to me that our sun looks just like a mammalian egg. Then I learned that light is 'emitted' from the mammalian egg at the time of fertalisation... then my mind was blown! As above, so below...?!
@@FractalWoman I like to imagine the scale continues. Where our sun, the egg, exists in another being who is stood under another sun on to infinity.... in a fractal like nature... just imagine the different relative time scales in such a system. Our whole known existence would be but a infinitesimally small flash of light when experience from the perspective of the larger scale. Its crazy to think about... maybe another universe it created every time a new child is conceived. I would hazard a guess that genitalia has a strong magnetic field, like the heart in relation to the rest of our body. maybe the black hole is the 'way out'...hehe!
Hi. Is there a way in which I could contact you? I'd like to share some insights into what you say, as I was very surprised about how close our understanding of the ether is. I think I could provide additional context to help you in your project.
This is the best way to contact me. If you have something to say that is insightful, then I would like the rest of my team (my subscribers) to be able to see it too. You could maybe write something up, then put a link to it here. If I like what I see, then maybe we could collaborate more directly. For now, I am trying to limit my collaborations a very small group of people. Too many cooks sometimes spoils the meal, if you know what I mean.
@@FractalWoman Fair enough. Would it be ok if I uploaded a vid to my channel and shared it in the comments of a recent video, or would you prefer a written format?
only 4 mins and 30 secs into this video, I just had to stop to say WOW... You appear to have just totally demystified magnetism with such a simple, intuitive explanation. My mind is blown. Best channel out there!
@@FractalWoman Its clear to me that you have an un-sponsored desire to find the truth. A very rare quality these days. Thank you for sharing your excellent mind with the world. In some ways its like finding out how a magic trick is done. The mechanics are usually simple and intuitive and it seems somehow obvious in hindsight. But even though we are starting to understand the mechanics of life once again, the complexity that forms from such simplicity is magic in its self...
Galaxies expanding in space were born rapidly from the center outwards. First, expanding supermassive objects were born in their own 3D Big Bangs. . Could it even be that this has already been seen with the James Webb telescope 😀 . Expanding supermassive objects emit zillions of separate expanding condensations of dark matter which quickly combine to form new observable expanding stars as if out of thin air, but of course not really out of thin air. . All it takes is two expanding supermassive objects that moved close to each other in space in the early days of the expanding visible universe. . So it’s not space that expands. In the nuclei of atoms, there are congestion areas of the energy that is dispersed into space, which recycle the energy that is dispersed into space. . Expanding galaxies are particles that transmit information from an object outside the visible universe that emits energy that has the character of galaxies. . The expanding nuclei of atoms circulate the expanding dark energy, which creates electrons and photons, which also expand. . That is, electrons do not stay around the nuclei, but when you send expanding light with suitable energy towards the expanding nucleus of an atom, a new expanding electron is created from the expanding dark energy pushing out of the nucleus. . The physicist thinks that he has detached an already existing electron from around the nucleus, and does not realize that a new, expandable electron that can be registered was born. . ”In” the infinite 3D space, eternal recycling is going on. Everything basically consists of one and the same physically concretely existing thing that recycles itself. . Due to recycling, objects have internal pressure. At the same time, they are under external pressure. Internal and external pressure is always based on a pushing force. . All pulling forces are a joke! . Expanding space is the naked emperor. Einstein opened the Pandora’s box of physics when he grabbed the concept of curved space out of his hat. Curved space is a hoot! . Only losers explain observations Hocus pocus with space that does tricks without anyone ever telling you how it does these tricks. 😀 In the nuclei of the atoms, there are congestion areas of the energy dispersed into space, which circulate the energy dispersed into space, thus pushing each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. Is it too difficult to understand and accept that all energy has an internal pressure that causes it to disperse in space outward into the already existing space to a larger and larger area of space? What is so hard to understand and accept that even quarks and photons have internal pressure? Space itself has no internal pressure. Space has no reason to expand or do anything else! Only losers explain observations with space. Space has always existed as an infinite stage of three spatial dimensions that IS nothing at all. Space can’t do anything. Truth is just too much for all physicist and cosmologist 🤣 There is no pulling force and no curving space. Curving space is naked emperor 🤣 Nuclei of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force which have a nature of electrons and photons which also expanding. Expanding dark lightwaves interactive with eachothers and get eachothers expanding faster same way what matter and light expanding. That’s why expanding lights move faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding. Yes yes, truth is too much for you all 🤣 The old expanding light is slower than the new, more energetic expanding light from our expanding galaxy cluster. When these expanding lights interact with each other, the new expanding light accelerates the speed of the old expanding light to the same as its own, and at the same time the old expanding light is stretched, i.e. cosmologically redshifted. You can’t tell anything about what this so-called the expansion of expanding space is. Nothing about what the expansion of space is based on. Nothing about anything that could enable the expansion of space itself. Space as an infinite scene of three spatial dimensions, which IS nothing at all, enables, for example, the thermal expansion of matter so that the separate atomic nuclei of the thermally expanding matter can move relative to each other so that movement takes place in 3 D space which IS nothing. Too much for you? Really 🤣 The trajectory of expanding light bends as it passes expanding stars and expanding galaxies. This is based on the fact that expanding light that has experienced billions of years of entropy is pushed towards stars and galaxies, which contains very small-scale space-dispersed energy that collides with expanding photons that are pushed past expanding stars and expanding galaxies. This is a claim that can be studied scientifically. We can try to manipulate the trajectory of light using light that is billions of years old. No one can scientifically study a god called curved space. You can only believe in the existence of your God / curved space. Too much for you? Really 🤣
When you say winding, you are adjusting a pinch and a twist in the center but not a full twist so that it doesn't knot in the center it makes a mobius strip shape? I'm going to download your code and try it. I also want to try tying knots and making it do nunchakus moves.
The windings are just a twist about the X-axis. This is easier to see when you turn off the auto increment of the phase angle and set the phase angle to 90 degrees. Then increase the windings. In the bulk of the medium it looks like a "pinch" because the twist angle decreases as you get farther away from the center of the soliton wave. Hope this helps.
@18:00 yes, but the _false_ idea "spin is discrete" came from Stern-Gerlach. In Dirac theory spin is just an eigenvalue of σ_3 (so outcome of a measurement detecting the circulating part of the Dirac current). The reason the electrons or silver atoms come out of a Stern-Gerlach filter in only two beams is because the device is a filter, as so will be any measurement of spin. This is clear if you numerically solve the Dirac equation and follow streamlines. As the electrons pass through the region of inhomogeneous B-field the Dirac current orientation rotates _smoothly_ and ends up aligned either 'up' or 'down' relative to the magnet orientation, as well as deflected accordingly. The magnet is imposing the beam splitting. If the magnet was rapidly rotating then the S-G beam would not split, it'd spread out in a cone or something.
Yes, I agree that the magnet imposes the split and it is NOT a function of the electron in the silver atom at all. But my reasoning is a little different than yours. In my reasoning, Yes, the large magnet causes the dipole moment of the small "magnet" to align with the large magnet. If the silver atom is just a little bit above the central plane of the magnet, it will go up and if the atom is just a little big below the central plane, it will go down. In my way of thinking, there are not TWO orientations of the magnetic moment, but ONE. The S-pole of the dipole points towards the N-pole of the big magnet and the S-pole of the dipole points toward the S-pole of the big magnet analogously to how a small magnet would behave if place between the N and S poles of the big magnet in the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
I'm really happy I discovered your channel. You have a gift for teaching and am very grateful you took time to share your knowledge. Please don't stop making videos!
Hi Lori, fantastic job!....I am guessing that if the disturbance was allowed to propagate instead of circulate then what we might have is a model for the propagation of Light? Also, I notice that you have created a hexagonal grid to represent the Aether. Could a disturbance such as that you have created be generated by perturbing the grid by either adding or subtracting grid balls [ grid units ] whilst maintaining the same Boundary size, or alternatively by decreasing the grid boundary size but maintaining the same no. of Grid units E.g. by changing the no. of units per unit area / volume? In this way the medium would have to move in some way to accommodate the change in no. of grid units to volume ratio
Not sure. Will have to think about that. If and when I do a proper simulation, I can just watch to see what the "particles" of the medium do when I create the wave.
