An Engineering Experiment to Cool the Earth 

What about all those “conspiracy theorists” who have been saying this for years? 🤔

Of course nothing can go wrong with this experiment and we now don't even have to woory about climate change. Stangely, it's autumn in Brazil and I'm sweating shirtless in a city that used to be called "The Brazilian Switzerland". The name wasn't because of cholocate, banks nor sophisticated industry - it was because how cooler the city was when compared to others in the region.

We are seeing catastrophic climate events almost daily in the United States. If marine cloud brightening works, we should employ it ASAP.

So why keep it a secret?

We all know that our air conditioning and cars are more important than global warming. I don't see people giving up thier comfort for the global good. Unfortunately we are selfish. I do hope that these experiments are able to help. I could see that these clouds could raise the salinity of the ground. I think if it rains over the oceans that wouldn't be a problem.

Chloros the pale rider is headed our way

I was struck at the end by the answer to the question of when we can see this in action. He said the scientist say it is too early in the technology to discuss all the applications. The truth is that one can do the analysis now and see if it is economically feasible. The answer is very likely no.

What severity!? N climate change... Like the seasons..? Crazy...!

Watch the Dimming documentary with Dane Wigington and Operation Popeye 1968.

16:02 That's not correct! The understanding about the correlation of carbon in the atmosphere and climate change started in the late 1950s. We were engineering nothing - we were just putting polutants in the easiest place using the cheapest methods.

This one’s really gonna upset the normies

What is the consequence of putting so much salt into our clouds we already have enough chemtrail dust that is killing our trees. The salt is going to effect all of our living beings on the Earth.

15:10 You really think I should accept an explanation that uses less than 20 words for why these ideas started to be taken seriously?

One of the reasons why people have a hard time taking climate change seriously is the use of the "Precautionary Principle" by the green movement in the 1970s. If you remember there were films like "Soylent Green" and "Silent Runner" and predictions for the complete decline of nature before 1980. The exaggeration had good intentions but as always it had unexpected consquences: once the world did not end in 1980, people started not to take seriously that type of prediction. The "Precautionary Principle" states that even when predictions have little factual basis, the fact that these predictions could be atastrophic, Governements had the duty to exaggerate and act as a precaution. The principle was later incorporated by the Neo-Conservative movement and gave birth to things like "I just hope the smoking gun is not a mushroom cloud" and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The New York Times should no better, btw. Fool you once, its a mistake, fool you twice, it's incompetence. What you are saying is that Climate Change is so bad - and it probably is - that we should try to control the climate artificially instead of bringing it back to a state in which it controls itself. You are also saying that we, citizens, can do nothing to change CO2 emission levels - or, in other words, there's no real democratic State in the west. BTW, people have been doing a lot to fight climate change but perhaps what you said is true: there's no real democracy in the Western World. Your lie is on how you said it - in a way that sugar coats it so much people don't see the feeling beneath the frosting.

Interesting that my long comment criticizing these ideas....disappeared...😨

Reduce carbon....that won't impact plants/trees at all... Oh wait, ignore all the carbon to oxygen theory ... Yupp - reduce the population as Doctor + Professor Bill Gates hit the nail on the head in his Ted talk.. Genius level lack of critical thought 🤯😵

Cloud brightening is great during the day, but what do they do at night when we rely on clear sky's to radiate heat to space? Unless we can increase clouds during the day, maybe with contrails, and decrease clouds at night, maybe with cloud seeding, sounds like a waist of time. Let's use the abundance of commercial airplanes over major cities to ease their heat island effect.

What could possibly go wrong?

We've been watching them Chemtrail since the 70's. THIS is what is holding in heat and humidity. We keep causing MORE problems.

What about the Chem Trail spraying? They've been at that for years!

There should be a separate app for podcasts.

Better Ye Tau's MIR set-up

Wouldn't a relatively simple plan be to mandate that all new cars, roads, tops of buildings, etc be either white or silver rather than blacktop or some other dark color? That would seem to be a relatively quick, cheaper, and less intrusive measure to make the surface more reflective. You give up a black car, but you still have a car. When you repaint your residence or building, you just have to pick a lighter color. If you live in Phoenix or Las Vegas, is it really that much of a sacrifice to put white rock in your landscaping and white shingles on your roof? A major city like London, New York, or Tokyo has a pretty good sized surface area.

Shame on the parents who had a chance to change but decided they would die before this was a problem.

Criminal act

Really a fairy tail was all you can come up with when talking about global warming?

Serving BS on a platter. Let’s fight bad emissions with good emissions - what a grand idea - what could possibly go wrong? The text definition of climate change supplied is erroneous, miss leading and horribly slanted to support unsubstantiated claims. Very poor reporting.