An headphone - Hifiman DEVA Pro - Review 

@ayoubahmad1686 never heard one. They didnt have one at High End Munich or CanJam London

Yes absolutely. The only problem you may face is that the bass is not strong enough. This is certainly more common among younger people who naturally have higher treble sensitivity than older people. Try it out for a week or two and see how it goes, because it's still an above average listening experience.

Pretty much sums it up.

If we all had the same opinions on everything, life would be boring ;)

I've actually never heard a Sundara. From what I've read and heard from friends, they should be closer to the Deva driver tech and sound, but definitely don't take my word for it. HE-500 owners are just as loyal to their HE-500's as they are divided by ear pad choices. Some people swear by pleather/leather pads, but I think pleathers kill the HE-500 magic. Velours are the way to go. HE-500's are basically baby HE-6's, but they don't have the same treble magic as the HE-6, but have a better (more normal) stock frequency response. They're also quite aggressive and 'slammy' which can be just as exciting for music as it is fatiguing. My modified HE-500 was my go-to reference for a long time. It has been superceded by the RR1 and STAX Lambda (tone corrected). Still... even today there aren't many planars around that can beat a tone-corrected HE-6.

@@GREQReviews Pretty sure the Deva really isn't the Sundara, I've heard meh reviews for the Deva and the Sundara gets praise, but that might be a classic case of Frequency response graphs lying a bit. The Sundara measures surprisingly close (closer than the HD6x series) to the HE-1 besides bass, but obviously doesn't sound like one. I've decided to go let myself get hit by the electrostatic bug, and your RR1 review certainly didn't help. Knowing how they work, there's no dissuading their superiority in producing accurate audio, and might just need EQ to be at their best. It's all minimum phase anyways so if it's a clean response from the driver, you can make it sound however you want, and will have the same result as physical tuning apart from the time domain mess that you can get from doing closed backs etc without perfect damping. The RR1 look like the most idealized case, close to the ear, electrostats, nothing to reflect stuff back, and just enough damping material from the dust covers to smoothen the driver from being underdamped, reducing any remaining energy storage in the driver's mass. They have an impulse response settling time of like 500ns according to the maker.. definitely better than these Sundaras would be with their extra mass.

You're recommending burn-in? In 2024???

Deva Pro is still for sale where i live, and on the Hifiman website.

@@GREQReviews last stock.

Sorry, there are so many versions of the DT770, could you be more specific? (My version is Pro 80 ohm which is still 'modern')

@@GREQReviews The most distinctive change I know from the old models to the new one is the logo The old (in three versions 32, 80, 250) has this logo ))) The new one has a "y" instead of the ")))"

@@husamalden2897 No idea. I've never heard the new one with the 'Y' logo. But realistically the new version should only be a cosmetic update. The sound should be very similar, or the same, since they have an invested interest in maintaining a consistent level of quality in their studio line. If there were any big changes I think we would have noticed an uproar by now.