ANCIENT BULGARIAN CALENDAR 

@Accelerated Down with the Khazars!

The ancient greeks called us hyperboreans look us up with that name you will find interesting information to say the least

казва се Исихия - арамий ако помня правилно

isihia aramii

Исихия - в ютуб ги има

Its "ISIHIA". Bulgarian folklore is most rich folklore on this planet. In national library is keeped more of 240000 folklore songs. Try. DJ89. ABAGAR QUARTET. TRIO BULGARKA. MARIA DIMITROVA. NUSHA CHOIR. Choir ANGELITE. NELI ANDREEVA. PHILIP KOUTEV CHOIR. ISIHIA. DIA. IRFAN. Bulgara. ORATNITZA. COSMIC VOICES FROM Bulgaria. KAYNO yesno solnce

Истинските татари са монголи.Всички знаете,че те са завладели Волжка БГ на Котраг,в нач.на 13 век,после и Русия.Нас,българите,ни наричат ту татари,ту че сме близки до турците.А по ДНК сме най-близки с хървати и маджари,ясно е защо.Българи са създали Киев,Будапеща. Имали са каменни градежи още през 10 в.,всички добре знаем.Велики сме и това е истина,не е хвалба.Поздрав от Вн-Елена ПП.А ,,старата Велика БГ"историците са нарекли Кубратовата, да се отличава от Волга БГ и Дунавската.Велики сме били...

@Jhon Smith Човече,нали и аз това съм писала.Тези бг,които монголите заварили(ислямизираните силом в 10 в., другите не са там),покорили.Техните потомци приличат на европейци,нали има снимки в интернет.Ние тук нямаме общо с тях освен общи пра...деди.Знаете,че с времето сме се толкова смесили всички.Не съм чела по ДНК с кои са най-близки, зависи кои гени са надделели.Смешно ми е,че ни наричат така от лоши чувства(главно от РСМак-я,ясно е защо точно те)и да сме се върнели в Татарстан.Бях се зарекла да не отговарям,нашето място за общуване(на историците)не е точно тук.Някои хора си мислят,че като прочетат доста по Интернет и са готови,а сигурно и вие знаете,че не е толкова просто.Виждала съм ваши коментари и на др.места.Където и да живеете,бъдете здрав и все така любознателен.Според философите това сме наследили от древните гърци. Сърдечен поздрав-Ели(историк,филолог).БГ

Татарстан е тюркска република, не българска!

Чувашите са българи

Bulgar Turks

@@pompacitokmakci there is nothing turk in the bulgarians, the dna is balkans dna, no turks, there is 1-2% asian and 1-2 persian dna in the bulgarians, nothing more, no huns or anything from asia, that some ancient people from the balkans were migrated to asia and other places for all that 1000s of years of they existing, and lately some of them are back to they home in the balkans, others found they new home in asia or other places in the world, is not make them other than balkans, ofc the once who leaved in other countries for 1000s of years are mixed, but the bulgarians in Bulgaria dna, is nothing connected with huns, turks, iranians or any others, 1-2% dna from each, dont make bulgarians part of them, just from all the invasions and also traveling around for 1000s of years, 1-2% dna from others is normal!

@@shaarkyygaming The name Bulgar is a Turkic word and proto Bulgars were a Turkic tribe and spoke the Turkic language. You have nothing to do with proto Bulgars, you are Slavs.

Dulo Clan IYI ... Bulgarians, Bashkirs, Chuvash people and Hungarians forever Children of Tangra!!!

The Turans were only described in Iranian records and folklore, but their linguistic and ethnic origin is proto-Altaic, proto-Uralic, and perhaps Paleosiberian.

@@alexanderrossovitch2585 Both are right

Hahahaha kid

Mouahahahahaha!

Bulgars are mixed people they are not turkic stop claiming the entire earth turk!

Ti si goliam pederas!

69barnet 4ikidjia

Bulgarians have always been Bulgarians,nothing to do with muslim origin,excuse me!Different nations and tribes might have mixed with the Bulgarians over the centuries but the proto-Bulgarians have no muslim origin neither moden Bulgarians with Bulgarian origin.The rest is a pure brainwashing and speculations spread by certain circles pursuing political interests.WQe,the Bulgarians know our History no matter what someone says. bnr.bg/radiobulgaria/post/100728915/nosim-genite-na-traki-i-prabalgari-i-ne-sme-slavan A genetic research has completely rejected the wrongly spread belief that the Bulgarians have turkish-altai origin( a fake statement deliberately spread by those who are in constant and pathetic denial of the true origin of the Bulgarians and who are using the wrong statement to their convenience,spreading pure lies about Bulgaria and the Bulgarians due to political interests or simply because of pure lack of knowledge) A team of Bulgarian and Italian scientists have carried out a DNA research recently aiming at finding out the truth about the genetic background of the modern Bulgarians.As a result they came to amazing conclusion. The genetic researchers had to go back in time 5000 years in order to build the genetic map according to which we are successors and heirs of the Thracians and ancient Bulgarians.The scientists took samples from the bones and teeth found in the Thracian necropolises.Our genetic material from the ancient Bulgarians dates back to VIII-X century of our calendar,The samples taken from the bones and teeth found in ancient graves were analysed and compared to the samples taken from 900 modern Bulgarians. The results of the genetic research show absolutely European population,the closest to Hungarians,Croatians and Italians. The Department of Medical Genetics at the Medical University in Sofia,Bulgaria ,the Institute of Microbiology,the Institute of Anthropology,the National Archaelogical Institute and Museum of the Bulgarian Academy of Science have been observing the whole process of analysing the genetic samples working in cooperation with the Department of Genetics at the Florentine University,Italy where all genetic samples were analysed in the university genetic laboratory. Interview with Desislava Nesheva, Expert in Genetics,Department of Medical Genetics,Medical University,Sofia,Bulgaria. ''If we look at the genetic map,we will see that the Thracians are more remote from both modern and ancient Bulgarians,while the ancient Bulgarians are closer to the modern Bulgarians.This fact is explained with the huge time difference-Thracians occupied our land in the millennium before Christ so therefore the data related to them becomes more scarce in the new era.However it is obvious that Thracians are pretty close to both modern and ancient Bulgarians. We have proven that the Bulgarians have no genetic connection whatsoever with Turkic-Altai population.We,the Bulgarians have no genetic connection with the modern Turks either,disregarding the widely spread belief that there was a genetic mix with Turkish due to the turkish ottoman rule.The ancient Bulgarians also have NO connection with the Turkish or the Turkic-Altai population.Unfortunately we couldn't research genetic samples of ancient slavs due to lack of access to any such(They used to burn the bodies of the dead slavs) However,the comparison of genetic samples taken from modern slavs and modern Bulgarians prove that we are not genetically close. Is the theory that we,the Bulgarians are mainly slavs, nothing else but a result of the politicаl conjuncture or is it due to a lack of scientific instruments? ''Maybe the truth is somewhere in between,suggests Desislava Nesheva,''You well know that the History has been rewritten according to certain interests.On the other hand,the science of Genetics has advanced a lot in the recent decades-we have used the best genetic methodology and it gave wonderful results.It can be discussed and debated that somehow our History has been manipulated and twisted,while the science Genetics is accurate and it gives precise information.'' ''Аnd because it has already been proven that the Bulgarians have genetic connection with the Thracians,it is good to know who they were. The Thracians were ancient civilization who have left rich cultural-historical heritage on the Balkans.We can clearly see from the research results that their genetic heritage influences the formation of the modern Bulgarians'',added Desislava Nesheva ''It is expected to publish the results in an authoritative scientific magazine.Now the scientists are looking for sponsorship so they will carry out a genetic research back in the eighth millennuim B.C.(before Christ) in order to research more ancient people who used to occupy the Bulgarian land. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UscSukfeRSk.html&feature=share

Volga Bulgars were Muslims later-in10 cent.,not in 7 cent.This is true. Bulgarian DNK(DNA)is like croatian and madzarian,we know why this is.My english langage is not good,it's a pitty,i can write another facts.Eli.BG

@@LinaLina-ff3lk bulgarians have nothing to do with bulgars who are genetically Turkish and stop giving pseudo-science😂😂look at real ones Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars from the fifth century BC, well before Bulgars (a Turkic tribe) or Slavs online.ucpress.edu/search-results?q=Bulgars%20a%20tribe&fl_SiteID=1&qb={%22q%22:%22Bulgars%20a%20tribe%22}&page=1 Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Around 4% of Bulgarian genes are derived outside of Europe and the Middle East or are of undetermined origin (by 858 CE), of which 2.3% are from Northeast Asia and correspond to Asian tribes such as Bulgars,[13] a consistent very low frequency for Eastern Europe as far as Uralic-speaking Hungarians. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Bulgarians Science, 14 February 2014, Vol. 343 no. 6172, p. 751, A Genetic Atlas of Human Admixture History, Garrett Hellenthal at al.: " CIs. for the admixture time(s) overlap but predate the Mongol empire, with estimates from 440 to 1080 CE (Fig.3.) In each population, one source group has at least some ancestry related to Northeast Asians, with ~2 to 4% of these groups total ancestry linking directly to East Asia. This signal might correspond to a small genetic legacy from invasions of peoples from the Asian steppes (e.g., the Huns, Magyars, and Bulgars) during the first millennium CE." www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209567/figure/F3/ 👉Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. 👉Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. 👉Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. 👉However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Central-Inner Asian and Srubnaya origin in the conquering Hungarians Endre Neparáczki HLA gene and haplotype frequencies in Russians, Bashkirs and Tatars, living in the Chelyabinsk Region (Russian South Urals) T A Suslova Diverse genetic origins of medieval steppe nomad conquerors Alexander S. Mikheyev1,2*, Lijun Qiu1, Alexei Zarubin3, Nikita Moshkov4-6, Yuri Orlov7, Duane R. Chartier8, Igor V. Kornienko9-11, Tatyana G. Faleeva9,10,12, Vladimir Klyuchnikov13, Elena F. Batieva14, Tatiana V. Tatarinova15-18*

@@LinaLina-ff3lk Look at real sources kid😂😂bulgar is still turkish language in Chuvashia As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama. www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545 The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don. www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625 Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent. www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states

@@kaloianstoinov8667 Bulgars are very differ from Bulgarians