We call Africa the motherland for a reason. I laugh when I hear or see yts using motherland to reference ur birthplace lmao smh. They copy all that we do with no understanding.
The Middle East is still Africa let’s stop that land mass gang babging that didn’t start until like repel unlike attract Jacobs law came down on to humanity
@Santhony Some still believe that Lie...'BUT'...the Middle East was Created, and its simply...'North East Africa'... Europeans, didn't want the 'WORLD'🌏...to know...'EGYPT'...was/is in...'AFRICA'... AFRICA...is where every thing began, and it's where everything shall continue...this is why you'll find a lot of Europeans, preparing for Africa, to be their new HOMES~ some, claims to be Israelites.. ''SAD''..💐~ Desperation setting...IN!~ Just leave them to GOD!~
Because Asia is where it all began, africa is 💩, golbeklitepe, noah ark, tower of Babel,jesus the christ, all important history start there, the land of shem (Asia) is also where the garden of Eden is
exactly because the older books, have more information, my good long time friend told me, there a book cost 50,000 it reveals who is who, all the people in the world, now why that book so costly, they don't want you to know
@thehourshow2851 you are referring to original books at that price. . Not copies, all this information is available, requires research, and most people are not going to read it anyway, very boring
My history teacher back in high school, told us that africa had lots of trees and rivers, the people came, and destroyed everything. We argued with him because thats not what the maps and tv showed us. He was right.
I thank GOD I was raised In a Bklyn era where you hear all this walking down Nostrand Ave on a Saturday morning 😮. Glad people are now awake for truth.
@@bgee5098 well im 56, and the rulers have tried their best to keep infomation hidden from the people,, and not all of us will wake up at the same times, i believe that the Most high give info to the people when there are ready to receive it..
Because there is a time for everything under the sun . .. African is EGYPT REMEMBER BILLIONS OF GODS IN THAT LAND. THERE IS NOT ONLY ONE GOD TO US 😊@@JesusIsLord890
You dont think that Eden are derived from, Ae Djin? E or Ae stands for "land". Djin are the word for "spirits". So Eden or Aedin is "the lands of spirits" or the "Spiritous land"! "From Eden they was driven out in to the wilderness, were there were only dark and emptiness". "From the lands and peoples that lifted your soul, and made you a better and still better person, they were driven out. Driven out, while they incorporated division,evilness and yellosy in to theire hearts and souls. And driven out, the could see, that in front of them layed the future of trubble,dispair and darkness. And trough theire lasting years,they often looked back and dreamt of theire old country.The lands were people out an effort to help each other, and was pleased when they realized that they had "better" themselves. And as this remembrance, of the old Aedjin , grew weaker and weaker, the insight of theire loss grew bigger and bigger. And this spirit eventually led the followers to create theire own narrative. The dream of creating and together building a new heven on earth. The new Eden. And as Wanderers of the east lands, so many mer and so many dreams was crushed. But still, in every part of what was and what is, some expression though said in different languages and cultures, they all were the reminissance of were we come from and was ousted from, due to our pride and lack of empathy. One such saying concludes it all. "Next year in Jerusalem"!
HAM, CUSH, AND CUSH’S SONS ARE THE FOREFATHERS OF ALL THE AFRICANS AND PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT. Genesis 10:1 King James Version 10 “ Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. “ Genesis 10:6 New Century Version Ham’s Sons 6 “The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim,[a] Put, and Canaan. “ Read full chapter Footnotes 10:6 Mizraim This is another name for Egypt. Genesis 10:7-8 New Century Version 7 “ The sons of Cush were Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabteca. The sons of Raamah were Sheba and Dedan. 8 Cush also had a descendant named Nimrod, who became a very powerful man on earth. “ BEFORE THE BERLIN CONFERENCE, AFRICA HAD NO BORDERS. Representing Cush in the Hebrew Bible: Rulers of Kush Statues of various rulers of the late 25th Dynasty to the early Napatan period. From left to right, these statues represent - Tantamani, Taharqa (rear), Senkamanisken, Tantamani again (rear), Aspelta, Anlamani, and Senkamanisken again. Taharqa is mentioned in 2 Kings 19:9 as “Tirhakah, King of Cush,” a ruler who came to the aid of Hezekiah against the invasion of Assyria. Credit: Matthias Gehricke, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons In 701 B.C.E ., an African king marched into Syria-Palestine to defend Judah against the invasion of Sennacherib, king of Assyria. Second Kings 19:9 mentions “Tirhakah, king of Cush,” coming to the help of Hezekiah, who was up against the Assyrian superpower. Though the Cushites are mentioned only briefly in the biblical text, a number of scholars have argued that their involvement in the conflict against Assyria was decisive in the survival of Jerusalem at this critical historical juncture. Who were these Cushites that came to the aid of Jerusalem? And why does the Hebrew Bible seem to give so little notice to their role in the 701 B.C.E. debacle of the Assyrians? The Hebrew Bible mentions “Cush” (Hebrew: כוּשּׁ ) and related terms some 54 times.1 The vast majority of references to Cush as a geographical region denote the African land on the southern border of ancient Egypt, known most commonly today as Nubia. In English Bibles, Cush is most frequently translated as “Ethiopia,” but sometimes “Nubia,” “Cush,” and even “Sudan.” Because ancient Nubia occupied the northern and southern regions of present day Sudan and Egypt, respectively, it is to be distinguished from the country of Ethiopia, located in the Horn of Africa. The 25th Dynasty of Egypt, which lasted for about a hundred years, from the mid-eighth century to the mid-seventh century B.C.E., was Cushite in origin. Comprising seven kings, of which Taharqo (biblical Tirhakah) was the sixth and most prominent, the Cushite Dynasty ruled the largest territory to exist in the Nile Valley in antiquity. Under Taharqo, the dominion of Cush stretched from the heart of the Sudanto the Mediterranean. In the eighth and seventh centuries, Cushite Egypt competed with Assyria for control of Syria-Palestine, but after a prolonged struggle Assyria gained the upper hand, eventually conquering Egypt and expelling the Cushites from the land of the pharaohs. Under its new political capital of Meroë, the kingdom of Cush would last for yet another thousand years until its final dissolution in the fourth century C.E. The rule of the 25th Dynasty coincided with the age of the classical Hebrew prophets. Thus, the Egypt of much of the prophetic literature (e.g., Isaiah 1-40) was a territory under the dominion of the pharaohs of Cush. Based on iconographic and textual evidence, Cushites are typically understood as a sub-Saharan African people. The Egyptians, who knew the Cushites best, consistently depicted them with black skin pigmentation. The Assyrian king Esarhaddon, who fought against Taharqo two decades after Sennacherib’s campaign to Judah, stated that Taharqo and the members of his royal family were “dark as pitch.” And the Greeks referred to both Cushites and other southern Africans as Aithiops, a term meaning “burnt of face.” For the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Greeks, the blackness of the Cushite lacked the kind of racial antipathy known to the modern world. For Greek historian Herodotus, the Ethiopians are black “by reason of the sun” (Histories 2.22), and he twice refers to the southerners as “the tallest and most handsome of all men” (Histories 3.20; 3.114). The Hebrew Bible also suggests that Cushites had distinctive physical features. Isaiah 18:2 refers to Nilotic Cushites as being both “tall” and “smooth.” Most Bible translators understand the latter adjective as describing the Cushites’ smooth, shiny skin. More directly, Jeremiah inquires, “Can the Cushite change his skin or the leopard its spots?” (Jeremiah 13:23, author’s translation). While some interpreters have taken Jeremiah’s comparison as an indication of ancient Israelite color prejudice against Africans, the Book of Jeremiah paints a most favorable portrait of Ebedmelech the Cushite. Ebedmelech is noted for risking his life to rescue the prophet from certain death (Jeremiah 38:7-13). His demonstration of faith in Yahweh earns him a personal message of salvation and security at a time when the Judean nobility would fall to the sword of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon (Jeremiah 39:6, Jeremiah 39:15-18). Though obviously noted by ancient writers, physiognomic features, such as the skin color of the Cushite, did not become essentialized elements of social identity in ancient Israel or elsewhere in the ancient Near East. Cush is represented in the Hebrew Bible mainly as a martial nation. Cushites appear predominantly in military contexts, most often as allies with Egyptians, Libyans, Sabeans, and others (i.e., Isaiah 20:3-4; Jeremiah 46:9; Ezekiel 30:4-5; Ezekiel 38:5; Nahum 3:9). Cushites are known for mustering large armies with horses and chariots, making them a force to be reckoned with. According to 2 Chronicles 14:9-15, Zerah the Cushite comes up against Judah with horses, chariots, and an army of one million strong. And Isaiah 18:2 highlights the military ability of the Cushite warriors, calling them a people “feared near and far” and a nation “mighty and conquering.” The military reputation of Cushites is also well attested in the ancient Near East, where Cushite males were revered soldiers and equestrian experts in Egypt, Assyria, Samaria, and elsewhere. Cushites were an integral part of the Egyptian army since the Old Kingdom (2649-2100 B.C.E.). Particularly during the New Kingdom (1550-1070 B.C.E.), a group of Cushites known as the Medjay served as paramilitary police in Egypt and specialized guards of the pharaohs. Moreover, Cushite military presence is attested in Canaan more than a millennium before a people called “Israel” is known in the land. Thus, the Hebrew Bible’s emphasis on the military reputation of Cushites is well supported outside of the biblical text. Nevertheless, despite the military emphasis surrounding Cush, representations of this foreign people serve the rhetorical purposes of the biblical authors quite well. From the perspective of the Hebrew Bible, ancient Israelite collective identity was oriented around the doctrine of election, which emphasized both the sovereign rule of the God of Israel, Yahweh, and the chosen status of Israel as Yahweh’s covenant community. The concept of Israel’s election implicates the polytheism of other nations and evokes a largely negative theological evaluation of non-Israelite groups. As a result, all alliances with foreign-and, therefore, idolatrous-nations are denounced by biblical authors. Going back to the Assyrian invasion of 701 B.C.E., the biblical historian is far more concerned to demonstrate Yahweh’s sovereign rule over the nations than crediting the salvation of Jerusalem to a foreign people. Thus, in the late eighth century, when Judahite elites were bringing tribute down to Egypt to forge alliances with the Cushite Dynasty, they faced sharp criticism from the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 30:1-7). Those who put their trust in Cushite-Egypt because of its abundance of chariots and horses would be greatly disappointed (Isaiah 31:1). According to Isaiah, the people of Judah would be “ashamed because of Cush their expectation and Egypt their pride” (Isaiah 20:4-5). For the prophet, it was the “mighty and conquering” Cushites who must in fact bring their tribute up “to Mount Zion, to the place of the name of Yahweh of Hosts” (Isaiah 18:7). In a word, all foreign peoples-Cushite or otherwise-must in the end submit to the sovereign rule of the God of Israel and to his chosen people. This means that the Hebrew Bible is far more interested in a moral-theological evaluation of Cushites and other foreign peoples than in any purely ethnic or political characterization. Kevin Burrell is Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at Burman University. His specialties include ethnicity in the Hebrew Bible, Cushites in the Bible and history, and the Book of Revelation. Summer • Vol. 50, No. 2 Enjoy the exciting Summer 2024 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review as you excavate dramatic discoveries, incredible insights, and fun facts from the world of the […]
It's a shame that most of Africa's history have been stolen or hidden. Sad! Thanks man for digging out the past, it's good to know. Our real history should be known.
I lived/taught in Bahrain (island off of Saudi Arabia) and there is a tree of life there that I did visit. I wonder if that is the tree of life in the Bible. Because the Middle East is part of Africa (imo).
Of course it is ..Africa has the most animals that Adam would have been able to name...man was made from the deepest, richest earth (dark), made in His image...the fact that they turned a story about an African nation navigating through the land with other African peoples into their story is crazy...what's even crazier, is that they used that story to enslave some of those very same people...the s hit is maddening!!!
@@jaybavis5896🤓🤓🤓do you really want that information because if so here it is. And if you're one of my sisters and brothers please spread this knowledge because it's facts and it's real. Now open up your Bible (if you have one), and if I can remember correctly Genesis chapter 2 verses 10 through 15 the oldest black man history book tells us there was a river that came from out of Eden and split into foreheads and water the Garden of Eden and one of the river's name was THE GIHON RIVER which today is known as THE NILE RIVER (they changed the name like everything else so we would not know the truth). The GIHON RIVER Compass the whole land of Ethiopia do not forget that there are maps and globes out there that shows the continent of Africa being named Ethiopia also the Atlantic Ocean was named the Oceana of Ethiopia / Ethiopian Ocean, the Indian Ocean used to be named "The Cancer of Ethiopia". Then you will plainly see that all the Middle East the land going up towards Syria and the land going out towards the Asian mountains including India was named Ethiopia. When the Europeans found out about this land they call it Utopia and we all know what the word Utopia means. And by the Nile River being the most fertile River on the planet more fertile than that of the Amazon River and have more diverse animals than any other continent on the planet that was named by Adam... And then years later Noah built an ark and placed two of every animal in the Ark and when the floods receded, Noah opened the doors of the Ark and let the animals out and guess where the ark landed, back in the continent that we know today as Africa. I hope that was enough information but you can find all this information in the Bible this is why I tell people the first two chapters of Genesis is very important. The older the Bible the older the maps in the back of the Bible.
BEFORE THE BERLIN CONFERENCE, AFRICA HAD NO BORDERS. ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, AFRICANS AND PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF HAM, CUSH, AND CUSH’S SONS. Genesis 10:1 King James Version 10 Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. Genesis 10:6 International Children’s Bible Ham’s Sons 6 “ The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim,[a] Put and Canaan. “ Read full chapter Footnotes 10:6 Mizraim This is another name for Egypt. Genesis 10:7-8 International Children’s Bible 7 “ The sons of Cush were Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteca. The sons of Raamah were Sheba and Dedan. 8 Cush also had a descendant named Nimrod. Nimrod became a very powerful man on earth. “ Representing Cush in the Hebrew Bible: In 701 B.C.E ., an African king marched into Syria-Palestine to defend Judah against the invasion of Sennacherib, king of Assyria. Second Kings 19:9 mentions “Tirhakah, king of Cush,” coming to the help of Hezekiah, who was up against the Assyrian superpower. Though the Cushites are mentioned only briefly in the biblical text, a number of scholars have argued that their involvement in the conflict against Assyria was decisive in the survival of Jerusalem at this critical historical juncture. Who were these Cushites that came to the aid of Jerusalem? And why does the Hebrew Bible seem to give so little notice to their role in the 701 B.C.E. debacle of the Assyrians? The Hebrew Bible mentions “Cush” (Hebrew: כוּשּׁ ) and related terms some 54 times.1 The vast majority of references to Cush as a geographical region denote the African land on the southern border of ancient Egypt, known most commonly today as Nubia. In English Bibles, Cush is most frequently translated as “Ethiopia,” but sometimes “Nubia,” “Cush,” and even “Sudan.” Because ancient Nubia occupied the northern and southern regions of present day Sudan and Egypt, respectively, it is to be distinguished from the country of Ethiopia, located in the Horn of Africa. The 25th Dynasty of Egypt, which lasted for about a hundred years, from the mid-eighth century to the mid-seventh century B.C.E., was Cushite in origin. Comprising seven kings, of which Taharqo (biblical Tirhakah) was the sixth and most prominent, the Cushite Dynasty ruled the largest territory to exist in the Nile Valley in antiquity. Under Taharqo, the dominion of Cush stretched from the heart of the Sudanto the Mediterranean. In the eighth and seventh centuries, Cushite Egypt competed with Assyria for control of Syria-Palestine, but after a prolonged struggle Assyria gained the upper hand, eventually conquering Egypt and expelling the Cushites from the land of the pharaohs. Under its new political capital of Meroë, the kingdom of Cush would last for yet another thousand years until its final dissolution in the fourth century C.E. The rule of the 25th Dynasty coincided with the age of the classical Hebrew prophets. Thus, the Egypt of much of the prophetic literature (e.g., Isaiah 1-40) was a territory under the dominion of the pharaohs of Cush. Based on iconographic and textual evidence, Cushites are typically understood as a sub-Saharan African people. The Egyptians, who knew the Cushites best, consistently depicted them with black skin pigmentation. The Assyrian king Esarhaddon, who fought against Taharqo two decades after Sennacherib’s campaign to Judah, stated that Taharqo and the members of his royal family were “dark as pitch.” And the Greeks referred to both Cushites and other southern Africans as Aithiops, a term meaning “burnt of face.” For the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Greeks, the blackness of the Cushite lacked the kind of racial antipathy known to the modern world. For Greek historian Herodotus, the Ethiopians are black “by reason of the sun” (Histories 2.22), and he twice refers to the southerners as “the tallest and most handsome of all men” (Histories 3.20; 3.114). The Hebrew Bible also suggests that Cushites had distinctive physical features. Isaiah 18:2 refers to Nilotic Cushites as being both “tall” and “smooth.” Most Bible translators understand the latter adjective as describing the Cushites’ smooth, shiny skin. More directly, Jeremiah inquires, “Can the Cushite change his skin or the leopard its spots?” (Jeremiah 13:23, author’s translation). While some interpreters have taken Jeremiah’s comparison as an indication of ancient Israelite color prejudice against Africans, the Book of Jeremiah paints a most favorable portrait of Ebedmelech the Cushite. Ebedmelech is noted for risking his life to rescue the prophet from certain death (Jeremiah 38:7-13). His demonstration of faith in Yahweh earns him a personal message of salvation and security at a time when the Judean nobility would fall to the sword of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon (Jeremiah 39:6, Jeremiah 39:15-18). Though obviously noted by ancient writers, physiognomic features, such as the skin color of the Cushite, did not become essentialized elements of social identity in ancient Israel or elsewhere in the ancient Near East. Cush is represented in the Hebrew Bible mainly as a martial nation. Cushites appear predominantly in military contexts, most often as allies with Egyptians, Libyans, Sabeans, and others (i.e., Isaiah 20:3-4; Jeremiah 46:9; Ezekiel 30:4-5; Ezekiel 38:5; Nahum 3:9). Cushites are known for mustering large armies with horses and chariots, making them a force to be reckoned with. According to 2 Chronicles 14:9-15, Zerah the Cushite comes up against Judah with horses, chariots, and an army of one million strong. And Isaiah 18:2 highlights the military ability of the Cushite warriors, calling them a people “feared near and far” and a nation “mighty and conquering.” The military reputation of Cushites is also well attested in the ancient Near East, where Cushite males were revered soldiers and equestrian experts in Egypt, Assyria, Samaria, and elsewhere. Cushites were an integral part of the Egyptian army since the Old Kingdom (2649-2100 B.C.E.). Particularly during the New Kingdom (1550-1070 B.C.E.), a group of Cushites known as the Medjay served as paramilitary police in Egypt and specialized guards of the pharaohs. Moreover, Cushite military presence is attested in Canaan more than a millennium before a people called “Israel” is known in the land. Thus, the Hebrew Bible’s emphasis on the military reputation of Cushites is well supported outside of the biblical text. Nevertheless, despite the military emphasis surrounding Cush, representations of this foreign people serve the rhetorical purposes of the biblical authors quite well. From the perspective of the Hebrew Bible, ancient Israelite collective identity was oriented around the doctrine of election, which emphasized both the sovereign rule of the God of Israel, Yahweh, and the chosen status of Israel as Yahweh’s covenant community. The concept of Israel’s election implicates the polytheism of other nations and evokes a largely negative theological evaluation of non-Israelite groups. As a result, all alliances with foreign-and, therefore, idolatrous-nations are denounced by biblical authors. Going back to the Assyrian invasion of 701 B.C.E., the biblical historian is far more concerned to demonstrate Yahweh’s sovereign rule over the nations than crediting the salvation of Jerusalem to a foreign people. Thus, in the late eighth century, when Judahite elites were bringing tribute down to Egypt to forge alliances with the Cushite Dynasty, they faced sharp criticism from the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 30:1-7). Those who put their trust in Cushite-Egypt because of its abundance of chariots and horses would be greatly disappointed (Isaiah 31:1). According to Isaiah, the people of Judah would be “ashamed because of Cush their expectation and Egypt their pride” (Isaiah 20:4-5). For the prophet, it was the “mighty and conquering” Cushites who must in fact bring their tribute up “to Mount Zion, to the place of the name of Yahweh of Hosts” (Isaiah 18:7). In a word, all foreign peoples-Cushite or otherwise-must in the end submit to the sovereign rule of the God of Israel and to his chosen people. This means that the Hebrew Bible is far more interested in a moral-theological evaluation of Cushites and other foreign peoples than in any purely ethnic or political characterization. Kevin Burrell is Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at Burman University. His specialties include ethnicity in the Hebrew Bible, Cushites in the Bible and history, and the Book of Revelation. Enjoy the exciting Summer 2024 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review as you excavate dramatic discoveries, incredible insights, and fun facts from the world of the […]
@@carabrown3927lessen my African Queen or king when the Arabs invaded Africa Egypt Libya Morroco Mauritania Tunisia Algeria and some part of Mesopotamian.(Sahara Desert) they castrated our ancestors black people thats why you have those quarter black quarter Arabs quarter white quarter Indian you dont know when that incident happen SONINI NANINI SOMANDLA NZAMBI punish even the land it became a desert that during the time of Finishing of the SPHINX and that period of time was REFER ZEP-TEP
Psalms 107:31-43 [31]Oh that men would praise the LORD for his goodness, and for his wonderful works to the children of men! [32]Let them exalt him also in the congregation of the people, and praise him in the assembly of the elders. [33]He turneth rivers into a wilderness, and the watersprings into dry ground; [34]A fruitful land into barrenness, for the wickedness of them that dwell therein. [35]He turneth the wilderness into a standing water, and dry ground into watersprings. [36]And there he maketh the hungry to dwell, that they may prepare a city for habitation; [37]And sow the fields, and plant vineyards, which may yield fruits of increase. [38]He blesseth them also, so that they are multiplied greatly; and suffereth not their cattle to decrease. [39]Again, they are minished and brought low through oppression, affliction, and sorrow. [40]He poureth contempt upon princes, and causeth them to wander in the wilderness, where there is no way. [41]Yet setteth he the poor on high from affliction, and maketh him families like a flock. [42]The righteous shall see it, and rejoice: and all iniquity shall stop her mouth. [43]Whoso is wise, and will observe these things, even they shall understand the lovingkindness of the LORD.
There's something about that number 500. When Putin released those paintings, I thought I had seen them already. I hadn't, I'd seen other artists renditions of the holy family,. 500 years ago it was common to depict the holy family as Black ppl because the people in Israel were black then.
@@IAMJUDAH1 Possibly it was the right time to show it now because a lot of people have been talking about it. Me thinks he knows Africa is taking back her throne again and will be powerful.
Only thing that makes sense if I’m invading your land one of the first rules of war is to deny your enemy resources and he did mention that they controlled the northern part of Africa at one point, damming the rivers to cut off their water supply sounds like something they’d do in order to weaken those ahead before moving in
@@maschonine736 plug the river at the mouth the mouth of many of those rivers are in the northern part of Africa if no water is flowing in those inland eventually dry up over time
Israel is a part of Africa, they built the Suez Canal to separate it from Africa. During biblical time, you were able to walk across Africa. The Suez Canal is man made. Research
Naw, that's not what he is saying. That little piece of land with no natural resources. You have been fooled by them. Why do you think Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Portugal, USA, China are all over Africa in the Gold, diamond, Cobalt, Coltan etc. All the resources are in West and Central Africa and some of South. Eden
@amanslife360• this is exactly what I keep telling my family, even in the scriptures deep , the Father himself said that for their disobedience their habitation will never be found again, so this is why I think like you do concerning some of their cities, especially Israel, that the real habitation of Israel has never been found, we know this for a fact because of this new nation of Israel has only been established since 1948.well if so... where's the ancient habitation of the true Israelites?!?
@@Leestreatbluenote Ancient Israelites...were born in...''JUDA''...(no..H)~ the Ancient Maps shows JUDA~ What the Ancient Maps doesn't show is...'ISRAEL'...Because it wasn't Created until, May 14, 1948. The 'JU'...is why and how those in Israel, began calling themselves JEWS. They stole our... 'IDENTITY'...and the Palestinians 'LAND'...🦋~🦋 The John Hopkins Medical Research...proved that...the place name Israel...has no ''ANCESTRAL TIES''...to the ''LAND OF PALESTINE''...Hitler said, if the jews ever become a nation, it would change the ''WORLD''...🌏..forever...he was SO....Right💐~
Hallelu”YAH” brothers & sisters the scriptures tell us in the last days knowledge would increase, indeed it has! Let’s also now do what also the scriptures tell us to turn back to our Creator “YAH” so that we will in turn be given back our land & be healed!!
I was thinking the same thing Go Black mentioned at the end of the video. With more information being revealed, I believe that The Garden of Eden was turned into what we know now as the Sahara Desert. The theology being taught today suggests the Garden was in modern day Israel, and the cradle of civilization was at the confluence of the Tigres and Euphrates River Valley. Why is that teaching significant? It discredits all and any contributions of dark skinned Africans. Prior to the building of The Suez Canal, The Levant Area into Iraq was Northeastern Africa. The people there were light skinned, which was acceptable to historians; the area included Egypt and Palestine, the future home of the Kharzar-Ashkanazis community. This was the beginning of revisionist history, the lies to whitewash Black Africans from any contributions to world history. This finding of these ancient maps are significant to linking the biblical account of Creation with our people, which reinforces the theory that the Bible is Black History.
It sounds more plausible that the garden of eden could have originated in the Sahara desert region. And would far better tie up with Atlantis being in the Atlantic sea region. I feel the destruction of Atlantis would have impacted on Northern Africa causing the Sahara to become a desert. If that area became inhospitable then the rising of a new civilization in Sumer would make sense as it would have been away from the earlier destructive forces across Northern Africa. Just my thoughts.
Q Fascinating!!! I lived in Africa 🌍 for 3 years As a white child. No place like home! Garden of Eden 💐 King Solomon 👑 imported monkeys, peacocks 🦚, gold and ivory from there Brought by the ships 🚢 of Tarshish. Q❤
I knew this information years ago by a black European historian actually he was from Africa but he lived in Europe did you know go black that the Sahara Desert was named by Abraham after his wife's name Sara
@@toddmaek5436 There most certainly is a ''Chosen People''...named the ''Israelites''...NOT...Israelis'... Those in fake Israel...call themselves, ''Israelis''...the name is no where in the Bible! The War...will tell it all...because they're not chosen.🦋...and GOD won't save Israel,... because they're Ashkenazis'...Khazars, Zionists, etc...Europeans, some from POLAND, like Benjamin Netanyahu...AKA...BENZION MILLEIKOWSKY~ polish💐
Southern America was once connected to Africa, I’m not sure about Northen part. They found fossils in locations of both continents that mirror the other! I learnt this in year 9 (14 y/o), at school! I’m now in my 30s! It’s quite shocking the amount of people who lack geographical knowledge!
I believe the Elite already know the things that are being revealed to us. They were the ones during the times of exploration who had the resources to pay explorers to go out on voyages and gather this information. They are the ones to decide what's shared with the common people. This type of education along with true history has been manipulated by the elite to benefit them, not humanity. They have hidden the truth for generations.
Of course they know what's beneath the desert and when it is revealed to all, history will once again be rewritten. Pity that our education systems are married to the colonisers history that shows them as brave and astute. It is much like the American movies that always demonize other nations and depict America as helpful and angelic to those earmarked for soft-colonization (no guns)
Very good question, and I suspect not an easy answer. Pretty sure that between logistics (bloody huge, impassable, inhospitable sea of sand makes equipment difficult to transport and maintain), political / bureaucratic difficulties, and spiritual / cultural traditions that needs to be respected, we might be able to account for half of the reasons we don’t see more interest in archaeological digs. Another big one is going to be “the party line” - archaeologists are NOTORIOUSLY hard-headed and loyal to whatever narrative their teachers created. Unfortunately a lot of their teachers were educated in white colonial mindsets that believed they were the best and brightest that ever were - to this day, many still believe ancient Egyptians were mediterranean europeans rather than Africans. The last potential reason I could come up with is tied to the “party line” issue: funding. Archaeology is an expensive business and the money has to come from somewhere. Donors pay for what interests them, and very often, reinforces their existing beliefs. It’s not easy to quantify and even more difficult to solve, but it is in our best interests to start SOMEWHERE.
I don't know of any schools teaching about that. Everything in our history were stolen and hidden. TMH is now showing those things that were stolen by the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN FOLKS.
They didn't Colonise you are listened a yt man rewriting history, The moors free the Iberian from The goth central eurpoean savages from both North Africa aswell .
They tended to call every dark melanated person: Moore, back then! Therefore many of our people (Yahudim), even though they were Hebrew/Eber/Ewe, could also be called a Moore! To add to the confusion, some of our people converted (forcibly or otherwise) to Islam! 🤷🏾♀️
Present day Israel is located in north Africa..East Africa, mainly Tanzania was where the garden of Eden locaited and the Great Flood during the days of Noe...I have full proof of that info..Im currently living in Tanzania and Im inviting Hebrews off the continent to come in. Been here over three years and Im living the best times in my life.
The flood was over the whole world but I don't doubt East Africa as a huge role in prophecy because of the fact they work so hard to hide these facts from the true hebrews. These places will be destroyed for their part in the slave trade. And it is very exciting!!!!
Its not really Israel anyway. They started to colonize part of Kenya that used to be Uganda. They still trying to join the Afrikan Union. So forget about the "middle east."
Jaleel White aka Steve Urkel once said in character, I ruled and crossed the Sahara forest, Carl said, i thought the Sahara was a desert? Jaleel said, "yeah, now!"
I been telling people that The Sahara desert used to be teaming with life, we go back millions and millions of years what history dates today or what is called theory of what they think the dates are.
Don't you wonder why people have been kept from dogging in the Sahara Desert, to unearth more truths? I do. Just imagine. It would be a monumental undertaking for sure, but would be so satisfying!
My opinion from what I have read biblically, it is true info. This territory will not be restored until true Israel returns. I cannot remember where I found this scripture. But I remember reading it years ago. Another prophecy of true Israel.
BEFORE THE BERLIN CONFERENCE, AFRICA HAD NO BORDERS. ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, AFRICANS AND PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF HAM, CUSH, AND CUSH’S SONS. Genesis 10:1 King James Version 10 “ Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood. “ Genesis 10:6 International Children’s Bible Ham’s Sons 6 “ The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim,[a] Put and Canaan. “ Read full chapter Footnotes 10:6 Mizraim This is another name for Egypt. Genesis 10:7-8 International Children’s Bible 7 “ The sons of Cush were Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteca. The sons of Raamah were Sheba and Dedan. 8 Cush also had a descendant named Nimrod. Nimrod became a very powerful man on earth. “ Representing Cush in the Hebrew Bible: B.C.E ., an African king marched into Syria-Palestine to defend Judah against the invasion of Sennacherib, king of Assyria. Second Kings 19:9 mentions “Tirhakah, king of Cush,” coming to the help of Hezekiah, who was up against the Assyrian superpower. Though the Cushites are mentioned only briefly in the biblical text, a number of scholars have argued that their involvement in the conflict against Assyria was decisive in the survival of Jerusalem at this critical historical juncture. Who were these Cushites that came to the aid of Jerusalem? And why does the Hebrew Bible seem to give so little notice to their role in the 701 B.C.E. debacle of the Assyrians? The Hebrew Bible mentions “Cush” (Hebrew: כוּשּׁ ) and related terms some 54 times.1 The vast majority of references to Cush as a geographical region denote the African land on the southern border of ancient Egypt, known most commonly today as Nubia. In English Bibles, Cush is most frequently translated as “Ethiopia,” but sometimes “Nubia,” “Cush,” and even “Sudan.” Because ancient Nubia occupied the northern and southern regions of present day Sudan and Egypt, respectively, it is to be distinguished from the country of Ethiopia, located in the Horn of Africa. The 25th Dynasty of Egypt, which lasted for about a hundred years, from the mid-eighth century to the mid-seventh century B.C.E., was Cushite in origin. Comprising seven kings, of which Taharqo (biblical Tirhakah) was the sixth and most prominent, the Cushite Dynasty ruled the largest territory to exist in the Nile Valley in antiquity. Under Taharqo, the dominion of Cush stretched from the heart of the Sudanto the Mediterranean. In the eighth and seventh centuries, Cushite Egypt competed with Assyria for control of Syria-Palestine, but after a prolonged struggle Assyria gained the upper hand, eventually conquering Egypt and expelling the Cushites from the land of the pharaohs. Under its new political capital of Meroë, the kingdom of Cush would last for yet another thousand years until its final dissolution in the fourth century C.E. The rule of the 25th Dynasty coincided with the age of the classical Hebrew prophets. Thus, the Egypt of much of the prophetic literature (e.g., Isaiah 1-40) was a territory under the dominion of the pharaohs of Cush. Based on iconographic and textual evidence, Cushites are typically understood as a sub-Saharan African people. The Egyptians, who knew the Cushites best, consistently depicted them with black skin pigmentation. The Assyrian king Esarhaddon, who fought against Taharqo two decades after Sennacherib’s campaign to Judah, stated that Taharqo and the members of his royal family were “dark as pitch.” And the Greeks referred to both Cushites and other southern Africans as Aithiops, a term meaning “burnt of face.” For the ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Greeks, the blackness of the Cushite lacked the kind of racial antipathy known to the modern world. For Greek historian Herodotus, the Ethiopians are black “by reason of the sun” (Histories 2.22), and he twice refers to the southerners as “the tallest and most handsome of all men” (Histories 3.20; 3.114). The Hebrew Bible also suggests that Cushites had distinctive physical features. Isaiah 18:2 refers to Nilotic Cushites as being both “tall” and “smooth.” Most Bible translators understand the latter adjective as describing the Cushites’ smooth, shiny skin. More directly, Jeremiah inquires, “Can the Cushite change his skin or the leopard its spots?” (Jeremiah 13:23, author’s translation). While some interpreters have taken Jeremiah’s comparison as an indication of ancient Israelite color prejudice against Africans, the Book of Jeremiah paints a most favorable portrait of Ebedmelech the Cushite. Ebedmelech is noted for risking his life to rescue the prophet from certain death (Jeremiah 38:7-13). His demonstration of faith in Yahweh earns him a personal message of salvation and security at a time when the Judean nobility would fall to the sword of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon (Jeremiah 39:6, Jeremiah 39:15-18). Though obviously noted by ancient writers, physiognomic features, such as the skin color of the Cushite, did not become essentialized elements of social identity in ancient Israel or elsewhere in the ancient Near East. Cush is represented in the Hebrew Bible mainly as a martial nation. Cushites appear predominantly in military contexts, most often as allies with Egyptians, Libyans, Sabeans, and others (i.e., Isaiah 20:3-4; Jeremiah 46:9; Ezekiel 30:4-5; Ezekiel 38:5; Nahum 3:9). Cushites are known for mustering large armies with horses and chariots, making them a force to be reckoned with. According to 2 Chronicles 14:9-15, Zerah the Cushite comes up against Judah with horses, chariots, and an army of one million strong. And Isaiah 18:2 highlights the military ability of the Cushite warriors, calling them a people “feared near and far” and a nation “mighty and conquering.” The military reputation of Cushites is also well attested in the ancient Near East, where Cushite males were revered soldiers and equestrian experts in Egypt, Assyria, Samaria, and elsewhere. Cushites were an integral part of the Egyptian army since the Old Kingdom (2649-2100 B.C.E.). Particularly during the New Kingdom (1550-1070 B.C.E.), a group of Cushites known as the Medjay served as paramilitary police in Egypt and specialized guards of the pharaohs. Moreover, Cushite military presence is attested in Canaan more than a millennium before a people called “Israel” is known in the land. Thus, the Hebrew Bible’s emphasis on the military reputation of Cushites is well supported outside of the biblical text. Nevertheless, despite the military emphasis surrounding Cush, representations of this foreign people serve the rhetorical purposes of the biblical authors quite well. From the perspective of the Hebrew Bible, ancient Israelite collective identity was oriented around the doctrine of election, which emphasized both the sovereign rule of the God of Israel, Yahweh, and the chosen status of Israel as Yahweh’s covenant community. The concept of Israel’s election implicates the polytheism of other nations and evokes a largely negative theological evaluation of non-Israelite groups. As a result, all alliances with foreign-and, therefore, idolatrous-nations are denounced by biblical authors. Going back to the Assyrian invasion of 701 B.C.E., the biblical historian is far more concerned to demonstrate Yahweh’s sovereign rule over the nations than crediting the salvation of Jerusalem to a foreign people. Thus, in the late eighth century, when Judahite elites were bringing tribute down to Egypt to forge alliances with the Cushite Dynasty, they faced sharp criticism from the prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 30:1-7). Those who put their trust in Cushite-Egypt because of its abundance of chariots and horses would be greatly disappointed (Isaiah 31:1). According to Isaiah, the people of Judah would be “ashamed because of Cush their expectation and Egypt their pride” (Isaiah 20:4-5). For the prophet, it was the “mighty and conquering” Cushites who must in fact bring their tribute up “to Mount Zion, to the place of the name of Yahweh of Hosts” (Isaiah 18:7). In a word, all foreign peoples-Cushite or otherwise-must in the end submit to the sovereign rule of the God of Israel and to his chosen people. This means that the Hebrew Bible is far more interested in a moral-theological evaluation of Cushites and other foreign peoples than in any purely ethnic or political characterization. Kevin Burrell is Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at Burman University. His specialties include ethnicity in the Hebrew Bible, Cushites in the Bible and history, and the Book of Revelation. Enjoy the exciting Summer 2024 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review as you excavate dramatic discoveries, incredible insights, and fun facts from the world of the […]
Some say it’s in Northern Ethiopia as the Bible says Jerusalem was surrounded by Mountains aend Yeha and Axum in Ethiopia fits that geographical description unlike present day Jerusalem/Palestine has no mountain and not surrounded by mountains. South Africa or Northern Ethiopia. The real place is definitely inside Africa. Also Bible mentions the presence of Lions and no lions in present day Palestine.
I just mentioned this in another comment. I am Ethiopian and I have seen an old map where it says Israel was in norhern part of Ethiopia. I can share the map if you are interested and it is not in yeah but around Gonder. I believe the Qemant people are the Cannites , because they even say that they are cannite. Now you have mentioned it , it gave me another perspective because this place have a lot of mountains.
@Axiom61 natufian remains were found to carry E1b1, at Mota cave in ethiopia the remains on an ancient ethiopian male carried haplogroup e1b1 and a maternal of L3x2a which is E1b1a....
Interesting. Thanks for sharing. Back in College in the early 1990's I came across some old maps in the library that called the entire continent of as being AEthiopia.
@@chazayah5985 what’s the point you’re trying to make because everyone knows Egypt is in Northeastern Alkebulan ( Africa )… I can not comment thoroughly because my comments are normally deleted or suppressed!!!
I discovered what i mentioned earlier in older maps dating further back then 1400AD… the “ promise land “ on the other hand is where Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries reside!!! That’s maps and land mass was way different then what it is today!!!
It's unfortunate that when Roman General, Julius Caesar went to Egypt. His soldiers are said to have accidentally burned down the Great Alexandria Library. The scholar that Queen Cleopatra was, she was not happy about the burning down of her library. Ancient visitors went to Alexandria just to see the great writings of the authors, before and during that era.
When I visited Egypt, my tour guide explained that when the pyramids where made the area was surrounded with rivers and that's how they moved the massive blocks of stones was by floating them on rafts made to move the stones. Now this definitely corroborates with that statement.
I have been saying for years that the Red Sea Moses parted was the Sahara. TMH parted the sand dunes so Israel could walk on steady ground. It does not take people 40’years to walk from Egypt to Israel. It doesn’t make sense that Moses will lead the people back to the land of Shem which they are before they made their journey to Egypt . It was already a baron wasteland when the trials of Israel left to come to Egypt. This is why the Israelites were residing in Egypt to begin with. It would take 40 years from them to walk from Egypt to sub Sahara Africa. It is also a possibility that South Africa and Namibia actually hold the true Jerusalem and Bethlehem
Some say it’s in Northern Ethiopia as the Bible says Jerusalem was surrounded by Mountains end Yeha and Axum in Ethiopia fits that geographical description unlike present day Jerusalem/Palestine has no mountain and not surrounded by mountains. South Africa or Northern Ethiopia. The real place is definitely inside Africa. Also Bible mentions the presence of Lions and no lions in present day Palestine.
The thing I see most interesting about this map (which proves a theory I already had) is that “Egipto” is labeled much “lower” inland than what we know now. Also the fact that it’s mentioned in conjunction with “Etiopia” isn’t lost on me either🤔…
🤓🤓🤓 that is what they want you to believe so African-Americans will not keep moving there, but also it says that it will be hundreds of years from now. Why would Africa split, I understand what they say about the tectonic plates if the continent do split, the United States and Europe had something to do with it. The same machine that they used to make tunnels maybe they are tunneling underneath Africa from one Coastline to the other Coastline and waiting for the ocean to keep eroding the song underneath the continent until it split. And how would they even know that is splitting the United States and Europe have nothing to drill into the ground Beyond 2 miles Africa has always been on a stable tectonic plate it's supposed to be the most stable continent on the planet.
Splitting in half or expanding? Just because a valley is created doesn't mean something is breaking off. Volcanoes form new islands or expand existing Islands. Facts, they just discovered an additional five thousand Islands off the coast of mainland Japan. Question everything those folks say.
The Holy Bible is right ! The so-called Middle East is actually Northern Africa, which was occupied by black people. That have LONG since been driven out of that part of Africa.. Africa For Africans !
Yes Black Brother Of Israel , don’t let the satan/people discourage your heart to let them make you turn your back on Africa you’ve done too much and reach too far , so stand your ground and continue to educate your Brothers and Sisters, I Just Love Your Works and Your Videos , Stay Blessed, Strong and Positive Always !❤
Brother, PRAY THAT GOD CONTINUES TO USE YOU TO TEACH, INSPIRE AND EMPOWER BLACK PEOPLE TO FIRST RE-CONNECT TO GOD AND BE HOLY, OBEY ALL OF GOD'S COMMANDMENTS AND TO RE-CONNECT TO AFRICA TO BUY LAND, CREATE BUSINESSES ALL ALONG THE SUPPLY CHAIN AND TO INVEST THEIR TIME AND MONEY IN AFRICA! CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FOR ALL OF US TO UNDERSTAND THAT UNTIL AND UNLESS WE RE-CONNECT TO GOD AND BE A HOLY PEOPLE, BE A PEOPLE SEPARATE FROM THAT WHICH IS UN-HOLY, THEN NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE AS IT RELATES TO FIGHTING AGAINST EVIL! ONLY TWO DUALITIES - WHAT IS GODLY, HOLY VS. THAT WHICH IS UN-GODLY, UN-HOLY! SEEK GOD WHILE THERE IS STILL TIME!
Maps are so important they linked us to Atlantis and they linked us to the pyramids all around the world even the ones that went underwater so the most important maps are maps of Pangea.
We’ve already knew this. Egypt got its knowledge from older civilizations in the Sahara. I honestly don’t like Europeans in Africa looking for these things.
Is there an African Anthropology Society or Institution that cares enough to go and do the research and dig up these places? The problem is when Europeans do it they create a false narrative, they hide information, they gatekeeper knowledge, they claim to be Egyptians 😂.
@@lovestrong3582 They have probably discovered a lot of things and hid them away for studying. The Dogon People knew about plants many years before Europeans set foot in Africa. How? The Egyptians were cutting and moving 80 ton stone many years before the Europeans set foot in Africa. How?
@@kingjamsby observing the growth of plants from seeds they scattered when they came back to the area when people were hunter gatherers. They did this through pulley systems.
I'm not at all sure what you've "discovered" (other than these stunning maps, of course). We are told that ancient Africa was filled top to bottom with the most civilized kingdoms in the world, "before written history". I put that in quotes, because we are told that they DID write down their history. The problem is that these civilizations wrote extensive records down.. on skins and papyrus, and things that did not last through the ages. We are told that their temples and castles were built from jungle hardwoods that didn't last the ages. The ancient Biblical records of nobles like Nefertiti and others traveling to Israel are our best surviving evidence of those nations. We do have SOME Egyptian tablets and etc. that mention the Afrikaani nations in passing. There are a few discussing Atlantis as Egypt's neighbor, for example. Additionally, the Atlas Mountains, and the Seat of Atlas (all in Africa), and Atlas himself do appear to be Greek, but then we also learn that Atlas was the Crown King of Atlantis, and that's where it got it's name. Most people don't realize that the Greek have been around since nearly the dawn of recorded history, but they may have started in northern Africa somewhere. However, it appears that that history was wiped out when the Great Flood wiped out Atlantis. The point there being.. we are told that as great as the legends of the Mediterranean nations of Atlantis and Egypt are.. as I said at the start, we are told that the Afrikanni civilizations were the first, and the grater of the two. Stunning to consider, isn't it? Side-note.. did you notice that on one of those ancient maps, it depicts a COUNTRY called Africa..? Us using the term "Afrikaani" may be a misnomer! The ancient peoples may have had an entirely different name for Africa, that has been lost to time! I'd be curious to find out what the ancient Egyptian, Hebrew and Greek words are for Africa, I can't recall off of the top of my head. :)
Factz ..part clue ... Sahara..is of Sarah.... ( Abraham Wife ) o.k. ... the video moving to fast : but I pick up another name written into the scipture, which is Tamar- ( something ) couldn't see it all < Tamar which either is of > Gen.38> which was Judah ( daughter in law ) 2/ in the womb ( I saw this name as well ) Zarah...?
The Garden of Eden is Uganda. But, I Found out a year ago that there is water underneath those noth African countries, still to this day, yet desert on the surface.
Mali in North West Africa has enough fresh water to supply the entire world for the next 200 years. Top secret and one reason for the endless wars... IYKYN
Don't you wonder why people have been kept from dogging in the Sahara Desert, to unearth more truths? I do. Just imagine. It would be a monumental undertaking for sure, but would be so satisfying!
I told you the maps is key to educating history and more to find out I had sent you an email about maps in general. It is showing the Pangea not broken where America Africa Asia and India close.
Don't you wonder why people have been kept from dogging in the Sahara Desert, to unearth more truths? I do. Just imagine. It would be a monumental undertaking for sure, but would be so satisfying!
@@jimb8830 What supercontinent formed 300 years ago? Pangea From about 300-200 million years ago (late Paleozoic Era until the very late Triassic), the continent we now know as North America was contiguous with Africa, South America, and Europe. They all existed as a single continent called Pangea.
Thank you. I will access e-mail in a little while and check it out. I'm steadily hungry for solving mysteries and getting confirmations for so many things that I've believed to be true. Thank you for your info. I will attend to it and comment back some time tomorrow. Much thanks.
@@TheSub-SaharanAmericanLegend King Solomon the RICHEST HEBREW ISRAELITE FROM THE TIBE OF JUDAH the same tribe as King David n the son of MAN CHRIST HIMSELF...THE KING OF KINGS...
Africa has such an incredible, rich history, much of it swept under the rug, far more interesting than most people imagine. The Malian empire, the Songhai empire, the kingdoms of Kush, Zimbabwe, and Benin - the list is jaw dropping. From masters of the sciences to warrior queens, scholars, astronomers, merchants, and engineers. Africa’s history is vibrantly fascinating, much like her people. Perhaps if more Africans understood the history that runs in their veins, it would help people understand how immeasurably valuable they are.
I learned about this stuff when I was in school I even saw some of these maps in books when I will go to the library we did not need the Internet this stuff has been taught
1375 was about 100 years before the discovery of America. At the time of the discovery; Europeans were very concerned about finding new paths to la India because the Moors(Blacks) were blocking the path to The Indias. It seems as if the Indias were more than one country. They used plural to refer to the Indias. They were seeking specias to prepare meat for winter. It's possible they destroyed the Indias, and the Moors were protecting the area. That could be part of the reason for picking slaves from West Africa. They probably blamed them for winter's deaths in Europe.
These maps do not necessarily prove the presence of ancient knowledge as much as they disprove the “5,000 years ago’ lie. Just 500 years ago, or less, upper Africa was not a desert region. It is not climate change that makes it a desert now, it is the sustained over extraction of its natural resources. If you take more out of the ground than the land can bear to lose, the land dies. Which is why many areas in Africa and the Middle East are now dry, desert lands. What people who benefit from the exploitation of natural resources don’t want people to know is that over extraction has a very heavy, rapid, and almost irreversible consequence. Now that so many resources have been greatly reduced in the Northern part of Africa, exploiters are looking to Sub Saharan Africa to increase exploitation, not telling the people what the certain future of the land will be if it is allowed.
