Ancient Wisdom, Carl Jung and the Physics of Consciousness | Timothy Desmond, Ph.D 

Have you ever searched for the idea online? I found this by searching "Lascaux Cave Golden rectangle." "While conducting research in the summer of 2016, Dr. Elliot McGucken came across the earliest use and appearance of the golden ratio (and golden spiral) in figurative paintings and sculpture, dating to over 40,000 years ago."

That’s a fascinating observation and discovery. I’ve been intrigued by the Megalithic Yard and the relationship to the Celtic Cross.

@@djquinn11 Sounds like a good mining operation to me!

I feel bad for your accident but I ain’t reading all that

@@johndconstantine Yea. I read somewhere American adults today have the concentration span 3rd graders had in 1960. I feel for you and your itty bitty world lol!

Which witch?

​​​@@JohnWilmerdingnot a witch but the idea of a witch and maybe an idea from where language came and how that affected our ideas on biology? I do have a perspective

I relate

How did you study a vehicle company?

You’re a true initiate 🙏

Same 🎉

All hail

Synchronicities abound. 👌

The algorithm works sometimes 😎👌🏽.

Modern research on Near Death Experience by Raymond moody, reincarnation memories by Ian Stevenson/Jim trucker and past lives regression by Brian Weiss all independently but coincidentally show that our consciousness survive death, we live many lives and our thoughts and actions matter in the hereafter. So be kind and helpful to others, be virtuous, meditate and cultivate ourselves to higher spiritual levels. Cheers.

Unfortunately this will never happen until we as a species learn to respect everyone’s differences. We also can’t move forward until we can forgive all the slavery and past slights of our fore fathers. Once we can forgive the transgressions of the past and accept peoples differences, we will never move forward as a species.

Watching them lay the Chemtrails overhead, as we speak. Where do these fuckers think they can go after the ENTIRE ecosystem is destroyed?

Please give your account to IANDS website. Thanks for sharing.

In this galaxy , did it feel soo vast and soo many stars of every color? And moving was effortless like the focus of a eye? And emotions was still there but no where as strong. For i have a memory of being , before here. And i dont understand it but i was just there waiting. I was actually anxious. And I remember turning right it felt like and i sa a single star surround by the void. It was different. it was separated or somewhere else.

​@user-jk1dh2zi7hAnd you know that for sure because you are so much smarter than anyone else

@user-jk1dh2zi7h Have you had an NDE?

@user-jk1dh2zi7h You have no idea what you're talking about.

Thank you!

Good work!

what about language? I have perspectives if you would like to hear?

Thanks man, would love to!

[Infinity and zero, theology, soul]: in·fin·i·ty MATHEMATICS a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞). (In counting numbers 0 is the subject where positive integers "1, 2, 3 and 4 etc" are the objects). What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary? a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity. b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers. Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it. Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it. Isn't⚡God⚡supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)? Well, 0D is outside of space and time: 0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless 1D, 2D, 3D (natural) = spatial dimensions 4D (natural) = temporal dimension Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language. Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (upward facing trinity) and female (downward facing trinity) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1. Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them. In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for atomic protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension). "Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)". A) The postulated soul, 👻, has 1. no spatial extension 2. zero size 3. exact location only B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Mass with no size is a unique equation in that it has no spatial extension. Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.

[Important point 👉 (dont forget)]: 0D (zero) is different from 1D-10D (nonzero) because 0D is a not-natural dimension whereas 1D-10D are natural dimensions. 0D monad (Creator event horizon) 1D, 2D, 3D are spatial (space) dimensions 1D line 2D width 3D height 4D, 5D, 6D are temporal (time) dimensions 4D length 5D breadth 6D depth 7D, 8D, 9D are spectral (energy) dimensions 7D continuous 8D emission 9D absorption 10D black hole (Destroyer event horizon) It is impossible for anything 1D-9D to approach 0D or 10D due to their event horizons. 10D contains a placeholder 0 (not locally real) for its event horizon. Only 0D is locally real on this side. The other side of the event horizon at the zero-of yourself (near horizon) is God. The other side of the event horizon of a black hole (far horizon) is not God. Anything we know about black holes (Destroyer) we know the opposite of that is true for monads (Creator), and we know some crazy sci-fi stuff about black holes. It's a mirror universe with 0D at the center. This side (Elohim; Singularity) is contingent and less real (the natural dimensions anyway) and the other side (El; Alone) is necessary and more real (pretty sure the entirety of the other side remains locally real). The zero-of ourselves (more real 👻) was made by the Holy Trinity (Deity; possessive; God's) in Genesis 1 which should not be confused with the Unholy Trinity (Deity; plural; gods) in Genesis 2-3 who messes with the 1D, 2D, 3D parts of us (less real 🤷‍♂️). Elohim was "syncretized" to just mean El during the Babylonian captivity. To avoid this simply use the Latin, "unsyncretized", counterpart Deity for possessive (God's) and plural (gods) context. (Septuagint and Vulgate use Post-Babylonian captivity "syncretized" meaning of Elohim so mistranslate as Theos and Deus, respectively). Gen 2-3 introduces the placeholder Elohim (not locally real) and their blind, foolish chief running amok. Plurality of bad guy that 'are' each other and 'are not' God. Nephilim are sons of the false Elohim associated with Yahweh (the BAAL, or LORD, of the gods).

[Monad in philosophy/cosmogony]: Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the sum "I am" of all things. The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both. The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.* It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people. [In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]: 1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force. 2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together. 3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions. 4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter. 5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz. 6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics. 7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions. [Monad in mathematics, science and technology]: Monad (biology), a historical term for a simple unicellular organism Monad (category theory), a construction in category theory Monad (functional programming), functional programming constructs that capture various notions of computation Monad (homological algebra), a 3-term complex Monad (nonstandard analysis), the set of points infinitesimally close to a given point

"Some first follow the true Savior but then turn away to worship a dead man." - the revelation of Peter THE WORLD RULER TRIES TO KILL ME And then a voice of the world ruler came to the angels: “I am god and there is no other god but me.” But I laughed joyfully when I examined his conceit. But he went on to say, “Who is the human?” And the entire host of his angels who had seen Adam and his dwelling were laughing at his smallness. And thus did their thought come to be removed outside the majesty of the heavens, away from the human of truth, whose name they saw, since he is in a small dwelling place. They are foolish and senseless in their empty thought, namely, their laughter, and it was contagion for them. The whole greatness of the fatherhood of the spirit was at rest in its places. And I was with him, since I have a thought of a single emanation from the eternal ones and the unknowable ones, undefiled and immeasurable. I placed the small thought in the world, having disturbed them and frightened the whole multitude of the angels and their ruler. And I was visiting them all with fire and flame because of my thought. And everything pertaining to them was brought about because of me. And there came about a disturbance and a fight around the seraphim and cherubim, since their glory will fade, and there was confusion around Adonaios on both sides and around their dwelling, up to the world ruler and the one who said, “Let us seize him.” Others again said, “The plan will certainly not materialize.” For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And as for the plan that they devised about me to release their error and their senselessness, I did not succumb to them as they had planned. And I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me, yet I did not die in reality but in appearance, in order that I not be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me, and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered merely according to their sight and thought so that no word might ever be found to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, happened to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. Their thoughts did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the rulers and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.

So do i

💯

Is this laws related to accident and thermodynamics? Thanks for this.. I'm also into newton regarding three body problem..

Yeah I probably was too! If you want to trip yourself out, look at that, then look at the sepher yetzirah. There’s a straight up EERILY similar image in it.

Welcome my friend and thank you. I’ll check them out!

Thank you my friend ✌️

For sure, there’s a straight line from Plato to hermeticism to alchemy.

You can make all the shapes using only 2. A straight line & a curved line. Sacred geometry patterns use a circle & connect points with a line & you keep adding & you get more patterns. Frequency and energy can create vibration and that forms into shapes, light & everything else. If you haven't seen resonance videos you can look up sand,water, bubbles and fire resonance & that shows shapes being made

@@paullayfield thanks I figured it would come back to vibration and such . I guess what bothers me is the “only 4 “ part . I have never had any physiological issues at all and nothing since that incident. Anyway thank you for the input

in its

@@herrweiss2580 lol, thanks! ... or is it " its' "? 😂

@@polyb1123 I know you’re clever than that. You take care. 👍

Welcome my friend 🙏

Are you an Eric Weinstein fan as well?

@@jackcassedy9961 you got the quote :-) not a "fan", don't always agree, but I respect him.

That's my daughter, although the picture is from 9 years ago, on the fourth of July.

Phantasmagoria. The cave wall is an illusion, its the Entrance. You must go within. Deep within the cave a shadows is the Man. 1+1=1 THE MONAD

What caused you to die?

@@CoolPigeon98 I got sick. I fell I'll. Brought to my bed. And I remember actually letting go and dying. Woke up the next morning. I'm not the only one this happened to in 2012.

@@KundaliniKing42 i believe you. I repeated the years 2012-2015.

@@CoolPigeon98 2011-2013 was groundhogs day. Do you know who Tom Cambell is?

✨🫶✨

Welcome 🙏

Love to hear it! Thank you and welcome!

@@THIRDEYEDROPS is there much of a community thing going on with a patreon type subscription?

Do you know what “squaring the circle” actually means?

That is a good point, but Plato had a good reason for inserting the mathematical forms between the archetypal forms and the material forms. The mathematical forms, such as the Pythagorean theorem, are eternal, perfect truths, while the many examples of their manifestations in the material world are temporary approximations of those eternal truths. For example, we can apply the Pythagorean theorem in the blueprint for the construction of a huge building, but the right angles formed by the corners of that building will never be perfect. We can describe the orbits of the planets as ellipses, but the actually orbits of the planets are never perfectly elliptical. The eternally fixed, perfectly predictable unfolding of mathematical forms and their interactions are only imperfectly and dimly reflected in the empirically observable universe.

@@toddesmond6820 "The eternally fixed, perfectly predictable unfolding of mathematical forms and their interactions are only imperfectly and dimly reflected in the empirically observable universe." Beautifully put. I agree that imperfectly and dimly is the only way a shadow can dance. Why do we infer that the real world is the result of the math, rather than that the math is the result of our observations of the real world; but as one of our most precise languages, it hints at the underlying perfection that we cannot see. It demonstrates that our shadows may be less real than we think.