Top-G Andrew Tate vs Virgin Piers Morgan || Digital CHESS BOARD on-screen 

Andrew tate fucked piers queen

Imagine needing PIERS MORGAN to throw a game of chess against you. Look at what the computer thinks of Tate's moves. He doesn't even know how to use a chess clock ffs.

@@pupdiogenes2548he never said he was an expert and piers would never do that, he wants to be smarter than andrew.

@@benoneill4805 You're talking about them as if they are toddlers, which is appropriate.

because morgan forgot his queen was in check and he castled instead.. tate distracted him with a convo about the king and the queen.

Thats not how it works irl

​@@anees8866 pretty sure it does

@@anees8866 that's exactly how it works

@@jackwoods535 I play chess and there I'd 0% luck in chess. It all depends on who is first to make a mistake.

@@filipjugovic6952 you could say its lucky your opponent made a mistake

I barely started playing m realized how bad the other guy is

@@Mr.watashi u mean Andrew or piers

Piers

@@Thebigpiigg been playing for like 2-3 months now. And peirs is god awful 😂

@@lifeislikeaboxofchocolates5383 he’d beat you

😂u realized what u just said right.....

​@@cox827 yk what even better 😂...

@@cox827 didn’t even realize it at first but now I do lol

taken*

Especially for us Americans, absolutely hilarious with the accent.

"intentional distraction" lmao. Any person above 800 elo would notice that their queen was open even if they were sat in the middle of a battle field.

@@m.a.a.d9275 Even i who am not serious at all about the game (I only ever play casual OTB matches with my brother and friends, never read a chess book in my life) knew instantly the second i saw that knight that Black was utterly screwed the moment he castled there instead of moving his queen to safety

Bro I watched this shit after hitting a fucking plug play and saw that shit while also understanding the analogy, it’s simply just piers fault cuz obviously he can’t keep focus as after one blunder he basically threw the rest of the game and made moves which I did not see to have any value at all they seemed empty, and that’s coming from someone who baked as fuck rn

@@tellahsage6477 what is this even supposed to mean. „The Moment he blinderes his most valuable piece I realized he’s in trouble!“ smartest Tate fan

@@buni3629 It's written blunders, not blinders ;]

Common sense like a fighting game. Any self competitive event is the same way. Like playing darts. Ur playing against urself and own mistakes.

bro what? this isnt a profound statement.

I mean it's kind of obvious

In the endgame sometimes. You kinda get 'lucky' when it comes to whose move first - black or white with K vs K and pawn or with zugzwang.

i mean it kind of is... how many people would admit to losing because they were outplayed? the truth is not many and bad luck is one of many excuses@@yoursleepparalysisdemon1828

Thanks💪

thats the whole point of the video

@@GoodKnightChess it’s not impressive at all it’s easy probably took 30 seconds

@@Niganigaballsackboiilol just a NPC comment, don’t mind him

@@Reid367 Still it made 1.3mil views and therefore probably more than your monthly salary

I’d guess 2-300.

@@BamaShanks yea, for tate.

@user-ti6cr4gz2g hard to tell with Tate. Piers was blundering too much to assess Tate.

@@BamaShanks he is 1600

@@Mega-gn6dx kid he is2200

standard openings

@HOW TO DO EVERYTHING 101 that doesn t mean anything chess is really hard learn even with ur father being a chess player

It's not even a game

@@user-od4yl3rf4n so what is it?

@@user-od4yl3rf4n what is it then?

💀💀

Cause it’s a grade school comment

@@ahdexter7688 Just like „I always take someone’s queen“? Or is that okay because your Messias and leader, sacred god and king, Emory Andrew Tate II., said mentioned quote?

@@leoborn4013 neither are good comments lol, but I was addressing Piers Morgan’s comment.

@@leoborn4013 what are you on about?

Yeah Except going for a walk at night.

​@@iminuru2424 they can go for a walk but it's a no garuntee of return 💀

@@mr.mxyzptlk7971 😌😌😌😌

@@iminuru2424 If someone tries to do anything to a woman, other people will step into save her. If someone attacks a Man NOBODY is helping him. When you finally leave your home and go outside you then realize life is much more dangerous for a man than a women. Statistically & realistically speaking.

You needa man up and smack your wife and tell her if she leaves you it’s a beating or death coming

thats how I was thought to play in a casual setting, you always say check for some reason

May be Peiers won't recognise he is in check, when he is in check. Andrew was right doing that for the Audience too

In a high enough level, you don't say check cause it's disrespectful to your opponent and also because of illegal moves.

My pleasure 😊

tbf they were talking while playing, that's not allowed if it's serious 😂

@@MrEvol94 Since they were both talking though, I'd say it's still an even playing field

@@MrEvol94rly they cant talk?

W son👑

Thats cool i hope he is still doin it

thats pretty cool

😅

ye ur waffling

@@beanboi9156 Yeah that’s what a small paragraph will feel like when your are at maximum brain capacity just reading.

@@moleahjobe calm down m8 im saying that its a bit of a stretch to say that also the queens didnt rlly abandon their kingdoms they were half forced into it but its an interesting point

What the fuck are you on about?

Queen (consorts) are expected to stay with their kings throughout the whole of history from ancient Egypt to the Anglo Saxons they were to die when their kings did, it is the princesses who are married off for power by their fathers

Quite litterally

Even the computer gets confused on what he's done with "??" 💀

@@mohammadgaribaldihahhahaha😂😂😂😅😅

@@mohammadgaribaldi it did tht because it wasnt the smartest play, because he protected a piece tht wasnt in danger

That was the most confusing move I’ve ever witnessed 😂

Every game you have can be very different, I'm sure Emory has had more than a few uneventful games lmao

@@marklyons8430 yeah but those are rare especially because he plays very aggressively

@@TrapConnoisseur. my point being is that Andrew could very well play like his father, this occasion being that "rare one" you speak of

@@marklyons8430 no? Andrew Tate plays the exact same opening everytime

@@marklyons8430 there is absolutely nothing unique about Andrew’s style, he doesn’t play like his father at all

i mean u can teach up to a certain point, training 10hours a day won't get anyone to become a master, having a genius father doesnt mean you will become a master and btw i think andrew is like 1600 elo which isnt bad

@@nviggashow9168 that’s not a 1600 elo, that’s at most a 600 elo.

@@Mega-gn6dx because he doesnt play against a guy his level ? And u can't rate someone with one game lol

@@nviggashow9168 actually you can on how carelesly the moves were

@@trivial9973 its a blitz game with literally no need for him to tryhard, hes just having fun still stomping

Yeah, I think Could beat him and I'm 500

@@alexandrasundell5463 im 600 i can beat you

The comment I was looking for, lol

piers was "state champion" so he's not a rookie, so beating him is a good accomplishment at the very least.

@@alexandrasundell5463 I’m 1100

....Rape women, Get endicted for human trafficking

I think he meant that playing a perfect game means you have only played chess for most of your life

no he literraly meant that you are a nerd if you play chess perfect, there is one more option that you play chess perfect without being a nerd, its called a genius. Other than that chess is for nerds

In order to play chess well one must spend the majority of one's life thinking about chess. By playing well, it's most likely meant at a high level, not casually.

@@jonsnow4770 expertly*, not well. "A well played game is a sign of a gentlemen"

1100 elo move, also piers would lose to martin playing like that

I wouldn't consider it a "great" move. It was alright. I think anyone with over 1000 elo would see that

He had a much better move in 3:40 as well

It was a pretty obvious move :)

They both had to play very fast, sure they will both suck especially piers

You're adding weight to the argument that women aren't funny

@@NeckbeardPr1methat joke wasn't even that bad

I’m starting to think people who don’t like Andrew Tate just wake up and find any reason to say something negative about him 😂says more about y’all than Andrew 🤷‍♂️ Bro is hating Andrew Tate winning a chest game 😂😂😂

@@BRlGADE_KINGPIN people are acting like he crushed him because he is so good, andrew is around a below average club player, not bad totally but not really remarkable, his father was really good I guess but chess isnt hereditery

​@@wooshifgay462 As someone who is a tournament level player, he's kind of bottom of the barrel when you exclude really young kids.

Well everybody interprets everything in many ways...

It’s actually mate in 3 if he doesn’t take the bishop, I would say Andrew Tate is probably around the 1100 elo rating

No it fucking isn't lmao its a sophomoric attempt to put up a front and make everyone think he's some master manipulator. My toddler could beat Piers Morgan at chess.

@@AlejandroGomez-on5ys GEEK

@@AlejandroGomez-on5ys He's 1800

its actualy not, he is just lucky that pierc didnt do anything about it xD one move with the king and it would took longer

🤖

That's a good thing. He's the interviewee

A 300 elo

Real chess games have blunders lmao

@@MrUbister Yeah but this was just an embarassment

I think he made a lot more than one blunder

Piers is awful at chess bud this isn't impressive

Chess is a beautiful enough game to waste your life on

You can see a much a better and mutual respect between them with each interview after the first. Started off really bad and and then it got better with each other.

all the great interviewers have managed to become friends first technique

*they're...

what is your profile pic😭😭

He was an International Master.

Yeah but piers played a horrible game looks like he’s 500 elo

His Dad was I think, but both piers and Andrew played pretty poorly haha.

@@LiamMill Andrew played with a very high accuracy and didn’t ever play elementary mistakes in the beginning to middlegame so I disagree.

@@shulmpino5505 the opening is just theory fym high accuracy 😂😂😂

facts. or though maybe he just hanst played chess in a really long time hes like 50 years old school champion would been like 12

maybe primary school lol. ut to be fair my high school didn't have a chess club and no doubt there wouldn't have been anyone above 700.

He did not tell you he was on the only person in the Chess Club so he was the default Champion. 🤣

The quote still rings true buddy Chess is a game Life is meant to be lived

Clueless...

🤣🤣🤣

Yeah, games with regular people it's like that, but once you play enough it's pretty easy to see the patterns and potential for forks

@@whitecrayon3281 Yeah, Knights are an excellent piece for forks. It's easy to shatter the confidence of beginners and intermediates once you find a perfect fork and take out the queen. Cuz most of the people are relying too much on their queens.

​@@seyonmahendran7182what kind of intermediate doesn't see a fork?

@@nebnoida5376 Actually there are a lot of intermediates who completely ignore a fork threat. But the lead to the fork should be better and clever compared to that of a beginner.

@@seyonmahendran7182 what is the average rating of the intermediates you are talking about? I think this is becoming a debate on the word "intermediate".

BRUH he is in a *s e x* trafficking case

How is he weird 😂

@@harrynunezz He thinks that cheating is okay if you are a man

@@whoeveneatsbreakfast it’s not cheating, in his religion you can have multiple wives. I do think it’s backwards asf and don’t agree with it but it’s not technically cheating if these girls all know about it.

@@masxn_t2276 you need to be able to take care of all of them equally and shouldnt treat one better than the rest, thats why its not really common nowadays since its really difficult

Yes, from the society

@@fyaaeya7803 why?

A pawn can be whatever it wants if it reaches the end of the board, not the king but strong pieces too. With hard work. Good luck

King can escape in c7

@@rieyukigrowtopia then Tate could go qd7 and its check mate, but in 3 moves not 2 as stated by op

@@mr.100rupees3 he wouldn't be able to cause there's a rook

@@rieyukigrowtopia no there wouldn't because the Queen would have taken the rook in the second move

@@mr.100rupees3 even if he takes the rook and checks the king it can still escape

Man was really using himself as a benchmark, "if you beat me at chess then you must be really good" 😂😂 Andrew Tate is decent (1700+ on chess.com) but Piers is just horrible.

@@GoodKnightChess Andrew is better than 90% of players, that’s more than decent

​@@ultimatestuff7111 how can you justify that stat?

​@@DalionDen his elo bro, he's a 1700

@@vercettikmg that doesn't justify 90% of chess players. You have to consider the fact that there are unrated chess players and rated chess players.

What…

It was. Did you not watch it?

@@parlyramyar it was mate in 3 are u blind?

@@RF-xx8re no in two moves of Andrews from when he said pretty sure you are blind 😂

@@parlyramyar 4:32 he says mate in 2 but its mate in 3

Ikr. Some may point out that his queen speech was a distraction but if he starts talking about the queen the normal reaction would be to check your queen so I have no idea.

Andrew played the Queen's gambit, Piers didn't accept the Gambit (by not taking the pawn) therefore it became a Queen's gambit declined but then again Piers played ...Nc6 which isn't very popular and is known as the Chigorin Variation of the Queen's gambit declined.

Lol you must be talking about a game you invented or something, definitely not chess

@@GoodKnightChessHe’s sorta right. White has a very small advantage at the start of the game, because white moves first

This statement is just plain wrong. White has a tiny advantage. Two good engines playing each other will most likely end in a draw.

@@odleyodles6321 He's absolutely wrong, "a tiny advantage" for white doesn't mean black can lose without making any mistakes or blunders. No, neither side can lose without blunders mistakes or inaccuracies, if chess were that stupid where one side has a winning advantage from the start, it wouldn't be taken seriously, it's popularity wouldn't go past the 4 walls of day cares😂. Two engines playing against each other ends in a draw most of the time and there are many times where Black wins.

There’s a rumours that said a perfect game of chess is always a draw. But even the best IA can’t play 100% the best moove

It's called castling en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling#:~:text=Castling%20is%20a%20move%20in,that%20the%20king%20passed%20over.