No, because in this case, Epstein would not have been interested in luring him to his island. Epstein only lured very wealthy or important people into his "business", for money, information, etc. It is also possible that he blackmailed everyone and worked for the secret service of a third country.
This is how a documentary should be done! Great archival footage, fast-paced, and people willing to go on the record. The soundtrack was an added bonus.
Just remember that this channel did not create this documentary. The BBC did. This channel just posted it. Perhaps the BBC would appreciate your compliments rather than this channel, which has less than 2K subscribers and is not the BBC.
exactly. and if you wonder that, people will treat you at least of victim blaming. at 17 i was in highschool and sleeping in my parents home, and no going out after 10pm.
I was thinking they meant the upper class richies? Maybe in some circles where it's viewed as special to know someone from a royal family? Using them as an accessory.
when are Americans going to realize that the Royal Family, all the pageantry, the Royal Palaces, changing of the guard at Buckingham and Windsor bring tourists from every part of the globe and the Billions of Pounds that they spend visiting and buying memorabilia by the ton. Try to get close to palace to watch guards change up close, better GET THERE EARLY! The Royal Family and British Pageantry play a significant role in keeping the UK afloat. BTW............I'm an American. Now you've been informed, my fellow American dumb-asses..........you may now continue to "Jay-Walk". Hey American, Question: Paris is the Capitol of what country? Ans: Unhhhh...........Europe?! Keep on Jay-walking!
Chelsea Clinton was on Epstein's Island when she was a young teenager, as well. She was with her parents, but damn! Who the hell would let someone like that anywhere near their children? So disturbing.
Dont forget Charles was best friends with Jimmy Saville. One of those birds might be a coincidence but 3 ? I would have to say that these "royal men" knew exactly what their friends were up too. Charles told Jimmy that he really helped out the monarchy and that no one would ever know how much he did for Charles. Now what could Jimmy get that Charles couldn't ? what would he be thanking him for ?
“It was a convenient place to stay,” states the royally wealthy, spoiled prince in staying at a convicted sex offender’s home in New York City because there are no hotels in that town. Wow, talk about burying yourself into your own grave.
I found that ironic for Andrew to say that as well. He always took the best hotel suites when working in Bahrain like that man said, obviously not concerned with taxpayers paying for his excesses yet here he stays with a pedo because it's "convenient". No Andrew, I don't buy that lie either. He stayed with the pedo because young girls came along with the accommodations is the truth!
It's extremely clear why he did the interview ... he's supremely arrogant and privileged and believed he could easily pull it off because he's above journalists and the public, having been treated that way all his life!! That attitude was beyond obvious during the entire interview!!
They're saying they ruined his life... he still lives in a manor, still gets taxpayer money, still has all his needs met. He's just not allowed to be publicly royal. I want my life ruined like that
Sorry but he doesn't receive taxpayers money and he had to pay 20 millions for the settlement with Virginia and also a million to his lawyers. His Majesty King Charles tries to get him out of the Lodge but the rent was made on Andrew's name and not on the name of the Royal Family (like always). I suppose it was a gift from the late Queen. He has no money anymore and is an embarrassement for all of us.
@@Supernovae2010 sorry, correction, he gets family money and a free house from Mummy. Again, I would love for my life to get ruined so good. I cannot find a source on that 20 million number, where did you get that? And didn't his Royal Enabler brother make him an official royal again? Idk if he really was a national embarrassment, I don't know how there is a single monarchist left on your soil
If you can't even find on the net, the settlement Virginia made with Prince Andrew,I can understand why you are so rude and abrasive. Good night. @@calebmcintosh1991
He was absolutely not made a working royal again, and he never ever will be. Idk what youve seen to make you think that but thats very false. Charles isnt that stupid. @calebmcintosh1991
Its obvious Andrew is not an intellectual! I think he is a spoiled rotten self serving jerk. Any grown man that threw a fit that his teddy bears are not displayed correctly on his bed is beyond ridiculous!
That's because the royal family are completely surrounded by the "Yes" People Handlers. They never have to suffer the consequences of bad behavior or judgement, they are protected from all those experiences that humble us and correct our own bad behaviors as we learn our lessons through the journey of our lives. Sooner or later that folly catches up with them, manifesting outrageous entitlement & selfish arrogance with complete disregard and distain for other people, you see it demonstrated in their interactions with everyday people. The whole lot of that family have outlived and lost any relevancy and honour in our lives and for the country. I remember reading in Kitty Kelly's book "The Royals" how Queen Elizabeth decided to give the palace servants a bag of clothespins for their Christmas gift back in the 60s, that's how miserable & cheap and distainful these people are. I thought I was reading about something that happened during the Victorian Era! "
@@fowchiiiliedpuppiesdied Oh, it's perfectly appropriate to be concerned with Andy the Weasel. I'd like to bring all of the wrongdoers to justice, but at least the young women have some sense of closure with the Andy debacle-one, incidentally, entirely of his own making.
Andrew might or might not have slept with a 17 year old, who boasted to her friends she had been with him, and lots of other important men such as Bill Gates were friends with Epstein. I find it more weird the media never talks about how Prince Andrew who was born 10 years after Queen and Philip stopped sharing a bedroom, and also Prince Edward, look nothing like Charles and Anne. Prince Andrew even has the same green eyes as Lord Porchester and Edward has a small nose like Baron Plunket. If you look at photos of Prince Andrew next to Lord Porchester and Edward next to Baron Plunket and see how similar they look, you must be brainwashed like North Koreans to not see reality. The respected writer Nigel Dempster said many years ago in his book Behind Palace Doors, that when Andrew was born palace staff called him The Love Child. Nigel wrote that it might mean that Queen and Philip started sleeping together again, after sleeping separate for a long time, but if you look at photos you can see reality. Also why are they called Mountbatten? Philip's mother never changed her last name from Battenberg, and why would he use his mother's last name anyway? Is it because the uncle who gave him asylum in Britain after Greece kicked out Philip's family so they were living off rich relatives in France, wanted his name in the royal family? If I even ask people to compare photos of the alleged fathers, some people get angry and act like they're living in North Korea.
I can tell you exactly why he did that interview. He had lied cheated and schemed his entire life and always found a way to weasel out of trouble in the past. No repercussions his entire life. No matter how poor or fanciful the lie, he had likely never been challenged. He still isn't facing any real punishment though so it just goes to show that he had nothing to fear no matter how bad he looked.
Thank you for your comment, sir! Perhaps you might take advantage of a lesson in punctuation, as it's difficut to make heads nor tales of your comments.
@@Starfish2145 don't waste your time. They probably think Radiohead's classic hit song, "Karma Police," is actually titled, "Comma Police," and on top of that, they think they are, "on duty."
The BBC had already made it available. You don't think this little channel put this together do you? This channel isn't even authorized to post such a documentary. It's literally stolen.
@@selmahareI’m American so maybe that’s why I did learn some things about Andrew - some good and some bad. I think he really served his country and put his life on the line even if I don’t understand or support the war he served in. I was shocked that he screwed over his own country with Baharain and even more surprised that politicians in Parliament stood up and said “shouldn’t we be done with” him as trade envoy. Wow. I figured they would handle that in private, I’m pleased they admitted to it publicly.
You are thanking tzhe wrong people. J. O´keefe had NOTHING to do with Channel 4, UK. it is basically stolen, like most videos on YT if it isn´t credited to the original Producer. Haven´t figured it out yet?
Trust me, those two are 100 times worse than Andrew. Andrew is entitled, spoiled and pompous but has always had deep regard for his now late parents and for the monarchy. Harry and Meghan despise the institution and the family that fronts it.
@@zzzbbboooAnd Andrew was close friends with sex offender/traffickers who provided him with underage girls. Yeah, he really has great respect for the monarchy and its institutions. I THINK NOT! There's absolutely no comparison. Andrew is a CRIMINAL. Full stop!
Just to clarify it is claimed at around 10:30 that Andrew's role as a decoy pilot meant he was tasked with taking the impact of missiles. This is not completely accurate. Decoy helicopters during the falklands war were indeed used to draw exorcet missiles away from ships but the pilots were trained in maneuvers which allowed them to draw the missile in at low altitude before ascending and allowing the missile to pass harmlessly beneath the helicopter. The job was certainly brave and certainly dangerous, but not quite as suicidal as described.
so their was no risk of Andrew getting killed whatsoever...playing matadore with a french missile that took out frigates, one would have to have confidence in moving your helicopter in a dance with death...and a lot of daring do brass balls guts...I think the motivator would be they were saving mens lives defeating the missile...
@@michaeldonald4532 I agree that it was ballsy and I never said he wasn’t at risk I was clarifying the quote from the documentary which suggested that his job was to take the impact of the missile which is not exactly accurate. Not diminishing the service of the brave servicemen who flew those missions at all.
@@michaeldonald4532 Funny how you are pretentious enough to write 'one' - 'one would have to have confidence' instead of 'you' but you misuse 'their' instead of 'there' - If you think Andrew was in any danger at all then you are very naive.
Watching him back in his younger days flirting with that Diana look alike interviewer actually makes me feel physically sick. He was and has always been a kinda dorky creep.
Andrew was narcissistic enough to think he could dispel all the allegations swirling around him but he wasn't an adept enough liar to deflect them and only sealed his own fate.
And again another insult to Americans? We are NOT THE IGNORANT MORONIC PEOPLE THAT YOU DARE to portray us as! We loved HMTQ, we aren’t Hollywood, folks. Your cousins you’ve called on TWICE to back you up ( and we have) don’t deserve to be insulted in this way!
Save your praise for people who deserve it. She is part of a mass media, owned, by governments, who are enslaved by their own corruption. They are willing to let Andrew go down, in exchange for many worse, much more dangerous versions, such as anyone with the last name “Clinton”. It is far worse, and far deeper than Andrew. As bad as he may be, he is their scapegoat. The media knows it too. Newsnight is also part of the entire machine. Wake up.
She gave him so many opportunities to express remorse or at least to distance himself from Epstein and he was determined to defend his Convicted Sex Offender friend. #SweatyNonce
I think it’s really sad that in the last two years of her life the Queen had to deal with the loss of her husband, Covid and Andrew’s crap. She must have been just exhausted with it all.
Thank you for uploading. What a fall from Grace...Queen Elizabeth must have been heartbroken to strip every one of Prince Andrew's royal patronages and military titles. As a mother I can't imagine her pain.
Do we really know that though? I mean, just because she gave more attention supposedly than the other children, it doesn’t mean he was indulged by the Queen. In fact, I doubt she was. The lifestyle itself combined with who he was or decided to be as a person is likely what caused him to fall from grace. He is ultimately responsible for his actions we can’t blame anyone else. I would like to believe that he is sorry for what he did, but we will never know, only he knows that and God.
@@lindafogarty3924 the fact that she allowed him to do the interview inside Buckingham palace and he convinced her the interview went well screams indulged privilege to me.
While people parrot on about Harry and Hewitt, when Harry looks like a ginger Charles with his close together eyes and same shade of red hair as Diana's brother, Andrew and Edward look mote like Lord Porchester and Baron Plunkett. Andrew has the same green eyes as Porchester and Edward has a normal nose. Neither of them have the inbred rat faces of Anne and Charles. The respected writer Nigel Dempster wrote in his book Behind Palace Doors, that Andrew was called The Love Child by Palace staff. That book was written in the 90s, and he either thought or was trying to make people think, it was because Queen and Philip got back together after not sharing a bedroom for 10 years after Anne. Yet if you see how similar Andrew and Edward look compared to their alleged fathers, and how close the Queen was to Porchester and Plunket, I think the truth is staring at us.
I had never realized that the interview took place on the Prince of Wales' birthday. In his Golden Child's mind, Andrew was probably thinking: "Ha! It's your birthday but, the media focus is all about me!" And, then, when the interview aired, the PoW probably thought: "How's that working out for you, you precious little prick?!" No one should be at all surprised by Andrew's lack of remorse or apology. The Golden Child is raised to believe he is beyond reproach. Hence, they NEVER apologize.
Your video team is amazing.....lot's of new and great stuff. So well put together.. So worth watching. Love the behind scenes. Remarkable. - CHEERS TEAM.
It would be interesting if Sam and Emily could make an interview With Princes accuser, asking authentic , honest questions About her glorious " carrier" since age of 13 . For example , Asking how a person with no formal education and no work In the last 25 years , lives in 2 mil oceanfront manshion ??🤔 Also , where're her parents while she travelled around the World with much older rich guys and made hundreds of thousends Of $$ ??
Look Andrew is a moron. U call a rapist unbecoming as an gentleman? Maybe if a guy cheats at polo hes unbecoming but sexual assault? Andy COULD of saved himself maybe if he distanced himself and said he got manpulated by upstein.
@@miramaric4383Only interesting to pigs and perverts and apologists. The FBI questioned her and determined she’d been trafficked. Good enough for any decent person.
I just love it when lawyers go crazy screaming to their clients to keep their mouths COMPLETELY SHUT and the idiots are too stupid to listen to accurate council. PRICELE$$.
Well, maybe the producer was right and he did the interview because of the daughter that was getting married. If true, doubtful she would imagine her dad would screw up the interview so royally. Pun intended.
Narcissists can’t help themselves; they have no self-awareness and no empathy, so they say what they feel protects their ego….completely out of touch w how it sounds to those of us w souls.
perhaps, but not at the time when a family is grieving. It wasn't just Andrew walking behind the Queen's coffin. Any other time, yes, heckle him, boo him, but maybe not at a funeral.
@@graphiquejackTough shit. Your constant double standards about manners and appropriateness are bollocks. Andrew deserves it regardless. 100% behind that guy. Never seen any manners from Andrew yet.
Well they contextualize it. Especially when they say for normal people he was provided a lot of money but not in comparison to the lifestyle he desired. Obviously in terms of family he is wealthy but not on the scale of the life he wanted.
@@miramaric4383idk, if I keep spending all my money but my mommy keeps filling my bank account, I'd safely call myself rich, and so would anyone with a brain.
What hell those girls were put through!!😭 Frankly, I am amazed at Mrs. Giuffre's courage to make herself and her tragic story known to the entire world. I agree with another commenter, @Carlos Martinez, that if Andrew were not a royal, the British government would have extradited Andrew to the US for a trial.
Those girls are whores and liars only into the money. Fancy that they weren't raped by some poor trailer park fat redneck in Mississippi. It's always some extremely rich man who rapes them and it was so bad they went back to be raped over and over. Not once did she say she was chained to a wall and forced. It's vile what's been done to my Prince and to her late Majesty in her last years
Impressive Documentary! The hard working team that put it together deserve many, many accolades. I was riveted & plan on watching it again. Thumbs up... 👍
Well………..huh. My hat is off sky high to the two women who were willing to speak at length on camera about landing and completing this horribly uncomfortable, unbelievable interview. I really felt for Mrs. Guiffre throughout her entire ordeal and sickened by powerful, super rich men who get away with such terrible vile actions towards women and underage girls who lack the power to do anything about it, and that her lawyers were such great advocates for her. I’m going to have to watch this again to take it all in.
Really you should feel sorry for the women that Virginia trafficked who are currently suing her as we write this. These were the same little girls that Virginia called up to brag how she had bagged a prince. The same little girls whom she abandoned after she ran off to get married at 17.. the same age as when she bagged her prince.
I know what you mean. After the FBI reported that the ‘bones of dozens of children’ were found at the tip of Epstein Island, I have a video to watch of guys who got inside the domed structure but still haven’t watched because of dread. It was distressing hearing Andrew had let Ghislaine Maxwell sit on the throne! Disgusting picture!
I'm always baffled that no one seems to recognize that Princess Anne was overlooked entirely. And she must have felt that way since she is doing all kinds of male traditional stuff now. Yet, she turned out to be the most loyal of them all.
I stumbled across one of her interviews a short while back and I thought she was the most suitable candidate to inherit the throne out of all of them - intelligent, eloquent, practical, responsible. I'm not a big fan of monarchy but if I had to choose one of them to represent the royal family, I'd choose her.
@@nado5918 You are right, I agree. The only thing she is lacking is a bit of glamour. She always looks very uncomfortable in an evening dress, which is a pity as this is a large part of the job...
He could have been a real inspiration. His military service was the real deal, and he was great taking charge when Windsor caught fire. He squandered every good thing he had in his life. What a waste.
The attorney, Paul Tweed, was born in Northern Ireland and therefore is British (though he may hold citizenship elsewhere, too). Many natives of Northern Ireland have an accent that contains echoes of Scots accent, the result of the forcible “plantation” of Presbyterian Scots into Ulster, the northern province of the island of Ireland, more than 400 years ago. I have no information concerning Paul Tweed’s own family or religious background, however.
The thing that was just so amazing was that he seemed to think that people would just believe him. I don't, or I hope the majority of the royal family isn't stuck I the 19th century like Andrew.
He's revolting and I have no sympathy for him, nor do I ever want him to be seen or involved with public life of any sort again, but one thing was said in the end that was quite true... it's unfair that he alone is the one whose life is ruined. There are many men who have been associated or accused alongside Epstein and they are still walking free, and that is a great injustice. Great doco... thanks for sharing.
Why is it so shocking that Andrew should have a relationship with Epstein but nobody says anything about Charles and Jimmy Saville? What about all the other people on Epstein's list, why are they let off the hook? I smell a cover up
You are absolutely right. The company we keep reflects who we are, and these two failsons kept the company of open secret pedophiles and rapists. They're either equally despicable or so brainless it should disqualify them from public life.
Because no one has accused Charles of sexual misconduct with someone Savile procured. Friendship isn’t the source of our disgust. Andrew has no judgement. The FBI have determined that Ms Giufrre WAS trafficked. Stop distracting and comparing apples and oranges. You are not in good faith.
I could imagine as a mother that the queen asked Andrew early on “what is going on?” And she believed what he told her. And then later, not s much. The queen was heavily criticized for her enabling of andrews behavior but I believe she was deceived. Andrew showed an appalling lack of respect for his elderly mother as well as Virginia guiffre
Of course he lied to her, but come on. The facts were out there. She reads the papers, and she wasn't a nut. She's not going to believe that the entire world is lying, except for her precious baby. She simply wanted to indulge him.
@@laurabattey No, she stripped him of his power after the newspapers came out, did you not see that in the documentary? He obviously lied to her up until the point of the documentary release and the papers the next day. Then he got stripped of power right after when the queen realised he was lying about it all.
If my husband was accused of something like this and he told me he didn’t do it who would I believe? But when I hear the same thing from multiple sources I start to ask more pointed questions. I think the queen reached that point. Not only did he have sec with an underaged girl but he lied to his elderly mother
The reason he brought his daughter is to create a perception of innocent...."I am a father, I would never do that." And to disarm the host/ interviewer/ situation/ questioner.
Bizarrely i'm not convinced he and Sarah have ever actually 'split up'but rather they are as deeply connected as ever, and either she is acting as his mother or they have an open relationship.
Apparently, it was Prince Philip who probably demanded that they divorce. Clearly, they didn't want to and were fine with their relationship as it was.
I'm of the opposite conviction, I don't think they were ever really "together" as more than friends and a convenient breeding partnership. The royals clearly don't marry for love, they have to choose the least controversial third cousin they can stand and keep a stiff upper lip
Virgin dufrey had her father and boyfriend delivering her for the so called parties. Why havnt any of the other high profile names been outed?? That’s a bit strange don’t you think?.
Of course he did the interview! Royalty, by nature, is ripe for having narcissist tendencies. By definition, a royal is the last word and in charge, no matter what counsel they are given. And of course Andrew would think his charm and denials would carry the day.
The irony that this very interview was what started the civil case.. so for that reason, Thankyou Sam and Emily.. The irony also, that these royal reporters all knew what Andrew was doing, for decades, and still say nothing is disgusting.
I would never defend someone who is clearly so guilty. He paid a hefty price to make this go away. The payment equals guilt. Anyone else would be arrested. I feel bad for his daughters.
Civil court was her only remedy. Under the law that extends the statute of limitations she could bring civil action until she’s 55 but criminal actions the SOL runs from when she’s 23. She’s 39 so it’s long run. The evidence against him to convict him beyond s reasonable doubt is also unlikely but on a preponderance there was a good chance. Sometimes it isn’t greed but practicality.
He was not criminally charged nor proven guilty . Settlement is NOT admission of guilt . Waste majority Of civil cases ends up with settlement for various reasons .
@@miramaric4383he said he never even met his accuser. If that’s the case, I would have charged into court and claimed my innocence. He has a police detail following him everywhere to confirm, right? No doubt the accuser wanted money and probably justice. She could also be right. We won’t know… Andrew’s story that he gave would have meant an easy day in court for him, odd he didn’t go to court. Has he had so much sex with young women he just can’t remember them all? Idk I remember who I have sex with so maybe I’m biased.
Been waiting for this to hit RU-vid...FANTASTIC!!!...The girl who brought down a Prince and a Journalist who put the Cherry on the cake! Genius, THE SCOOP OF THE CENTURY!
The journalist to be credited should be Julie K Brown.... Julie researched why justice hadnt been served for 143 named girls... Julie researched those names and found all the girls The 1st complaints were lodged in 1995! There were some revealing victim interviews, on a YT channel, that coincidentally crashed 1 month prior to maxwells trial.... Channel owner could restart, but without the epstein files!....
Oh. It's legal issue ladies and gentlemen The difference is that RFM do not focus on legal subjects so they can act wisely answer wisely despite the simplicity of facts.
That interview was like the switch for his downfall and his ultimate total destruction... I wasn't fully convinced abt all the allegations until I watched that train wreck disastrous interview..the whole time I was squeezing my fist and pillow watching it in the most cringing manner!!! it just backfired 1miilion times. I can imagine what Charles had told him right after the interview, the screaming in fury and the yelling would be unbelievable.
Me too. I didn't want to believe it. The bloody bastard is my age, I thought he was hot (although I really liked Charles). He's a bugger alright. Glad the Queen took away his Titles before Charles made it in. I'm afraid Charles would not have the strength to take him down. He's a bit slippery.
@@dunbarnoon9872 I don't think the other Royals (other than the Queen) were consulted. Andrew wanted to "clear his name" and he, the favorite son, asked his doting mummy's permission, which, as always, she granted. That's probably all there was to it.
Because until Parliament made a change to the succession, only male heirs were allowed to be crowned king. Now starting with Prince William the line of succession has changed to allow Princess Charlotte a place in line.
Dear Mr. Tweed: You said Andrew would be "fighting to clear his name". That photo of PA and his arm around Virginia's waist would not have cleared his name. It would have cemented his name as a pedo. He shouldn't have done the interview with Emily Maitlis, that's for sure. But paying off Virginia was the best way to stop this because PA would have lost in court. I can guarantee you of that. That photo alone would have taken him down.
Such a good looking dapper young man with movie star qualities. A shame he did what he did and made such bad decisions. He should have learned to grow old graciously. All of the poor victims and he did it.
He did not abuse anyone . Woman was a juvenile Prostitute since age of 13 . Conveniently converted Her regular " bussiness" in to victimhood to get money , Plain and simple .
Goodness, you can see wee Louis in him when we was a toddler. He is a lot brighter than school showed. Helicopter piloting takes brains. The standard is incredibly high. Huh. Harvey at the party too. Very informative and balanced vid. Thanks.
Dickie, He DID commit a crime, he just wasn't charged with it in a court of law. He settled the lawsuit that was what kept him quiet and not having to answer. Really, Dickie, after Jimmy Savile and the rest, you should know better.
If one cannot produce sweat, perhaps due to a traumatic incident in the Faulklands ... would such an unfortunate individual succumb to exhaustion if dancing at a club ?😅😅
Andrew in that interview stumbling over his words was just cosmic justice for those girls (now women) he violated. His arrogance and ignorance led him to that chair to be picked apart by someone smarter than him. I’m sure his victims got no closer at all from it, I do hope it was at least a little satisfying to see. A pompous man realizing he’s dumber than he knew in real time is now out there for literally anyone to see for eternity. I do feel sorry for his family that had nothing to do with any of that. Prince Andrew is ruined basically forever. He’s so infamous that nobody alive today will ever forget his name, and most of us have never heard of him until all this come about.
This is how an interview should be done. Can you see how the interview would be a fluff piece if she caved in in the beginning when he wanted soft ball questions. She declined and that was that. Then he agrees, and history is made.
Shocking and revealing start!!! Amazingly produced, which makes it more interesting and also entertaining. Really telling about what seems a kind of simplistic way of thinking when he says: "I think the rich people can learn a great deal from the less fortunate people and I think also the less fortunate can learn something from the upper class".
What we've learnt is that no amount of mummys money can make this go away. He is tainted forever. But thanks Andrew, as a poor person thats good to know.
Lots of people are going hysterical that Prince Andrew might have slept with a 17 year old who happily bragged to her friends she was with him. While nobody cares Bill Gates and Clinton were friends with the same man. Also Prince Andrew was single, while the Queen was married when she had Andrew with Lord Porchester and Edward with Baron Plunket. You only need to look at photos of them compared to the alleged fathers. While people would rather parrot on about Harry and Hewitt, when Harry looks like a ginger Charles with his close together eyes and same shade of red hair as Diana's brother, but Andrew and Edward look mote like Porchester and Plunkett. Andrew has the same green eyes and Edward has a normal nose. Neither of them have the inbred rat faces of Anne and Charles. The respected writer Nigel Dempster wrote in his book Behind Palace Doors, that Andrew was called The Love Child by Palace staff. That book was written in the 90s, and he either thought or was trying to make people think, it was because Queen and Philip got back together after not sharing a bedroom for 10 years after Anne. Yet if you see how similar Andrew and Edward look compared to their alleged fathers, and how close the Queen was to Porchester and Plunket, I think the truth is staring at us. Yet people would rather parrot on about Prince Harry and Hewitt, when Harry looks like a ginger Charles with his close together eyes, and has the same shade of red hair as Diana's brother. It's like Americans who chanted on against Commies in the 1980s, while in the 1980s the USA government were arming and training religious extremists in Afghanistan against Russia. Then after Russia left Afghanistan, the USA didn't care what the extremists they helped take over were doing in Afghanistan all through the 90s, until 9/11 in 2001. Now people come up with all kinds of theories about 9/11 which are dismissed as they can't prove it, while despite their own people being harmed, people ignore obvious historical facts about how the USA have helped extremists get into power. Same as how when people are harmed by extremists who trained in Libya after Gaddafi was killed, no media reminds people of when the British secret service whistle blower David Shayler told how the USA and Britain were funding Al Qaeda in Libya to kill Gaddafi.
@@anastasia10017 Yeah, what he said is true but he said it in a way that reveals that he absolutely didn't mean it and didn't know what he was talking about.
@@anastasia10017 There isn't. He only has a "fortune" because the aggravated taxes of the "less fortunate" pay for his ridiculous lifestyle and the crimes he committed. The "less fortunate" are just duped into thinking that the "fortunate" mean anything to them.
