Angry Pilot Lines Up Too Close 

just runway rage , there is no road there

It seems like roadrage except that airplains can't see behind them, so there's no way to for the lead airplane to have any clue what the airplane is doing behind them, but then I thought maybe the road rage is being directed at the tower controller for being to slow since the controller would see what we are seeing in the video the the road rage pilot would be well aware the plane in front of them can't see anything behind

That proximity could lead to malfunction or defect of some instruments or plastics / paint. I suspect someone lost his job because of a traffic incident..

@@forgotten_world I doubt anyone lost their job. The biggest risk is foreign object ingestion.

“Testosteroni overload”?

Exactly what I thought...

It's an aircraft too. Someone could also drop a phone while taking a helicopter ride, lose a GoPro off their little Cessna or have something fly out of the cockpit when taxiing with the doors open for air. I imagine balloons are considered like submarines are in terms of right of way: everything gets out of their way.

Never mind a fecking cellphone - these fellas were BUNGEE JUMPERS! Booooiiiiinnnnnngg - aaaaaarrrrgh - stretchhhh - splat; ingested into a airliner jet engine!

FOD? whats that

I was thinking more about the fire going out *weeeee smash into plane*

It does😂

LMAO 🤣

It was sweet right?

Isn’t that a common joke between navy and airforce pilots ? T He navy have to be better at navigation since they cannot use highway signs to know where they are going….

It's not super shocking if you're only flying 1600 ft in a PA38. That thing is like a car from the Flintstones.

@@rixxy9204 Expensive whistles and bells I don't want or need.

I would have thought that airspace to be restricted to aircraft using the airfield, unless he had ATC permission. Lucky you, either way! t. non-pilot. Edit: Disregard. From commenter “photonsfromthesun” below; "LAX in los angeles has a route that GA aircraft can take to get across the airspace without controllers guiding you and you just fly directly perpendicular across the middle of the runways and the lowest option is only 2500 ft above the runway! You can look up "how to fly vfr over LAX" its pretty cool”. Cheers!

@@jayhache5609 I was going to say "It was the mid 70s" but it seems that it is still currently allowed, thanks

I think Aviation101 has a video of him doing this exact flight.

Cool story!

As a controller now, a lot of times the easiest place to put transitioning planes is right across the field since everybody else is landing or taking off

Found you

@@EggsAviation nice

💀💀💀

@@EggsAviation aha

Omg

As people that pretend everyone behind them must stay behind because they are selfish and slow like a snail with mental illness!

A hurry never is good in aviation.

In aviation, safety always comes first

I have a saying for that. “But it’s me”, you can almost hear them.

You should. Everything you have and take for granted is because of those people. Have you contributed anything back to their lives?

They have very common extreme wind and weather conditions, and in that sense, people who work in those conditions come out typically as better pilots just by pure experience. I've seen so many people in modern airplanes just jump for the autopilot without fully appreciating the plane, it makes me sad.

- That's what you call a proper TAILgating 😛

That was Arkansas State Troopers and just before the cameraman started filming they performed a perfectly executed P.I.T. manoeuvre on that MAL A350!

Never knew there was such a thing as a 'sheriff' in the UK lol

​@@Kuricang31 What about in Nottingham?

😊❤

It’s very common practice at many airports to line up planes behind departing planes to increase the take off rate. Especially if there’s a heavy, they may line them up at the beginning and have multiple smaller planes take off in front as there is a larger separation time if they were to let a heavy go prior to smaller planes

@@argh._ It is NOT common... You haven't got a clue and are obviously not a pilot. ..And never will be... True???

19 passengers died in minnesota because a pilot had anger issues. He was intimidating and insulting his co pilot throughout the flight and then during the landing the 25 yo co pilot was afraid to speak up and therefore did not call out the altitude and the plane rolled then crashed. it was an episode on mayday disasters. very informative show

@@onetransam1998 I saw that episode I think the captain was a sociopath

"Because of the weather" he was stupid enough. . You haven't got a clue. .. You are obviously not a pilot. So why comment? ???v

That was my question too!

its not like it decides where it wants to go

Probably for the same reason balloon pilots get tested over runway and taxiway markings - they are aircraft.

Balloons are like submarines in terms of right of way. Everything must get out of their way.

@@DUKEisALIVE Exactly they go where the wind pushes them and can't be controlled in any meaningful way.

probably but it was sweeden they kinda make there own rules as they go

@@roobear78 Sweeden is actually spelled Sweeeeeeddddeneneneeneeeneenenenenenneeeeeeeeeen

I imagine they had enough vertical separation for VFR.

Hot air balloons have right of way over powered, heavier than air, aircraft. It looks like a smaller airport so if the cargo plane is departing VFR, then this would be fine. That being said, I bet the balloon pilot was a bit stressed!

I found it counter intuitive but the air space about a mile directly above an active runway is usually the clearest and safest, on either end of the runway aircraft can be at all sorts of elevations but right above the runway they are all much closer to the ground I think most go arounds happen much lower than a mile high which this Balloon seems to be. LAX in los angeles has a route that GA aircraft can take to get across the airspace without controllers guiding you and you just fly directly perpendicular across the middle of the runways and the lowest option is only 2500 ft above the runway! You can loom up "how to fly vfr over LAX" its pretty cool

Back to the Sim after that one I think!

@@hamsterminator back to Ryanair

No pilot in their right state of mind would even think about entering a runway without ATC instruction. This type of manuever is done all the time at busy airports. Line Up and Waits are given before the departing aircraft even begins their rollouts. Plus this is an A350, the wake from the A320 is like a baby pushing an adult. It doesn't affect anything.

@@SEAAviator What about Jetblast blowing onto the nose of that A350 at full power?

@@SEAAviatorIt affects! You are absolutely wrong! During taxi we maintain minimum 50 m distance from aircraft in front! In case of line up we maintain a minimum 200 m distance from aircraft taking off!

@@kaesarromanova1876 What type do you fly?

@@SEAAviator A330

❤❤❤

yeah puts me off too, a bit annoying childish approach to these headlines.

Saw this live on BJTV no evidence of anger at the time.

shameful act, his license should be suspended. this make me think twice to fly MAS, more expensive national carrier

That was one dicked up mess. Once on the ground, LEAVE it there. OK, MeppyMan, I'll play. 34 years of flying these things including the B777. Look at the video again. At 59 seconds you see the VASI lights, so I do in fact know how far down the runway they were. The 777 has astonishing brakes even at heavy weights. You can stop one easily in 5000 feet. So I seriously doubt the available runway was the issue. Moden fadec-controlled fan engines do not need "spool-up time". You can be in the flare and power out of a landing with ease, especially when at much lighter landing weights. After all, this plane can fly on ONE engine with 300,000 more pounds of fuel onboard than this was one carrying while flying on two. Speed? Not likely an issue since the landing speed is approx 20-30 percent higher than the stall speed. Once you cobb the throttles, any low airspeed problems you might have will go away FAST in a triple at landing weights. And, what's the procedure for a Go-Around? "Going-Around, TOGA, Flaps 15, Pos Rate, Gear Up...." Did the flaps ever retract on the Go? Nope. The plane was over-controlled and all over the place from flare to GA. I'll stand by my opinion. That was one dicked-up mess.

yeah.. they could have just put that nose down and the landing would be fine.

Too far down the runway and probably too fast. Go around

@@lbowskyou do realise that they likely made the decision to go around before they touched down. It takes time for the engines to spool back up and airspeed to increase. You also have no idea how far down the runway they are, or their speed,or anything else that might have contributed to the decision. I hope you’re not an airline pilot, but if you are I’d love for you to correct me.

@@MeppyMan I'll have to agree with Ibowsk, the pilot was not good. Ok, it's fine and I'm sure he wanted to play it safe by doing a go-around, and yes we don't totally know all the details, but just by looking at the landing you can clearly see that this pilot didn't really know what he was doing. Watch the Bhutan airline pilot and see the difference.

Correct 👍

Ikr. Pretty sure they only move after they have received instruction from the tower

Yeah I figured it must have been something like that.

That is not true. The BA jet took off and then the Malaysia took off. I watched it live on Big Jet TV on May 7, 2023 (from which this video came from).

No matter what the situation was at LHR , It’s not safe to do that … risk of damage to the aircraft. Small hole in the fuselage, damage to the angle of attack indicator etc … and who knows what could have happened to the aircraft.

Haha😂.. Tehegeh hegeh, meh kita cocok dia. 😂

Kat jalan pun duk cucuk2 apatah atas runway lagi 😂

At airports like LHR and LAX they sometimes give line up and wait clearance immediately after they give t/o clearance, before the a/c in front of you has begun their t/o roll, and they can get tetchy if you delay your line up and wait instruction. That move was still very inappropriate, unreasonable, and risky, but it might have been a misguided attempt to do something out of respect or obedience, or out of fear of losing their slot because of close approaching traffic. Not the strongest likelihood, and none of those are excuses for that move, but we don't know what we don't know, and we don't know what motivated that pilot.

@@beenaplumber8379 pilot was me, i needed to t/o immeditaly and get auto pilot rolling so i can take a shit

Are you suggesting this channel puts misleading sensationalistic titles on its videos to get clicks? Good point.

I don’t think that’s true, the A320 was obviously taking off from 27R

I guarantee this was not an angry pilot. Probably given clearance to line up and wait behind departing airplane. Most pilots would wait a bit to maintain more clearance.

@@spinglobe1 ALL professional pilots would not do that..... The clearance is AFTER THE DEPARTING....the preceeding aircraft was STILL THERE. Malaysia Airlines have an appalling safety record and culture. You can see why ! Only 3 SAFETY STARS OUT OF 7. Fact not opinion. Not my sort of airmanship and no professionalism. .

@@daftvader4218you always like to pretend you are a pilot, but you always make mistakes and show you are not. In Europe, you can indeed receive a clearance to line up behind another aircraft and both sit and wait. The preceding traffic is getting an intersection take off. Having said that, this was a bit close, most pilots would’ve waited a bit.

For large airports, having the VFR traffic passing over right in the middle of the runway is the least disruptive scenario. It won't interfere with the departures or arrivals. That's what they generally want us to do when we request to cross their CTR with a small plane. But to have a balloon do exactly that, you need a good crosswind ... and a bit of luck for the trajectory to make it work.

Wrong., that was very skilled. Instantaneous reaction and counter. Fighter pilot instincts likely kicked in on that pull up, but he insured to gain speed before performing that manoeuvre. In any case very safe despite the 'show'.

@@ahm_767 there is ZERO need to perform agro maneuvers - unless the ship is heading towards a collision (which its not) - in a LOW energy state this is a BAD IDEA

at least not as bad as the malaysian airlines pilots

Late flare, excessive rate of descent. Control input is needed to counteract gusts, etc.

Put down the crack pipe.

Just looked at the airport in google earth and they're already there. Ten twin turboprops in total. If I had to guess I'd say they're all Saab 340.

You're the ATC one mate. You're the one who should've reported one of your colleagues who directed the MH A350 onto the runway instead of the pilot

@@Kuricang31 Line up AFTER the departing aircraft. ... That is the clearance. .after the departing ......BA had not departed. Nobody expects an idiot to line up that close....not the sort of appalling airmanship and professionalism that that is expected. Listen to those plane spotters !! You are obviously not a pilot....

Also highly illegal. Britain is weird.

what a wild ride lol. especially that take off when you have zero idea what is going on. Hopefully the pilots verbalized the maneuver

​@@sirus312I'm sure they did. But I hope they kept the mic off.

*passengers

Japs have hentai and manga. They have seen worst

Thanks for that... You know what your talking about.. Not like these ignorant armchairs.

I found it counter intuitive but the air space about a mile directly above an active runway is usually the clearest and safest, on either end of the runway aircraft can be at all sorts of elevations but right above the runway they are all much closer to the ground I think most go arounds happen much lower than a mile high which this Ballon seems to be

chill.

You're so full of it, take an exlax

Do you think balloons have some means to steer? They don't. Other than changing altitude to possibly catch wind going in a different direction, they have no control of where they go. This is well known. Balloons have the right of way. I guarantee you that the airport knew they were going to overfly the airport well in advance and planned accordingly.

I once was clrd to cross CTR over treshold of the runway. There was a landing a320 and the atc gave them the clrc for go-around "in case of GA left turn 020 due to traffic crossing the treshold at 2000ft." So i think everything is possible even if its not standart. Maybe this example cleares it;)

No. Please do not talk about things you do not know about. Heathrow operates on an MROT philosophy.

I obviously can’t hear what was said on radio, but even MROT says to “maintain safe separation”. I’ve been flying mostly helicopters for 20 years, and mostly in the US, but I just can’t imagine being directly behind another jet during TOGO power would be considered safe.

This rule never existed, conditional clearances allow multiple trafic on the active

@@hyrrokinfamily i agree, years ago i was on an 747 waiting to take off right at the start of the runway and an easy jet plane turned onto the runway a few exits in front, maybe a few hundred meters in front and went first

​@@charlesjay8818A few hundred metres is fine, this is 20 metres

Well it was not brain damage... Nothing to damage! !!!#!

It's not playing online.

No, there is no rule about one plane on a runway at a time

The exhaust is from one of the engines. The hole is the exhaust port for the auxiliary power unit, which is used sometimes when the plane is parked.

Especially when it comes to pitot tube covers........ Appalling airmanship. ..