Ever wondered how animatronic dinosaurs are made? Get the full history and the 'making of right' here. Subscribe to Discovery UK for more great clips: ru-vid.com_c... Follow Discovery UK on Twitter: / discoveryuk
Nova 147 Technically it’s more like a Utahraptor than a velociraptor, but they call it velociraptor because they have no knowledge of dinosaurs whatsoever.
Hah the kind of clay there using is made for mold making and effects it’s very unique and can be melted with heat and hardens at room temperature. Draw with jazza Has a video of him using the stuff.
This. This is my childhood. Whenever I was sick, we’d put How It’s Made on. This episode was my favourite. Thank you, How It’s Made, for being ,weirdly enough, my childhood.
@@user_28943 What? Sorry dude, I was just talking about how I loved How It’s Made when I was younger. Apologies that I triggered you with a cliché. Why are you so bothered by that?
Imagine in the distance future, all of humanity go extinct and little intelligent gremlins rule the earth. And they just create humanoid robots based off our skeletonal remains, just for entertainment purposes.
Can we FIRE whoever it was that decided that, after 7 minutes of building the animatronic, we'd only see SEVEN SECONDS of the finished product in a small shrunken frame, please?
@@MrKlausbaudelaire Very, considering actual velociraptors are a fraction of the size of their JP counterparts & were basically angry chickens. More likely, they've used teeth based on the Utahraptor.
@@MrKlausbaudelaire except they're not. While there are similarities between the JP raptors & Utahraptors, as well as the deinonychus, the JP raptors are not accurate to any dinosaur that ever existed
Ya the incorrect naming hints towards that Not that I blame them this was made very well I've actually that Jim Kirkland, they guy that found Utahraptor, the correct naming
No, i am a triggered Dino fan here because they called it a Velociraptor. Its a fucking Utahraptor, Velos had a head shapes more like an Austroraptor, And were much much smaller. JP velos Are also inaccurate.
Andre studios yes, I did. It’s impressive work. However, that does not negate how it should have feathers, or else it shouldn’t be labeled as a velociraptor. It’s perfectly ok to appreciate and criticize something at the same time. Don’t get me wrong, it still is very fun.
Why does everyone point out that this is not what velociraptor looks like? We know! It’s a Jurassic park recreation, obviously not going to be accurate chicken with feathers!
@@kaistzar2831 Exactly! That's such an anatomically incorrect raptor! It's hands are in the wrong position, it's colors are waaay too muted and it had feathers.
@@manuelcaycedo561 There's so many other jobs that are much more readily available to me, and it might be a bit difficult to get in for "Just a few weeks of hanging out". I'll try it out, like a buncha other things! But it likely won't work out the way I expect it to! Maybe I could try making my own project or helping a friend with their s someday, I dunno!
tends to be a lot more complicated to recreate humans convincingly in any medium, due to how hardwired we are to focus on faces. Leads to what's called the uncanny valley
@@Rachett969 We can recreate humans, but the only issue is that due to this pesky thing called the uncanny valley, you end up with someone who looks like they have been possessed by a demon.
Okay, as an animatronic creator myself, it annoys me a smidge when the narrator states that the cylinders are pneumatic, explains that they work on compressed air, and then ten seconds after calls them hydraulic... and as far as I can see, and true to the first statement, the character is completely pneumatically operated. So how could you get mixed up and say that they are testing the "hydraulic" components.. It's a whole different cylinder and is powered by the pressure and flow of liquid, not air! Sorry for the rant, I just thought I'd point it out. Everyone is talking about the fact that it isn't a Velociraptor or whatever but I just couldn't let this slide 😂
Because those are the raptors from Jurassic Park, they used to use animatronic dinosaurs for the movie & by the way the movie said to complete the incomplete DNA they used others animals DNA like amphibians. Their DNA is impure.
Then don't watch stuff like this if it's gonna gives you a panick attack. I get those but only certain things trigger my anxiety attacks but not this. This would never trigger me an anxiety attack.
Totally awesome!! And if anyone is interested Design Toscano sells outdoor dino sculptures, tho they are of course not animated or as neat as this example.
@@velocityraptor9270 they used them in jwfk actually and are going to use them again in jw 3 which means the first Jurassic world is the only one to fully use CGI
The wrists are wrong I think, I remember reading that this is not how the wrists normally rest... because it would mean they are broken. Either way, the craftmanship is great! And it moves as well!!!! Love it
What was this animatronic made for? It seems far too complex for the average museum, but I don't recognize it from any movies or theme parks. Also, who was it made by?
This figure was created by Garner Holt Productions. They are responsible for many disney animatronics, universal, Chuck e cheese (studio C), and many other theme parks and attractions.
I keep seeing people in the comments saying this is going to a museum, and I'd like to know too. like not even touching the feathers thing, it has egregious broken arms with no "but my childhood lizard dino monsters waah" reason a museum would be okay with if they're ordering custom sculpted raptors at this price point.
some did have bony structures that were used to create sound. Parasaurolopus for example, these head pieces were remodeled and then later pushed air through to create sound. This is not completely acurate though as we don't know how they controlled this themselves, so it's more guesswork. they actually show this in the first Jurassic park movie (raptor).
Using dinosaur's modern relatives and other animals, scientist have figured out that tyrannosaurus had more of a super deep growl like a crocodile instead of roar, and that Brachiosaurus sounds from Jurassic Park are actually quite accurate to their noise
@@kayleighbuys585 True, since fossils generally only show bone structure we have no idea of the exact shape and structure of the more fleshy parts of the respiratory system (technically vocal chords can be considered as a part of the respiratory system even if you don't need them for respiration) and sinuses which affect the exact range of sounds a creature can create. There was someone once who actually showed how different a creature can sound with the same skull if only the sinus cavity is altered slightly by thickness of membranes or additional fleshy tissue partitions (which I guess some animals have, don't know which though). That isn't even including what kind of vocal cords they have which can also greatly alter the types of sound they make and we can never know because that kind of flesh is not fossilized in any case except perhaps true petrification. Even some animals that have fairly recently become extinct we don't know what sounds they made because often the people who hunted them didn't think to record it by writing accurately about it let alone audibly recording it. All that was usually preserved was hide and bone, which is about the same as fossils are in judging how they would have sounded.
I know this is an unpopular opinion because of how lame it is, but I'm pretty sure they couldn't roar like in the movies. Actually, im pretty sure they couldn't roar at all due to weaker vocal cords. They probably didn't sound too much different from modern birds and lizards.
