@@donkeydongle3691 only if you're playing an idiot that doesn't know how to properly play aggro. I've been an aggroburn player since Yu-Gi-Oh in 2004. The biggest problem has always been healing and "walls"(mtg term) board wipes are easy to play around
Chat: omg aggro bad, unfollow Also chat: every game back seat gaming that would be huge missplay. People always think aggro is easy to play then they try it and get baited into bad plays and lose
I think I watched this already but it popped up in recommended again and I just had to comment this is one of the best thumbnails on the channel. The editors have ascended
I'm curious : how do you know the difference between a sniper or someone who's just playing around cards? And this one is for the snipers : Why? Is it worth it?
> how do you know the difference between a sniper or someone who's just playing around cards? I'm guessing that they play around the cards you have in hand, while they don't play around the cards you don't have in hand. So if your deck has 3 copies of both card A and B, and they play around the third copy of A you drew, but they don't play around the first copy of B you haven't drawn yet, that's a guaranteed sniper.
Sniping is less about playing around the cards they *do* have and more about *not* playing around the cards they *don't* have, when normally you'd need to respect the possibility that they have those cards in hand. And while I'm not a sniper, it seems like the primary benefits of doing it would be: free/easy wins, satisfaction from hurting others, and the fame (or imfamy) from showing up on a content creator's content
@@hendrialbaihaqi6992 You not understand me, me talking of top winrate Annie deck which has over 54% winrate. Imagine think overturned solitaire deck doesn't need a nerf in an aggro/viego/thralls meta