Its so incredible what apple can do with their control over the entire process whereas Microsoft can't put all or even most of their effort into windows on arm
@@thevisi0naryy did this channel verify wether the “vague” claims were true or false? Guess ranting is much easier to do than actually backing up your rant 😂
0.5 Ghz Apple CPUs, only $1399, your left arm and your first born child** *We would have also charged you your kidney, but we were feeling generous today *Processor pins not included
@@velxcity07 It’s that convenience of being able to upgrade without buying a whole new computer that’s a deal breaker for some people. They could’ve bought it when they were in a less power-hungry mindset, and then wanted to upgrade afterwards.
I’m as big a Linus fan as the next guy... but I’m sorry this was a really bad take. Poorly informed and making speculative assumptions. I expected much more from this channel.
I wouldn't say I'm a fan, but I also don't see where he makes speculative assumptions other than at the end where he says "bold prediction" and even then it was based on apples history of bad gen 1 support.
@@danielhu6485 He went off on a rant about a product he hadn't used, clearly didn't understand just to get his user base that are largely Mac haters to get "likes" and "Views". He is well aware that his viewers hate Mac so its easy money. I guess his reputation at this point means little considering his recent clusterfuck (and follow up attempted apology) with Tim Sweeney and the PS5 SSD speed. Many reviews have come out today/yesterday about the new Mac hardware and it wipes the floor with current Intel CPUs and takes them to school. :)
@@WhiteEvo6 Ok, so exactly what part of his rant was wrong? I keep seeing pple saying “this hasn’t aged well,” but what aspect exactly in this video was “wrong”? Do pple hate it simply because it was negative??
He made speculative assumptions based on the horrendously vague "performance" graphs Apple showed in their presentations. Much like those "Performs better than the top detergent" commercials with no actual relevant information, just vague marketing nonsense.
@@wayward03 did they fix that chip that keeps breaking yet? Or move the two pins away from each other so the power pin doesn't fry the fuck out of the CPU data pin?
"We are oh so environmentally friendly!" Says the company scrapping a whole motherboard with CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD and who knows what else soldered into it if a single capacitor blows up.
How often does these SoC boards fail? Or rather, how often do they fail due to something other than user error, i.e. liquid damage? Louis R. would still be able to swap out a blown cap or corroded connector if it's accessible, even on these new boards - authorised repair shops would swap the whole board anyway regardless if it's Intel or AS, right? Apple removing the charger from the latest iPhone box saves a lot on shipping and CO2 emissions - having a couple thousand extra boards saved from recycling due to everyone being able to swap out the M1 or T2 chip isn't even a drop in the ocean compared. Also, authorised repair shops would be able to document their recycling so that the components goes back into the loop - how are unauthorised repair shops able to recycle whatever they eventually end up not using?
This take on Apple Silicon smells strangely similar to Steve Ballmer's take on the iPhone. I don't think this video will age well. Intel, AMD, and Nvidia all need to double-down on development. At least Nvidia had the sense to buy ARM knowing they needed to play catch up even before M1 was announced to the public. For the first time in history, a single company is going to produce everything that goes inside the computer chassis - it just took this long to get here.
@@syn010110 You have choice because of capitalism. This to be fair is closer to a communistic production system. Anyway, I think it is great one company can do it in house. So much more efficient. I think you need to read up on capitalism / communism.
@@nickthaskater basically this. Apple was expecting much more efficient chip from intel so they designed their chassis accordingly and then intel just failed to deliver by making their 14nm+++++ chips. Rather than engineer another chassis to cover intel's fuck up, they used the same chassis and decided to start work on their own chips.
@@devnull436 you use Chrome. That’s just another way of saying that your knowledge on how things work in the tech industry is on par with a 4 year old. If I be generous about it.
@@devindykstra but we need to protect our planet. what if someone took the chassey and replaced it with a poisoned plastic on EW. that's for our protection you idiot (YES I AM BEING SARCASTIC)
Devin Dykstra the likelihood of this or the T2 dying is slim. SoCs have a lot less points of failure and ways too fail than multiple external processors. When was the list time the I/O failed on your CPU? When was the last time the memory died on your phone?
Come on, it's a MAC, everyone already knows it not only has none but probably also has a JTAG at the bottom of the board with the backlight and CPU pins right next to each other, just to make sure it dies right after you've spilled a tiny amount of liquid on it. What I think he's asking is just how is he going to explain to his customers that he can't repair their device, because BGA components could still be repaired, so Apple decided to put everything into one SoC that he can't buy.
@@MrSalat21 they installed a water sensor that will notify apples servers that you spilled liquid thus voiding the new warranty terms and automatically and irreversibly brick your mac
This is when let your apple hatred take over. Instead of being a fair reasonable tech channel. You are loosing your followers and their trust day after day 👎🏼
He probably dint get the review Unit. His hatred. lol! I have been watching his videos for long. You can surely roast apple for all those pricing and no charger issues. But this video was just biased and ridiculous. Waiting for him to own up and give us a real, unbiased review.
@@mohsinirshad5148 Every single M1 reviews only compare it against last gen macs and not a single video comparing the M1 against 11 Gen intel or Zen 3. All AMD zen 3 and 11 Gen intel are still ahead of M1 in terms of single core performance www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu_benchmark-cinebench_r23_single_core-15
@@nonameyet2205 let softwares optimize ,have patience its just 1st generation and you are comparing with 11th generations,1st generation is still competing very well with 11 generations
I didn't recognize the name since the only time I've ever touched an Apple product was giving tech support to friends, but I instantly knew what you were talking about. That's the goofiest shot I've ever seen in an Apple promo.
Are you serious? Dude look at the benchmarks coming out. AS M1 CPU smokes anything Intel has even when emulating x86 and the GPU is more powerful than a PS4. All while being extremely more efficient than Intel chips. As far as your comparisons between Macs and iPads, last time I checked macOS is a still a desktop operating system and iPadOS/iOS a mobile OS.
No It Doesn't 'Smokes' Everything. It Is Competitive With Everything Intel Has, While Being More Efficient. But Multicore Score Is Less Than X86 8 core but wins in Single Thread. (All Of This Is Based On Leaked Cinebench Scores). It Is Basically as Efficient as AMD's Ryzen 7 4800U in Multicore But Faster Than It in single Core. So, Still Damn Fast But Not As Revolutionary as Everyone Thinks
@Vishnu MRV Well! That's What I am Excited With M1 If They Have the Performance Apple Claims Then Apparently Mac Book Might Just Become The Best Bang For The Buck. Which Will Be Quite Ironic In My Opinion. But Also Ryzen 7 4800U laptops Are Also Arounch 1K Mark. So, I believe Next Year We will See All the Big Windows Laptops Adopt Ryzen Which Didn't Happen this Year sadly. So I Believe 2021 Is Going To Be The Year we would See a revolution in Laptops To Ryzen Like In Desktops With Zen 2
@Vishnu MRV 2X The Battery Life !! Previous Year the Ryzen 7 4800u got upto 14 Hrs Of Battery Life(with A smaller Battery than MacBook Pro). If Windows Was As Optimised as MacOS, Ryzen 4000 would Have Gone easily upto 20 hrs remember Even MacBooks with Intel Inside Used To Last Longer than Windows Counterparts Due To Software Optimization.
@Vishnu MRV No I am Just Trying To say They Are Way Better Than Intel Chips But They Are roughly equivalent to amd Chips In Raw Performance. I Like OSX so Much More Than Windows. Especially when There is an Update, It just bricks Everything. I also Gave Apple Credit for Making MacBook Air Ultimate Value.
@@HarshGupta-zz9ur those M1 chips are designed to be in a fanless chassis. Wait until the pro processors with proper cooling and then we'll see if it's similar to ryzen.
Let's all be honest, iPads are a failure as a whole. No matter what the selling nubers are. The fact that iPadOS is a thing, shows that desktop software is still a better user experience.
@@KlemenRotar ipads arent a failure, they are just a more niche product meant for visual tasks such as writing, drawing, painting, sketching, designing, and some other leisure activities.
Apple not only worked on the AIM alliance that produced the PowerPC, it also worked on one of the first ARM processors with Acorn. This was for its Newton PDA back in 1993. So Apple is an OG when it comes to the ARM design.
It’s ok to be wrong if you have done your best to analyze the available information. But here Linus just tried to bash Apple just for being Apple, he didn’t have enough information to base his bashing. It makes him very unreliable. And just because he owns 3 Mac Minis it doesn’t mean he is not biased against Apple (he keeps using that as a “proof” he is not biased).
I dont think he "bashed" apple without a basis. He was skeptical, since apple's presentation really looked like generix corporate exaggerated presentation. Since he saw what happened to the surface pro x (F in the chat for Microsoft's ARM laptop), I think it was justified that he speculated that this ARM based mac will not age well.
@@Ben.99 Exactly. If you'd spent more than 5 mins paying attention to the trajectory of Apple silicon over the last decade it has been obvious that they're head and shoulders over the competition. Also, they do make mistakes, but generally they under promise and over deliver.
@@jjoulekelvin2986 But when he compared the mac to an ipad, the mac is definitely a computer, so comparing a mac to an ipad is like saying an ipad is a computer. But yeah lol, your point is valid.
@@frogthespy9371 Oh I forgot to specify the definition of a computer: a device capable of running desktop applications without the need of dilution of the software. And a mobile device: a device that can run applications but all of them are watered down and not capable of running complex tasks.
@@kevinsingh8035 Wrong. You're probably looking at a desktop computers definition. A calculator is a computer, and very so much every 'mobile device' you see around these days.
Their computers are years ahead now because ARM is the future. And they are the only company that can pull off this transition so smooth. Good luck with Microsoft Intel AMD Nvidia and all other manufacturers to build a system that will be near the arm Macs. Apples Hardware Design with Unified Memory architecture and Machine Learning acceleration cores and power efficiency is just superior. And then the ARM machines need what? Maybe 60 - 70 watts under full load while a Windows PC uses like 250 - 300 watts to maintain equal performance
@Martin Sauer if their computers were so good, maybe they’d use actual numbers in their presentation. If apple somehow violated the laws of thermodynamics and made a computer more powerful than a desktop with a 10 W TDP, well I’ll be damned. Until the embargo lifts and actual performance ratings come out however, nobody can say anything.
_Damn the point he made about Apple pretending to be an eco-friendly company while fighting right to repair and throwing millions of devices in e-waste really shows you the type of company Apple is transitioning to_
@@fineartpottamus9020 They delivered my dude...just not apparently to your inbox yet. Not sure where you heard that but I just watched multiple videos of live benchmarking and tests that put these machines on par and ahead of maxed out $4500 2020 16” MacBook Pros with dedicated GPUs. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7PlIb_EGMcY.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7PlIb_EGMcY.html
"Everything that makes a Mac a Mac, is built right into the die" Ah, yes, that must include their proprietary features of making sure no one can repair them.
@@utubekullanicisi Why go to the hyperbole, when the very common reality of wanting to upgrade/replace faulty ram/storage is a much more realistic need? Or are those not convenient to talk about?
@@vaan_ But Apple weren't the first, nor the last to do this... Many of the flagship ultrabooks are like that. Mac has two distinct demographics. People who'd never do that because they don't know anything, and people who are very technologically minded and know exactly what they are buying.
@@vaan_ The only benefit of not soldered down RAM and SSD is being able to replace them when they get faulty. Otherwise, benefits outweigh negatives for MOST people on this planet. Soldering them & packing at least the RAM into the SoC have efficiency advantages, performance advantages, security advantages, form factor advantages, etc. It’s not like Apple never offered laptops with replaceable batteries, SSDs, RAM, etc. They had a pretty loong experience designing their laptops that way. But one day they realized it gets in the way for more ambitious things they want to do, like making the battery less likely to degrade (at the time they ditched replaceable batteries the longevity of their batteries has gone up from ~300 cycles to 1000 cycles. Coincidence?), making the most out of the power the battery can provide, making the most efficient laptops both form factor wise and power consumption wise, etc.
@@ChadPANDA... he was “wrong”. He called the chips iPhone chips (completely wrong) and also called them a dumpster fire (completely wrong). It’s all part of his RU-vid plan though. Create outrage with ridiculous video title like this one. Get tons of views. Then create “I was wrong”video a week later and get tons of views.
@Julien Lindauer Bruh it depends on how much you want to specify; if you really want to push it, then an M1 Macbook Air and an M1 Macbook Pro are completely different devices as well. It's clear that Linus wasn't thinking that deeply, I don't get why you insist on examining every single detail.
Yeah Big Picture here, Linus is like iPad this iPad there, kinda silly to me as this is a real milestone in processors evolution, I'm really kinda bored of the hole childish approach of this channel with sell itself as tech-savvy enthusiasts but in the end loses focus...
@Ther Ther 100% agreed. I generally find Linus to be good hearted and fair when it comes to Apple, but I guess THIS video is what happens when you’re surrounded by a HUGE community that hates Apple.
If anyone remembers the intel transition, the first ones to switch were just current models with new internals. The iMac G5 became the first intel iMac and the PowerBook G4 became the first MacBook Pro
Bruh if you can’t handle bias you should not live. No seriously, everything has bias in this world, that’s why listening to multiple perspectives is so valuable
Yep, my 2017 macbook that previously been used by my mom everyday, still had like 8 h of battery life fully charged. Meanwhile my 2019 asus laptop? 2.5-3 hours, take it or leave it.
TLDR: RU-vidrs like Linus Tech Tips are influencers, whether they like the term or not. As such, they shouldn't let their personal prejudices get in the way of their content. Instead of applauding what may be potentially the biggest leap in Apple's computing history, you couldn't help but look for holes and skew things in a negative light without the evidence. You're only validating the toxicity, bias and drama PC enthusiasts deny exists, and setting a terrible example for the next generation of youth getting into this community. Let's foster excitement of technology, not hatred between brands. Linus I've been a long time subscriber, but you need some honest feedback, some tough love if you will. Between the title of this video and your pessimistic attitude throughout, this video really rubbed me the wrong way. Clearly I'm not the only one as even Jonathon Morrison called you out publicly on it. I'm both a PC and a Mac guy, own both and in fact I used to be both a PC and Mac technician for over 10 years. I love technology, and if someone asked me about either I'm capable of speaking from an unbiased point of view explaining the differences neutrally, without crapping on either platform always saying there's advantages to both. I don't know if you do this just to garner clicks, or it's your personal bias against apple showing again but either is just straight up unacceptable. To be clear I love a majority of your content and the content from your employees, but always at the cost of "tolerating" your apple-related content as it always held a negative undertone, and this kinda pushed it over the line for me. I used to be a "PC Master Race" guy too, but it was just a phase I recognized everyone goes through until I grew up. Society unfortunately promotes a "us versus them" behavior no matter the subject all about being on a specific "team" so you can talk smack about the "other" team. It feels good to, and to be part of a certain tribe and relate. Sports, cars, food, and computer platforms are no different. As amazing as the PC community is, it's also had the reputation of being elitist and toxic at times, which no one can deny - just look at other comments on this very video. And how could you not when it feels so good to say "I built a PC for half the price of a Mac". Makes for a great video I'm sure, but only serves to divide, and hardly creates an inclusive environment. It wasn't until I bought a mac and fully utilized it's benefits over the years that I realized how immature I behaved before, and now instead of scoffing at either platform, when people ask for my personal opinion I can tell them both are good in their own ways, depending on their needs. Other tech youtubers seem to be able to speak neutrally about this as well without issue. Watching MKBHD's M1 Mac review released this morning proves the point I've told people for years: You can't compare specs on paper anymore. Even as I write this Dave2D released an amazing review of his own where he starts off by saying he's trying to be as neutral as possible from the start. In a time where there's enough negative stuff going on in the world, it doesn't cost you anything trying to speak from a more neutral, or dare I say optimistic point of view - Now more than ever - just by being a bit more self-conscious. RU-vidrs hate being called "influencers" but what you say and how you say it does in fact bring people closer together, or drives them that much more apart. I for once want to see a community that loves computers as a whole, and not just the brand that you see attached to it.
You know, this RU-vidr, as I have seen before, only states one thing. “Bigger the number, the better it is”. That is not always the case in the real world though. It is either misinformation or propagation of misinformation for getting more views. If he has some authenticity left in him, he should take down this video and upload a correction video. Authenticity > views.
So true. I am a PC user and I also use android now and then but holy shit the people who love to shit on apple have no idea what they're talking about. I used to use a mac with my iphone, I have never seen a more streamlined and efficient ecosystem with ANY other platform I've used. I just came back to this video after the performance reviews were released by other youtubers, i just want to see these people who only care about numbers on paper eat their own words. Apple isn't always making the best decisions, like that charger thing with the new iphones, but the fact that Apple seems to only want to compete with themselves has always resulted in them improving their own products generation after generation. Meanwhile, every other company (I'd say except AMD with their new ryzen processors, where they didn't really focus on just shooting up the clock speeds and rather just on imrpoving the zen 2 architecture) is just focused on giving their new devices a +5 number on their snapdragon processor or 2 more GB in their phone. Those numbers don't translate to shit if the OS is bloated and the apps are not even optmised enough to run on them. You just can't review apple products the way you regard every other company's products. They're playing by their own rules, which is not great but it should be respected and they should not be reviewed the way you review products by other companies. Edit: a small example of apple being focused on themselves is how the iphone 12 still has 60hz display. Maybe iphone 13 will come with 120hz. iPad pro already has Pro Motion (which was also NOT marketed as 120hz), so why doesn't apple just bring it here? Because Apple has one of the industry's best 60hz displays. They just working on themselves. When a higher refresh rate does finally come to an iphone it will be optimized and efficient unlike most battery drainers on androids rn, but by then people will be like "yeah we got this 4 years ago on our android what's new?" They just care about numbers. That's not the whole picture.
@@unorthodox6802 touchè - it was a bit of a novel for sure, but something I’ve felt for quite a long time and needed to get off my chest. I’m glad I’m not the only one that feels this way.
Can you please point towards the segments that he’s “bitter” and “hateful”? Like I get that he’s hella skeptical, but bitter and hateful are a bit harsh
He is skeptical about apple's claim about the performance of the M1 chip and rightfully so as they have made very vague claims. Also, Apple further locked down its ecosystem and made upgrades impossible which he does not like. So I can see why he is irritated by this launch.
@@ramanpratapsingh8486 his skepticism was proven wrong. Downvote was not about the locked ecosystem, I am the first to hate it and that s also why I am a Windows and Android guy, but Linus showed here that he has no vision, like many gamers and other amd/intel fanboys that cannot see the revolution that Apple is making in computer tech...
Wouldn’t give a channel like this shit either. Even if it’s a stellar product, the audience for this channel demands Apple and Intel blood, and reviews will reflect what the audience wants. Watch for the review, it will pay special, lengthy attention to any negatives of the launch.
@Michael Thompson Throwing statements loathing for pleasing the audience can’t be called as a review. Childish though, have to admit how butthurt he sounds when he call Apple Silicon M1, “ASS M1” despite the fact that he was “reflecting what the audience wants”. This seems legit for any audience ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-f4g2nPY-VZc.html.
@@tcroyce8128 Nope, he is probably just doing real benchmarks that simply show that it is exactly what everyone expected (and he predicted): Great performance in specialized tasks (i.e. iPad land) and mediocre performance in general with compatibility issues. It's basically 4800u performance (not even Zen 3 is needed) at the same price with some pros and some cons. I don't understand Apple fans ... a few months ago you did the same shit about the insanely priced Mac Pros that had no real target audience (while defending shitty old Intels to the death). But yet here you are again with "haha, iTz tEh besTest coMpuTAhhin teh WoRld" while never having cared about CPUs before....
@@donsimpsonshead8809I was referring to what "Linus will do"... The usual, he will just test it. He isn't invested in your childish cult war. In this video here linus didn't say anything specific regarding bad performance. He said that AS will be fine (since we already know how similar chips perform in ipads and we can extrapolate that, so yeah.... It's exactly what the first tests show...) but the m1 will be probably replaced soon with newer version. What exactly was wrong with that? It's finally a decent enough laptop by apple that matches or even slightly comes ahead of AMD but at huge costs regarding compatibility, freedom and consistency. With new Zen3 mobiles this will be already history again. The flaws regarding small RAM and SSD (seriously, those sizes are a joke... ) , probable throttling or lacking IO are still severe flaws to point out...
@@Xul That guy is no hardware design expert like half of the RU-vid tech bros. Assembling hardware is like a garage mechanic. You don't make the next gen engine or gearbox going inside Nissan. Name one "benchmark" that he's going to formulate that will test two non compatible ISAs, one of which is a proper SoC while the others depend on NoCs and other BUS interface depending on the motherboard being used?
I'd bet at least $5 that the joke was in the script too. Scripted humour can be good because timing is critical for the laugh and so it can be planned.
Yep. Deciding what "kind" of machine you have based on what instruction set its CPU is such a dumb metric. You're not interfacing with it through machine code, we have operating systems for a reason. I thought Linus was smarter than this.
One is a Retriever And one is a Great Dane They are very different But exactly, the same Tablet Soc (Retriever) M1 Soc (Great Dane) Features (are different) Architecture (is the same)
@@thechemtrailkid at the time of release none knew emulation was going to be so good So if you were a professional and had to wait till 2021 to use Photoshop you might not want to buy the arm computer. 2 months of not being able to use your computer for what your want is wasted money
Not just that you can have only 16GB, but that 16GB is shared with the graphics and the 16 core neural engine for machine learning, so it might not be the best platform for a pro, especially if you work with machine learning.
@Add channel name Exactly, it just shows how much of Apples claim that the Mac book is a pro machine is just a load of hot air, they claim it has great graphics, and how its great for machine learning and any other task, then they cripple the machine with a max memory of only 16GB, and the sad thing is, most people will believe Apples claims.
"i was wrong, but i actually admit it this time" yeah fucking right lol, this guy is such a sore loser. if he makes a video and actually fully admits to being wrong without a bullshit disclaimer or blaming it on the marketing, ill buy all his merch.
Seriously. Who would have thought that the company who has a proven track recorded of designing highly optimized chips and designing highly optimized software would be able to successfully design a product using both.
@Garden variety internet hater the Rational Apple Fanboy Hater market is still big (but getting smaller) on RU-vid. Don’t think he will betray them any time soon (I mean, if I was talented enough to be a big RU-vidr, I wouldn’t)
@Garden variety internet hater I want to see a video that’s counts the times someone brings up apple in other videos that have nothing to do with the video or when they hate on apple for something than okay when Samsung or some else does it
now that the entire system is on a chip that can detect whether you used original parts with a serial number that matches one from their partner suppliers, goodbye, right to repair.
@RottenProduce that's absolutely true, but I'd rather have a computing behemoth. Their screen are indeed amazing, but for me, it's more important having renders done quickly. It's a matter of preference.
All the new reviews that came out today call the M1 Macs stellar, and here he is trashing the system before he even gets his hands on it. He should have waited.
@@tslug all the popular tech reviewers have released reviews on the m1 macs today and finding they are faster than comparable priced intel processor laptops even when running in emulation mode. Apples M1 macs are even outperforming their laptops listed at 2.5x the price of the base M1 laptops.
If you’re talking about the Tomb Raider demo, that’s actually pretty impressive. The game ran on the chip while being virtualised at the same time (not written or optimised for MacOS, just being translated in real time to run on Apple silicon), so it has two simultaneous processes running together. I didn’t expect that. Virtualisation has always been crappy. The fact that the game runs at all is praiseworthy.
i mean it ran well for a game that was built for x86 can possibly do on a low powered ARM chip but any AMD ryzen mobile APU could put up a bit of a fight
@@narenaviation7795 "Amazing, every word of what you just said was wrong." He never said anything about the Air slowing the M1 a lot, never said the transition would fail, and never said getting an iPad would be better than a Mac.
They must have like 2 (worldwide) customers because who the fuck is gonna pay $200.000,00 a year to access a bunch of user-unfriendly spreadsheets for a CPU architecture?
@@alvarotavares1966 it's pretty much apple, qualcomm, samsung, huawei, and Nvidia. I'm sure there are others, but it's all large companies who believe they can turn a profit selling thier own silicon.
Actually you do see zero-to-something transitions, e.g. in certain software that comes in three-to-four editions like "Personal" (free), "Business" ($x/year), "Enterprise" ($y/year). Except they write it out as "free" rather than $0.
@@robch.2901 No Adobe cloud is a real problem. Davinci Resolve runs on Linux. Though with caveats. Most of the program works, except ADR - so no voiceovers from within Fairlight. And it won't import codecs like h264 or aac/mp3. So you have to use ffmpeg to convert to dnxhr with pcm audio. But the rest of it works, and is a decent match for Pr, Ae, and Au. There's GIMP and Krita, neither of which are no Ps. But you can get work done with them. Inkscape is quite good, and almost matches Ai. And then there's Blender. Which is amazing. For a full on DAW, both Ardour and REAPER are very good. So if you want to make a film or video with animations and pro voiceover, you can do it on Linux. But not with Adobe CC.
While I see that this may not be for everyone, as an iOS developer, I will be happy if these new machines run cooler and not actually cause 3rd degree burns while compiling.
If before people could have a mac while still have android phone this move will clearly obliterate this concept in favor of Apple's own ecosystem which will be great for people who actually know what they want, not just buying apple products without knowing how to take advantage of them
@@PoTskiii are you saying an M1 Mac can only compile binaries for Arm based CPUs? Bc no that’s what Universal 2 is for, it outputs native binaries for X86 and Arm.
Every Linus channel launched an anti-Apple video nearly the same time... like.. that's just annoying. Unsubbed from all and will block all of them. Unprofessional and totally biased.
The car tire approach of "repair until it has not value" is pretty stupid. Tires have lead to massive contamination and even fires that last for many, many days. It's also an engine of violence as "repair shops" that insist on not following the certification process rely on stolen component ofthen. No company is taking the proper approach. The greatest recicle protect ever was the Coke/Pepsi one. That requires relevant discounts to the consumer and value to the corporations. About Apple, I will say they are not that bad, they lead the way with Solar, Paper etc.
Going by early benchmarks, this might be another Apple Watch type situation with Linus Edit: Did some snooping on Apple.com Edit 2: Oof About the MacBook Pro, and what the performance claims are in relation to: Testing conducted by Apple in October 2020 using preproduction 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with Apple M1 chip, as well as production 1.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i7-based 13-inch MacBook Pro systems, all configured with 16GB RAM and 2TB SSD. Open source project built with prerelease Xcode 12.2 with Apple Clang 12.0.0, Ninja 1.10.0.git, and CMake 3.16.5. Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of MacBook Pro. There’s clearly more to this chip than “iPad SOC in a Mac”
@@ts757arse Using the 13in MBP as a proxy for apples future “pro” plans might be a bit mistaken considering that even Apple started out selling it as an Air alternative back in 2016. Since than it’s always been a more “prosumer” device more than anything, and likely why it was featured in the same presentation as the Air. What they decide to put in the 16” certainly might give us a better idea though It’s still early days, and we haven’t seen what their high TDP solutions look like, the effectiveness of Rosetta 2 and whether dev uptake will be as fast as needed. All major factors in deciding how functional these new devices will be with pros I don’t think Apple intends for the M1 to be the chip to fully replace pro workloads anytime soon (probably why they’re going to keep intel around for a while) but they certainly are building up to something much more interesting, especially considering that what is essentially their first chip is already competitive with Intel/AMD (to some extent) and that is before we factor in Apple-specific optimizations and considering the much lower power draw. I’d say wait and see, it’s still waay too early to come to a conclusion.
@@ts757arse It’s probably somewhere in between. Apple has pulled off some genuinely impressive engineering though I can’t help but think that Intel could’ve been just as good if the right choices were made. Transitions like these have been staring them in the face for nearly 10 years now and they stood by and watched ARM do to them what they did to PowerPC and the like. One thing for is for sure though , from Apple to AMD and stuff like RISC-V, computing in general is about to get a lot more exciting.
I honestly don't think it should shock anyone that Apple's first attempt at these probably won't actually be crowned the fastest CPU in the world. They have likely chosen to roll it out to their lower-end line first for a reason. If people are thinking that these would out-perform an i9 or any of the other slightly delusional things I have seen written online, I could only ask....why? If Apple was seeing that kind of performance they would have split this release into two tiers and released out of the gate with an M1 and maybe an M1X or something and charged a lot more for the higher tier. This is their low tier line at low-tier prices (for Apple). If they can keep up with the CPUs they were replacing, and it looks like they do, I would say that is sufficient. This is just a start. This is Apple we are talking about. Evolution is standard price. Revolutions cost much, much more.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eatIzqwB2dA.html Christ died for your sins and rose on the third day, showing that anyone who trusts in him for salvation, will have everlasting life. (John 11:25-26) "Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?" (John 3:16) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
@@reevanamin5865 I don't think the 'real' Desktop is gonna be around much longer in this instance. Can't see them writing a new OS and maintaining it long for these devices when it's make more sense to just go with a slightly more filled out version of the mobile OS...or probably, the same one...just on a bigger device. Maybe give it a 2-3year, if they're not already doing that and people will be left to discover that upon receiving it
@@nicwilson89 100% disagree. In fact they’re been moving in the opposite direction. iPadOS was split out of iOS and watchOS, tvOS are their own separately optimised operating systems. If there’s a market for a desktop operating system, Apple isn’t just going to throw away macOS. This isn’t Microsoft we’re talking about here where they tried to fudge the two together.
MacBook Air is better for UNIX dev work, software dev work, Photoshop, etc. iPadOS is locked down in ways people not in certain industries wouldn’t think of.
@lasest2 I’m not sure that’s anything new. Even current Macs have to get their App bundles signed by an approved developer before the system will launch it. I’m more concerned with Apple possibly requiring signed executable binaries, which is an entirely different concept and more frightening to me.
As Linus explains in another video, he is not referencing the actual hardware itself in the title of 'dumpster fire' but the event itself, and i can see why. I was highly sceptical of their claims simply because we saw a bunch of meaningless graphs and useless claims, none of which we knew the basis of. Like were they comparing to an actually solid laptop like the XPS 13 or a Raspberry Pi PC?
@@sanvirajzahinhaque9795 I mean, that's probably the less important part you know.. apple literally has every part inside their products locked down so u can't replace them
@@dan3a have you ever tried removing with alcohol? I did.. I killed my battery. And yes apple is running this stance of being an environment friendly company while not being repairable.. But they aren’t the only ones not making repairs hard... And you have to admit that
@@ernestomartinez1655 the battery is the thing that dies the most... What are you on about? I have had an iphone6s for 5 years and the thing that broke was the battery. And i fixed that.. While the galaxy s6 from my house was dead 2 years ago cause no android updates
I’m retiring my 2011 iMac for video editing. I still want to use FCPX, don’t @ me about Adobe. Guess I am going to wait and see what comes out with bigger screens and with gpus.
Hah, I retired my 2010 iMac last year. I bought the new 16inch Macbook Pro and use it with a 27inch display and a CalDigit TS3 for i/o. I think it works out pretty well. Excited about the new M series Macs, but I think if you need a Mac, the 16 inch is good.
@@tharealmb i hope so, cuz everytime apple releases something new, it becames worse, Steve Jobs must be so disappointed with apple becaming so greedy, for the price of the mac mini i can get a whole new PC with way better specsa
@@tharealmb Apple is gonna have to support Intel as long as they support the 2019 Mac Pro. So if you make a Hackintosh right now, you have at least a few more years.
0:19 An iPad that runs MacOS, has a trackpad the size of an iPhone 12 mini, and a translation layer that allows you to run x86 apps. What an iPad ladies and gentlemen. 1:15 It’s not an ARM CPU, it’s an ARM SoC (system on-chip), which integrates the CPU, GPU and sometimes even RAM, along with other hardwar blocks dedicated to specific tasks right into the same microchip. 2:11 “Who wrote this crap?” that’s Mahatma Gandhi’s quote. 3:10 They’re not calling it ‘Apple Silicon M1’, they’re calling it the Apple M1. 3:52 Why don’t you mention the benefits of soldering down the RAM & baking it into the SoC like more efficient energy use and being able to make thinner & lighter devices maybe even after you mentioned the downside of the inability of after purchase RAM upgrades? Oh I guess you just want to be a RU-vidr influencer that tears certain groups even more apart thanks to your ‘opinion’. 4:01 Yes, they are intenitonally vague because they’re comparing their chips to the ‘latsst PC laptop chip’ that is an INTEL chip. And they’re still selling Intel Macs & Macbooks. In fact, the majority of Apple’s Mac lineup still consists of Intel Macs. So, if you tried to use your brain a little bit, you might have guessed they didn’t want to bash their partner AND the rest of their OWN Macbooks. 4:07 I’m not arguing about how useful the comparison you’re talking about is. But as you might imagine, the “most popular” laptops aren’t usually the fastest ones. But being 3 times faster than a not-so-fast Windows laptop probably still puts them in a competitive place compared to other ‘low-power’ (which are all HIGH-power compared to Apple’s measly 10-15W M1 chip) silicon, like Tiger Lake and Ryzen 4000. 4:32 Even the hottest running Intel Macbook is not even close to being a laptop that’s in the ‘one of the most uncomfortable laptops to hold because the surface gets too hot’ list. You’re a guy that’s held countless number of Macbooks in your hands over the years, what’s the point of acting this prejudiced about the surface temperatures of the Macbook Air? It will perform about as good in terms of the surface temperatures as you might expect from a bigger iPhone chip. Meaning, virtually no heat felt whatsoever. 5:02 You still got the “This makes no sense” look in your face, even though a Macbook Air with a fan makes all the sense that it does. It has a fan, therefore it will be able to sustain its boost clocks indefinitely, and it has a bigger battery. What doesn’t make sense about it? 5:06 ...And also a bigger battery, longer sustained clocks, a 100 bit brighter display, and a bigger trackpad. 5:26 have you paid attention to how thin the lids of Macbooks are, as opposed to the thickness of an iMac? How are you expecting them to be able to put a 1080p webcam in a lid that thin? 6:35 Again... how are you expecting them to be able to put 10GbE networking with basically an iPad Pro A14X chip inside? You’ve said in your iPhone 12 coverage, “2020 has been a rough year so I’m giving it a pass on them for still not announcing the date for the announcement of the new ARM Macs”, and now you’re mad at them for not being able to add 10GbE. Alright. The Intel-based Mac mini that DOES have 10GbE networking option is still being sold by the way, so it’s not like Apple abandoned 10GbE lovers by wiping out all the Mac minis with 10GbE option from their website with these Mac minis with 1GbE. A little bit more patience till next year, when the supply chain turns a little bit back to normal and Apple can make an M series chip taht specifically supports 4 TB4 ports, HDMI 2.1, 10GbE, etc. 6:54 They didn’t change anything with these new Macs as the first gen products because the change on the inside is significantly risky enough that you want as little changed parts on the outside as possible. Pretty clever of Apple, if you ask me. This will result in better user experience thanks to them putting these chips in their well tried and tested enclosures. 7:00 IMMEDIATELY after you say something positive about Apple in this video, you do a follow-up with negatives. Just shut the fuck up, man. I doubt you’ll even miss having eGPU support on these new Macs as the iGPUs inside have dangerously close performance to dedicated laptop GPUs from Nvidia and AMD (if there’s any from them, lol). 7:41 Till EARLY 2021, not 2021. 7:42 Why are you saying something like that like it’s Apple fault? Of course that’s the logical and right thing to do on your WORK computer. Apple isn’t forcing you to upgrade to a new hardware platform immediately. 7:57 Apple has ben SCREAMING this whole time that they WON’T lock developers OR users in to the App Store on the Mac and they’ll be able to distribute & download apps exactly the way they did on Intel-based Macs. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Hg9F1Qjv3iU.html See 52:57 on this video. 8:45 The problem with those first gen Apple products you mentioned that caused them to get dropped from software support relatively quickly compared to the 2nd and 2rd iterations of them (even though they still got as much software support as the longest supported Android devices do) was their performance. Do you REALLY think performance will be a problem with these M1 series chips (M1, M1X, M1Z, etc.)? Early benchmarks have already shown the single threaded performance of these things are head to head with the frickin Ryzen 9 5950X, a 105W CPU vs. a 10W CPU. 8:53 Saying they’re not environmentally friendly because they don’t make their devices easily repairable while ignoring the TONS of things they do for the environment like using 100% recyclable/recycled materials for their products, using almost 100% recyclable packaging, donating for the Californian wildfire, etc. isn’t a very non-biased take. TLDR: Delet dis video.
@@JA2988-e6j It's not? Replacing a whole motherboard and dumping the rest of the old, still working, parts instead of replacing a single component is actually more environmentally friendly? That's interesting.
My macbook air from 2013 has everything soldered except for ssd. I do not see a change. And my S20 has everything soldered with no expandable memory and no headphone jack like the iPhone so...
Its the general consent on the internet he is playing. Which is sad because I always came here for the critical, but fair apple reviews. Not he is just master of the sheep turning positives into negatives even. Like with the phones. They have magnets but we dont want that, we wanted that on Ipads. Reeeeeeee. And don't get me started on the Thumbnails. RIP Linus Tech, Master of Sheep. Herder of the flock.
I remember watching the into and thinking "Linus is normally right, but dam he's wrong about this" I then ordered my M1 MacBook (air, base model) and well, you probably know how great it is by now xD That base model can edit multiple layers of 4k with heavy colour grading in final cut (final cut is why I left windows xD) And that's after 5 hours of editing (remember, no fan)
@Takeshima antivank HK loves Trump2020 If he is 100% wrong you should be able to give me multiple instances of where he's wrong right? Or are you simply someone with all bark an no bite; someone who talks and acts big, but when they actually see an alpha, they whimper and shy away immediately?
Of course you can criticize anything for its shortages, as everything has shortages. But it should be when you truly have one instead of just showing prejudices when you even didn’t touch it.
