Apple Watch X! This Changes EVERYTHING! Again. 

hey the link doesn't seem to work

Not available in Australia 🇦🇺- what a surprise!!

no thanks

It’s not really a major upgrade honestly

Right??

It’s depressing.

Haven’t had it 10 yrs 👎🏽

Well, to be grammatically correct, ‘has’ should be ‘have’ since ‘years’ is the plural form of the word. Just say’n.

Original apple watch was released in April of 2015 so 9 years ago.

Yup

The renders are based on leaks and rumors from sources such as Mark Gurman, 9to5Mac, MacRumors, etc. We just extrapolated off of what was leaked to come up with a design that we thought was plausible.

@@ConceptCentral those guys aren’t right all the time, but the design you’ve made is awesome!

@@danbh84yeah but it’s all they got so what are you expecting, actual pictures? Lmao

@@Sidney-uy1dz umm no

no need for bigger battery, just make cpu a little bit slower, but more power efficient, nobody needs watches that are faster than iphone 7 lol. Source - look up transisters, clocks and core count and add a15 architecture

I actually this is Apple’s worst product! Battery life is terrible and progressively gets worst with all the new tech added.

Tbh if they can’t adapt the product to be thinner then they can’t increase battery life without making the preexisting product thicker which wouldn’t really be wise to do with the current standards for smart watch aesthetics. (For most the biggest reason why people go with an Apple Watch-they like the way it looks and matches their iPhone. I know there’s more to it than that but the general public doesn’t really look into tech as much as we do) This is a marketing scheme to buy them time to get that battery upgrade without losing market presence while transitioning. If they can make the battery just as effective as it is now in a thinner case, then down the road they can go back to a thicker case similar to past cases with a better battery without compromising the functionality of the watch. Then the device will slim down again, rinse and repeat. If the size of the watch is getting smaller, then obviously the battery has seen improvements even if they’re not practically identifiable. The improvement we’re getting now we actually see in a few years from now most likely.

Nope disagree, I’m perfectly content with my AWU.

you mean blood clot detection ?

@@skodaroomster8124YEAAAAHH BUDDY

Been also waiting on the same things

On my series 6, when I unlock my iPhone 13 mini with faceid it unlocks the watch without me having to touch the screen

@@gunnerplaygames2305it happens with the ultra too.. but he’s talking about a touch system on the watch without touching your phone

@@terrycanada3978it’s a fucking watch

FaceID would be so intuitive-the simple act of looking at my Apple Watch would unlock it. The FaceID feature could be further secured by linking it with sensing that you're wearing the Watch, AND the accelerometers sensing the action of raising your arm and angling it so that you're looking at the watch face. This could make sure that you are consciously/deliberately intending to activate it rather than someone removed it and pointed it at your face. Could even be linked to your biometrics-if it detects rapidly increased stress levels (e.g., sudden jump in heart rate because you're being mugged), the Watch could stay locked, and even lock your iPhone and/or iPad if it's on your person; depending, of course, on how you've configured your security settings.

I type in my passcode once whenever I put it on, roughly once every second day, I don’t think it’s a big thing, how are you “so sick” of it? Do you need to take it off and put it on several times a day?

Damn good question 😂😂😂😂😂

@@bamaboyburns8079 I believe they’re quite sought after by Apple collectors - who will pay near full retail price for one in pristine condition and with the original charging case - ah to be rich lol 😂

I thought it was 10k

@@kingfisher111They were all different prices depending on the model and the strap u got - any gold on the strap was solid gold as well

It made no sense.

Nothing new Least for the next 2-3 more years. At best, slimmer bezel.

@@kingfisher111 get a life

@@petehon1005 have much better and sensible than u.

Lol damn, quite the over the top reply for a pretty realistic response 😂 The only reason for shorter timeline would be if the new health features can't be done through an update. Which most likely will be the case. ​@petehon1005

I agree lmao, when I had my series 7 before going to the series 9, I had the magnetic leather link band on it and I got it snagged on something and my watch flew off and got a dent in the stainless steel casing😂

Not to mention if you work anywhere near fine metal dust it's going to be a problem

If they change the band system I will NOT buy the X. I’ve spent hundreds of dollars on bands. I’m not gonna replace them all.

@@DOWNR4NGE same it makes no sense to change the proprietary band they have used since the beginning all it is is another cash grab look at the amount they sell the bands for. I hope they get sued into oblivion for trying to control the market it is completely true and a valid lawsuit.

Smartwatch. If you look up smartwatches, the only non-circle watches I see are FitBits and Apple Watches.

Don’t forget the santos prior to the tank, the original wrist watch!

a game changer...what do you mean with a game change. A changing game is another game and therefore out of the league. Useless. everybody talks the same. please bring some AI comments it will at least be able to think !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I look at my Garmin, 77% left -> 12days.

😆

I have my dad’s watch, a gold case Elgin tank watch with mainspring movement from around 1940!

Exactly. Like overhyped Vision Pro. "Uaaaa, Apple did it again. Changing the future. I have wet panties." Apple sheeps discovered VR.

If they do it wouldn’t be the end of the word, the current blood oxygen sensor is not very reliable

Got mine for $225 love it

@@RaymondPlaysgot it the other week and I absolutely love it as well, don’t think I’ll be upgrading this year tbh

We designed it so that the band connectors at the end aren’t removable, that way they wouldn’t take up the space that is required for them to slide in and out. Instead the watch bands are supposed to magnetically attach themselves to the band connectors at the end of the watch. Hope that makes sense!

Yeah I was confused, I know its only a mock up but the design doesn't look 'revolutionary'? I wonder if the X will actually end up being that different and not just add these few changes that that do not seem very mindblowing at all :(

@@ConceptCentral so someone will be able to just snatch it off a wrist ? :(

​@@marcsequence I use the magnetic link band on my current Apple Watch and it's very secure. I'm sure the new bands will be just as tight

@@ConceptCentral I think I was thinking that like the band would physically come off of the watch itself rather than being secured to it and adjustable via magnetic enclosure. I think I just pictured it wrong my bad.

Why does that matter? You charge your phone every day. Is it that difficult to put your watch on a charger at night?

​@@blaisebanko3487 it is more that it is inconvenient cos you need to take off the watch each time... which is more effort than charging a phone. It also means there is a period when you are not being tracked monitor.. if for example you are charging it overnight means you can't track your sleep. If you want to track your sleep then you will have less battery life in the morning when you need to use it.

@@blaisebanko3487 because most of the other brands are able to produce watches that last longer. It's called getting what you pay for.

@@blaisebanko3487 Because the competition can.

@@blaisebanko3487 people wear it for more accurate sleep tracking than the phone

Trickle down economics

@@marcsequence code word for planned obsolescence

Don't question the fanbois :)