I understood now about these students or people or whatever, they're just have knowledge in science and technology and they don't know anything about high moral principles and love and about rama who followed the principles. And he said that sri rama did everything for his pride , what an illogical statement it is means he was questioning about his character and that not the correct. Okay, I have a question for his statement that if his son get an accident and he joined him at hospital then i will give a statement to his actions that this guy only protects his child because his son to him a credit card in future not because of love. Can he agree with me?
😂😂 obviously sir he can't agree with u. Bcz he is not putting himself in Ram's place. He is just brainwashed that Ram is misogynistic person he treats his wife as an object. He is questioning Sita's character. But mostly these other religion people have heard what west mentality told them they never heard indians prospects neither they read the books. They are just told the story in a very short manner if it has. And they never thought to read in depth before making such rubbish arguments.
Ramayana is not a myth because a simple story of a man walking from ayodhya to lanka and defeating ravana and taking sita back to ayodhya is true. If you see 10 heads, pushpaka vimana for some people it might not be convincing for some people. May it was written that way to make it look larger than life RAMAYANA IS NOT A MYTH IT IS OUR HISTORY
From India who are converted or in process of being converting. Mostly our friends neighbors who are influenced or brainwashed by the west religion or peaceful community
At any cost this 3 young man are not accepting about Ram.. Where scientists of other countries come to india about this research and now they also believe that Rama really exists.
The problem is that “today” we find Ram’s action questionable. We think what he did to Sita was injustice, and it was. Even in Ram, the husband’s eyes it surely was injustice to her. Yet he took the step of banishing her. For whom? For the people that we “today” know were making the wrong demand. That’s why this entire episode doesn’t sit well with our modern sensibility. But if you consider this as history and not myth, and go back six or eight thousand years back in time, the Dhobi that declared his inability to trust her would have come across as an authentic applicant. And Ram the King put aside the husband in him and did what the rules back then dictated. Such were the times. All of human race was once barbaric (more so than today). Ramayan was only an ancient pit stop in this long journey of evolution. With our modern sensibility it’s difficult to fully comprehend what was the definition of right or wrong back then. If something, this episode only justifies that even Ram was after all a man.
12:01 if people of those period of satyayug n dvapar yug have same mentality as Kaliyuga then what is the difference between two yugas .Of science n technology.
I can claim the same about the father's and maulana who don't even come out to these kind of institutions bcz they will get exposed. If we started to ask questions about your religion and your history 😂😂. So please don't just show your brainwashed mentality hypocrisy here. Go do it in someplace else 😂.
Awww maybe you can ask same question to ur father or ur madarsa maulana. Ohh my bad they only address in closed places bcz their hypocrisy will come out if they tried in places like these institutions. 😂
Bruh seriously. What you learned from the video is that the sadguru's mike is loud😒🤦. You people can't digest the truth doncha. The worst part is you were a Bharatiya too before conversion.
Nope it's the other religions who feed this kind of bullshit to bring down our religion to their religion level so that they can convert u, ur friends, ur neighbors and full country
Raj Dharma is bigger than Pati Dharma You need to read and understand the complexity of these events instead of just knowing the outlines and question a deity based on half knowledge and modern ideologies You shouldn't read into something that was written millenniums ago with your current sensibilities and that too with half knowledge
Bunch of infant kids wearing pants instead of diapers asking questions . Thank you Sri Jaggi. You are the true. Teacher to these kids whose brains are still in infant stage. Well said to these brats.
@@Gamer-ik7gk by the clues of the existence, whenever u have time , search the video of evidences , then u will see enough evidences .... , rather than fighting for evidences kabhi accept karke dekho u will see the effect by ur self
@@swapnilsolanki7929 Search Kiya to ye chize mili ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yBIxWTPYodA.htmlsi=f9kfYdqSzdWj0Ore ru-vid.com5WsUU6b8dRI?si=Zv19tH6H5EZx0QKD Evidence mil gaya ramayan mythology hone ke. Tumne accept kar liya na tumhe kya effect dikha?
Kids, you seem uneducable. If you want to learn, talk to Ami Ganatra or Balagangadhara. You need some education. The essential part of Sadhguru’s remark is it is not fact, it’s truth
