'Are Those Crimes Or Not?': Hawley Presses Biden Judge Nominee On Illegal Immigration Stance 

I dos not like the way the nominees deflect questions that deserve a yes or no answer..

You can't get a straight answer from Republican. She recognising individual cases and human rights.

There's plenty to say here so to keep it short, Biden nominated Garland and at his hearings he blew his own Trumpet to no end. And what has he actually done since March 2021, certainly not a hell of a lot. I suspect thats why he was appointed.

Thanks that's all I want to know

@@deborahskeete I'm glad there's somebody out there enjoying this great Democrat administration! See you at the mid-terms when Republicans rule everything but the vegetable in the White House!

Evil is the word. Worthless is another. Scum, piece of sh it. Etc.

I am very believable it's just there's so many haters trying to get me out of here to cover their fucking heinous abuse they turn people against me and tell them lies and your right I do have one hell of an agenda. For justice and righteousness. Death penalty for whom

@CWB • BINGO 🥳🥰😮‍💨

Exactly.

Words empty words, she did not answer

@Noob and Friends - they 'always' tap dance around answering a question that was 'not' the question. I totally believe they drag their non-sensical answers to kill time because they know the senators are only given a short time to ask questions and much often the Senators have to stop their questioning and will often tell them they'll follow up with a letter about their question and wait for a reply. Over and over I've watched these long drawn out non-answers, in most cases is is very obvious that they are trying to run out the clock. These Senators are doing a very important job and the amount of time allotted to them is much too short. They need to give them each an 'additional' five minutes at least to continue with their questions. No reason for such a rush job. If these nominees have to stay longer or come back within the next day or to (at most) then that's what they should do. They lie through their teeth all the time. Pretty rare they just get a yes or no answer even when the Senators explicitly tell them they want just a yes or no answer, they still do their tap dance to kill time, they don't want to answer the question their asked with a yes or no answer. The Senators all lose time for more questions they have because of this.

@@luisacleaves9492 , AnOTHER slithering snake in the grass is what Kato is , as she so clearly messages her predisposition demeanor .

Typical democrat

@@kimkulesa3041 Honestly if they have to come back another day to try to answer questions again, I know how I'd vote regardless of party. I want judges who can say, "As the law currently says, entering the nation is a crime. I agree that the law should be upheld until such time that it is agreed upon to be changed." How hard is that for these people? She can still virtue signal that she doesn't agree with it, but ultimately vow to uphold it while it's in place. Or if a candidate from the right is asked about abortion, they could reply. "While my personal views may not align with this law, my professional stance is that it will be upheld to the best of my ability until such time that it is changed." Honestly I think if someone answered a question like that, they'd gain a lot of respect from the opposing party. It's fine to have a personal view that differs from a professional one, people are expected to do that all the time. The real problem is that these candidates are always looking for a way to avoid saying they'd uphold a law they don't like, and it makes them look so dishonest and snake-like.

Must got her job like Harris did in California

She gave a clear answer that anyone with common sense could understand.

It was a yes or no question and she like all the Democrats simply cannot answer. It was yes or no, period. She must have a low IQ

@@scottfarner5100 So how about you summarize it for the rest of us dummies, Mr. Common Sense? Should be a quick and easy task, no?

@@mattturner5429 he was asking her a question about a statement she made 20 years ago to the media in defense of her client who she has a legal obligation to defend. She made it clear that was the purpose of the statement and not a reflection of her beliefs.

100% braindead. Western civilization is OVER, and we either better get used to it, or recreate it starting immediately...

She saying she has no core values, and she becomes whatever she has to, to farther her career..

@@parallax9281 , Add, AND to further agenda the leftist Democrat dogmatic destruction schemes.

@@frankelizalde9306 That's the real problem. Will she do the right thing? Or sell out to the highest bidder.? Whom ever that bidder may be.... America appears to has a slight "bidder" problem right now..

@@parallax9281 I think it shows here, no matter who you are, when you go Left, you lose all sanity, you become a lunatic, and you will lose all moral standadards.

@@HueghMungus Well, she claim she wrote a bunch of stuff because she had to place her public defenders hat on..? That's fine.. But lawyers still have their core beliefs reguardless of Due process the law compels them to carry out.. Not all defendants are either nice or misunderstood people.? She got to have a compass somewhere under there.

Rapid blinking of eyes reveals that Kayto KNOWS that her responses are not fully REPRESENTATIVE of her actual disposition. Dishonesty on her face and words shows.

Her eyes are blinking sooooooo many times when she lies! She is a compulsive liberal liar!!

CRIMINAL SYNDICATE IN OPERATION !!? CHINA HARD AT WORK!!?/

Advocating for a client doesn't make them innocent and victims of the government. Thinking that role determines the truth is insane.

Don't be silly, Vander. Of course she can answer. She chooses not to. The truthful answer would make her look bad to many so she chooses to obfuscate. Not standing behind her words and actions- now THAT is worrisome.

When will Josh testify about his role in the Jan 6th terror attack? Is outright treason "worrisome" or is that ok to you?

@@drumzRfun1 Troll...not worth responding to you.

will not, there is a difference

It’s disqualifying.

No kidding. It’s alarming she ever landed a seat on the bench.

Josh Hawley IS the man!! For other references, check another video titled something like "Senator GRILLS Zuckerberg." Sorry I don't have the correct title.

She does not seem to be an activist, even though that would not be disqualifying. Not sure where you got that idea.

Constitution explicitly prohibits migration laws. Internal and external to the country. Moving from point A to point B is never a crime so long as you avoid trespassing on private property.

The thing is, you want a defense lawyer to advocate for their client and downplay any wrongdoing. That’s their job. I probably disagree with this nominee on political views just like you do but it’s a cheap tactic to fault them on their service as a public defense attorney when literally any defense attorney is supposed to do exactly what she did.

I disagree I hate lawyers but at the same time that is why lawyers are hired to represent their clients

@@mememantyrique1029 correct. defense job is to get the client off scot free. after 911 there was a lynch mob mentality. Bsides, you cant prosecute someone unless they have a defense, and a shitty defense will only get them an appeal., so prosecutors should want a robust defense so the conviction stands.

Specially considering how many of them are in high positions of office :)

As a defense attorney her role was to defend her client to the best of her ability. In her role as judge that was not her role. Wtaverever her feelings, she ought o be judged by her actions as a judge. Hopefully as a judge she has never acted as an advocate. Even umpires have favorite teams, but they do not wear their caps. Unfortunately, nowadays judges do run as members of parties and do cultivate a reputation that causes certain interests to seek to have their cases tried in their courts.

She would absolutely not be able to maintain employment at a properly run McDonald’s, let alone any legitimate public service position, if either institution weren’t totally corrupt and/or bought off/out... How disturbing yet predictable. 🤦‍♂️

Pathological liar nomination by this progressive liberal Socialist Administration in favor of destroying our republic laws and standard’s. Never put the enemies in the Court as Judges. Whatever happened to commonsense?

Her eyes are blinking sooooooo many times when she lies! She is a compulsive liberal liar!!

@@DrNick-mb9df ....I just hope your doctorate studies were in something other then the medical field

She's really scary.

when a lawyer has an IQ of 60 they get to be addresed as 'your honor'.

She's probably a maxed out donor of Biden

democrats voter base are criminals so checks out

check out her political donations, all you need to know.

Thank you

Proof she should loose license to practice law

You meant to say: as long as I didn't do anything and I was paid, idk if it was a crime!

✔

demo(c)rat nominees : communist infiltration

Listen to the words he pointedly uses too.....he is very, very good at drawing these people's true agenda out....

@@jaceebrynne49 , Senator Hawley draws out the pathological predisposition hypocrisy- act of Kato , who has demonstrated leftist dogma by what she has said and done.

Yeah like when he said BLM vandalized his house and terrorized his wife and kids .......PT Barum was correct and your proof of that

I worked building maintenance in a courthouse, I walked into an office one day and a guy judge was explaining the difference between working days and business days !

What about being on the stand in HER courtroom and avoiding the question? She would throw you in jail for contempt.

@@Mwoods2272 Actually, she would hold the questioner in contempt of court if he asked those questions more than once. Attorney client privilege is sacred. Fortunately for Hawley, he is not in a court of law and there is no penalty for a congressman asking someone to violate the law.

@@scytaleghola5969 You’re adding “facts” to this scenario that don’t exist.

@@Individual_Lives_Matter Ms. Kato actually made this point in her comments. Were you not paying attention? Hawley was asking her to make statements about the guilt of her past clients.He knew what he was doing. It's just Kabuki theater for the under informed...

@@scytaleghola5969 you’re missing the part, where no one forced her to be here. She CHOSE to be here for a JOB that she WANTS. she has zero right to obfuscate in her answer to her JOB INTERVIEW, and still expect to get the job. Doesn’t want to answer? Then don’t go for the job

Hiding behind her locks of hair. Eye fluttering is a big tell. If failing to answer that laws were broken wasnt good enough to paint the picture.

CRIMINAL SYNDICATE IN OPERATION !!? CHINA HARD AT WORK!!?/

Your a CINO

Social Justice doesn’t need to be able to see clearly.

Maybe it is to help hide that her eye-blinking goes into overdrive when she has trouble "answering" some of the questions. Almost looks like she is lying or something.

The problem with stupid comments like this is that democrats will pick the weakest argument in a comment section and use the to dismiss all arguments.

@@jonathandevereaux298 Not a stupid comment. There's something called professional appearance and decorum.

@@jonathandevereaux298 She's 50 years old. She's wearing the haircut of a trendy 20 year old, from juuust about 30 years ago. A haircut that intentionally obscures her eyes, at a hearing intended to allow people to judge her character and suitability for a powerful position. You don't see anything..... odd about that? I mean... 50 seems a bit old to be giving the metaphorical finger to "the man" by trying to look like Joey Ramone. And doing it after you've been nominated as a Federal judge is just.... dumb. She looks like "hello, fellow kids!" personified. I wonder if she's wearing platform Dr. Martens underneath that table, lol.

That is what I was thinking

actually the court artist requested it. he was getting ill.

She attempts to distract with you with her non cleavage. Check out that sternum!

Evil eye...

Yeah, I don’t trust people with beards either.

Correct

No there job is to represent their clients ....and lord knows there has never been a case of a prosecutor lying to get a conviction .....SMFH

@@BatMan-iy1li their

@@nitetrane98 .....Yeah I know ....big deal

Yes. We should only promote prosecutors to the bench not defense attorneys. The defense attorneys will always be for the defense. But the prosecutors can set aside their past beliefs and be neutral umpires and judges.

the more shes in the light better to learn from what subversives are in america that carry the american title.

Well when the dems are trying to make voters out of illegals. This nomination makes perfect sense. She is completely un-American. And definitely should never be put in a position of power.

They seem to always pick the worst person for the job, by intention I presume. Blessings..

Indeed, “ not a single one …” .! Accentuating the “positive” , EVERY SINGLE biden nominee is floating in the biden cess poll of stench. Let’s Go FJB, Brandon !

Oh believe me these aren't Biden's nominees

But they do get approved. All the Dems plus a handful of Rinos.

CRIMINAL SYNDICATE IN OPERATION !!? CHINA HARD AT WORK!!?/

LMFAO

This is why people don’t trust pirates.

Lawyers have no business in congress either.

Believe it or not, it’s the duty of an attorney to show their client in the best light. It doesn’t matter if the client is a complete turd. If she believes the client is lying, she still has to argue his point of view during a case. It sounds bizarre but that’s how litigation works. With that being said, she seems to be the cleanest sock in the clothes hamper of Biden nominees.

@@farticlesofconflatulation If she is clean I don't want to see dirty

@@randomperson-sn4rj it’s a dirty hamper indeed! All Biden nominees are like moronic robots programmed with the same algorithm to evade strait forward questions.

And calling him 'Senator' before every response in a slow and condescending tone. He knows that he's a Senator, she doesn't need to repeat the title every time she answers a question. She's wasting time.

@@BST-lm4po she's doing this to think of how to lie to give herself more time to lie

@@Franciscasieri like kamala cackling to give herself time to think of a good lie !?🤣😂👍

Never thought about it that way, makes sense. I've always thought they were just being smarmy.

@@BST-lm4po Though this is true, it's just fake political respect, if she didn't do it, she'd be called out for being disrespectful to his position, the same is true in the UK when our politicians call each other "honourable" as a title before speaking to or about them.

Growing disconnect from the government and the people only hurts the innocent i hope everyone keeps this in mind when its all over those that made everything worse over the last several years wont face judgement... Especially with people like this

This is the sort of garbage nominees that handlers of biden INSTRUCT biden to select. Merrick Garland is one who is currently floating in biden’s cess pool of stuff.

The only role of a judge should be to follow the Constitution and the laws in America.

What prior record

Wrong, good? By what standard?

There isn't a single good intention in that thing.

Her initials are KKK, how bizarrely appropriate.

I've heard the road to hell is paved with good intentions, by ignorant ppl

Guess who nominated her .

Ye do labor under the misconception that they are still operating within logical and reasonable boundaries. Get a grip, They are not.

These Biden pick doesn't know the constitution laws! Give her some weeds to smoke!

It's because it would be imbarrassing to all democrats standing waist deep in the swomp!

@TrumpLovesBBC I was thinking pot but it's more like crack! Trump will be back #1 president, weather you like it or not! Cry yourself a river commi

@TrumpLovesBBC You're wrong about everything from the BBC through to your allegedly "Independant, unbiased reporting" It doesn't list out the alleged 30k+ lies. It doesn't specify that "Cheeseburgers stacked a mile high" (clear hyperbole) isn't a lie. Your unbiased and independant source is a HEAVY left-leaning source. Most UK news is left leaning. The Independant also came out with articles in 2017 about Trumps "Russian Collusion" that never happened. So I mean your sources are about as fake as the bullshit they spread. Cheers for the effort though. How hard is it to listen to President Biden mumble his way through scripted conversations and speak pure gibberish? Hows the leader of the Free World holding up? Funny nobodys allowed to talk about his health or his Son's obvious corruption but that was 100% of the Left leaning headlines from 2016-2021. Trump's health and alleged corruption with his kids.

She preferres to go through life with blinkers on!

She's nicely saying, she will be whatever you want her to be..

@@parallax9281 That’s pretty pathetic. My husband will tell you that I think for myself and if I don’t agree with him I don’t hesitate to give him my viewpoint. I know ladies that try to be whatever they think is necessary at the time but that’s just being fake and insincere to who you are. Not for this girl.

@@dalejumonville9147 This is for a lifetime appointment and all the perks that come with it.. It's like she's saying, she has no core beliefs. There are men who do stuff like this also.. Which is why these hearings exist..

@@parallax9281 Which I don’t approve of this when men do it either. These people never answer a direct question and you can’t tell me personal beliefs don’t factor into it with many of them. I just want them to be honest in their answers and adhere to the Constitution that governs our Republic. That’s not too much to ask of people who are appointed for life.

@@dalejumonville9147 Check the Forbes channel out, to where LA Senator John Kennedy ask her basic law questions.. My point is: the USA is in a pickle because people like her, got fast tracked thru the process..