Тёмный

Are TV Detector Vans a Myth? 

Little Car
Подписаться 47 тыс.
Просмотров 52 тыс.
50% 1

If you’re not from the UK, or even if you’re not of “a certain age”, you may not know what a TV Detector van is, or even why they’re needed. In the UK, the BBC or British Broadcasting Corporation is funded almost entirely by a licence fee backed by law that states that anyone in the UK who watches live TV transmissions needs to pay the licence. The odd thing is you don’t even need to be watching BBC content - if you watch commercial channels live, you still need to pay.
To get early ad-free access to new videos, or your name at the end of my videos, please consider supporting me from just $1 or 80p a month at / bigcar
Link to my other channel - Big Car:
/ bigcar2
Sources:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Televis...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_dete...
www.pensiontimes.co.uk/cultur...
www.theguardian.com/society/2...
www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-i...
#littlecar

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

 

13 май 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 770   
@michaelmanuell326
@michaelmanuell326 2 года назад
Some years ago whilst working for the electricity board. We were called to west Windsor for high voltage fault. The whole of west Windsor was without electric. When we arrived there my partner and myself spotted a TV detector van, operating. The two of us walked up to the van. And the operator had the back door open and was sitting there twiddling his knob, whoops, knobs. We asked him had he found any houses without a licence. Replied, "a few and that was only after twenty minutes or so." The two of us then explained to him that whole area had been off supply for the past two hours. Reaction. Closed the doors and drove off. 😁
@garyprice6504
@garyprice6504 Год назад
Love it!!!!!
@finjay21fj
@finjay21fj 10 месяцев назад
Heehee yX-D 😂! Bravo (/^v^)~ ❤️🥇🏆
@laurencecope7083
@laurencecope7083 7 месяцев назад
No such thing, just scare tactics.
@wisteela
@wisteela 7 месяцев назад
There was, but they didn't work that well.@@laurencecope7083
@nickwallette6201
@nickwallette6201 6 месяцев назад
Uh... they were using a Watchman, clearly. Loads of Watchmans out there.
@mudskipper0075
@mudskipper0075 3 года назад
My Dad was a TV repair tech in the 70’s /80’s remember them.!!! His mate was one of the supposed TV detector van operatives ,it was an empty van....🤣🤣🤣🤣
@1harryrobert
@1harryrobert 3 года назад
It picked up the local Intermediate Frequency oscillator in your analogue TV to see if it was switched on
@paradox2012
@paradox2012 2 года назад
I know where a van was kept in the early 90s, by pushing my face against the blackened windows I could see the back was completely empty 😂
@Bowdon
@Bowdon 2 года назад
@@1harryrobert what are you talking about?
@tiseye654
@tiseye654 2 года назад
100% ..TV LICENCING IS FRAUD.DO NOT PAY IT, THEY CAN DO NOTHING...IGNORE THEM TOTALY..
@Gosportinfo
@Gosportinfo Год назад
Yes my dad was in the Post Office and the Post Office drivers could get afternoon and evening overtime to drive them around route. Seems if people saw a TV detector van sales of TV licences would go up in the area.
@althejazzman
@althejazzman 3 года назад
The irony of watching interesting RU-vid content on my TV without a TV licence because I only watch RU-vid.
@lakrids-pibe
@lakrids-pibe 3 года назад
Yeah but finding the good yutube channels is a pain in the ass. The RU-vid algorithm is a horrible curator.
@BilisNegra
@BilisNegra 3 года назад
@@lakrids-pibe Plus you need a keyboard always at hand to skip ads.
@andidubya3840
@andidubya3840 3 года назад
You have a TV - ergo the *ability* to view live TV - need a licence?
@althejazzman
@althejazzman 3 года назад
@@andidubya3840 A TV doesn't give you the ability to watch TV any more than a computer does. I have no connection to an aerial. My TV is just another computer monitor. I don't watch live TV at all, so I don't need a licence. I fill in the form every few years.
@andidubya3840
@andidubya3840 3 года назад
@@althejazzman yes my mistake. I believed some parts of the threatening letters i used to get when I had no TV
@johnwhite9760
@johnwhite9760 3 года назад
When I was a student back in the late eighties my flatmates and I got out of paying for a TV licence by writing back to the BBC telling them that we were members of "The Brethren" (a religious sect similar to the Amish that doesn't allow television). It actually worked!
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 3 года назад
Stick it to the MAN... or in this case {the TVvan}
@grabham59
@grabham59 2 года назад
I got round by the clause in the 1949 Wireless Telegraphy Act that says that a set "largely or entirely powered by battery" was exempt from the licence fee - I had a black and white set and a car battery (though never actually used it)...when they came around the halls of residence, showed them, quoted it and they agreed I was exempt...
@trevormillar1576
@trevormillar1576 Год назад
Yes, they really exist. They are called the Plymouth Brethren or the Exclusive Brethren.
@szr8
@szr8 7 месяцев назад
@@trevormillar1576 "Plymouth Brethren" could have been a cool name for a car in the US.
@AnalogueInTheUK
@AnalogueInTheUK 3 года назад
There has not been a single court case where evidence from a 'detector' has been introduced and used to support a prosecution. Go figure.
@hobbified
@hobbified Год назад
Of course not. Once you've knocked on the door and been inside, any other evidence is superseded. But you need justification to knock on the door.
@davidspear9790
@davidspear9790 Год назад
I don't know, but maybe that's because evidence from a detector van on it's own is not admissible in court and needs further evidence to back it up.
@AnalogueInTheUK
@AnalogueInTheUK Год назад
Check out ChilliJohnCarne's RU-vid channel. He's an expert on this matter. Please don't believe the shite that the BBC myth machine keep pumping out (via a PR company costing millions per year). youtube.com/@ChilliJonCarne
@rdrhouse
@rdrhouse 11 месяцев назад
@@hobbified exactly, previous comment by analoguelnqatar just can't see past his/her nose.
@kevincronin464
@kevincronin464 7 месяцев назад
you actually need a warrant to force entry into anyone's home regarding a tv licence. just tell them to FO. they won't have a warrant because they won't have evidence. The only way these goons abtain evidence is if you are stupid enough to let them into your own home. amazed at how brainwashed the people in this country remain @@hobbified
@arnbo88
@arnbo88 3 года назад
Simple solution: When the television detector man Mr. Bastard (his friends call him "Right Bleeding") knocks on your door; get Vyvyan to eat the tele. It worked on "The Young Ones".
@althejazzman
@althejazzman 3 года назад
Oh that old trick? Eat the TV? It's not a TV, it's a toaster!
@merikblackmore
@merikblackmore 3 года назад
Vyvyan is too busy getting stuck on his window ledge to eat the TV
@theotherwayofstopping4717
@theotherwayofstopping4717 3 года назад
When that telly comes out the other end...........
@althejazzman
@althejazzman 3 года назад
@@theotherwayofstopping4717 It'll be 13 channels of shit.
@anthonyrobinson5694
@anthonyrobinson5694 3 года назад
For the last TEN YEARS I have done that, informed the bbc that I do not own or rent a tv, yet they still insist I am breaking the law by not having a license. Even when I invited the Inspector inside my property. NOW I just ignore their SCAM LETTERS.
@stevenhale2935
@stevenhale2935 3 года назад
Go on Anthony, bloody 'av 'em
@vinnyvasquez
@vinnyvasquez 3 года назад
Should have just ignored them from the beginning
@WalrusRiderEntertainment
@WalrusRiderEntertainment 2 года назад
You need one to watch RU-vid too actually..
@Micke120872
@Micke120872 Год назад
@@WalrusRiderEntertainment Sort of correct, but only if you watch something that is also currently being broadcast as live as it is being produced. If you watch purely non live RU-vid stuff then you do not need a licence. You only need a licence if you are watching something live happening at that moment. If RU-vid has anything broadcasting the coronation of King Charles III next year that is being broadcasted by RU-vid totally live as it happens, then a licence will be required, but if you watch it say one hour after it finishes, then it will not be live and therefore no licence needed.
@MarkJohnson-ro1ed
@MarkJohnson-ro1ed Год назад
@@Micke120872 In theory, all it needs is a 1 minute delay.
@vspencer9764
@vspencer9764 3 года назад
I’ve not had a licence now for 10 years and the rule of thumb is if you ever get a knock on the door just close it as these goons have as much right to come into your house as a double glazing salesman and no communication means no fine. Even if they look in your window and saw you watching live tv it can’t be used as evidence just remember no name no fine and sign nothing and you can’t go far wrong.
@discountdave4537
@discountdave4537 3 года назад
Very good advice. Unfortunately, people don't follow this and still sign the 178 form
@helioshaul3924
@helioshaul3924 2 года назад
a stranger walking up to your window and looking in, could be considered criminal intent.
@oatseawong6664
@oatseawong6664 2 года назад
NHK in Japan also use the same model.
@davidspear9790
@davidspear9790 Год назад
Under the implied rights of access they get by default, any sight of live tv being viewed through a window would be considered 'fair game' to them. Removing their implied right of access will only increase their suspicions and possibly encourage them apply for a warrant. Keep your curtains closed, and if they do call, say 'no thanks' and close the door.
@ahisma
@ahisma 3 года назад
You missed the single, most important point about any form of detection device - their evidence CANNOT be used in any court in the UK! This is because the BBC has always refused to explain how the devices work which means that a defendant cannot contest the devices accuracy therefore it is impossible for them to have a fair trial. There have been many attempts to obtain the technical details, including frredom of information requests but they have all been refused - this is why not a single court case has ever been offered "detector" evidence.
@chriscantplay...2933
@chriscantplay...2933 3 года назад
I think it’s simpler than that - the evidence doesn’t exist. Just a very dishonest organisation but that became obvious during the referendum!
@Phil-Sands
@Phil-Sands 3 года назад
Biggest con was making people believe these vans or hand held devices could detect a TV. I used to see them all the time slowly driving down the street to terrify people with neighbours chapping each other's door to spread the word.
@garethreece
@garethreece 3 года назад
Bunch of bullies. We had an empty house (my nan's) and even after we'd politely phoned and explained it was an empty property they continued with the passive aggressive letters. Once we started ignoring them they got even more snotty! I eventually had to ring up and Impolitely explain the situation to get them to shut up and **** off
@dapprman
@dapprman 3 года назад
Might be pot luck. About six months after I bought my house I received a TV licence demand for my old flat, turned out the new tenant hadn't bought one. I seem to remember I just had to complete a form or compose a letter and return it - never heard anything again.
@MrRnipperBrockleBroadcasting
@MrRnipperBrockleBroadcasting 3 года назад
The threatening letters started arriving at my late fathers address between us registering his death and the funeral, he had been old enough at the time to have had a free license. They really don’t like you using their threatening language back at them!
@garethreece
@garethreece 3 года назад
@@MrRnipperBrockleBroadcasting Indeed! But while I'm a polite, reasonable person (mostly), that tone in a letter really did put my back up!
@MrRnipperBrockleBroadcasting
@MrRnipperBrockleBroadcasting 3 года назад
@@garethreece Yes absolutely.
@Locutus
@Locutus 3 года назад
You're an idiot for getting worked up about these letters. Just ignore them. I don't have a TV, and I constantly get bombarded with letters, I either bin them or return to sender. Over the years, they have reduced their letter frequency to one every 6 months. Never has anyone come by, despite living in a large town. Don't get worked up over these things.
@sjsadler8061
@sjsadler8061 3 года назад
I had a friend who worked for the BBC technical services - He swore they didn't really exist ... Just a nasty fear campaign
@SINTD_666
@SINTD_666 3 года назад
They existed in the 70’s. My mother tells me she had a photo of me outside our flats and there was a detector van in the background. It might have been the only one in the country though.
@lucian6395
@lucian6395 3 года назад
@@SINTD_666 you sure that she wasn't teaching you to pay it when you where older, and even if it was there, how do you know it worked, not just a fake spinning thing on top
@SINTD_666
@SINTD_666 3 года назад
@@lucian6395 She definitely wasn’t teaching me to pay it. She didn’t have a license herself and she refused to buy one until she got caught without one and went to court in the early 80’s. How do I know it worked? I don’t know if it worked or was fake. But that wasn’t the question. The question was whether they existed or not. I don’t believe they ever worked. Certainly not well enough to get a conviction if that was the only evidence they took to court. Unfortunately the enforcers worked psychologically. If people thought they had been caught by a detector van, they usually admitted what they had done. Not only that, if an enforcer knocked at the door randomly and could see or hear the tv, they had you banged to rights anyway. They could say they were alerted to your address by a detector van if they wanted to but the van would never be used as evidence. Frequently they would use other tactics like peering through front windows or looking and listening through letterboxes. If they looked through a letterbox or a front window or even randomly knocked on the door and were challenged by the homeowner, they would have excuses for all of those things. That’s another detector van tactic. They would say the van picked up a signal and that the enforcer had knocked on the door but there was no answer so they called through the letterbox or went to knock on the window. The detector van (fake or not) was a tool. I’ve just realised how long this message is and I’m probably telling you what you already know. If I am I do apologise.
@lucian6395
@lucian6395 3 года назад
@@SINTD_666 similar thing with my nan, it's till a psychological thing with her even though she has never been confronted by them, she is afraid of what will happen. (P.s your message wasn't too long)
@SINTD_666
@SINTD_666 3 года назад
@@lucian6395 What you’re saying about your nan was definitely part of their long term plan. 20 years ago young people moved out of their parents home, it was one of the things they accepted they had to do because their parents did it. It was always the same things; set up direct debit for rent, council tax, water rates etc. Then get insurance, get a phone number, change address with DVLA, car insurance etc, and then make sure you have a tv license. It was ingrained into them like religion. (No offence meant if you’re religious) I have a tv license although 99% of the time I’m either on Netflix or Now TV movies or RU-vid. My kids like one or two tv shows they watch live so I have to have a license.
@robwebber1217
@robwebber1217 3 года назад
A military spokesman was once quoted as saying that even they didn’t have the technology to detect an electrical device receiving radio signals, and even if it did exist it would never fit inside a van.
@johngayder9249
@johngayder9249 3 года назад
The technology has been in use since the late 50s - but I don’t know if the BBC used it. Check out “Rafter”: warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/aldrich/vigilant/lectures/gchq/rafter/
@davidewhite69
@davidewhite69 3 года назад
its quite possible to detect the beam circuitry in a CRT tube set, but whether the BBC would have gone to expense is questionable, especially in the 60s 70s, IMO it was all a bluff
@StringerNews1
@StringerNews1 3 года назад
LOL, no. Any radio receiver has a local oscillator, and the LO radiates EM waves at the frequency it's tuned to. Detecting a LO requires...another radio. Pretty simple, and yes it was the military that first used them in WWII to catch spies.
@martinusher1
@martinusher1 3 года назад
The two things they could zero in on would be the line scan oscillator and the local oscillator in the tuner. The equipment would be a directional aerial and a spectrum analyzer. This would work until the 1980s and would certainly not work today which is why they went for set registration in the 80s. Now its a lost cause.
@StringerNews1
@StringerNews1 3 года назад
@@martinusher1 yep, with newer TV front ends in little Faraday cages, going after the baseband video is the low-hanging fruit. A CRT yoke made sounds you could hear across a room, so it should be easy to pick up as RF. Detecting color in the US would require nothing extra, as the frequencies are slightly less. But for PAL, listening for the color subcarrier (with its own LO) might just work. Today, they could compare the spectral balance of light from the TV, and figure out what show it matches, which I'd fear in commercial hands!
@HALLish-jl5mo
@HALLish-jl5mo 3 года назад
"Some aspects of the equipment have been developed in such secrecy that engineers working on specific detection methods work in isolation - so not even they know how the other detection methods work." As an engineer, that's hilarious bullshit.
@BertGrink
@BertGrink 3 года назад
I seem to remember hearing about that on Karl Smallwood's YT channel.
@MillionAirL
@MillionAirL 3 года назад
That's exactly how some technologies are developed - e.g. weapons systems.
@chrisplunkett2814
@chrisplunkett2814 3 года назад
It's called 'compartmentalisation' and is in widespread use in lots of industries that make for example secret defence products.
@AnalogueInTheUK
@AnalogueInTheUK 3 года назад
@@chrisplunkett2814 Correct. However, the BBC have never used any evidence gathered by using these gadgets in a court case. It's just a load of horse shit, designed to scare the elderly and vulnerable.
@KarrierBag
@KarrierBag 3 года назад
I grew up with my parents owning a TV and Radio repair, sales and rental shop. My dad always said the detector vans were a load of rubbish. Now living on a boat, I don't have a TV, I haven't had one for over 10 years.
@nvrndingsmmr
@nvrndingsmmr 3 года назад
They did look pretty cool with those giant antennas on the roof, but the 1984-esque surveillance aspect is certainly pretty disturbing!
@lakrids-pibe
@lakrids-pibe 3 года назад
Hello from Denmark. We have the same licensing system, the same TV detector vans, and the same rumours the vans were just for show. There's a funny anecdote about the 1976 licensing campaign: It was a combination of a TV spot and two letters to the public. One letter, with a green dot, was sent to every houshold with a licens. When the postman came to a house that didn't get a green letter, he was supposed to give them the other letter which had a red dot. The green letter was a polite "thank you for paying". The red letter was a very stern reminder that owning a TV without a license - "dark viewing" (sort seer) - was illigal. All the letters were delivered on the very same day, and on that day (in the evening) the TV spot was aired: Popular comic actors played a family who received the red, threatening letter, and then the neighbor came by and reminded them of all the distributors on Danish radio. It only costs X kroner a day for all the great content. The campaign was a hughe succes. 150.000 new houshold signed up. But it was also very controversial. It's legal to send a letter to all your customers you have in your register, but when you use the postman to search out the families who are not in the register .... let's just say they never used the method again.
@elbecko7969
@elbecko7969 3 года назад
It's good(ish) to know that other countries have this terrible idea
@albo1506
@albo1506 3 года назад
Also from Denmark. We now have a media licence. If you own a tv, a smartphone or computer you have access and therefor have to pay this media licence. Btw I had a visit from the detection van a long time ago. So they did exist.
@acoffeewithsatan
@acoffeewithsatan 3 года назад
@@albo1506 they likely simply used the data collected to find obvious users who didn't pay. If you need a license to use pretty much any means of Internet connection (like everyone who isn't part of an older demographic), you more than likely have an Internet subscription yet don't pay a license, it's pretty safe to assume that you are violating the norm. Now park the fancy van they claim can detect infractors outside your house, ring your doorbell and say they've "detected" usage of a TV or whatever yet you don't have a license... Either you scare away and admit the infraction, or they'll have to prosecute you using... the "data" of the fake van? Nah, more like your Internet/electricity consumptions data which is meant to be private... I guess you can see where we're going.
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 3 года назад
In merica you'll find a red dot on your forehead.
@bob_the_bomb4508
@bob_the_bomb4508 8 месяцев назад
You forgot to mention the cat detector vans for the cat licenses…
@anessenator
@anessenator 3 года назад
The BBC's quality dropped off a cliff when the cuts hit in the great recession. Don't have a license, don't want one, get all my entertainment online.
@UXXV
@UXXV 3 года назад
They aren’t real. The vans existed to scare but the technology didn’t exist. There was a huge fidonet thread on this in the early 90s where telecom and TV folks let the cat out of the bag. They would see who didn’t have a license, park the van outside and ring the door bell and say “we detected a Tv in use within these premises...” people seeing the uniform and van parked outside were quick to own up to avoid larger fines.
@davidbrayshaw3529
@davidbrayshaw3529 3 года назад
The technology aspect is an interesting one. A simple radio device was definitely able to "hear" the local oscillator of a television set or radio. I discovered that as a child playing around with shortwave radio. The problem for the detector van however, was that local oscillator operated at very low frequencies which meant that they would have had to have used omnidirectional antennas with greatly reduced gain. How effective these were at detecting such a weak signal through a double brick wall is debatable but I would suggest that they were somewhat compromised to say the least. Any atmospheric electrical noise or noise generated by unshielded motors and generators would almost certainly have drowned out the local oscillator. If any technology was genuinely employed in these vans to detect TV's, it would have been a horrible job to operate it. I don't know many people that would spend eight hours a day listening to static and lightening crash's for very long, do you?
@pjohan74
@pjohan74 3 года назад
From what I heard in another country than UK, they did for some time work but only if you lived in a single household house. Not in a multi-apartment house like the one in their warning commercials. 99.99% of the work were made just ringing doorbell at or phoning up people that did not pay license and ask. Lived for quite some time without TV and was phoned from time to time, sometimes quite rode. Offered them to visit my house and see if they could find a TV and if not just stop bugging me, but they never accepted. Later license was moved to ordinary tax in my country and no one get bugged anymore. Probably a much more efficient system.
@davidbrayshaw3529
@davidbrayshaw3529 3 года назад
@@pjohan74 I would hazard a guess that in times past it was possible to detect a radio appliance in areas with low density housing. I'm not so sure about it when you're talking about medium and high density housing. Directional antennas that could operate on such low frequencies are the stuff of science fiction.
@richardcrossley5581
@richardcrossley5581 3 года назад
@@davidbrayshaw3529 Imagine how they work now with Home Plug AV kits sending Ethernet over the electrical wiring. There's noise enough to make the radio hams complain, so it probably disrupts TV detector vans.
@davidbrayshaw3529
@davidbrayshaw3529 3 года назад
@@richardcrossley5581 They wouldn't stand a snowball's chance these days. I live in a smallish town in Australia in a location where you wouldn't expect much noise. When I've had the radio gear up and running on HF I get noise of around S3-s5. My mate lives closer to the center of town in a duel zone (business/residential) area and he's given up on HF at home due to a constant noise level of S9, all man made. There is no way that a TV detector van could work in my environment let alone the hustle and bustle of a medium density city. Don't even get me started on solar and poorly shielded inverters.
@frankdogui7195
@frankdogui7195 3 года назад
Here in Italy they recently "solved" the problem by including the TV license into the electricity bill, claiming that now everyone with a smartphone can watch RAI's crap.
@Wok_Agenda
@Wok_Agenda 3 года назад
We did that in greece since forever but it is around 50 euros per year nothing like the 200 the bbc wants
@miaugato93
@miaugato93 2 года назад
Same in Portugal, but it's like 3 euros monthly and state channels still run ads, apart from the 2nd channel, the news channel but only on FTA, and the radio.
@silvermane9370
@silvermane9370 3 года назад
I got a look in a Commer detector van some time, I’m guessing in the early 70s, the big Ariel on the roof wasn’t connected to anything inside. My dad said the driver had a list of tv licences on a street and they drove round looking for a tv through the lounge window or an Ariel on the house.
@dapprman
@dapprman 3 года назад
I was about to post about this - you are correct - I've been informed from several reliable sources the same, it was a psychological tool and reality they just drove to houses with no licenses and looked for tell tale aerials or flickering lights.
@Wok_Agenda
@Wok_Agenda 3 года назад
Aerial , little mermaid has nothing to do with the bbc
@MukkaMonkey
@MukkaMonkey 2 года назад
@@Wok_Agenda Not true! its the name of the in-house BBC magazine!
@vylbird8014
@vylbird8014 9 месяцев назад
@@Wok_Agenda If you want to see some real nitpicking, get an engineer and a biologist together and ask the plural for 'antenna.'
@runoflife87
@runoflife87 3 года назад
This is almost Orwell-like.
@TheRatlord74
@TheRatlord74 3 года назад
The UK is moving rapidly in that direction I am afraid. In fact most "western states" are heading this way.
@DeneF
@DeneF 3 года назад
That will be Orwellian then?
@xr6lad
@xr6lad 3 года назад
My grandfather, now dead, said in the 90’s that the world was moving more and more towards authoritarian rule of one kind or another and he’d seen it change but by bit since the 40’s in various bits of legislation that individually didn’t look much but lined up was significant.
@GRAHAMAUS
@GRAHAMAUS 3 года назад
@@xr6lad Hilarious, when you look at how truly authoritarian it was in the 1700s, say. Transported for theft of a loaf of bread? The reality is that it's a hell of a lot more liberal than it used to be, and grinding poverty has diminished.
@junkiejackflash
@junkiejackflash 3 года назад
People who claim every goddamn thing the government does is Orwellian, are themselves Orwellian. Read a new damn book people. Hell, ease into it with Brave New World if ya have to. I've come to the conclusion that the world is only as shitty as you let it be. And it's kinda shitty because every single generation just bitches about changes, and how "it used to be better." No it didn't, you just don't think about the shitty parts of the past. People in America used to (and a smaller number still do) bitch about how not being allowed to call black people the N word is trampling on the constitution. Idk man. "This is so Orwellian" is so goddamned overused and almost all of the time the subject is not actually "Orwellian." Call me up when they start rounding us up in cattle cars, then I might concede some points.
@MENSA.lady2
@MENSA.lady2 Год назад
Here's what really happened. A total of24 Commer Cob vans were modified for this work. It was intended that each of the 11 TV regions would get 2 vans. The remaining 2 would be kept at the Depot in Stanmore Middlesex as spares. The BBC tried to prosecute a Scottish viewer but the viewer discovered that politicians would not allow them to be deployed in Northern Ireland. The viewer screamed "Discrimination" and the judge agreed. The politicians refused to back down so the vans were scrapped. They were rust buckets and often failed their MOT test They didn't work either and as the aerials were made of polystyrine the snapped off if the driver exceeded about 40mph. .
@alanhynd7886
@alanhynd7886 3 года назад
Worked for the post office (as was) BT (as is) back in the early 80s. Never worked with the detector vans directly; however, the word in the company was that there were only a handful of vans that had real detector kit in them. There may certainly have been a number of others with non-functional or even no kit inside. It didn't matter that much. Word was that they just drove them around town centres, parking here and there and maybe doing the odd interview with the local press or radio on why they were in town. That was all they needed to do,
@vinnyvasquez
@vinnyvasquez 3 года назад
If everyone didn't put their TV by the downstairs window and didn't invite inspectors in, the TV licence would disappear. It's the people who let them in who keep that method going.
@gaborhertelendy
@gaborhertelendy 5 месяцев назад
Its true but what can we expect in a such a uniformized country where all the houses look the same, and you can't stick out of the mass in any ways?
@dangerouslytalented
@dangerouslytalented 3 года назад
In Australia, we got rid of the license fee because everybody had TV anyway so they just used general revenue.
@emilymaitlislaptop
@emilymaitlislaptop 3 года назад
Not seen you for a while. Must search for your latest...
@georgemaragos2378
@georgemaragos2378 3 года назад
Hi - my dad told me he got caught out 1961-1965 some where there, but by 1970 there were no more license fees in Australia
@dangerouslytalented
@dangerouslytalented 3 года назад
@@georgemaragos2378 I think it was some time in the early 70s. I didn't even know about the license when I was growing up
@chubbyroyston3880
@chubbyroyston3880 3 года назад
Thats because the aussies wouldn't pay so abc gave up in tbe end
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 3 года назад
@@chubbyroyston3880 as a bunch of desendants of convicts I can see why not. G00D F0R THEM.
@deltauljCustoms
@deltauljCustoms 3 года назад
Thought I was whatching a ChilliJonCarne video at first!🤣
@Aetost
@Aetost 3 года назад
I remember seeing one during the early 00's, parked near the student residences in my university campus. Did seem like a prop to me, though, as the antenna never moved, nor there was any activity around it whatsoever, during the day it stayed parked in the middle of a field, near the aforementioned residences.
@theadamtron
@theadamtron 3 года назад
My favourite clip on TV detection was in the young ones where Vivian eats the TV to avoid the detector man.
@joannaatkins822
@joannaatkins822 3 года назад
I cancelled my subscription, and abide by all the rules for not using BBC services. The final straw was when they started charging me £25 per month in advance for two years payment period. That and some heavily implied political bias and cronyism
@cesariojpn
@cesariojpn 3 года назад
#DefundtheBBC
@video99couk
@video99couk 3 года назад
In the earlier days, it was certainly possible, even quite easy, to detect a TV. When colour TV came along, they transmitted even more hash and were even easier to detect, even if you couldn't generally detect the channel they were watching. Detecting the channel would mean looking for the local oscillator frequency, which is a relatively small signal compared to the hash coming off a 22" Decca Bradford hybrid TV from the early 1970s. Flat panel sets would be essentially impossible to differentiate from a computer monitor since they are more or less just that.
@Kevin-mx1vi
@Kevin-mx1vi 3 года назад
Indeed, TV sets used to be huge things, with little or no internal RF shielding so the set's own "spurious emissions" may have been detectable with the right equipment. These days a small aluminium pressing is enough to fully shield the small PCBs in a TV. Incidentally, the level of these emissions is governed by law & is very low, otherwise the whole RF spectrum would be blanketed by interference from electronic devices. This is the reason that "WiFi Boosters" are illegal in UK - They take your WiFi signal & re-transmit it at an increased amplitude that might drown out your neighbour's WiFi & make their's unusable. Likewise why you can't buy routers with monstrously powerful WiFi signals.
@Yuushiboy
@Yuushiboy 3 года назад
To force someone to pay for something they dont even use should be illegal. I wonder what would happen if Netflix removed the subscription and charged people even if they dont use it?
@LittleCar
@LittleCar 3 года назад
Some of the US Government's money goes to PBS, whether you watch it or not.
@matthewjones12181
@matthewjones12181 3 года назад
@@LittleCar if you've gone to a school in the United States, I can almost guarantee that you've seen PBS produced materials. I know my children have used books from their school library that are PBS co-produced. PBS has a long reach and is usually viewed in a positive light. Just my observations, though. :)
@deancosens5710
@deancosens5710 3 года назад
I think the same is probably true of the BBC. I certainly remember watching a lot of Blackadder in history classes 😁
@Mithrasboy
@Mithrasboy 3 года назад
What if you don't use medical services for a year? Or don't need the fire service or the police? In a grown up, caring society we often pay for things we don't necessarily use.
@gaborhertelendy
@gaborhertelendy 5 месяцев назад
@@Mithrasboy You might need medical service eventually, nobody knows. You might need fire service, you cant say never. But i will definitely never watch bbc channel. Thats a difference.
@ABrit-bt6ce
@ABrit-bt6ce 3 года назад
Significantly more money leaves me via Patreon for You Tube creators than a TV Licence would cost. I probably ought to cut back on that :)
@chrisgurney2467
@chrisgurney2467 3 года назад
Ah but the difference is you are paying directly for the content you want, and not for that superfluous stuff you don't :D
@martinusher1
@martinusher1 3 года назад
Radios used to be licensed to fund the BBC but once they became portable and ubiqutous they gave up and just focused on TV licenses. TVs have followed the same fate -- what was once a relatively rare, large, power hungry box is now something that slips into your pocket, has numerous other functions and pretty much everyone has one.
@ProfSimonHolland
@ProfSimonHolland 3 года назад
keep the bbc independent of government and advertising....it's amazing value for money. i think the bbc should also look at international subscribers.
@chinafox1949
@chinafox1949 3 года назад
That white detector van was the type I saw once in the 80's when I was a kid living in Wales. It was driving around the country lanes next to no houses there huge fields, just the odd farmhouse. I'm sure they just wanted to be seen rather than actually doing anything. What I find curious in that all these years where people tell stories of what jobs they have worked in the past as far as I know there have been no online interviews or forum posts with anyone who worked on these vans.
@paulinecabbed1271
@paulinecabbed1271 Год назад
They had detection Cars as early as 1952, look it up
@TheShowgirl25
@TheShowgirl25 3 года назад
Remember the days before tv was invented? You used to need a licence to listen to the radio!
@BilisNegra
@BilisNegra 3 года назад
Nobody here will literally remember, but some could have a very old relative who does.
@ageinghippy100
@ageinghippy100 3 года назад
@@BilisNegra I remember having a radio license, they weren't abolished till 1971.
@inregionecaecorum
@inregionecaecorum 3 года назад
@@ageinghippy100 They were abolished because people stopped bothering to buy one, I am surprised the TV licence still hangs on, but seriously it will not be around for ever and neither will the BBC the way things are going.
@darkgoodness2108
@darkgoodness2108 3 года назад
TV detector vans always sounded like part of a threatening PR campaign - But hey, the BBC have always been good with props. :) Our family moved recently to a house which has both a name and a number - For some reason our TV licence is registered to the house name, but not the number, even though both count as the same address. We're currently getting angry letters from TV licensing, and for months they've been threatening us with a "visit" from an enforcer, normally using letters in red envelopes. It's a good thing we've still opted for a physical copy of our up-to-date TV licence, registered under our name and address, so we can wave it in front of them if they do decide to visit. It's disgusting that they've even threatening their paying customers, though. We haven't contacted them to correct them on this principle - It should be their responsibility to update their database and realise that both our house name and number are one and the same. It'll be interesting to find out what happens if they take us to court over this.
@fgsaramago
@fgsaramago 3 года назад
The map for Portugal is wrong. There's an about 3€ fee/tax added every month to every single domestic electricity bill to fund public broadcasting. It seems the assumption is that any household connected to the electrical grid will watch RTP content at some point and such draconian licensing as in the UK would obviously be deemed illegal as it's incredibly privacy invading
@miaugato93
@miaugato93 2 года назад
The irony is not every single domestic electricity bill is used for a home with a TV. Sometimes it's just some land and you hooked up electricity to run the appliances. Bam. Your crops are paying 3€ monthly. Same for vacation homes that you only go there for 2 weeks a year. Consumption = 0€, fees includling broadcast fee= 15€
@fgsaramago
@fgsaramago 2 года назад
@@miaugato93 oh yeah, its full of holes. If you have a holiday home, youre paying it twice. Its a relevant example seeing that Portugal has the highest holiday home ownership rate in Europe. Not only that, theres now a new (starting in 2022) 2€/year fee that every cable package and video streaming provider has to pay for each subscriber they have in the country, also for the public broadcaster. Any individual now, besides the direct fee in the monthly electricity bill, is also indirectly paying a fee in the cable/internet bill, plus for each video streaming service it subscribes to. Still, were quite a ways off from the kind of stuff that exists in the UK, with TV licensing ;)
@christopherthompson2167
@christopherthompson2167 3 года назад
All smoke and mirrors, empty vans with dummy antennas on the roof!
@discountdave4537
@discountdave4537 3 года назад
And dummies in the vans
@reynardkitsune1
@reynardkitsune1 Год назад
I think the last time I had seen a detector van driving around our streets in Germany was in the early 80s, maybe as a kind of farewell as it was common knowledge that they couldn't single out a household with an unlicensed TV set in a city area. But as someone mentioned it below, Germany found a far more effective solution: tax everyone.
@KarlAdamsAudio
@KarlAdamsAudio 3 года назад
Does this mean the Cat Detector Van from the Ministry of Housinge ("I never seen so many bleedin' aerials") wasn't real either? ...
@LittleCar
@LittleCar 3 года назад
'Fraid not!
@davidbritton9812
@davidbritton9812 3 года назад
Hello miss!
@JGlaister
@JGlaister 3 года назад
I would like to buy a license for me pet fish, Eric.
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 3 года назад
Musta been before they installed a CATalitic converter on them.😁
@johnnysea7
@johnnysea7 3 года назад
I'm just sitting here in the U.S. shaking my head in disbelief. Britannia, rule the (air) waves, I guess? Orwellian, indeed. there has to be a better way than to criminalize pensioners and single mothers trying to scrape by.
@deancosens5710
@deancosens5710 3 года назад
If you look at it another way, the licence fee is a means of funding high quality public broadcasting without forcing everyone to pay in their taxes or subjecting them to commercial advertising. You'd be amazed how much more enjoyable TV is without ads although there's less chances to get up and make a cup of tea! If you look at it as something you either opt to help fund or opt out of, it's not a bad idea. And from that point of view, if you're enjoying what other people are paying to fund for free, well it might seem a little bit like pinching some of what they've paid for!
@lakrids-pibe
@lakrids-pibe 3 года назад
I shake my head in disbelief at TV news and children's programs surrounded by commercials. Public service television is great. At least where I live.
@MyPhobo
@MyPhobo 3 года назад
@@lakrids-pibe Most children's shows are on PBS in the USA which is funded by donations and doesn't contain commercials. Which kids shows have commercials?
@applausenu
@applausenu 3 года назад
National broadcasting is greatly funded and of such high quality in the US I guess you don't have to worry.... oh wait.
@johnnysea7
@johnnysea7 3 года назад
@@applausenu Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the USA is greatly funded and has high quality programing. I've lived in the UK for a few years and agree that television programming there is of high quality. My "disbelief" was towards the way TV taxes are separately imposed, instead of having them incorporated into the price of televisions and accessories. But I get it, we ALL pay for television services regardless of which side of the ocean we live. The UK has a system that works for the UK, and the US system works for the US.
@LexAngel
@LexAngel 4 месяца назад
My late mum didn't like their attitude towards her, so she always refused to let them in or reply to their letters. She could have just let them in and they'd have seen she didn't have a TV or a computer, but she always refused. :)
@bassebassesen2254
@bassebassesen2254 3 года назад
We had them in Norway, now the state channel/radio is deducted from the tax for anyone with a normal income. For a time it was locked to tv purchase, so if you ever bought a new TV in your name. Now everyone with a job basically has to pay
@JTA1961
@JTA1961 3 года назад
So it's basically "our way" or Norway.
@1979jon
@1979jon 3 года назад
They should make the bbc a subscription channel
@petermardon2698
@petermardon2698 3 года назад
There used to be a “radio receiving license” in Canada at one point but it was suspended in WW. II to encourage radio use, and was never re-instituted.
@pgbaines65
@pgbaines65 3 года назад
The BBC is a bargain next to other tv services and no adverts. It also goes to reduce the cost of other tv services in the UK. In America, you are lucky if you can get any free channels and the cost of satellite or cable is a lot more than they cost in the UK. 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🤠👍
@skp115
@skp115 3 года назад
Wait, you have to pay money to watch free to air TV? That’s so weird. I never lived in a country that has that.
@oatseawong6664
@oatseawong6664 2 года назад
that;;s no advertisments. It's so surprised that country is better livng quality than country I live, and than Lebanon.
@jefferysmith3930
@jefferysmith3930 3 года назад
I learned something new today. I had never heard of that funding system before
@robert43g
@robert43g 3 года назад
1 of the best things Australia did was in1972 we got rid of our tv licence ( to pay for our ABC ( like your BBC)) Instead our taxes pay for it . Like Sweden we had people knocking on our door . Pity our ABC is as bad if not worst than your BBC
@Mithrasboy
@Mithrasboy 3 года назад
The BBC is a much bigger organisation than the ABC with a huge amount of output. There is no comparison.
@myMotoring
@myMotoring 3 года назад
Wait... What? UK still enforcing TV licence? In Malaysia it officially ended in 1999 but people weren't paying since early 90s anyway.
@allwaizeright9705
@allwaizeright9705 5 месяцев назад
Fact is there has been NO PROSECUTIONS from "TV Detector" vans...
@discountdave4537
@discountdave4537 3 года назад
I haven't had a licence for years and I still watch live TV. The British Bullshit Corporation still haven't and won't convict me. I hope the BBC see this
@NOWThatsRichy
@NOWThatsRichy 3 года назад
In this video, Little car goes all 'ChilliJonCarne'. 😃😃
@hopje01
@hopje01 2 года назад
The only thing I can think of, when an analogue tv with an aerial connected, they look with a spectrum analyzer if they can detect the local oscillator signal from the tv tuner bleeding into the aerial. The frequency of that LO is in direct relation with the receiving frequency.
@jensschroder8214
@jensschroder8214 8 месяцев назад
My father is not a radio amateur, but he still experimented with TV reception antennas. One day a car with antennas drove through the village trying to get radio directions. Father quickly ran to his system and unplugged the power supply. The van drove away. But there was also the story of the CB radio operator a few towns away. This had unlicensed hardware in use when transmitting, especially HF transmitter amplifiers. The authorities confiscated the transmitting devices. These vehicles with antennas can primarily locate transmitters. Either you are sending something illegally or a signal is being emitted unintentionally after a frequency conversion. But today it is hardly possible to locate something like that because there is a lot of high-frequency garbage in the air.
@combatking0
@combatking0 3 года назад
I don't remember the last time I watched TV. Almost everything I watch is on DVD or RU-vid.
@stephenevans6070
@stephenevans6070 7 месяцев назад
They caught a lot of people because of the fact that TVs were either bought on HP or were delivered by the shop to the customer, so there was a name and address, this info was then submitted to the government, the smart money bought a 2nd hand TV, no records then
@parkecorepersonaltrainingp2601
@parkecorepersonaltrainingp2601 3 года назад
Just love these. Would you be able to do the Tamiya story. As a modle car fan for over 40 years that would be great to see 👍👍
@VladoT
@VladoT 3 года назад
After the failure with collecting TV fee here in my country they put the payment as part of the electricity bill. After many people just started to pay only the "electricity part" of the bill they pressed on the cable companies to charge each customer extra for the TV subscription fee effectively doubling the cable TV price overnight ☹
@AlainHubert
@AlainHubert 3 года назад
I'm astonished. I didn't know about this TV license-to-watch fee. And I suppose that TV stations still had commercial breaks for broadcasting publicity on top of that? Anyway, very interesting video, thanks for sharing for free! ;-)
@joannaatkins822
@joannaatkins822 3 года назад
Actually no, the BBC only advertised BBC products and services, but the non BBC terrestrial channels did use adverts
@BertGrink
@BertGrink 3 года назад
@@joannaatkins822 We have a similar situation here in Denmark where the State-owned Danmarks Radio is not allowed to transmit advertising. Other TV and Radio stations do broadcast commercials, however.
@JBFlytography
@JBFlytography 3 года назад
Load of s**te. Not paid for a TV licence for about 4 years, still never been fined.
@TheLeeFudge
@TheLeeFudge 3 года назад
They did exist but I’m not sure that they could detect TVs nowadays. Cathode ray tubes emitted radiation that could be detected at some distance and someone could see what was on your screen. I was in communications in the Royal Navy and we used signal insulation around communications equipment compartments to block the emission of this radiation.
@jfbeam
@jfbeam 8 месяцев назад
A properly operating CRT does not create any radiation. Certainly nothing that would be easily detectable _by a f***ing antenna_ yards away, through walls and brick. (or the metal panels of a ship. military and government tends to get excessively paranoid around SIGINT.)
@Ribeirasacra
@Ribeirasacra 3 года назад
Correction. The Dutch Public service has adverts on it. They are shown between programmes rather than during. This is less intrusive and makes for better viewing (IMHO). Funding is partly by taxes. Nearly all of the country is served by cable TV. feeds for this are relatively low. Deepening on the service provider and package they can watch the various channels of the BBC.
@kmfw72
@kmfw72 2 года назад
The ad from 6:47 is from Ireland, not the UK. RTÉ is also funded through advertising.
@InfiniteLoop
@InfiniteLoop 2 года назад
Wow, that opening advert is super big brotherly.
@PiperLund
@PiperLund 3 года назад
Sweden has also moved the fee to a form of tax. One can wonder if there are any risks of the public tv network becoming more political when there is a possible chance for the politicians to put up conditions that suites their own agenda?
@fgsaramago
@fgsaramago 3 года назад
What do you mean by it becoming more politicised?
@deancosens5710
@deancosens5710 3 года назад
Interesting point. If you fund it through taxes then the politicians might be able to influence what is produced by influencing what is funded. Interestingly, despite its remit of non bias (or because of it, depending on your viewpoint) the new director general of the BBC has supposedly cut back on comedy funding - the suggestion being this is as he allegedly strongly supports the government while the comedians generally do the opposite. You might see that as reducing the bias against the government or increasing the bias towards them, depending on your viewpoint!
@PiperLund
@PiperLund 3 года назад
@@fgsaramago Kind of what Dean says. If politicians can open or close the tap with money, they can tell what is ok to show on TV and what is not. Public TV isn't, and probably never have been, unbiased but I still think it's a dangerous road to go and let politicians run the game of information.
@fgsaramago
@fgsaramago 3 года назад
@@PiperLund if there's a specific tax to fund it, isn't the effect the opposite? With that guaranteed source of funds, not much influence politicians can have
@PiperLund
@PiperLund 3 года назад
@@fgsaramago It is a specific tax, but the government decides the budget for the public network every year. Since they decide the budget they can also give clear directions for example what to report on, what narrative that should be run and who gets to be in the center of attention. I'm not saying that it automatically becomes corrupt or politicized but I would say there is definitely a possibility.
@Psycandy
@Psycandy 7 месяцев назад
always wondered about this, but then again, since every household had a TV, you could just point at any domicile and say 'there's a TV in there' making TV detector vans redundant. Monitors were a grey area, so were satellite dishes and PC tuner cards. It was a bit of a mess. Pretty sure the Google Street View car counts as a detector van :)
@russell5791
@russell5791 2 года назад
May have worked in the past, detecting a CRT, but not now with all Telly's being flat screen LCD - and many just used as monitors for games consoles.
@stephenc6648
@stephenc6648 3 года назад
Nice shot of the Auto-Magic Car Park at 2:13. I parked in it this week. Sadly it's very dilapidated now. NCP spends just enough on maintenance to keep it usable but not a penny more.
@LittleCar
@LittleCar 3 года назад
It looked so cool in the 60s - so futuristic! And I lived for 24 years in the West Midlands and never knew about it.
@stephenc6648
@stephenc6648 3 года назад
@@LittleCar It's a really clever design because the parking area is on two interlocking spirals. That means the entire surface of the car park is a massive ramp so you don't have to go up and down a spiral ramp to enter or leave.
@richardcrossley5581
@richardcrossley5581 3 года назад
@@stephenc6648 Having fought and just about won getting a car in and out of Kingsway Shopping Centre in Newport I can appreciate the Auto-Magic design. Kingsway had 75cm walls at the ends of each ramp, just high enough to hit with a bumper or dint a rear door.
@crcomments8509
@crcomments8509 3 года назад
You could probably detect a signal the Chroma crystal in a CRT TV set, that would allow you to differentiate between a B&W set and a colour one. The other possibility with CRT sets is the detecting the interference from the High voltage circuit for the Tube, in a colour set it is much higher than a B&W set.
@E36ist
@E36ist 3 года назад
All I remember about this advert is my Dad muttering bollocks whenever it came on and calling my Auntie soft for believing it.
@TheShowgirl25
@TheShowgirl25 3 года назад
It's only if you watch 'live' broadcasts that you need a licence for! Watching pre-recorded programmes & repeats should be free, right? The BBC get round that by saying that even if you don't watch 'live' tv - the fact that your set is capable of receiving 'live' broadcast leaves you liable to pay. The only way round it is to de-tune your set so that it is incapable of receiving BBC channels at all. I was told that by a tv licence inspector!
@deancosens5710
@deancosens5710 3 года назад
That's interesting that he said that. I understood that you could have a TV set as long as it's not capable of receiving live TV (I.e. no aerial or other device is connected) and you don't stream live TV. For example, I use an old TV screen as a computer monitor!
@mpol701
@mpol701 7 месяцев назад
Bbc don't say that, licence laws are clear if u watch non live and dvd blu-ray though any device or tv no. Law is broken u can have devices and tv as many as I want, they have yo prove u watch live owning a tv or device isn't proof
@mpol701
@mpol701 7 месяцев назад
Taking bbc off the set? No that won't work as freeview will download all content and all freeview and satellite requires a licence anyway, no they have to prove u are watching illegally live or using iPlayer
@ag-fd1py
@ag-fd1py 3 года назад
Total BS. Detection of a receiver is impossible. RF engineer 30ys.
@Rich-on6fe
@Rich-on6fe 3 года назад
Detecting the tuner might not be be practical but detecting the stuff that's driving the CRT display isn't hard.
@hepphepps8356
@hepphepps8356 3 года назад
Not the UK, but we had the same system in my country, and I have been told by at least one telecom/broadcast-distribution guru that participated innthis they could indeed do this with ease back in the day when TV sets were overpowered, few and far between. Resonance in the reciever and the crazy picture tubes back then was more than enough. People feared them as hell as they were percieved as a direct continuation of the cars the Gestapo used to triangulate illegal radios during wwii occupation times. At some point it got easier to just ring the bells on fridays and saturday evenings of adresses that didn’t have a TV on paper and listen for them when someone opened, but the Vans and sinilar handheld devices where used in infomercials for quite some time!
@cool386vintagetechnology6
@cool386vintagetechnology6 3 года назад
It is possible if the set has a poorly designed tuner that leaks local oscillator radiation. In fact it's possible to tell what channel the set is tuned to if the IF is known. The way around that is to use a TRF front end, and for good measure, an electrostatic picture tube to avoid electromagnetic radiation from the line output transformer and deflection yoke.
@MyMarsham
@MyMarsham 3 года назад
I immediately thought of the Young Ones episode in which the TV detector turns up at the door, and Vivian has to eat the television.
@nils9853
@nils9853 3 года назад
In Germany before the general fee for all households, you also only had to pay when you owend a TV. But they did not use vans, they just knocked on your door. They could not enter, but depending on the daytime they had a good Chance to hear the TV running. Or they just mentioned that there has been a Problem with the Service and asked if the quality was back to normal....
@ianhelps3749
@ianhelps3749 3 года назад
Sometimes they would look through your rubbish bins to see if you are throwing away last weeks TV magazine. Or they would phone you pretending to be carrying out a survey, asking what you thought of last night's programmes.
@wclifton968gameplaystutorials
@wclifton968gameplaystutorials 3 года назад
"fund national broadcasting" - why not instead not fund national TV broadcasting using taxpayers money, problem solved now that the BBC or RTÉ or whoever can be privatised on the stock exchange so no more TV License/Tax
@beetooex
@beetooex 3 года назад
Because Brits don't like paying for public services
@chrisrebar2381
@chrisrebar2381 3 года назад
beetooex Or, may be it's because many of us don't like funding government fear mongering BS propaganda!
@beetooex
@beetooex 3 года назад
@@chrisrebar2381 Enjoy your little culture war. It's nice for people to have a hobby.
@chrisrebar2381
@chrisrebar2381 3 года назад
beetooex Sort of proves my point!
@grandetaco4416
@grandetaco4416 7 месяцев назад
I am American citizen, however I heard about this paying for TV in the 80s as a kid. There was news story stating that the detector vans had been broken for years, but they just drove them down the street to scare people into paying their bills. I think the best way to handle a TV tax would be just a tax on all new television sets. Glad that PBS can't do this to us, however they just get 10% of their funds from our Taxes anyway, which is probably more wrong than what the BBC is doing.
@safirahmed
@safirahmed 7 месяцев назад
It's possible to identify the use of a CRT by the electromagnetic emissions. It's possible to identify the use of some equipment capable of receiving live broadcasts but not whether the broadcasts are actually live.
@Rekaert
@Rekaert 5 месяцев назад
Well, it breaks down like this. Not only do they not exist, but they would be entirely redundant. A device that detects a working TV would not be sufficient for the task, as you can own and operate a hundred TV's, and not need a licence, or you could operate zero TV's, but actually need a licence. The licence is not for the TV. It's for watching or recording live broadcast, or for watching BBC catchup. Simply put, TVL have a full list of UK addresses, cross-referenced with a full list of issued licences, so know which properties are without a licence. Armed with that knowledge, they dispatch a salesperson to visit the property. This is a sales and information gathering exercise, where the attempt is to persuade the owner to buy a licence, or to gather sufficient evidence so that a magistrate will grant a search warrant, and then hope they can enter and gather enough evidence for TVL to progress a court case. This person has no special powers beyond the next person in the street. There is no role such a detector plays in that dynamic, and not only have no warrants been issued on the back of one, they cannot be issued because then the BBC would have to explain to the legal authorities how they work, which they have persistently refused to do because doing so "would harm their ability to collect revenue". They may as well declare they have a crystal ball, and try to use that as evidence. They were, and remain, a scare-tactic intended to coerce the uninformed public into paying for the licence, which has become increasingly outdated. It remains one of the most scandalous cons of our time.
@Supersyncopation
@Supersyncopation 3 года назад
What would they do if everybody just stopped paying ? In reality you have to incriminate yourself to actually get prosecuted
@LittleCar
@LittleCar 3 года назад
They would probably have to stop broadcasting BBC TV and radio as they couldn’t pay any of the staff!
@discountdave4537
@discountdave4537 3 года назад
The majority of prosecutions come from doorstep confessions. The bbc goons scare you into signing a 178 form which you basically admit to watching live tv without a licence. Warrants are extremely rare. So, don't sign anything
@thunderwarrior1759
@thunderwarrior1759 Год назад
Back in 1981 you were supposed to have a license to use a CB radio and that you can detect because you are transmitting a signal but a tv doesn’t
@dapprman
@dapprman 3 года назад
I'm not sure about the original ones, but putting aside they would never work for blocks of flats, by the time of the commerce van it was all a psychological trick - I've been told this from multiple reliable (even inside) sources. As at least one other here has mentioned the vans were to scare people, in reality they just used their list of houses that did not have a license and looked for a tell tale aerial and/or flickering lights.
@oleo007
@oleo007 Год назад
Very interesting content,I'm from Brazil,I never heard nothing like this,licence for watch TV !!!!
@AntonyThorburn
@AntonyThorburn 3 года назад
ALL A CON.
@davesy6969
@davesy6969 3 года назад
I used to have a job delivering unpaid fine reminders and the vast majority was for non payment of tv licence or evading buying railway tickets.
@kevincronin464
@kevincronin464 7 месяцев назад
l have a bachelor of science degree in electronic engineering and have worded for the MOD as a RF engineer for 3 decades. I work at the cutting edge of Electronics. The science is very very simple,... electronic tv detection devices cannot detect a signal emanating from any dwelling. The most laughable of all is when you could purchase either a blk and white tv licence or a colour one. if you are able to detect the difference between either signal,... there is a nobel prize in science waiting for you
@neil6477
@neil6477 3 года назад
In the early 1970's and as a Telecomms Engineer working for the then Post Office, we had the opportunity to apply for a 'rotation' in the vans. When they were in our area they would park their vans in our Parts Depot and so I would pass them every morning when I went to pick up my yellow work van. They had two large detectors on the top which could be used to triangulate the exact position of the TV emmision.
@jimbob8385
@jimbob8385 3 года назад
Cancelled my licence. Rang them. Easy. Didnt even argue. I really dont miss the woke bbc. Happy with netflix, prime and catchup.
@hatednyc
@hatednyc 2 года назад
Have you the video of the call with a TV Licensing agent where he admits they do not in fact work and explains how it’s actually done with records and mailings?
@matthewcb1970
@matthewcb1970 3 года назад
Don't watch live TV - no licence needed. Must say I have not missed it one bit. The BBC does not serve the public at all, they need to be made to compete in the open market. We all know what would happen in that situation though...
@jaymason1015
@jaymason1015 3 года назад
I live in the USA so forgive my ignorance but I never heard of such a thing. All the airwaves are free here. There is no way I would pay for a license to watch TV. Especially when the broadcast companies make billions on selling time for advertising. It makes no sense. We have the option to pay for cable tv to broaden our viewing content but local channels are free. As for myself I don't watch TV. I prefer the internet.
@EricTheBlue61
@EricTheBlue61 3 года назад
I'm 60 and I've only seen one once in my life. That was in the 1970s. Even though they're meant to be unmarked now, I'm fairly sure there are none left. Retailers have to send your details to the licensing agency when you buy a set now and for a while recently, when a flat I owned was empty, they wrote to me relentlessly asking if the address needed a license. At my workplace, they block use of the BBC iPlayer on the company WiFi, so if I want to watch it on my lunch break I have to use mobile data.
@wonniewarrior
@wonniewarrior 3 года назад
I remember when we had to pay a annual fee to have a C.B. radio in Australia, about $22 AUD back then when I had 1 in my car. Of course I never paid it.
@althejazzman
@althejazzman 3 года назад
Now that you have to sign in to watch any live or catch up services on iPlayer, the BBC just correlate the address you provide when you sign up, with the addresses of those who have paid the licence. There's nothing to stop you providing the address you are currently staying at, where the home owner pays a licence, whilst watching iPlayer on your laptop at that address.
@superowl91
@superowl91 3 года назад
the optical device used was the mk1 human eyeball.
@pjohan74
@pjohan74 3 года назад
In Sweden, they started broadcasting TV on internet and thus claimed license from everyone owning a smartphone, or a tablet or computer with internet connection. One citizen appealed since he claimed it did not work on his 1995 i486 computer that he used for surfing the net, and he won i several instances. After that the fees were moved to the ordinary tax. If you have an income, you pay. Period. Since then fewer people have to work collecting the fees. We also used to have TV detector vans and, more common, people working around with antennas trying to detect signals. But most offenders were caught just ringing the doorbell and seeing a running televisions or asking the occupants. Or they phoned you up and simply asked if you had a television, most would politely answer truthful. We had no fines though, at least you normally didn't get any, you were just automatically reported to start getting license bills, and nothing stopped you from calling them up and claiming you no longer owned a television. But one intrusive part of the law was that the tv shop had to report name of anyone buying a television, making may people buy there televisions under fake name. It was also possible to rebuild you television so it could not receive normal tv signals, just satellite. But I think they removed that after too many started using it, especially since the public channels were available on satellite.
@jerkersandquist7244
@jerkersandquist7244 7 месяцев назад
Dont forget the threat of getting a snail put on your eye.
@Mariazellerbahn
@Mariazellerbahn 3 года назад
I have NEVER watched live TV yet if I had a device CAPAPLE of receiving, I had to have a licence. Now all that has changed. Each year I have to sign a declaration to say that I am only watching DVD's.
@richardcrossley5581
@richardcrossley5581 3 года назад
Once saw a TV detector van, a white Leyland Sherpa with the relevant labelling. It was parked in the local supermarket car park one evening. I suspect it was just an empty van, but unlike the one depicted, looked just like any other white Leyland Sherpa.
Далее
Why SCART is so Smart
13:16
Просмотров 265 тыс.
The Scénic road to success - the Renault Scénic Story
28:39
КАКОЙ У ТЕБЯ ЛЮБИМЫЙ МАРМЕЛАД?
00:40
Incredible magic 🤯✨
00:53
Просмотров 2,9 млн
Why "Victor"? The JVC Story
16:19
Просмотров 84 тыс.
I Have 10 Days To Buy A TV Licence or Else!
12:13
Просмотров 59 тыс.
The Windscreen Wiper Story
10:27
Просмотров 87 тыс.
BBC Says TV Detector Vans Are Real!
12:00
Просмотров 73 тыс.
TV Licensing Tried To Get Into My House
9:57
Просмотров 7 тыс.
The Matchbox Car Story
16:05
Просмотров 544 тыс.
What's a Telex?
8:23
Просмотров 128 тыс.
Citroën's Death or Rebirth? The Citroën ZX Story
13:30
Why Ceefax & Oracle Changed How We Live
20:45
Просмотров 28 тыс.
The Sidi Rex Boots🔥 #motorcycle #racing #shorts
0:14