Arn Knight Templar - Final Battle of The Red Crossed Knight 

This is a non tactical movie. 😜😄

No warfare innovations till the 1400s???🧐what about English Long Bow?,The crossbow?,siege engines like the Tribuchet?

@@peterroberts7684 the long bow was an English innovation mostly, down to the point that only the English knew how to make them perfectly, other countries would not have had them and if they did it was through the hiring of a English mercenaries during and towards the end of the Hundred Years’ War, this was rare though considering how poor financially the northern countries were compared to the kingdoms of Central Europe. As for trebuchets they were costly to erect and took skilled labor and a lot of time to build them. They were never made to be used in a set piece battle like the movie depicts, which is why they were called siege weapons. They would never be used against blobs of infantry, and again to make them and use them effectively required engineers who were skilled laborers in their own right. Engineers were few in the north, which is way sieges in those countries usually revolved around ship blockades and starving the settlement out. Resources were extremely scarce especially in Denmark and Sweden, very little to grow, thus they were poor. The very reason large migrations of who we call Vikings left in the first place.

@@patmcsperin1484 oh thank you. These things are cool to know as we watch these kinds of movies

@@peterroberts7684 he's talking about the sweedish and other North people.

Hw was that respected

Is this scene from Kingdom of Heaven or other movie ?

@@Tiffany36236 It says on the title - "Arn the Knight Templar".

@@Tiffany36236 the name is in the title

@@teutonicknight2015 Thanks, I thought it was just his name and the movie name was different :3

Have you read the books, they go much deeper into their lives?

What is the name of the movie please??

What books are they?

@@maximusmeridius3380 Crusades trilogy by Jan Guillou.

@@Subcomandante73 thank you

Which movie

Agree, great books, in particular the base-ness of certain characters, and how certain deeds can not be healed even if everybody tries.... Really a great book series.

Big history adict and I didn't know that,so thank you sir

+Nick B Thank tou my friend for your comment. When The Templar Order ended by the French King and with Pope clearance, The Templar Order had his refuge in Portugal, by the King D.Diniz. The white within the new cross means the Order was purified.

Ah I see I always wondered why they have so many different crosses, do you have a list of all of them somewhere?

Allure1337 my friend, just look ok the web, for the history of the religious militar orders symbols. i recomend the Pinterest, very Cool. The Templar cross suffered some changes through the years,and this one in particulary, are in use today, as a honor medal given by President of the Portuguese Republic.

Allure1337 pin.it/R5wLRkT

Amen

"What does it matter.. we are going to fight anyway" -Mike Tyson

@@mastercraftsman8072 facts who gives a shit about these quotes death is the outcome

True. deus vult

A true warrior knows he fights for something other than himself.

😂😂

In the books it talks about them never having seen long bows before. Theyd only had small short range bows before Arn brought a archer home with him

The Long Bow was the artillery of mediaeval times... The French found a way to break their line and win a battle though.

They did not realize the "feeler shot" was done by their weakest bowman. He was going for height not distance. So they felt safe where that arrow landed. They got "CONNED"

Is the invader Russian?

Sorry to break it to you, but swords do not cut through mail.

He probably cut trough the neck...

Nope, not even if you try to cut it from the top. He maybe cut his face.

@@morningprince3626 what can go threw it were the scorpios

@@morningprince3626 Стрелы, кстати, тоже)).

Budget?

@@teutonicknight2015 Budget = Low budget/cheap

A bit late, but this was the most expensive scandinavian production ever made lol

Dann kennt dein Sohn keine guten Filme

Movie name,please

Jesus bless you . He loves you Repent ! ru-vid.com

I recommend you watch this

Name ?

@@emanuelserban5339 name ? Of the movie

@@TIME_IS_CHANGING_ Arn the Knight Templar

Not on the strength of this clip.

John Mason i like ur dog

John Mason I know right 😂😂 and at the same time I also thought it was a miss fire..haha 😆😆

Jude Camilleon it was actually quite common to do so

ChemicalFX I understand that those armies may not have seen it bit I'm saying the person who commented should know that most European armies Did this

To be honest, a professional bowman know his range...;)

Maintenant c'est les Vlandais 😂

Name ?

dont worry my brother :) ur russian brothers are there :)

@@annameier8894more like, 31 other NATO Allies. Sweden will always be free and whole.

@@andrewhorsfall317Russians and the Ukrainians didn’t run from each other and when the U S says bye bye 2 Europe all u b running except the Russians

日本人の成人はとても身長が低かった 手足も短く、子供の用だった

Who cares this movie dog poop.

0:29 me

except that by taking low ground you make your entire strength clearly visible from above.

No-one should ever watch 2019's The King. It's not even worth my time to shit talk it, it's just bad.

I don't heat what he said but everybody left and right is roaring in agreament and so will i.

They actually would have many designated people to yell the speech for the people farther away. The larger the army, the more people who would be on repeat duty

Jesus at a distance... man 1: What did he say? man 2 : I think it was "Blessed are the cheesemakers" Lady 1: "Aha, what's so special about the cheesemakers?" man 2 "Well, obviously it's not meant to be taken literally; it refers to any manufacturers of dairy products."

@@rngod2121You need to write a parody Bible written from the pov of a dyslexic man, hard of hearing, always at the back, a dime short and a day late. Could be hilarious. Good joke. Thank you.

@@kaoskronostyche9939 It's called "The Life of Brian", watch it.

Many of the antitank recoilless rifles made in the 1960s and 70s prior to laser and satellite guided smart warheads had a "marking rifle" attached to the launcher chassis. Usually a .50 BMG rifle that ranged and plotted the target. The crew of the enemy tank would hear the BONK of the .50 caliber projectile striking their tank and think nothing of it, not knowing that 5 seconds later, the 50 pound HEAT warhead is about to follow and turn their tank into molten slag.

"The Lady of Shallot." And no, I did NOT look it up. I'm just the most literate prop forward ever.

HIii

And now Arabic is the second most common language in Malmö. You fought the wrong enemy, Sven.

All that struggle and bloodshed just to hand it over to a bunch of people who hate you and genuinely see you as weak and pathetic.

i realize Im kind of randomly asking but does anyone know a good place to stream new tv shows online?

@Nikolai Archie Flixportal :D

А как называется?

@@Zihiya Арн - рыцарь тамплиер

Sabes el titulo de la pelicula

Цей герой боровся за свободу свого народа.Така бородьба зараз у моїй країні

@@user-rj3ki2bn7d не лги

Petra Meyer oh shit...

Petra Meyer you are all vikings wtf

And today you don't even have to cross a border guard to enter Sweden from Denmark or vice versa.

You do realise all the passport controls happen at the trains between Sweden and Denmark, right?

Interesting fact. a lot of the men that were struck down during combat during those times, actually survived and lived out their days afterwards, or rejoined the army (if there was one left). Yes, many died and the battles were gruesome. It looked much worse than it was, however. War didn't really become something that took a ridiculous amount of life until the Industrial Age with the invention of Gunpowder Artillery, and the exploding shell. War sucks. But many of the more ancient fighting has much honor in it. We don't see honor much anymore these days.

May god rest his soul in heaven

@Arn De Gothia…that actor is Michael Nyquist, who played the bad guy in the first John Wick movie. He was a very good actor.

@@BonnChnd ื

Crag_r to be fair though, in that time period the now was dominant. considering king Harolds rag tag bunch of peasants launched over ten thousand arrows in the first MINUTE of the battle vs the invading Normans, not having archers sealed your fate.

arrows go through shields and simple chain armor if they're designed right and at a reasonable distance. and as you can see they do wear helmets, but in Arns case you could explain it with the disadvantages of wearing one such as narrowed sight etc.

Nikolas Douglas In some circumstances sure. But when it was shown Aarows going though chain at their max range then it gets sketchy. Especially when these clearly are not warbows but small hunting bows, the chances of them getting though chain at any range is not brilliant to say the least. Chain however will stop swiping sword attacks quite easily, in order to puncture chain you generally need to get quite close for a stabbing attack. Not something seen here. Its not even about a narrow slit helmet. At the very minimum you would have one that covers the top of your head leaving your face free (like most of the forces here). Expecting to rely on chain alone, when the rest of you is covered in multiple layers would be unheard of.

The arrows MAY be able to break the links but said arrows would then have to go through the gambeson as well. Despite what Hollywood would have the audience believe, armour did actually work and bows were NOT as effective as is normally depicted e.g. the one shot one kill nonsense you see in basically every movie that features bows. Crag is right, but sadly this is normal for movies and tv series where historical accuracy is set aside for the action and pacing.

The Lindybeige is strong in this one

ไปต่อยพ่อมึงสักทีดีไหม???

I loved it

Absolutely good battle no doubt, have you ever seen the show on Netflix Knightfall?

Oh yeah realistic where sword goes through mail -_-

@@koreancowboy42 he said “Duration wise”

A martial arts teacher once told me , fights in movies are far to long but necessary or there's nothing to really watch ... A real fight lasts about 8 seconds tops , usually shorter as it's the first mistake that loses the fight

Nope. They didn't expect that many archers. Failing scout lol.

Actually, that guy was trained by Admiral Ackbar.

to be fair they had no reason to believe before hand that arrows can go straight through both shieds and armor.

Haha yes that was my reaction when i watched the movie. "What trap!? the fact that the other army had archers!?" Gave me the feeling that none in the production crew had read a single thing regarding to historical warfare, better yet watched a single decent movie that portrays two armies attacking each other. Too bad though, the book is actually really good and described the battles with great detail.

The arrow was marking the possible max range of the archers attack, and also, from which point they can start shooting with arrows. You watched the movie and you guys still dont understand a bit of it.

too bad we aren't wearing chainmail and armor.

@@bryanjensen300 armor didn't start to effectively bounce arrows until the very tail-end of the Medieval period. This is the very beginning, when most men were wearing ONLY chain. Chain is good against slashing weapons, but not crushing (because it's flimsy) or piercing (open rings). Even at the battle of Agincourt, it's suggested that French men-at-arms wearing iron or steel "munitions plate" were the ones taking the brunt of the damage, and the wealthier knights in tempered steel were able to just slog through as though it were a hailstorm. The real problem though are the horses. It takes a LOT of arrows to bring down a horse, but they're not keen on being on a battlefield at all, much less getting shot. Referencing Agincourt again, this is why subsequent waves of attack went in on foot - the horses were too unreliable in the face of all those arrows. Mounted charges were the exception for the majority of the medieval era, not the rule. Their use in battle is overstated in cinema, because a cavalry charge looks stunning on screen.

@@bryanjensen300 armors didn t do much against longbows. So many knights died by arrows in those days.

also :"Oh no ! Our armors are made out of butter ! "

@@unhommequicourt Ce n'est pas ce que démontrent les preuves les plus récentes. Je te conseille l'excellentes video " MEDIEVAL ARMOUR TESTED! - Arrows vs Amour 2 " et toutes les autres de la même série, de la chaine de " Tod's Workshop" sur le sujet. C'est une collaboration entre Tobias Capwell - auteur et expert dans le domaine des armes et armures du XIV et XV du et surtout curateur de la Wallace collection de Londres, un artisan forgeron qui recréer des armes et armures de cette même période selon des modèle d'époque et l'un des rares archers dans le monde qui pratique encore le tir au longbow anglais traditionnel.

a strange fact, that there is some truth to that practice of having their shields strapped to their backs in history, either to control their horses or to wield a large weapon like a huge axe or a pike.

The infantry is far more stupid. "Oh no! There's a rain of arrows above us! Let's just hold our shields for decoration, it's not like they're used for blocking projectiles or something..."

A cowardly, stupid one about to be captured.

This was over the top though..... Ooohh nooo the other army has archers,,,,its a trap!

KingExituS only Saladin was the only bad guy in this movie who's tactics actually works.. besides him, most are stupid

They didn't really act like idiots. The Sverkers would have never expected the trap as long range archery was practically unknown of during this Scandinavian era. Arn was simply smart.

still, after the first wave was taken down by archers, they just send in the second wave in the same wave, sounds stupid to me.

KingExituS because it happened in real life for example Agincourt hastings, cannae

what hapend wehen he wake up

not only that but they charge them WITH the archers :-/

@@owenthomas2914 The idea was to overpower them, and that was done back then. They had no way of knowing about the reinforcements and strategy.

The classic tactic of underestimating the opponent. The opponents advantage.

Exactly. At this time Sweden and the other scandinavian kingdoms was nowhere near as advanced as the other european countries.

If you enjoy topics about masculinity and mastery, I invite you to explore the videos I share on the Mastery Order Channel. Challenge yourself with some ideas about manhood, explore your masculine potential to the maximum and become the kind of man you would admire. We can only better ourselves together, as men among men, so I invite you to use what I share and, of course, share your own points of view so that others can benefit from them as well. All the best to you!

@@sophiaherschel567 tell all those dead French knights at Agincourt that then lol

@@galayeoman right 😂

@@sophiaherschel567 oh no this is a very realistic depiction of how it actually happened this movie is set in the ealry middle ages so no full plate armor yet. those archers are using longbows, those have a drawweight between 150 to 180 pounds. that is a LOT of force. what you see here is what happens when you shoot mass volleys of arrows. only at the end of the middle ages when full plate armor became a thing bows became less effective against knights, but could still kill you. just look at Agincourt, although they did not shoot in an arc as seen in this movie but they shot point blank into the french so they would have a better chance of penetrating armor etc.

@@galayeoman arrows don't go through thick armour the French in agincourt wore chainmail

@@Rohit-tp7qx Millions of arrows being loosed every minute by thousands of archers at a time, arrows don't need to go through plate armour they will find gaps dummy i don't know what you were trying to prove with this stupid comment. Or were you just pretending you knew some stuff?

I hope the book describes this better, cause i fail to see what's new warfare here? Every army used Archers, the Longbow is not something New that only the English and welsh used, their are also theories that the Bow was introduced by vikings that came to England, there are tales of very strong viking Archers that used obviously very strong bows. The Longbow had been in use probably for ages, it's just a long powerful bow, Warriors used bows of difrent drawweight according to how strong they were. One inovation that came to the Longbow after the crusade was the curves at the end of the bows. Anyway what's portrayed here is idiotic, it's not how they used cavalry. And Archer fire at long range can not kill Knights in chainmail unless you hit him in the eye.

JanXXVI well i just told about the book. And it's not a documentary.

Good writer's that write about historical settings, do their research, they read many books on the subject, G.R.R.M f.eks has read lots of books on the medieval age before he started to write Game of thrones, and that is fiction, but it's damn good fiction cause there are so many details that are taken from medieval history that fits so well with his fictional world. Now i havent read the books on Arn, so i don't know how they are, but im betting their a lot better than the movies. Im also betting that the Author did his research on templars and the medieval period of the crusades. Longbow tactics that you mention here, could be just mass amount of Archers as the English armies of the hundread years wars used, archery was not something New, and every army had a large portion of Archers or crossbowmen. The English could Field many cause they made it tradition and insisted that the farmers practice archery, this took years of training. While the French also had Archers and longbowmen, but they used more mass amount of crossbowmen, the crossbow doesnt need years of training to be able to use it like a warbow does. So if this hero copied the tactics of the English by installing a large archery tradition no the swedish farmers, it is not well shown in this Movie, English longbow men also used stakes infront of them, so that cavalry could not charge straight at them, and the Archers were also often deployed on the wings while Heavy infantry of men at arms and foot Knights formed the center. I don't see any of that in this Movie, so im criticising this Battle scene as very badly done and unbelievable, which is a shame, cause i like the story in the movies.

It's been a while since I read the books, but it was basically something like this: The books states that Scandinavia at the time, is still stuck in the "viking" style of fighting, mass Infantry without any support from Cavalry and little to no Archers. There was also some mention of the fighters acting like "berserkers", in that they would wield too heavy weapons, and focusing too much on raw strenght, instead of agility, endurance and technique. Arn, the maincharacter, grows up in a monastery, where he is taught how to fight and ride by a monk who used to fight in the Holy Land as a Templar. Thus he learns state of the art fighting technique and military tactics. These skills are obviously further refined when Arn is sentenced for adultery, and has to serve as a Templar for 20 years. During his very last years in the Holy Lands, Jerusalem is captured by Saladin (Hattin 1187). Arn survives because he has a "mutual respect" relationship with Saladin. Then he joins the 3rd Crusade, and goes home afterwards. So his timeline as a Templar is pretty much 1167-1192, give or take a few years. The book also places a lot of focus on the Templars and the Hospitalliers as pretty much Medieval Special Forces, which is kind of accurate. They were low in numbers, but had the best training, the best equipment, the best technique, discipline and tactics of their time. So when Arn returns home to (current day) Sweden, knowing a war with Denmark is only a matter of time, he starts reforming the army, replacing "viking" fightingstyle with Templar style training focusing on technique and endurance, and ofc adding Heavy Cavalry and Massed Longbows. The battle in the video is the end of the third book, and I believe it was supposed to be 15ish years after he returns home, so somewhere around 1210 give or take a few years. How historically accurate this is, is obviously up for debate, but that's an extremely basic version of how the books went.

Well, this is NOT historical settings, but all pure fiction. Jan Guillou has been inspired by Swedish history when writing the books, but he doesn't claim that it's something that actually happend. But he has reused a lot of swedish landmarks and places that is known for historic reasons in Sweden. If you want to compare it, think of it as a Swedish Robin Hood, Ivanhoe, Beowulf story. It's just legends.

Spot on was thinking the same myself. English / Welsh longbow men actually developed irregularities in bone structure in their " pulling arm " shoulders. Yes your right for time it took to pull the bow they would have waited to the last second.

بين من و من

It's stupid, by modern thinking. But here we are, right?

It's not true . If you have minimal historical knowledge, and reconstruction. Mass killing in fight with heavy damage . Horses and heavy cavalry its damage too , but swords and axes kill peples more then anyone.

Not always the case. Many battles of English civil war left many thousands dead or dying and fields literally muddy from blood.

Whilst still formed up in cohesive units the casualties aren't terribly heavy... Once an enemy line is broken or flanked, or their resolve falters and they run.. Then people die wholesale.

@@mrpirate3470 correct. Historically about 90% of all casualties occurred after a unit broke. Which is why in ancient and medieval battles the Victor's often suffered tiny losses.

🤣🤣🤣

Thank you. This bugged the shit out of me and my army buddies. We were all yelling for them to shoot a good 5 seconds before they did. Flight time, dude!!!!

'A movie isn't me. Therefore, what interest can it be.' My quote now available as an NFT for $10,000 Can.

True a bow fully drawn is nine tenths weakened, The "War Bow" is never held at full draw,(if anyone could hold an 110 lb at that weight) It was nocked, drawn, and released in one fluid motion.

Как фильм называется, подскажите пожалуйста, спасибо

@@user-jh5xc3ir9i Арн Рыцарь Тамплиер. Есть 2 части

@@cocojambo236 огромное вам человеческое спасибо!!!!

@@cocojambo236 спасибо👍🙏