Arrested For Calling Someone A Muppet Section 4a Public Order! 

They certainly are!

@@robertmawby3021 I second that

Objection; ;;; Common sense and police in the same comment. I find this to be offencive, threatening and is causing me massive amount of stress. It is also a gross misrepresentation of the actions of 99% of plod I have watched videos of.

Old school police; I’m in my 70s and remember them being bullies when I was a child, so they must be in their 90s.

@@robertmawby3021 yap you don't see a off duty cop bullying people

@@bigdave9949 can't sue the police. Trust me, I've tried nine times. All that happened is I got death threats from the police and banned from the police station for "harassing" the officers.

As for claiming money that’s fine I totally agree with it, but I prefer some sort of internal fine for the officers so it actually hits them and not just the people that pay their wages in other words US

it will only stop when they are made to pay for it themselves, they know exactly what they are doing.

@@catsarereallyfurryaliens agree dave.

That seems to be the height of it these days.

@@stuartb4525 yep, they have so much trouble tracking down your actual criminals, largely a waste of time and public money

STOP AUDITING NOW! You are obviously terrible at this. You are failing at every single video. You provide ID, you participate in interrogations, you let cops arrest you for speech, etc. PLEASE stop auditing. Your audits bring us closer to a total police state

Police those mean tweets and protection of nonces

I wonder if they updated the Police crime stats to include, "gratuitous use of the word muppet".

Da da da da da da da, da da da da da da, da da da da da da da da da da da da da da.

Its one sick country... Rioters walk free... Take these fools to court..

Trouble is this is all the pathetic piggies are capable of these days the soft woke snowflakes

The UK is basically a nazi state at this point.

It`s because in reality they think a uniform gives them power. Which it does not it`s an illusion they think is real.

Maybe your aggressive attitude has got something to do with it. Your immediate response to any interaction is verbal aggression

Also to remind him whose in power

And to get his details!

Good idea!

In the Netherlands, we have a business called HEMA, famous for it's 'rookworst' You could wear a T-shirt with an image of that as well (aka 'sausage 🌭)

@@bigdave9949 course i have haha

They might claim to be "offended" if it had a picture of Miss Piggy 😂

instigator? the guy recording is the only instigator. saying to people “what you looking at” for no reason. he needs to grow up.

Yeah same, the auditors exposed the widespread unprofessionalism

Two officers did disgusting unlawful things to me and my non verbal autistic 8yr old son at the time, 4 years ago. A grown woman in her late 30’s hit him on the sly. I saw and got angry. The store called the police on me and hid cctv evidence, said there was none in the store. But told me it was blurry, when I went next day to complain about our treatment. They teamed up with the police, told lies, got me arrested, then everyone turned on me, they was glad they covered up a grown woman hitting my child. I won the court case and they told the biggest lies. My son had to go with emergency carers, because I was in the cells because I wasn’t happy a lady hit my son. The police attacked me and my son when they turned up, grabbing our hand shaking it and laughing, my necklace broke and I was telling them to stop, because my son will run in the road. They laughed and said “so what, I don’t care, I’ll arrest you”. So much to it that I can’t write it all. I’m not surprised by their behaviour at all anymore since then. They definitely don’t care about the public and vulnerable children. Evil evil bullies, can’t stand them 😒

@@leataylor9277 I truly believe that the evil ones will have no room to even breath in the future, auditors are growing in numbers and even the general public are becoming educated in the law and regularly pull out their cameras. Lawyers are seeing a growing cash cow coming out of the police corruption, we need to see the police in courtrooms for abusing the public, that'd put them firmly in their place. God bless you.

@@leataylor9277 So sorry to hear about your awful treatment. Hope you and your son are doing OK.

@@allysonperkins4503 Thank you so much for your kind message. We doing ok thanks, and due to his autism, he could never speak on it. I’m still depressed about it now, and it still haunts me. I’m hoping to see them again, but haven’t since court. I really want to see them, to record them and say everything they done and how they’re evil. I was stupid to not record the encounter when it happened, but I know better now. I’m so glad we have these types of auditors to expose these wicked satan people. I hate them with all my heart.

@@goodyeoman4534 So, out of interest only, what then? What if he refuses a financial offer of compensation? Where does it go from there, officially?

he deserved it anyway

More like clown employees 🤡.

Why ?

@@666salop Because calling somone a muppet should not be reason to arrest someone, ya muppet.

Section 4a includes using 'insulting' language, which means that you could literally say 'hello' to a person and they could have you arrested for committing a section 4a public order offence. The problem is whether something is insulting is subjective rather than objective. Therefore, hello may be subjectively fine with one person, but subjectively insulting with another (e.g., say that person came from a culture where it is insulting to say hello before saying your name... for arguments sake)., Now, onto the specific offence in this video: I regard muppet as subjectively complimentary, as the Muppet show was one of my favourite shows as a child. It portrayed various characters in a positive esteem who entertained and gave joy to countless people. Therefore, to me Muppet is a compliment. However, to some people Muppet is subjectively insulting, as they regard Muppet as an insulting word - maybe they could not afford a telly so never watched the Muppet Show. It's a grey area of the law which needs updating.

@@666salop < Satan and Hitler's Spawn

what would have happened if you refused to give them your details after being arrested, until you saw a solicitor? because surely then, and only then, would the solicitor say wether you should give details, after all, they could just arrest anyone they want just "to get your ID"?

@@mrmischief2506 If you've been cautioned, even improperly, it's probably best to give them your name just to avoid "special" treatment at the hands of the thugs who have already proven themselves willing to ignore the limits of their powers and to act outside of the law.

@@bigdave9949 "You do not have to say anything but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned, something that you later rely on in Court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence" It's not an offence to not give your name when arrested. You'll be logged by the custody sergeant as "name and address refused" and processed as normal. They might be more inclined to hold you for longer (up to 24 hours) or to bring punitive charges in order to get you before a magistrate, which would be an inconvenience at best and a potential conviction at worst.

Every court in the land has agreed that not knowing who you are cannot be used as reasonable grounds for suspicion, as a consequence of Rice V Connolly 1966. Therefore, the Officer's acted contrary to the law by using a false premise.

@@bigdave9949 Wouldn't that negate the right to remain silent?

Nah gotta push further corrupt police dont care. Qualified immunity needs to go & we the public shouldnt be paying for their inhumane actions.

​@@bigdave9949 No need for that. I do have a life thank you very much. I'm a student studying computing, a big, growing industry. Far more than you'll ever achieve.

@@bigdave9949 😂😂😂

Fair point, and they should. He put the call out not long before his arrest. He said he'd discovered a little hotbed of them, or words to that effect, and sure enough, four come trottering out all at once and immediately break the laws they are paid to uphold. I wish I could get there to support him myself.

Hnk will get you a pay out I use them

Correct. There is no such thing as a friendly conversation with a Police Cuntstable. If they have reasonable grounds, they will not be having a “friendly” conversation. They are just looking for something to use against you!

If arrested you have to .

@@andrewstratford4753 They can't force you loooool

@@andrewstratford4753 can't force you to talk lol

@@andrewstratford4753 If you’re arrested unlawfully you 100% don’t have to. It may delay your release but you absolutely do not have to.

sue, how do you do, compensation time!

@@pjo2386 The only pity being that plod don't have to pay it directly from their own pockets.

@@Nigfis They should have insurance, the more claims the more the insurance premium goes up. If your really bad the insurance companies wouldn't insure you, so no job.

How did he handle them like a pro? He's been arrested twice in one week for his speech to cops. It seems as if his videos are PROVING that it's illegal to call a cop a muppet. NOTHING is happening to these cops making these arrests, so why should the cops stop doing it??????????

@@goodyeoman4534: "It could be evidence, instead, of cops abusing their powers of arrest."

Yeah i've got a brain that can hurt you as you clearly lack one you MUPPET, then stand back and watch as it slowly sinks into their empty heads.

@@goodyeoman4534, pffft. You're joking. The taxpayers aren't being asked to decide anything. A video is being posted. That's it. The videos are showing cops all over the UK that they can do whatever they want without any consequences. When the practice becomes standard, then the taxpayer accepts it as standard. THIS is exactly why videos like this DAMAGE the cause. This guy needs to either follow up and provide us updates on the consequences that these cops suffered, or he needs to STOP.

you're = u r

yesterday Huddersfield, today Hull, tomorrow....?

Even if you say are you acting under oath, it matters not as they DO NOT CARE. But the civil claim part against all 4 must proceed with all haste.

Thankyou 😃

100 %agree total guts 👍

there must be a record of a complaint if one has actually been made.... I suspect the future update will involve details of compensation and an official apology.

They were just following orders. The person who ordered them is higher up. And probably the woman who was called a muppet.

Cheers bro

a man named sue - how do you do? compensation time

100% They all really screwed up their pension big time. Abuse of powers, false arrest, trumped up charge. This cannot be allowed. A legal letter to the chief constable, followed by legal acrion against all 4 of those muppets follows.

And uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour. Calling someone a muppet is not insulting, nor a threat, not abusive.

This is almost entirely incorrect. I’m a huge fan of auditing generally, but not the spreading of misinformation in the comments sections of the videos! All three don’t have to occur at all. That’s why it’s written as harassment, alarm OR distress. The offence of intentional harassment under the Public Order Act is different to the offence of harassment. The Public Order Act offence refers to a single incident where you have intentionally caused distress or alarm to another person. It’s also not the case that the incident has to provoke lasting damage, only that it has a “significant effect” on the victim. Nonetheless, the CPS wouldn’t have brought a charge as it wouldn’t have been in the public interest (due to its nature). I’m not being insolent, but please don’t advise where you’re uncertain. The purpose of auditing is to ensure that the Police only act within the remit of the law, not what you think should constitute it. All the best.

Exactly

Funny enough they didnt even though she swore first

I know haha

1st how do you watch you tube videos if your blind. does it read out whats happening along side the audio 2nd. a blind person doing an audit would be cool. i would like to see how they react . you would have a medical reason to film and would be discriminatory to stop you in certain situations.

@@MelbourneAlan hi. thanks for your comment. yeah i could imagine how cool that might be. to answer your question, i have a screenreader software which helps me locate things on webpages but there isn't anything extra on the videos that explains anything that is happening visuall, but lets face it you don't really need to see to know what is going on from the dialogue on the video. its cool your curious though as i think i might be the same if i wasn't blind and saw a comment like mine.

@@MelbourneAlan You don't watch, you listen to the narration and conversation.

I didnt

@@AY-Audits You said you gave your details to the custody sergeant and then he refused to allow your detention. You could have asked if you are going to be detained in a cell first and then and only then should you give details. Anything less than that then you're not obligated to.

🤣🤣🤣

Welcome aboard!