Artemis I Launch Tests NASA’s Mission to Return Humans to the Moon | WSJ 

It's very cool but I don't see it getting America out of our current civil war. I wonder if the money would have more impact on nuclear fusion and fission research to create more power which will help more people? Hard to know. Yet to hear anything about living on Mars which is something we need to do. I would prefer to see my tax money go toward something else. To each his own but, it is cool.

yeah i saw it live too it was damm good

It really irks me when they mention, "first person of color and first woman". Who gives af. Just send people who are qualified. Everything comes back to race and gender and it's annoying.

It really irks me that people don’t see this as a waste along with DOD spending. I don’t care how you try to twist it to make it seem that it is not that much.

Where does all that money go? Oh lies and corruption, got it. Yup approved, please keep us entertained and fighting each other.

@@proanalysts Where does all that money go? The private industry contractors that fund both political parties. You do know that the US government doesn't manufacture anything. Everything, from the printing of money to building aircraft carriers are done by private, for-profit contractors. The same contractors that contribute to republicans and democrats alike (of course, mostly republicans in the case of defense contractors) to keep their business dollars flowing. Fear of a foreign enemy is what keeps the plebs defending the DoD expenditures when in actuality the fear is mostly unwarranted. Defense is absolutely necessary but targeted and flexible funding would far more effective than just simply building an eleventh aircraft carrier for $14 billion. Currently our concern should be foreign hacking of national infrastructure rather than a "Red Dawn" scenario. Does NASA contractors have costs overruns and waste? No doubt they do just like all the private contractors that depend on government contracts (to be fair, some NASA contractors and DoD contractors are the same companies). But at least in the case of NASA, the goal is to further the understanding of science. The DoD is mostly about chest-thumping bravado.

@@lebski6033 cringe

I was under the impression that they were using space x rocket for moon mission.

@@RealShaktimaan same here. At this point I give up on any major space achievements in our lifetime. Complete joke

@@truthwillprevail8629 Google says development was started in 2011 so it was well before SpaceX had working rocket.

@@RealShaktimaan i think this makes it worse, so space X developed and executed a technology while nasa had a 60 year head start and still gave us disposable rockets.

I think you got mesmerized when you first heard about recoverable rockets and missed the more important factor.... Recoverable-reusable rockets cost 3x as much as launching brand new ones.

It will be as fake as Apollo. They gave as excuse "lack of money/funds" for not going back. Now they reinvent techno we supposedly had used multiple times with Apollo. Why waste more moeny for new techno, if money was the reason we didn't go back in the first place for like 50 years? Is this in order to hide the fact that we never went there and no such technology ever existed? I think so... Who is the Great Deceiver? The Father of lies?

Agreed, you know they're playing politics when they emphasize black and female astronauts. Does that mean we should now reserve Nobel awardees for Black and Female people? What about Northern American Native Aboriginals?

PEACE LOVE PROSPERITY BONANZA FREE THINKING GOOD HEALTH HUMANITY UNITED HONESTY OPTIMISM

It’s not virtue signaling. Women and poc of color have been over looked in the space program for decades, wasn’t until 80s when changed started to happen. NASA is just simply stating that they are no longer overlooking certain racial and gender groups and they are working to correct their discriminatory past.

Why are you even bringing that up, who cares? I just wanna see people on the moon

Thats what they want you to think but the real reason is so that they could still use the old system of manufacturing in multiple states so each one gets federal funding and the politicians will approve a $2 billion waste

4 billion per rocket and they don't even have any suits to eva or set foot on the moon. Yeah this is just so those states get government funding. And nasa just put up a vid titled "we're ready" AND THEY DON'T HAVE ANY SUITS. Probably why they turned off comments lol.

@@spacehomer9269 exactly. This rocket is literally a Saturn 5 made from shuttle hardware. Should be easy. But because the government is in charge, all these manufacturers will charge as much as they want and no one is there to check them. It’s corruption and bureaucracy at its finest. There is no excuse to have this rocket be so expensive and most importantly take over 20 years to develop. Especially when a company in your country already has a rocket that is capable of lunar orbit…. (Spacex falcon heavy)

Yeah, this is a jobs program so that various congressmen and congresswomen can bring money to their districts. Having costs go down defeats this purpose...

@@spacehomer9269 One SLS rocket costs $4b. The US federal budget is roughly 4.7 trillion, looking at receipts from '20. That's 0.085106383% of the budget. Go look at other programs to cut if you want to lower the budget. Touch NASA and the entire space industry in America will instantly collapse (including SpaceX, which gets most of its budget from NASA.)

1000% GOLD!!! 😂😂😂

In mythology Artemis is a woman.

@@LisaAnn777 Men better

@@pequod4557 sure maybe but Artemis is still a woman.

@LVB🦅 sure maybe but Men better

Transparency keep dreaming lol.

Unfortunately cannot afford the proper live stream 'image' due to budget cuts with aid to UKRAINE, wouldn't want Putin to send images first. Trade offs ya know. Just believe what they tell u, it's not like they have ever lied before. Great track record. That serpent tongue says it all.

You are also paying for those cameras, lol

@@JJTIP_TOE that mind set has gotten this country where it's at

It will never happen, mate

because 50+ years ago was a lie.

Makes you WONDER if the U.S. really went to the moon 60 YEARS AGO…or NOT!! 😂

You need to relearn. 50 years is a long time and to see if today’s technology works.

@Matt Howell I like how you think..

@@du-me-Utube-1975 how exactly would it be possible for NASA to fake it 50 years ago

Exactly.

Like they've been there before.. you know I feel like school lied to Us. About moon landing. There's a lot of conspiracy about that. Anyway

What

@Mr. Sun ….Russia is BUSY fighting the needless WAR the U.S. has created….or have you forgotten that???!!

Agreed....the Soviet uniom never really recovered from losing the race to the moon. Still, they did manage to inspire America to show them what a great nation could really do...and the tech that came from the space race ensured US global dominance for the next 50 years.

50 years ago. And if you don't believe that humans went to the Moon already, then why are you watching videos of it?

Had they been....there wouldn't be any issue now...50 years to learn and still can't get it right.

@Mr. Sun No, real Soviets rulers are (were) in the same team as ours. Fascism won WW2 and conquered the World we are living in. Game is staged for our eyes to create false beliefs.

And Lovell, Haise, and Swigert made it home by the skin of their teeth. Space flight is always a risk.

It will be as fake as Apollo. They gave as excuse "lack of money/funds" for not going back. Now they reinvent techno we supposedly had used multiple times with Apollo. Why waste more moeny for new techno, if money was the reason we didn't go back in the first place for like 50 years? Is this in order to hide the fact that we never went there and no such technology ever existed? I think so... Who is the Great Deceiver? The Father of lies?

@@AndyCutright The biggest risk is survival without a bathroom......

It’s a new rocket

In a Hollywood basement.

Yep...ready and able. They say that they won't have the first crew on the pad until 2025. By that time half the world's population should be wiped out according to "Agenda-21, and by 2030 they will have obtained their goal of a 90 percent population elimination, according to "Agenda-30".

CGI this time friend. the father of Lies has other tools at his disposal to keep the bovine citizens happy and complacent... hoppium is the ultimate drug.

😂

The difference is they are developing technology to help us get to and remain on the moon. 50 years ago it was a quick stop and go.

No, the boosters are the shuttle ones so they are recoverable and refurbish able, but not like the falcon nine.

I do think they are gonna try to refurbish the capsules though.

@@freduinst4333 the boosters arnt actually recoverable from the orion, as they lack parachutes. They decided to ditch the reusability because it ultimately saved no money compared to just making new boosters, as the boosters are basically metal tubes filled with solid fuel, and are as such very easy to make.

@@freduinst4333 it costs more to refurbish one than build a new one, so they changed it.

They have been mandated by congress to use old familiar technologies with old workforce. You Elon Musk fanboys are really exhausting.

Makes you WONDER if the U.S. really went to the moon 60 YEARS AGO…or NOT!! 😂

they did, and they're doing it again

Just check out the falling regolith from the Apollo astronauts feet as they skip along. That tells you they did not actually get there.

@@NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow Great piont. I notice this too.

@@eapleitez I belive if I tell you that u are invisible you will belive me

hard to believe not since 1972....sounds like a scam to me. Maybe drop MARS rover on the moon to clear up this mess.

Makes you WONDER if the U.S. really went to the moon 60 YEARS AGO…or NOT!! 😂

It was announced years ago that the plans for going to the moon had been lost somehow. No explanation 😕

@@Moose803 🤣🤣🤣🤣 And you believed it...? I bet they would have been kept even safer than the formula for building an atomic bomb...if they'd had them.

@@jmdatrain4245 do you not believe they ever existed?

That's true but I think they want to do it safer this time. Remember there were accidents and deaths in past missions

And the cgi

Flat earthers.,Moon landing deniers. Cancel generation will say the rocket is not woke enough and feminsists will say the name of the rocket is to masculine.

CGI. Kubrick used frontsecren projection. Now they will use CGI. Watch movies like Gravity, interstellar. They have been perfecting it...

The moon landing wasn’t faked. If it was then Russia would have proved it was by now. Cope harder

@@roberthak3695 Insanity usually sounds confident.

@@daxmarshall4969 non sequitur. ad hominem. get good bot.

Lol 😂 😂 😂

IYKYK 😂😂

They will be able to pick up the camera they there last time.

This is telling me they haven’t been there before 🤓

🤦🏻

Stanley Kubrick directed Apollo, but it’ll be Christopher Nolan this time around, and Hans Zimmer will compose

Blame it on NASA Administrator Nielsen, who is more of a politician than a scientist.

Well it was the original space race that got us there in the first place.

I'm not a fan Dicators so no Russia or China(untill the CCP loses power).

Why they team up? US allegedly did it alone 50 years ago, with advanced technology and wealth we should be going there on daily basis by now

@@nimozuz2109 A̶l̶l̶e̶g̶e̶d̶l̶y̶*

You still need to know how it works in order to service it, make improvements, and see what areas will be under the highest stress. Skip that and you’re just asking for an Apollo 13 but no one knows what the hell’s wrong with it.

And with something as delicate as an engine, you definitely don’t want to just transplant one that’s a few decades old into a new rocket and expect everything to be a-okay. It doesn’t take much for that engine to become a veritable bomb.

You've watched how many different tests SpaceX has done with their series of rockets, most recently Starship right? Just because they did something 50 years ago, doesn't mean starting over with many new systems & a lot of future goals this needs to achieve going forward will just go perfectly. Think about those Starship tests & how many revisions they're burning through. NASA doesn't have that luxury being a public, government organization using taxpayer money, so they have to get almost everything right the first time. They can't just keep pouring resources into iteration after iteration & go through trial by fire. Artemis 1 is the best chance they'll get to iron out & test all the things they need to know, & hope it's all settled by Artemis 2.

😆🤣

It’s a new rocket you clown. The first one of its kind evert built

you act like the apollo 1 mission went straight to the moon without any incidents

Yeah, all those German rocket scientists are dead now.

Modern Scientists are superior, the respect they receive has gone down, if everyone stays out of their way they can pull it off

@@AndreaOlivieri87 they went like 9 times, if they were faking it they would have faked it once But cut them a break they haven’t done a manned mission to the moon in over 50 years, most of the people who worked on the Apollo program are retired if not deceased, they basically have to redo it from the ground up using old notes and designs that weren’t made for modern technology (many of the old parts don’t exist anymore and they have to work around it)

It is much more corrupt and no objective way to find out the truth from the news media!

I mean back then apollo had 10 times the budget

its been like what 50 years since the last launch to the moon most of those who worked on those launches are either dead or retired. there basically using outdated notes not ment for modern use and the parts for those rockets used in the launch may no longer exist or stopped being produced since the program was stopped 50 years ago so cut them some slack. i do really hope this succeeds. since this is gonna be a historic moment in human history which people in the future might remember as the program that kickstarted the age of manned space exploration

@@bossjohnny6355 I get what you are saying but I'm not buying it. There is no way they did this in the 60s.

thats exactly what was thinking, I was under the impression that this mission is going to put men on the moon but no that's not even happening till mission 3. it's like doing it from the scratch- I am starting to be skeptical about previous moon landing.

They plan to mine the moon. To do that they need to reignite people's imagination so they can pour trillions into moon colonisation and mining base camps on moon. Later they would start mining asteroids probably in last 21st century or early 22nd century and setup launch bases on moon for other planetary missions.

they need the 50 billion for covert operations. peak oil already surpassed...

the military uses 780 billion dollars, they don't need all of that money

@@definetlyachessmaster Do you know the meaning of Covert?

Hollywood technology was great on the 60s.

Yes they did it 6 times, they even find a cocacola bottle on the moon

@@titooyus6788 .....Source: trust me bro!! 😂😂😂

NOT

Don't pay attention to it. The science and the achievement is what's important. I hope the astronauts get the training they need and get there and back without any lethal drama.

@@bigzed7908 We're criticizing them for paying attention to these things. Its just horrible. We should send the best of us, not the worst.

@@all2jesus Who's the worst?

I'd prefer if the rockets didn't randomly explode because we didn't have enough time to correct the mistakes it's not that we can't get it done it's that we need time to correct the rockets, so they don't become the world's most expensive fireworks.

Exactly

Staged in 69.

You are right.. America is such a jealous country that is why they are in a hurry even if they have diarrhea.

China is waiting for the technologies to be developed by US so they can steal them and then they could send their people to the Mars.

They have no plans until at least 2033 I believe

They are testing long term life support. This rocket is a potential platform for a human Mars mission. They need to see how it holds up to radiation.

you did not witness anything except for a fake video of a fake space vehicle

You witnessed a staged event

Hi there " rabbit ears " good to know you're still alive ! Take the " red pill " next time !😂

If man walked on the moon 50 years ago, we would be going there for weekends by now, how was it achieved at that time and now with all the advanced technology and wealth we did not visit again, think about it

you witnessed it some studio in Hollywood

The moon landing wasn’t faked. If it was then Russia would have proved it was by now. Cope harder

Second to that, totally agree

I wonder how much it will actually help them this time, technologies changed so much and is so much more weak to radiations and electromagnetic waves. Our knowledge also got a massive level up since last time, I suppose they would aim to make the whole trip and missions a lot safer for the people that will be going over there. The biggest help the previous missions will provide, is likely regarding the Moon's surface itself, they will be better equipped and ready against it compared to the previous missions.

@@RubiaStorm Whats wrong with stating a fact, so after your confident assessment of my non contribution to rocket tech, which is true, are you going to now assail us with the brilliance of your scientific achievements which qualifies you to open your big yapper? Yep, didn't think so.

or as an alterative you could point a laser at the reflectors we put on the moon 50 years ago. however you would need a pretty good laser

Marxism is everywhere now.

the lead reason is not to put a woman or person of colour on the moon. the lead reason is to launch artemis 3 with the lunar gateway to make repeated manned lunar missions possible and ultimately to use the moon as a test run for mars. stop being so dramatic

@@bordedup546 I agree with you that it is not the lead reason, but "other reasons" is still disappointing to even have to state...I'm a "person of colour", and to even hear that, is just condescending...men and women, of all colours train for this...and I would HOPE NASA will pick the most qualified, but alas, that's probably just too optimistic to hope for in this day and age. I will still watch this launch, and hope for the future of people-kind...I mean humankind (dumbest thing PM has ever said amongst so many others to pick from...)

@@bordedup546 Exactly....the main reason are the missions themselfes. So does it really matter to use male or female, black or white astronauts to do do the job? So why not send a woman or person of color to the moon? Its just a fun extra, not where the entire mission is about.

@@oldarn590 its not even an "other reason" its not a reason at all. They would do the missions anyway, and the mission isn't "not complete" or "failed" if its not happening. Its just an extra, like: why not, if they are doing it anyway. Why not an extra fun detail to put the first woman or man of color on the moon. I mean... it doesnt really matter if a woman, man, black or white person does the job, right?

Hahaha funny

The lost the tech. Someone threw it out on inorganic collection day.

Makes you WONDER if the U.S. really went to the moon 60 YEARS AGO…or NOT!! 😂

But you'd need Tom Hanks to pilot it.

You lose the key skilled people over time

and tin foil and construction paper

They only need to re-engineer everything if they want men to walk on the Moon for real.

Does this surprise you?

No, that's just something conspiracy theorists like to say.

Well since you put it that way... why not!

Buzz light year 😂

To the Moon, and Boom 💥.. will be nice to watch it exploded..

@@richardthetroll6758 weirdo

Go where?

@@teamtryxgg281 NASA !

@@teamtryxgg281 NASA!

@@teamtryxgg281 NASA!

It was fake this is the real one

This time we're planning for a moon base, and Artemis 1 seems to be a test for the SLS Rocket. I don't think they're 'reinventing the wheel', I guess this is just the first time we seriously plan to send humans there since the 70s

the problem is that no one makes any of the tech they used the first time anymore, so now they had to start from scratch.

Never sent any humans and still not sending any.

@@Dolphinsfan1981 Quit crying... you know trump lost. ❄️ Snowflake lol

thank you, it will be just as big of a lie as it was last time, they just want to do it better

i recommended you watch nasa's brief video that breaks down what the artemis mission is about. the main difference this time is that there will be a gateway permanently orbiting the moon, mission supplies will be flown up by contractors before crews arrive, crews will stay for longer and the overarching goal is to use the moon as a test run for mars. it's a lot more complex than the original moon landings and there's a greater focus on maintainimg our presense on the moon so we don't lose progress like the last time

Makes you WONDER if the U.S. really went to the moon 60 YEARS AGO…or NOT!! 😂

Yea its all BS, they lied

Strategically moved launched time since the competition (Russia) is busy waging war.

Just like the first Star Wars movie!

Drink the Kolo aid and keep your head down...

@@tjellis1479 yeah u should,,,!!!!

If we don't destroy earth first.

Elon Musk IS doing it...

they are going to use a variant of starship to land on the moon

Your entire life is immensely better off than it would have been without the Apollo program. The downstream technical discoveries alone are massive. You like this computer thingy you're using? Who do you think paid for its development? DoD all the way dude.

it always was, with women and minorities being blocked from frontline roles in the 50s and 60s.

Right on. So the conspiracy theory was I think true

@@davekim1027 apollo 8 did the same thing in 1968 before the proper landing in 1969

Never lànded in '69

Makes you WONDER if the U.S. really went to the moon 60 YEARS AGO…or NOT!! 😂

You haven’t done something in 50 years you need to relearn.