Don’t don’t make stuff up. Here I’ll be fair. Arthur Morgan is a fast gunslinger yes but not as fast as John. John was so fast in one of the missions when he and Arthur coordinated to escape when John was grabbed by the Pinkertons if Arthur uses deadeye you can see John moving faster than everyone else including Arthur. Also Arthur tells Javier or whoever he travels with him on the mountain mission that he wanted to hate John because when Dutch and Hosea adopted John he was the golden child a natural gunslinger which meant Arthur had to work twice as hard. Also in RDR1 John gets extra training from Landon Ricketts. I’ll admit if it came to a fist fight Arthur would barely win. But if it came to a gunfight John would barely win. But don’t get me wrong I respect both characters. And they probably would never fight they’re brothers.
@@srilankanricefarmer7571 How did he get faster? 1907 is his prime physically. Draw speed is a matter of physicality. John didn’t get faster in rdr1, not possible. He got better in aim / accuracy though
@@abayomi-j4v Video game logic lol. No but seriously somehow doing the training with the bottles with Landon Ricketts made him faster. His draw in rdr1 was calculated to be 0.05 seconds which is insane compared to irl where people can do it in 0.15 seconds
Arthur would whoop john in a fist fight. John would beat Arthur in a melee weapons fight. Gun fight is interesting could go either way. Arthur beat all those famous gun slingers in duels though (except the one with the pig farm that decided to use a knife lol). In the time Arthur was alive, he would have beat John, but at Johns peak he may have beat Arthur. Still very close.
This debate could go on for hours. Wish more people would appreciate these two brothers would never fight and are both the baddest gunslingers in the west.
