Aryan Origins | Migration Theory and Etymological History 

Please make more video on the Parthian empire

3:50 Müller was great. The high culture was a mix of Aryan and Drawid. See Harappa

The invasion happend. See the Veda. Arya Vs Mleccha

7:00 we can conclude that the central Asian nomadtribes which called themselves Arya where white

17:40 Stop! Heyerdahl never said something supremacist! He quoted logically that the Mayan had contact to Egypt

Of course ppl never considered themselves racial groups, considering thats an 18/19th Century term, and etnos or ethnicity was specifically a Greek word synonymous with natos or [born of] nationality that migrated into European language. But Id like to see these guys explain the blondism and blue eyed caricatures of personages from India (incl Buddha) to predynastic red headed Egyptians like the mummy referred to as "Ginger" and statues of ruling elites of Egypt who had blue eyes, when Blue eyes is a recessive trait that emerged proto Indo European peoples around the Black Sea approx 6-8000 years bpe. Protip you cant do it. Blondism and Red hair are purely N. European traits and Blue eyes was a trait the expanded out from a single PIE mating pair. All the wordplay in the world cant dismiss the fact that IE peoples from N. India/Pakistan/Kaffiristan to Iran to N. Africa to Europe are all from one shared lineage and were at least part of the ruling classes of all the relevant nations of history. We are brothers and sisters.

I think they had a concept of race, but otherwise true and true. Modern genetics has proven the migration of fair haired blue eyed ppl from the Eurasian steppe. Also, Aryan refers to the people of the age of Aries. Atlantian descendants.

@@NegativeBodhiImage the mummies with red hair is a result of tobacco that they use during the mummification process. Nothing to do with European or caucasians

@@NegativeBodhiImage blue eyes and lighter skin are not characteristic or exclusivity of Europeans. Stop being manipulated by racist uncultured scientists and Eurocentric enterprises

But it have matters with slavs,since aryans are slavic people.And this SAMA chanel is lying to you,just like other 'history chanels'.I know that some people don't know this,but its been proven long time ago,than aryans are slavs who has come to india in 8000BC.They just don't want you to know real truth,so wake up man.

Aryan Invasion Theory has been debunked. You're right, it's because of the "race politics" that this identity was thrust upon the people of the Indian subcontinent.

@@jimhalpert3269 Who debunked it? Do you understand that there are people in India who have blonde hair and blue eyes and who live up around the Himalayas, these are not people who descended from the British occupation. These are organic Indians. The _Kalash_ people of Pakistan are ideal Hitler Aryans, they all have blonde hair and blue eyes and they worship the ancient Indian gods.

@Amal Paniker "Thou Indra, art destroyer of the cities, the slayer of the Dasyus, the prosperer of man, the lord of the skies" Rig Veda VIII- 87.6 "Indra, the slayer of Vrittra, the destroyer of cities, has scattered the Dasyu hosts sprang from a black womb." Rig Veda II 20.6 The Rig Veda praises the god who "destroyed the Dasyans and protected the Aryan color". Rig Veda III 34.9 It goes on to thank the god who "bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the water". Rig Veda I 100.18 "Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshiper, he subdued the lawless for Manu, he conquered the black skin" "Black skin is impious" Rig Veda II 12.4 "One car-wheel of the sun thou rollest forward , and one thou settest free to roll for Kutsa. Thou slewest noseless Dasyus with thy weapon" Rig Veda V 29.10 "Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the black skin far away" Rig Veda IX 41.1 "With him too is this rain of him that comes like herds: Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard. When the sweet juice is shed he seeks the pleasant place, and stirs the worshiper as wind disturbs the wood." Rig Veda X 23.4 "At the sweet draft the Soma-drinker waxed in might, the iron one with yellow beard and yellow hair, he will bear his bay steeds over all distress". Rig Veda X 96.8 "He hath slayed Dasyus after his wont, and laid them low with arrows. The mighty thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters." Rig Veda I 100.18

I was looking for a lot of similar information and sort of disappointed at its absence too. There’s a RU-vid channel that shares mythology and history including Indian history and it actually sites the invasion theory and even connects that to the foundation of caste. So I wanted to see what other information was available about “Aryan people”. I think this video is useful in a completely different way. Racism, white supremacy, and European influence can be observed in most parts of the world and to think that the misinterpretation of Vedic texts can be considered one of its roots is astounding to me. I feel more inclined to learn about India because of how much it’s indirectly impacted the world in this dimension.

this video was a let down.period.

Ancient Iranian didn't worship allah 😂 they were Hindus

@@ALOK-pe5fp Zoroastrian actually, learn to accept other peoples identities, if you want to respected too

@@ALOK-pe5fp Persian used to practice Mithraism and Zarthostrianism

@@ALOK-pe5fp emotional demage 😭🤣🤣😂

@@peymankoohi8195 before that 😂😂😂 They were too invented from caves 😂😂

True, Britishers were the real loots.

British, Germans and other Nordic peoples are the real ARYANS. Others like Romas and Jews are eternal enemy of the ARYAN. Indians are mixed with DRAVIDIANS and therefore a savage race, should be subservient to the WHITE, NORDIC ARYAN HERRENRASSE. Talent, abilities and hard work are irrelevant.

Show evidence then....IVC going out was purely due to geographic reasons....you want to self satisy your ego like Adolf back in the 1940s only to get bashed in the face

​@@charumohanthere were already chariots in India mate look up recent excavations

ANY ONE WHO REALLY believes in proto-indoeuropean language and aryan invasion/migration theory, pls watch these videos and tell me in reply what you think about all that shown in these videos-- 1) Hinduism and Judaism - Shared Roots Different Branches? , this video is one example which debunks the aryan invaison/migration theory) 2)The Rigveda Chronology And The Indo European Homeland | Dr Aleksandr Semenenko 3) Semenenko A.A. Shield Agrument of the Indo European Dispersal out of India 4)The Tarimian Trace of the Indo European Dispersal | Dr Aleksandr Semenenko(this tells about the connection with the tarim basin mummies in china)

The word Indian is very misleading. When India is mentioned today, we mean the present boundaries of India. Indian culture is also very misleading word. There is nothing like an exclusive "Indian Culture." India is an artificial country created as the result of Colonialism. And the culture of the people differ from one point to another point. India had different "cultures" down the millenniums. And nothing can be claimed as one exclusive culture. India today is the handing down of practices and way of life that began in the Indus Valley Civilization. There is nothing like a Hindu culture as the word Hindu is the name of a river and not a religion. Vedas written in Indo European language does not reflect a life in the Indian sub continent and neither does the geographical features mentioned therein. Replete with horse sacrifices , it reflects the Yamnaya culture of Central Asia where horses play an important role. And horses are not an indigenous animal of India.

@@vineethjoshy4819 Well you’re reflecting the misunderstanding of western scholars about Indian history. I feel sorry for such Indians who didn’t even take the time to understand our roots. Firstly, there are many traditions and cultural practices across the Indian subcontinent, yes, but that does not mean that they do not have any unifying historic identity to fall back to. I can point out several cultural practices which are common throughout India which can be traced back to the so called “Harappan civilisation”. For instance, married women wearing vermillion on the forehead partition is one such cultural practice you can find across India and nowhere else. Secondly, the Rig Veda is not a book of horse sacrifices. Please understand that. There’s a lot more to it than just that, to give you a perspective, you’re talking abt an element in the Rig Veda which is mentioned few dozen times, when the text in itself is a collection of 10 volumes with over 10,000 verses… do you see how simplistic your interpretation is? Do you know that not all the Rig Vedic poets prefer to use the word “Arya”. There are atleast 5 different schools of thoughts that exist inside the Collective of poems we call the Rig Veda, each having its own traditions, and disagreements. There are atleast 2 distinctly identifiable language families in the Rig Veda. And here you are painting it all under one word “Arya”, which is hardly used few dozen times in the text spanning 10k+ verses. Any scholar who has been a traditional student of the Vedas or even any Sanskrit scholar worth his salt will not make such mind numbing claims, only westerners who like to cherry pick evidences and the communist scholarship who quote them for references do this. The geography mentioned in the Rig Veda is clearly to the EAST of the Indus River. Moreover there is no archeological evidence whatsoever to prove the claims that there was a sudden cultural shift nor is there any evidence for a shift in the ancestry for the last 10k years. Yet people claim that Hinduism came from outside. Lastly but not the least, I challenge you to find not 10 or 20 but just 1 literary reference of Indigenous source, from anywhere inside India which hints at an event that is similar to the one which you mention as the “Aryan migration” which is simply a shift in civilisational values, find me one literary reference to such an event, atleast in some sort of word of mouth story of such a event, given what you’re narrating is not just a simple event but a shift in the very fundamentals of the civilisation and it’s direction. Such a massive shift should have had some impact in the cultural memory of these people who live here. And don’t ask me to believe that everybody chose to ignore it and move on.

@@vineethjoshy4819 I seriously insist that you listen to few lectures from real archaeologists, eminent scholars such as BB Lal, who I feel are trying to bring these fundamental facts to light. It pains me to see even Indians show little interest in this topic to dig a little deeper. It’s not that hard either. Again I’m stressing on my point here, I’m not claiming that we are some racially pure and superior people or some BS like that. We have had plenty of inbound migrations and outward migrations our culture that we see across India today was shaped by thousands of years of interaction with the outside world, in its own unique ways. But I disagree with the idea that there was some singular migration into this land which defines the character of what we call as India today.

@@rammani7170 So who are the real archeologists and eminent scholars? People who interpret data to suit their requirements? “Misunderstanding of western scholars about Indian history.” So who is to decide there is no misunderstanding? Especially in these times of intense falsification and distortion of history to suit certain interests? Why are you belittling Indus Valley Civilization calling it so called Harappan Civilization? If you are a true Indian and proud of its history and culture, you would not have said “so called Harappan Civilization.” The leadership of Indian communism are mostly Brahmins and Savarnas who are equally interested in interpreting Indian history to suit their interests. As for the evidence for a shift in the ancestry for the last 10k years , the evidence is present in the genetic make up of the various people of India and the prevalence in various proportions of the so called Aryan DNA R1a. You first study about this and the findings of the DNA results of the 4500 -year-old Rakhigarhi skeletons instead of trying to drown me in confusing verbiage and hollow claims.

@@vineethjoshy4819 1. You think I’m talking here without even going through the recent studies? And sorry but no I’m not belittling anything or anyone here. If you’re offended by facts I’m sorry for you. 2. I gave you one properly eminent scholar professor BB Lal, or Vasant Shinde (who’s the freaking author of the paper you’re quoting here). Listen to their speeches and then come here and give me advise. 3. Ancestry shift? Steppe Migration = Aryan migration? You’re having too much in your plate to prove and too little evidence. Till today the largest source of South Asian genetic ancestry is from the IVC cline the genetic influence of those who you call “Aryan” (which I disagree actually), on the Indian population was never enough to shift the ancestry. You can refer to interpretations from anyone in the Genetic field worth his salt. Nobody will agree with your statement that there was a “migration of ancestry altering proportions”. The proponents of your so called “Aryan migration”, those geneticist use a circular argument here. For instance Dr. Razib Khan? Claims he’s a neutral investigator of truth but as a Geneticist did he limit his opinion to a Genetic one? No! Now I agree that everyone has right to his opinion but you cannot use your scholarship as a geneticist to make statements which contradict the findings of Archeologists. That too when your own genetic findings have very little direct evidence to support your claims. He openly admits that the steppe migration did not have an ancestry shifting level of divergence in population genetics, the dominant ancestry was still the IVC cline, but he goes on to make a claim that “but this migration was not more of a genetic one but a cultural transformation”, now how qualified is a Geneticist to make a claim outside his work area like this? Is there any evidence for major cultural shift? I don’t think so. Infact even in the so called “Vedic era” there are little to no horse bones found, shall we say that the Aryans never really existed in India, and there’s no such thing as Rig Veda in India today, you might even believe such nonsense. You people cling on to the one and only SNP that you can find. In the Eyropa

Love you too bro

From india

🙏🤍🙏from Goa, India!

The original Aryans came from India, and conquered Iran.

@@user-k4d-e59mo28oc they're now under the dust, people like you that say your ancestors invaded someone else's land don't even have anything they can be proud of in their life so they are proud of some dead grandparents. Take this arabic poem: "It is not the brave young man that says "My dad did!" it is the brave young man that says "I did!""

Confusion was likely the aim..

Dazzle and confuse...

Purposely done to please his masters

There is NO distinction. The narration of this video is technically and conceptually wrong about nearly everything.

The confusion was no accident. The creators of this pseudo documentary did this to use a supposed scholarly inquiry into Indo-European origins as a vehicle to advance their anti-racist political agenda. This is so very typical of the way leftist agitprop is done and, unfortunately, the majority of the dim bulbs who watch this will be completely suckered by it.

Caucazian is most beatiful and inteligent peoples in Earth

It had nothing to do with purity or beauty. They were obsessed with skull shapes and found that the skull shape they most closely identified with the white race was that most typified by people living in the Caucasus region. Of course today we understand that that is pure nonsense.

@@brucetucker4847 The Caucasus as the origin of humanity and the peak of beauty In the eighteenth century, the prevalent view among European scholars was that the human species had its origin in the region of the Caucasus Mountains.[22] This view was based upon the Caucasus being the location for the purported landing point of Noah's Ark - from whom the Bible states that humanity is descended - and the location for the suffering of Prometheus, who in Hesiod's myth had crafted humankind from clay.[22] In addition, the most beautiful humans were reputed by Europeans to be the stereotypical "Circassian beauties" and the Georgian people; both Georgia and Circassia are in the Caucasus region.[23][22] The "Circassian beauty" stereotype had its roots in the Middle Ages, while the reputation for the attractiveness of the Georgian people was developed by early modern travellers to the region such as Jean Chardin.[22][24] Christoph Meiners' 1785 treatise The Outline of History of Mankind was the first work to use the term Caucasian (Kaukasisch) in its wider racial sense. (click on image for English translation of the text) The term Caucasian as a racial category was first introduced in the 1780s by members of the Göttingen School of History - notably Christoph Meiners in 1785 and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in 1795-it had originally referred in a narrow sense to the native inhabitants of the Caucasus region.[25] In his The Outline of History of Mankind (1785), the German philosopher Christoph Meiners first used the concept of a "Caucasian" (Kaukasisch) race in its wider racial sense. Meiners' term was given wider circulation in the 1790s by many people. Meiners imagined that the Caucasian race encompassed all of the ancient and most of the modern native populations of Europe, the aboriginal inhabitants of West Asia (including the Phoenicians, Hebrews and Arabs), the autochthones of Northern Africa (Berbers, Egyptians, Abyssinians and neighboring groups), the Indians, and the ancient Guanches.[36] It was Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a colleague of Meiners', who later came to be considered one of the founders of the discipline of anthropology, who gave the term a wider audience, by grounding it in the new methods of craniometry and Linnean taxonomy.[37] Blumenbach did not credit Meiners with his taxonomy, although his justification clearly points to Meiners' aesthetic viewpoint of Caucasus origins.[38] In contrast to Meiners, however, Blumenbach was a monogenist-he considered all humans to have a shared origin and to be a single species. Blumenbach, like Meiners, did rank his Caucasian grouping higher than other groups in terms of mental faculties or potential for achievement[37] despite pointing out that the transition from one race to another is so gradual that the distinctions between the races presented by him are "very arbitrary". ----------------- I think it is clear that my words "they thought so.. " is backed by their (leading racologists of time) own words (NOT mine - it would be arrogant)

European scientists - rather *colonial scientists* did everything to please their masters and twisted entire world history. Now that Out of India theory among others backed by science are coming out, academia has already started accepting every other probability there is and come to a distinguished conclusion through proper evidence, research, discussions and debates. *All this they do now by first learning ancient languages - going to the subcontinent, dwelling deep into the works of the ancient world, archaeological sites, pottery etc. and then come to a conclusion which colonial historians were extremely feeble at (not generalizing but in plural).*

Please provide his paper work

Read his Book Who were the Vedic people?

There is no doubt

@@profrajeshmaurya5078 ..... indian historians are notorious for cooking bogus stories. The language and religion of IVC people has no correlation with vedic Hinduism

Vedic civilization was from uttrakhand Himalayas to ganga yamuna

That's correct- and this happened _all over_ . Egypt is *another* good example- at various times it's been conquered by Southern Europeans, Greeks, Central/Northern Europeans, Arabs, Romans, Persians, (and even more ancient Hittites and Hyksos). India, for itself, has kind of a peculiar geography, so that no big world empires ever came out of India, however India is geographically amenable to being conquered. From 10,000 BC and even before then, the history of the world is a history of people going to and conquering other places. Even when it was the tribe across the valley, if they had more grain in their silo, "let's go attack them and kill them and take their grain".

you should check out robert sepehr, he has it right when it comes to aryans without the politicaly correct bs

@@दीपकनागर-थ5छ Yes, only South Indian Dravidian "archaeology" rejects it.

@@दीपकनागर-थ5छ So becoz some South Hindu said it's not true, it isn't??

Is this “historian” too political?

More nazi Mythology Rascist pos

@@pranays The name Aryan first appeared in Iran The name Aryanzanti is mentioned in the Medes Kabi, which is touted as the ancestor of the Kurds. 50% J1-J2 DNA in today's Kurds For example, there is 50% R1A DNA. The R1A rate is VERY HIGH among Kurds who believe in the Alawite and Yazidi religion. because it didn't mix with the Arabs Kurdish cities of Turkey

@@Πρωταθλητής-ξ4ι J2 is native anatolian?

@@VSLS06 J2 Original Anatolian DNA Anatolian people in Kurds Among the Kurds, J2 and R1 are the most common.

@@Πρωταθλητής-ξ4ι I'm greek pontic with J2

There is cave painting of horses in India, which is about 40000 years old.

@@mmMstatus prolly donkeys.

If Sanskrit came to India from Iran or other countries then why there no Sanskrit used anywhere except India? There are not even traces of it outside India. The whole Aryan Dravidian theory is political, created by British.

​@@yashpednekar331r u from Goa?

@@mmMstatusyes bhai

Translation: "I'm an autistic retard who already made my mind up and only looking for info with confirms my fantasies"

Erich Zackenstein :: Robert Sepehr doesn't go anywhere near anything ; near anyone ; near any documentation that contradicts his "aryan ( caucasian ) theories" for _every_ "great", ancient civilization. _He debates no one. He removes comments from his videos that dare to contradict his grandiose illusions about Ancient History & "aryans"._

@@cliffgaither Ah, Shalom Rabbi.

@@erichzackenstein7113 :: Aleichem Shalom !

yeah this is clearly propaganda and the person presenting has a clear bias

What do you mean?

@@RatgenerationX Hitler fallowed Blavatskys' ideology and mythology. And Arian is the term used for people born under the sign of Aries.

😂

And it is horseshit. No thanks. Democracy sucks for third worlders

When india was thriving the “brits” were barbarians being dogpilled by the romans. Civilization existed much earlier in india than britain. Pick up a book bro

thanks gamer

technically etnos was a Greek term, and has a history of about 2500-2800 years... but there is evidence the Egyptians considered race on the table of nations as well as other sources like the Indian Epics.

ETHNIC THOR. You talk such rubbish

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i I never went into full detail about the haplogroups and such so I find what you're telling me fascinating. I agree on A LOT of things probably even more than I realize at first glance even. Except I disagree in some minor issues. Technically, the widespread nomadic Scythians relationship with the Classical Greeks predated Alexander the Great by Centuries. And it was deep enough to have Scythain iconography not just in Greek art during the Golden Century but in the sacred Parthenon itself. Ilyrians on the other hand, never expanded to such extent going from Northern Italy to upper Greece and it is possible that they had reached Macedonians but not Thessaly since historically speaking, Ilyrians lived further North and were said to clash with and form alliances with the Etruscans against protoCelts from Central Europe. It seems much more plausibly to me that blond hair in Thessaly comes from a much earlier preAnatolian period and is not Pelasgian but Chalcolithic or even Neolithic in origin. Ilyrian tech however, might as well have reached all of Greece since the Spartan already had a variant of the Ilyrian helmet when in the Peloponese by 8th Century BC. As far as DNA is concerned, mainland Acheans came from Cycladic Minoans from circa 2800 BC to 2400 BC whom themselves came from from Anatolian peoples from around 6000 BC. I recall a study done in Crete with bodies from around 3300 BC, from 2007 I believe, which sugested that they share the same DNA with modern day peoples from the island. Likewise genetically speaking, Classical Greeks were indeed decentants of the so called Mycenean Acheans (study from 2017) but they also kept their culture as a basis of their own and somehow Hellenized ( impossed it ) the rest of the Aegean Sea. However, Anatolian peoples had A LOT of interaction with Semithic peoples after the Chalcolithic ended thus making them remarkably different from the Acheans both genentically and culturally speaking, and more similar to Bronze Age Pakistan than Bronze Age Greece, which is why Semitic Sumerians were keen to trade with Harappan peoples from that far back into the Bronze Age. Although their heads of empires did form a brotherwhood between eachother, according to letter transcipts, it was no different than between the Egyptians and themselves, meaning it was more of an honorary title for important peoples, heads of state / government officials, rather than a familiar bond of an ethnic origin of some sort. At this point I'd also like to mention Armenians are also a very interesting group since the were a horse riding steppe dwelling people reaching the heartland of Europe (modern day Armenia) well into the late Bronze Age. But basically this tells me they were at the very edge of the Hallstatt sedentary peoples and had a very strong connection with preScythian Aryans/Iranians. The Mitani took horses from the Armenians and came up with the war chariot tech and it was through this vehicle how the great Empires of the Bronze Age reached their peak in splendor, including the Mycenean Acheans. The history of how both, Minoans and Hellenic Greeks, were able to survive the Bronze Age collapse is remarkable. They basically kept retreating further away from the coast and kept building higher and higher up in the mountains to places which were seemingly impossible to conquer by the SeaPeoples, and finally after they were gone, they gradually returned and reclaimed their lands, Pan Helenism was syill a reality but it had been so long that they lacked a written common language, and by the 8th Century BC when they had already fully recovered, and were fighting against eachother while amassing considerable armies, but keeping a Pan Helenic sentiment which could undoubtedly trace back to those frightful humble recluses from Dark Ages after the Bronze Age Collapse that eventually lead them to best the mighty Persians in the Archaic age with a little help from the Scythians previously weakening the heart of the Persian Empire course.

@@ophilliaophillia5918 ¿Thor?

R1a is ayarn yes an it's in britan a little bit but were mainly rb2 the oldest version that predates your one an these are the Israelites who came to Europe years ago loads rb2 on the western side Celts an they went all over

Stiythan from Ukraine there saying some where but bramiham are basically the druids chosen class when euro adopted being pagan after original language like Welsh being related to anicent Hebrew an criptic Christians oringnal egyptians who left chase out to return to the island they originally came form lreland

😂😂

Both Vedic and Pre Persian civilisation are holder than Greek civilisation. Greeks did take these cultures back with them when Alexander tried to conquer India.

Είσαι άριστος!

Nonsense. Its etymology goes back further than the existence of Greek as a language or even a sub-family.

@@nick.u182 This is what you think? Greek civilization is much older than any Civilization on Earth! The Vedic period, or the Vedic age (c. 1500 - c. 500 BCE), The Persian Empire, also known as the Achaemenid Empire, lasted from approximately 559 B.C.E. to 331 B.C.E. The Greek Aegean civilization is a general term for the Bronze Age civilizations of Greece around the Aegean Sea. There are three distinct but communicating and interacting geographic regions covered by this term: Crete, the Cyclades and the Greek mainland... Crete is associated with the Minoan civilization from the Early Bronze Age.It was a few years ago that a American archaeological team made a startling discovery - they found the oldest indications of seafaring and navigation in the world, in an area called Plakia on Crete Island in Greece. 130,000 Years Ago.The history of Crete goes back to the 7th millennium. The Cycladic civilization converges with the mainland during the Early Helladic ("Minyan") period 4000 BC, and with Crete in the Middle Minoan period. (Late Helladic, Late Minoan), the Greek Mycenaean civilization 1600 BC spreads to Crete....Relax now! Greece is not only the Classical years.

@@brucetucker4847 Greece is the oldest Civilization on earth! Read Timaeus and Critias to see how Athens is 1000 years older the Egypt...more than 11600 years old! Enough with your nonsense!

If you are Aryan why follow Semitic religion like Islam?

@@ShridharUtube it's not a a religion for only sematic people it's a religion for all humanity !!

@@FarooqKhanx-mk5jv aryans only worship indo Iranian religion either vedas or Iranian avesta

Also.....you guys are Aryan, but those people he attributed the word onto aren't

All iranains and Indians are aryans by genetics. However, the ancient aryans did look more like modern russians and eastern europeans do today. And they mixed with dark skinned natives In those regions.

@yitzhak shekkelsteingoldmanberg Nazi spamming lol

@Khushal mithra अरे भाई पारसी देश आज भी हर साल सूर्य देवता मित्रा की पूजा का दिन Nowruz मनाते हैं। ब्राह्मण किसी वैदिक देवता का त्योहार क्यों नहीं मनाते? क्योंकि वे imported देवता हैं। कृष्ण, राम, शिव स्थानीय हैं all over Persian world Vedic gods are found in archaeology but not in India, why ?

@Khushal mithra क्या बात करते हो। पारसी और वैदिक मित्र, इंद्र, रुद्र, वायु, वरुण एक ही काम करते हैं, देवता लोगों का एक ही विभाग रखते हैं, एक ही हथियार रखते हैं। फिर वे ब्राह्मण के वैदिक देवताओं से कैसे भिन्न हो गए? मूवी और टीवी का spiderman अलग अलग कैसे हो सकता है। these are exactly same characters in Persian and Vedas

@Khushal mithra what did word India meant in BC era? It was area around river Indus, later sometimes it went up to river Raavi. Anything east of Raavi wasn’t India or Hindus for Greeks or Persian. Who had influence over that India (now Sindh, Punjab, Kabul) ? Persian did. Ganga Yamuna wasn’t even on map when Scylax was mapping Indus River and it’s tributaries and naming it Indói which later became India. You really need to read history. Persian Devas are Vedic Devas. There is no difference. Brahmins much later retrofitted those but never worshipped them ever. That’s why there is no Vedic archeology in modern India. Even Roman ruins have tons of Mithra, Indira but none in India

@@uprightwalkingape3483 🤣🤣🤣 Kuch bhi

😂😂

Bro can you speak Sanskrit?

Shalom, please see Anacalypsis by G Higgins. You are correct.

It's disgusting really. I often wonder if people like him really believe their own propaganda.

​​@@chrisnewbury3793 Aryans were tall, golden skinned central Asians who killed and raped ancient European Neolithic population

@@utkarshsingh8297 we don't know where they came from originally. The Central Asian thesis is theory at-best.

I think it was Hermann Goering who said, I decide who is Aryan and who is not.

Not really. The people who originally invented the Aryan term and identity were almost certainly the Andronovo people, who were genetically European. These people then mixed with the Bactria-Margiana Archeological Complex(BMAC) and this mixed group then invaded Iran and the Indus Valley

@@दीपकनागर-थ5छ that's because most central and western Europeans are R1b. R1a is not the only "Aryan" haplotype

@@alexdunphy3716 That's a misinformed opinion. First of all saying Andronovo were "European" is wrong to start with. Yes, they shared huge genetic similarity with Corded Ware Culture of Europe, but neither of them had any common understanding of "Europeaness" it's like saying Yamnaya were Siberian, cuz they derived a huge part of their ancestry from Ancestral North Eurasians. The European identity is a modern construct, not applicable to these ancient people. Secondly, it's not certain if or not Andronovo themselves started calling themselves Aryans before they started migrating south towards BMAC. It's equally plausible that they came with this whole idea of Aryan identity after migrating into BMAC, when they mixed with the Iran-Chalcolithic Farmers of Oxus civilization (who's land they inhabited) infact Andronovo Homeland was itself situated over the Oxus Homeland which means there was mixing even before their migration southwards, Eastern sites of Andronovo show even mixing with East Eurasian populations. Finally, there's no evidence of any large scale "invasion" of Indus Valley Civilization (peaking arounf 2000 BCE), infact it was already mostly gone by the time Indo-Aryans migrated into India (1500 BCE). Hence it is more plausible that the process was more of a migration (settlement with no major aim of subjugation, with possible minor skirmishes here and there) rather than full on invasion .

@@alexdunphy3716 Nope, Aryan Haplogroup is exclusively R1a1a, there's almost 0 evidence of R1b being present in either Andronovo or even Sintashta. R1b is not related to Indo-Iranians at all.

Even if "World Encyclopedia" isn't billed as some top notch academic resource, this article only goes two minutes in before the loaded language crop up. "Elitist" and "racist", outside a direct context to the terms themselves, have absolutely zero business in defining something. Utterly blatant, embarrassing attempts to sway the reader to their "correct" opinion. Not gonna work on me and the point where I check out of this video altogether.

All iranains and Indians are aryans by genetics. However, the ancient aryans did look more like modern russians and eastern europeans do today. And they mixed with dark skinned natives In those regions.

Exactly what I was going to say.

its found in almost all indoeuropean languages from the european atlantic coast in the west to india in the east.

Arya means followers of vedas

@@IAMTHEINVINCIBLE1 there are 4 Vedas

@@human8454 yes, rigveda, yajurveda, samveda, atharvaveda

not only. @@IAMTHEINVINCIBLE1

same here learning all these at 30, education/school system sucks it was nothing but to earn good grades.

I wonder why it's not mandatory taught in college. I believe if everyone we're to learn this it would end racism by skin color. In truth according to this video. If we're civilized that makes us all Aryan no matter what our skin color.

@@jimgeorge3273 grow up, the reason is because Aryans still exist and some people control the world, history is written by the victors.

@@jugg9140 America and most so the European countries are not racist take your hate elsewhere. Move to some country where others think like yourself. We won't lose any sleep over losing all you America haters.

I don't believe America is a racist country. In fact I thinknthe exact opposite.

Yeah, it’s so sad in a way. Everyone seems to want to jump to value judgements immediately. It would be so cool if we could talk about ethnicity and the genetic makeup of a population without assuming that it’s about superiority or anything. Obviously this whole topic has been abused by racist pseudo science in the past, but it’s not very helpful to just try to reverse the entire narrative to make people feel better. If we keep assigning so much meaning and value to anyones ethic/racial superiority, humanity is probably never going to overcome racism. Just because one population was conquered by the other, the descendants of the conquered population are somehow lesser people? That’s just such a backwards mindset. Sorry for the rant, I just got super confused by this kind of stuff in the past to the point where I thought that there was never any kind of aryan migration. Until it came up in one of my classes where it was mentioned by an Iranian professor of mine and I asked if it was actually still scientific consensus. I felt so stupid for just buying into this Out Of India narrative when all the evidence seems to point in a different direction. But yeah, I hope that some day we can just collectively move on from even feeling that ethnic empowerment is even necessary. Kind of reminds me of the whole Olmec head thing that has been going on.

Oh lol I’m so sorry for ranting, that wasn’t intentional but I guess it’s a good thing to have a conversation about this kind of stuff 🙃

@@algepaca The inability to entertain such subject matter and not let it devolve into “my race is better than yours” is an indicator of the state of intellectualism today.

@@algepaca no worries. It was a good rant. All things that needed to be said.

It's also good when an ethnicity wants to claim to be a powerless, persecuted minority, but really hold all the power.

I'm a Hindu and a North Indian, Which texts are you referring to? Vedas? If so then I'd like to tell you that the Aryan tribes fought the people called "Dasyus/Dasa" and Micheal witzel and many other scholars have said that these were the North Iranian tribes. And Aryan invasion theory is debunked, The correct theory is "Indo Aryan migration theory", IAMT/AMT for short.

@@KaiserOfAryas then why does Geneology match up with this "debunked myth" lmfao cope mate cope

@@ryanparker4996 Geneology supports Aryan migration theory, Not Aryan invasion. The heck are you even talking about? And the best way to support the invasion theory is to give archeological evidences, Which you failed to do so. The academia has discarded AIT long ago, You don't seem to have knowledge about it though

@@KaiserOfAryas Aryans brought horses to India. The original invaders buried their horses when they died. Look it up.

@@ryanparker4996 We had horses even before that. we have drawings of horses in caves which are older than ur entire races

It's New delhi where our ancestors resided and since it's our capital lfmao

You guys have a Black Forest too?

Adi Divyan /vayanaattukulavan theyyam Divyan/thiyyan Daivam/theyyam Thiyyas god's are theyyams Centuries old thiyyas theyyam thottams do mention the meaning of the name thiyya as divya/divyan (in english it means divine) several times in the theyyam rituals Thiyyas are shaktheya hindhus from Malabar kerala thiyya means divyan/divine and theyyam means daivam/ deva and in central asian and Chinese language also the word thiya meens divine/deva or heaven and the ritual performance of the divine is called theyyam/daivam And most theyyams are related with thiyya community of north malabar and thiyyas ancestor god is vayanaattu kulavan/aadi divyan/aadi thiyyan and ancestor godess or kula devi is Arya poomaala bagavathi and sree kurumba bagavathi is also an important goddess of thiyyas almost all sree kurumba kavu and temples in malabaar is related with thiyya and they also worship muthappan an aryan god of thiyyas a mixture of Shiva and vishnu as one divine soul theyyam in all parts in the country and many of thiyya theyyams do mention Arya word many times in their theyyam thottams like Arya nation,Arya land, Arya god,Arya king,Arya daughter etc.. and the nearby hindhu communitys around north malabar area also adopted theyyams from years and gentic studies by indian government authorities also saying thiyyas have an out side origin from south india and thiyya played a huge role in the spread of kalaripayattu, Ayurveda and theyyams in malabar kerala and the ruling hindhu party in india BJP (bhara thiya janatha party) also named after this community 'bharathiya means divine people of bharat' it use to glorify the people of bharat. And the word 'thi' also means in Malayalam 🔥 fire(agni) the purest thing and its colour is orange which is a sacred colour for hindhus and in central asian-chinese vedic hindhu-bhudhist mixed religion they used the word Thiya to glorify their gods like Dàzìzàithiān (Shiva), Dìshìtiān (Indra), Dàfàntiān (Brahma), Jíxiáng Tiānnǚ (Lakshmi), Biàncáithiān (Saraswati or Bharathi) and scy-thians are also an indo iranian tribe lived in central asia and bow 🏹 and arrow is their sacred weapons in anciant greek also thia means divine/god/ goddess and a goddess called 'theia' also present in Greece methodology and many gods also carry 'thia' name in ancient greek religion and the fire 🔥 goddess is called 'hestia' in ancient greek mythology and in central asia a kingdom called scythia was also present in history In the Vedic tradition, soma (Sanskrit: सोम, romanized: sóma) is a ritual drink of importance among the early Vedic Indo-Aryans.The Rigveda mentions it, particularly in the Soma Mandala. Gita mentions the drink in chapter 9 It is equivalent to the Iranian haoma(alcohol drink)The relationship between humans and the deity was one of transaction, with Agni (the sacrificial fire) taking the role of messenger between the two. Strong traces of a common Indo-Iranian religion remain visible, especially in the Soma cult and the fire worship and animal sacrifice is also part of early vedic tribs 🙄🤔

The word expert had lost all meaning. The word has become just as skewed and meaningless as the word racism.

Seems like there is a agenda against it...

Seems like some people think knowing things like history is bad.

@@coreyleavell6921 Guess it depends on the version...

Sure, I guess. But there's undeniable genetic research that contradicts some of the claims here. People know this because they follow news about genetics because it's interesting and we are all curious about our origins. That's it.

Sh I had it saved ,I can't find it anymore ,- they are trying too bury the history of the Aryan Race ,,because Others feel the word is too strong !!

I believe your right ,but this guy is teaching somthing that is not Accurate,,The Real Aryan Writings Are so hard to get ,,from Sumerian Times ,,it's the Actual Begining Race of white people ,,,I came across some of this stuff on the computer,wi

@@michaelarnold1672 that's crazy

The Aryan invasion theory into India has been debunked maybe you should consider the out of India theory which they're trying to hide & do have evidence one being the DNA marker of European House mice which comes from India & we all know where caravans of people go their animals follow too!!!

@@marasimix9369 Thank you, I'm open to all sources of info.

Underrated comment.

Here comes the white supremacist who claims himself as aryan aka indian and persian. Any Indian opposing this colonial bs becomes rucist LOL.

Good point. One need not be an Indologist to notice India's stratification is based on color, and this system has roots in Vedic times, pointing to Aryan hostility to darker skin peoples. No amount of diversity celebration can really, as it were, ignore the Elephant in the room. We have gone full circle: from the British attempts to justify it, to modern attempts to deny it.

@@MrResearcher122 That stratification was created by Europeans aka brits. Roots in Vedic times? yeah you people have been trying to put the blame on indian people for ever. Which you people failed to prove.

Yes Aryan migration was truth nobody should deny that

@@MrResearcher122 wow,

@ABHISHEK RAJU I have no issues with any theories of any variety as long as they're plausible, my issue with the video is that it spends 3/4 of the time telling us that Aryans are not the same as German Nazis which anyone with half-a-brain knows. It's false advertising and the video should have been entitled, "Why you shouldn't confuse Aryan with white supremacists."

@ABHISHEK RAJU Thanks, I will also keep in mind that this is an issue that people feel strongly about

a LOT of people need to hear that though.

@@suzandouglass5241 go sip your Starbucks coffee Suzan and keep your nose out of things you will never be able to compute.

@@suzandouglass5241 it's not even worth debating someone like you.

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 then what it is?

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 Hinduism is worlds first religion. Our Indian word for religion is 'Dharma'. Actual name of Hinduism is 'sanatana dharma'.

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 you are funny😁

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 you better go to nityananda island and preach your stupid ideology there😁😁

@@rebelxyz2077 the literal meaning for "Dharma" is Duty". Hinduism is not a religion it's Dharma. The literal meaning for "Religion" in sanskrit or Hindi is "Pant".

Completely missing the fact that OTHER ÆRYAN groups spread to the north 🤦‍♂️

@@VikingMuayThai WE WUZ KANGS N SHEEYIT, DEM ARYANS WUZ WYTE

I am pretty sure arya/aryan is mentioned atleast a million times in ancient vedic hindu texts... I think iranians stole from indians

@@scienceseekerresearcher6130 Of course. Iranians came later than Indians. They use the word Arya but don't know it's meaning. Only Indians know it's true meaning. It is not a race, it never was. It is a quality. But Iranians don't know it, just as Germans, because these people stole the word and then reinterpret it to make it something else.

@@asmirann3636 So True....

@@asmirann3636 Iranian word Ariya not Aarya . Iranian word Ariya come Arrattas Empire of iran Parthian indian Kshatriyas ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Q7Jxb_ihRxE.html 🤔👈

@@asmirann3636 kavian dynasty Founder king Kavi Khusad Forefathers King Kavi Chayman Parthava Parthian in Rigveda defeated by BHARATRaja Sudas. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Xexi6JiRepk.html 👈🤔

Rig Veda described only parts of India. Not Asia. Writing from that period has not survived. We have archaic brahmi in Sri Lanka. Before that it's mostly like Indus valley seals.

True this is the best theory on here. Everything else is just ppl fighting for their side their affiliation

Definitely not

Genetic studies do not confirm "replacement"...

@@kmaher1424 yeah, what those genetic studies confirm is that Aryan peoples mixed with the native population, Western Hunter Gatherers. That WHG's had blue eyes and slightly darker skin (think Cheddar man) and Aryans originally had Brown to Grey eyes (which is why ethnic Aryans have Green to Blue eyes) with blonde or red hair.

Not entirely replaced. Less than 50%, genetically.

@@augustuscaesar8287 the group that later refered to themselves as Aryans, is not the same group as the Yamnaya. They're a later group also descended from the Yamnaya, but a seperate group from those who went west...this group went east, after having split long before.

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 my understanding isnt complete enough to coherently explain why youre wrong i typed a reply that got pretty messy. either way its sad to me that indians seem to choose nationalism and anti colonial sentiment over reason and science when it comes to this. "we dont like you guys so we now change history" is a rather pathic act of revenge.

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 im willing to accept any theory thats widely acclaimed by the scientific community and i do my best to understand genetics though youre right i dont understand it very deeply. in my original post i am asking a question to better understand however i was met by indian centric theories that seem to generally be disregarded. any type of agenda is always misplaced in science.

Well it was a moral caste system which was initially ruled by lighter people though it started off religiously than through time did it become a racial caste system

@@Dorkeydaze the lighter people were the descendants of aryans who always thought themselves superior and thus were the ruling castes thats racist from the start

​@@StaminatorBladerstop projecting your racist theories on us. Caste system was originally based on ones action(karma) and gunas(quality). And this sort of hierarchy is common in indo european cultures. Later on , it became hierarchal. Has nothing to do with skin color. And viewing everything on the basis of skin color, misses the point completely. For reference read, purusha suktam of the rigveda.

Afghanistan was ofcourse part of Hindu culture before turning Buddhist

Yeah Hindu one Nature worshiper worshiper of Indra Agni rudra bramha Vishnu Rudra Aryaman like gods, gandhar is indeed mentioned in Mahabharat because mother Gandhari the princess of afgan married here. But islamic is malecha culture who don't worship Nature and Aryan god Indra Agni bramha Vishnu Rudra Aryaman ☀️so islamic cult is melechcha because of it's tradition and origin Arab

It was rambling and childish. It's one thing to disagree with a hypothesis on the merits of the evidence. It's a whole different thing to accuse people who support a theory you don't like of being white supremacists. This ad hominem nonsense should stay on the playground.

The channel is more focused on the mainstream scholarly consensus in all its videos. Its pretty consistent.

Yeah this video is globalist propaganda.

@@sahulianhooligan7046 consistently 💩

@Khushal mithra Ofcourse it does Only the twice born sacred thread wearing dwijas were considered Aryans

@Khushal mithra Who said Indus valley was Dravidian ? Dravidian itself is a mixed community of Indian hunter gathereres and Iranian farmers

Didn't Buddha have blue eyes ?

@@tamjansan1154 There is no evidence for that and its unlikely But its not impossible since blue and green eyes are not uncommon in India Green is however more present more than blue

@@ceoofthebaseddepartment4979 Old Buddist script ( Pali Canon) say that one of his physical characteristics are blue eyes. He is depicted with blue eyes on many occasions.Besides there is no physical evidence for 80% of scientific and historic theories but they are presented as truth in schools and media.

@yitzhak shekkelsteingoldmanberg I'm Hrithik Roshan's dad

Let the Catholic Church out of it! Even if it is indeed the mother of most evils, this kind of theories come from British- Anglicans colonialists and German Protestant political-philosofers ( crazy in love with male blonde peasants in uniform: their fashion taste brought them to start wars just to watch them attired like that all the time). Nothing to do here with the Vatican, who learned already one thing or two when it divided the World globe just to give a Half to Spain, the other to Portugal, this is why they were not that vocal about!

Rakhigarhi is not 9000 yrs old it's part of mature of Harappan age and is this somewhere from 3000BC to 2000BC. Also the skeletons found in Rakhigarhi have no steppe DNA but today steppe DNA is present in populations of north-western India and Pakistan, now from where did that steppe DNA came ?? Well it came from Aryan migration/invasion, Rakhigarhi itself proves Aryan migration/invasion. Also Europeans scientists and scholarly individuals since renaissance have kept themselves away from churches and have looked at classical Greco-Roman civilization for knowledge, a non-christian civilization so there is no need to think that they had thought of "how can it be non-christian civilization". In every possible way ancient Aryans were going to predate Christianity so for sure they didn't had such mindset.

@@craftyunicorn4291 hello , My point is that Rakhigarhi site is near 3000BC old but they found DNA which matches ancient Iranian DNA dating 9000 years old so it disapproves Aryan invasion theory and sarswati remnants too , you can check articles about this available not internet so nothing to hide

@@kautilya6999 How does it disapproves Aryan migration/invasion theory ?? The Iranian gene you are talking about was pre-indo-european western Asiatic gene. The population of IVC was a mixture of South Asian hunter gatherers and agrarians from Iranian Plateaus. But the steppe nomadic gene that is identified with Aryan gene is completely absent from IVC population, but today it's present in populations of Pakistan and north-western India so there was indeed an Aryan migration/invasion.

@@craftyunicorn4291 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1bsyi4zYHP0.html - I humbly request you to watch this video by Social Scientists, you will get you doubts clear. 🙏

why?

Being Aryan has nothing to do with racism and fascism. Its our identify inscribed in stone from 2500 years ego. Associating it with Nazism is a huge insult to us. That monster Hitler stole it from us, as he stole the Swastika from Indians. Damn him

@@SponsorShort "The Aryans, a name that meant “noble of birth and race,” migrated from their ancestral home on the Eurasian steppes, crossing the Hindu Kush east of the Iranian Plateau. Travelling in tribal groups of varying sizes over a period of hundreds of years, they set- tled in the land they called “Sapta Sindhu,” or the “land of the seven rivers,” in which they found lush plains for their pastoral lifestyle. They conquered not by barbarity but by overwhelming the indigenous tribes with their sophisticated battle tactics and their swift, spoke-wheeled chariots, battle equipment never before used in the Indus valley." - Encyclopedia of Wars, Philips C and Axelrod A

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i Yes, actually it's the oldest sign in existence. The oldest one has been found in Ukraine and is almost 12000 years old.

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i The oldest attestation of swastika is in the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture.

Not Hendo Indo Aryan You ain't an Aryan Just because you Persian Aryan is a race Most Persians aren't Aryans neither white

​@@khashayar8989 you are using a hindu/ Persian word yet now 😂 aryan originated from Sanskrit rigveda which mentioned yavan as anarya Non-aryan 😂 you can't disprove it until you are using aryan word, tell me any European which is more older Sanskrit 😂 which use Arya😂 want to become so called aryan but don't want to believe on Aryan origin culture 😂 you are malecha anarya

(he doesnt explain the prevalence of blue eyed personages of Dynastic histories either, (from India to Persia to Egypt etc) considering blue eyes was strictly a PIE trait emerging from the Black Sea about 6-8000 years bpe. interesting the information he neglects, its almost as if theres a narrative or an agenda afoot.

So what? That's for a different video

@@tewekdenahom485 So what...? You serious or a Troll? Information is invalid if it is skewed... Kinda like Government Statistics.

@@NegativeBodhiImage I thought that blue eyes was a trait first seen in the weird dark skinned Western hunter gatherers. The trait seems to been selected for as current European genomes have just a trace of the old hunter gatherers left.

VIN RUSSO. I was thinking the same thing. Where does the Caste System come from. And other ideas of people who come from the upper classes that they are superior to people who are the same ethnicity. Did these ideas come from Ayranism

And that nationalist mythology is just as silly and irrelevant as 19th century European nationalist and racist mythology.

@علي ياسر which Iranians were made kings please provide evidences. In the early mandalas of Rig Veda there was a mention of the great war of ten kings with the king Sudas in which the ten kings lost this battle to the King Sudas . One of the ten kings was known as Parshwnatha who later migrated to Iran and his tribe later came to be known as Persians. The term Arya Dharma has been exclusive to the people following Sanatana Dharma. Those who differed from the Dharma are otherwise.

@علي ياسر why is your name in chinese?

aryan invasion theory is already debunked , even also by a british man himself , lol , you dont even know where these pepole took the aryan word , its not even aryan its arya which we call ourselves from long before 5000 years , a lot of history is recorded

That’s Reeeeeecist!

That’s not true because Jatts and Kambojs are lower caste yet are lighter than upper castes and have more West Eurasian features

There is ample evidence of advanced cities in the Indus Valley Civilization. The nomads, albeit military superior, couldn’t manage anything beyond mud huts.

@@dhruvyamdagni5858 can you tell me who debunked it? I'm curious and this subject fascinates me

College aged Male feminist with a sex offender look to him. No shit

Egyptians hated and subjugated black Nubians.

even if our earliest pre-homo sapiens ancestors stem from Afriqa it's unimportant, we ain't the same group of people anymore and a lot has changed.

@yitzhak shekkelsteingoldmanberg south Indians are also Aryans And I am saying this as a north Indian a foreigner like u don't know anything Adi shankaracharya was Aryan a south Indian

@@Noone-gz8li man these people are dumb don't waste your time, from a South Indian.

Did you know that theory was created by British and Arabs?

Yamnaya people had been mostly from Caspian sea including kassits which most of them are iranian Scythians .

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i Jinn is Arabic. It might've even arrived from the word "Chin" (China) since Arabs can't pronounce the letter CH. But the Muslims mostly say the Jinns were Black skinned and tall.

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i Here's some people with actual horns (watch the second half of the video): ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mImd6fr8VpA.html And here's sme people with Jinn feet: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8hwHFhjnG9U.html

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i Some parts are metaphors but the whole thing isn't. Devils (people/tribes with horns + weird feet + tail) did exist. They're recorded in almost every ancient text all over the world. Such people who have a crazy culture of self harm do exist and were even many more before the modern world.

@@user-ud7ei6zv7i Devil tribes are recorded in every single culture + They're almost in every religious book (Avesta - Torah - Bible - Quran and...) + The previous generations (our grand parents) used to claim they've seen them + There are people with actual horns and weird feet present on our planet with their videos on RU-vid!They had to exist.

what a stupid observations. Of course he’s going to clarify the misinterpretations and racist approach do pseudo-intellectuals that tried to steal history that wasn’t theirs

That "knowledge" doesn't work in your favor.......you guys got everything wrong.

@@navidvarzeghani2789 Who are "you guys" Navid?

@@musaka2022 haha.....you would want me to say huhn? Count one and one together, i trust that you are more than capable of that.

@@navidvarzeghani2789 Should have expected a weird answer from an Iranian

@@navidvarzeghani2789 haha.....

The points of intersection of Avestan and Vedic geography are centred in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan , Kashmir and upper Punjab.

But not Muslims. As per this document Muslims are anaryans. 😉😉😉

Offcourse

Same with the Spaniards. I have cousins from Spain with blue eyes or green. Bet you have nice eyes..Its all mixed blood and how you interpret things..

2:40

@dash Rex the R1b DNA is about 30-35% of Armenians actually to some extent or another and R1b and R1a are the aryan bloodlines which migrated from Anatolia/Eastern Europe to India and Western Europe later America

@dash Rex It's not specific only to Indo- Iranian..that's the point. Ireland, Ares...etc.

Blonde hair most likely cones from the Baltic but coloured eyes maybe southern Russia and the steppe, but do you have the character of the arya, do follow izzat ?

خسته نباشی آریانا شد آریایی؟ 😂 خودت هم می‌دونی آریایی اصیل ایرانی ها هستند نه پشتون های طالبانی

Aryana = Aryaiee YES!!@@آریاافشار-ك1ج

Yes, princess of gandhar 🙇🏼‍♀️❤️ mother gandhari is mentioned in Mahabharat​@@posthumanguy435 And mama Shakuni also 😢

Aryan doesnt mean shit in armenian.

The word is derived from Sanskrit arya.. which doesnt mean anything in armenian. Stop lying.

grantham also used for writing parkrit/sanskrit.

this video guy is just a guy out there, not a true expert or anything like that. just has strong opinions and does some reading and puts out opinions. rather obviously.

Saraswathi is not present-day Indus or ghagra or hajra. It is Helmand in Afghanistan . Something Hindutva types are loath to accept

​@@velamuranand8356the description doesn't match with what was written in the Vedas. Saraswati river was said to be massive and drain in the ocean. The river of Afghanistan doesn't match any of the description.

@velamuranand8356 afghanistan was a part of india anyway

Well obviously your a bigot for questioning the 'facts' given. Whites were backwater non migrating heathens whom just claim connection and are wrong..... This video is farcical at best. Some of the 9ldest Egyptian pharaohs had red hair still preserved and blue eyes genes but that waycist

No it is no coincidence. It is a well established fact (through the study of ancient DNA) that the Corded Ware culture of northern Germany, Poland, the baltic region, Bielorussia and western parts of Russia/Ukraine was the origin of the populations who later became the Indo-Iranians. The Indo-Iranians are not direct descendants of the step populations who were the founders of the Corded Ware culture (Yamnaya). Instead, the step population pendulum first swung west (Yamnaya -> Corded Ware) and only then it swung back from there (with new DNA admixture acquired in the West - in particular Western Hunter Gatherer DNA - in the baggage).

@@epwlod777 and we are the racists here? Man your an history and culture thieving man or woman with no self awareness whatsoever.......go learn about your own culture and history which most of you describe as "rich", if it's rich i don't see any reasons as too why you guys would want to steal my People's history...... Is it political maybe?

@@navidvarzeghani2789 lolololol and what exactly should I learn? Do you know your history? Muhammad? Didn't he have red hair? Oh well inconvenient facts I guess. People like you love to ignore the genetic histories. North Africa and much of the near east was not of the same stock as it is now.. Sub-saharan Migrations have drastically altered the original inhabitants into what is there today. But again. Inconvenient facts.. Can't have them fucking up your racism

@@epwlod777 they did nothing like that and we Persians mostly kept to our selves only exception being the sumer which we had a very close relationship to. Don't try to teach me my own history, we study and learn it as soon as we are able to speak haha......but it's true that our armies enlisted them and also gave them freelance jobs in and we appreciated their performances (somethings never change it seems)

Are you not aware that Indo-Aryan peoples extensively inhabited Eastern Europe well into the historical period? Scythians and later the Sarmatians are unquestioningly Indo-Aryan and lived from the Danube in modern Hungary all the way east past the Urals. The descendants of the Sarmatians, the Ossetians literally call themselves Aryan in their own language to this day...

@ssir5927 Did you know that almost the entire continent of Europe also call themselves Aryan? Even the Greeks! Also, the entire country of India, Pakistan, Azarbaijan, North Africans, Russians, Ukrainians, and many others call themselves the TRUE Arans, and everyone else is a second class to them? Yes, the name Aryan has become a CURE for the inferiority complex these people have about their own race! Aryan is NOT a race as invented by the French, English, then the Germans. Aryan is simply a character identity of a devoted Zoroasterian individual of Iranian origin and nothing more. Now you can believe in anything you like but I already explained the origin and meaning of Aryan. Peace ✌️.

@@marioscubla6558I am referring to the actual endonym of the Ossetian people, not some vague hyper-race thing. My point is that the horse riding militarily dominant ancestors of the modern Iranians are in fact European. Genetic evidence has tied them to the Baltic of all places. Actual historical evidence places Iranian peoples in Europe. This is not myth, but actual written history from not even that long ago.

@ssir5927 You are drawing your information from the white supremacist Eurocentric history, which is full of FAKE glorification of the imaginary dominant white European race! But in REALITY, true science has already proven that chronologically the white race came to existence roughly some 7000 years ago during the bronz age and before that they were brown skin, black hair people living in north Asia to Eurasia where exactly the Persians, Meds, Parthians, and many other indo Iranian people used to live as simple hunter gatherers. While some of these people migrated to the west into the European continent void of vitamin D in their diet.......low UV sunlight......they gradually became white. Whereas the 3 major indo Iranian tribes the Persians, Medes, and Parthians, just migrated to southwest Asia from north central Asia into the Iranian platue. These Iranian people had black or brown hair, somewhat olive skin color, and morphologically tall and slender, which had NOTHING to do with their ancient pre European cousins who had moved to Europe several thousands years earlier and Genetically MUTATED into a much lighter skin, hair, and eye color. There is absolutely no other connections between Iranians to Europeans other than what I mentioned. The Osetians over millenia have mixed so much with Slavic people that they don't even look like Iranians. Finally, horse riding is a skill achieved by many different people over at least 13000 years ago and not just by Iranians. I hope I covered all the topics on the Aryan myth invented in the 17th century first by the French, English, and the Germans.

@@ssir5927 They are not indo Aryan. Indo Aryan specifically refers to a group of indo European ancestry that inhabited India. It was only these people and their Iranian counterparts that ever used the term Aryan as a self designation in any way, often cultural. It is not genetic. It definitely does not refer to any European when it comes to this context. And it has no significant value. Just another name used by one of thousands of cultures throughout history.