Another good video. I did have a question. How does the Cumulus compare to the GT 2000 12? To me, most shoe companies have blurred the lines between neutral and stable, with the emphasis on "minimal stability." Thanks again and keep up the great work.
The GT 2000 is considered a stability shoe, and the Cumulus is a neutral shoe. If we were to use a scale of 1-to-10 and "5" out of "10," it is a neutral amount of control right in the middle. Any number above 5 would have some degree of stability or pronation control. The Cumulus, is a 5 out of 10 and the Gt 2000, is a 7 out of 10. I hope this helps.
Also, the use of a scale in your reply was very helpful. If you could use that for stability shoe reviews, that would be helpful. That really helps clear up any expectations regarding stability levels of a "stability" shoe. You guys are great.
There's no height change from version 25 to 26 (they're 37.5 in the heel and 29.5 under the forefoot). There is added midsole width under the arch of shoe, giving version 26 a more stable platform. Hope this answers your question
