Can you pretty please do a video about Marx’s theory of private property? I already read the 2nd Treatise by Locke, and I’m also in the middle of reading Leviathan by Hobbes. But I’m rusty on Marx. 😅
I've just found your channel and I'm so glad I did! Your voice is lovely and you seem very intelligent and well-read. I'll definitely be adding lots of the books you mentioned to my to-read list. As a Classics major, I recognised a few! 🤣❤️
You should also try to read some of Marco Tulio Cicerone books like: The Catiline Conspiracy or The republic and other Romans books on politics! I read most of them and they are pretty good not gonna lie!
Great video but side note, liberals are also right wingers when looking at politics globally, because of their support for capitalism and focus on individualism. America does not have a left wing party they have 2 right wing parties.
I'm not sure if you have heard of it or not, but 12 Rules for Life bye Dr. Jordan B. Peterson is an amazing read for personal philosophy and self-help.
The whole point of classics is that they’re timeless. Plenty of these ancient books are more up to date than books that were released 5 years ago and already obsolete.
@@catherinemarshall3003 some favourites are mark fisher’s capitalist realism, Frederic Jameson’s Valences of the dialectic and Adorno’s Minima Moralia.
The very definition of a classical work is a piece of [literature] beyond the constraints of time. Everything politics, philosophy or art is incapable of being outdated. There will always be something to learn or grow from regardless of it's age. The further back you go the more room you have to develop with the text, opposed to being pampered by the artificial, just plain contrived rhetoric of modern "polphil", as you call it.
@@ReganASMR I am joking, but really the majority of "perspective" economy-political philosophy are a useless garbage, because it could work only in fantasy. I am from Russia, we have already passed through this terrible disaster, which calls communism
@@mayatnikwin6765 To disregard a very broad economic system like communism because of Stalinism begs the question why is capitalism not disregarded because of Nazism? The answer is of course, because Nazism is just one horrible version of capitalism, just like Stalinism is just one horrible version of not even communism but arguably socialism
@@emlynpugh2476 By no means am I rejecting communism solely because of Stalinism. On the contrary, I believe that Stalinism is not any kind of communism, I was just "state capitalism". I have a claim specifically to communism. And Hitler's National Socialism is not a right ideology in one eye, it has the word socialism in its name. Friend you got it all mixed up
