oh i know right? the sound is all right, neil newbon's voice is very distinctive and difficult to emulate using AI, and the picture is technically very beautifully illustrated, but man i wish people wouldn't always make him look super young. give the man his wrinkles back i'm begging
there is nothing wrong with using someone else’s voice for an AI cover, this is entertainment content without copyright or monetization, and you should be ashamed for doing nasty things on the Internet
@@blackrose8412 Well, no one is taking away their earnings, lol Let me remind you, is this entertainment content or are you writing your “important” and “objective” opinion under any parody video/any fanart/any ordinary cover?
@@DanekaPepeka the implication that a person/actor doesn't retain the right to their own voice because it's not monetized is insane honestly. it would be completely fine if this was fanart or a voice cover done by a human consenting to use their own voice and labor, you do understand the difference between transformative works and genAI right?
@@blackrose8412 well, the right to voice remains with the actor, the right to the song remains with its copyright holder, but, for example, no one usually asks for permission to make fanart/regular cover of a song for some reason (although in both cases someone else's creativity is used as the basis) I don't want to continue arguing with you, you live in your own world with your own understanding of morality in relation to what was done using AI, which is your right, but I don't recommend coming in the comments and writing something about shame, you might end up branding yourself a toxic clown :)
