If I'm not mistaken the quest 2 will support this as well so the graphics might get alittle better but I also think we will have to wait for a quest 3 update
@@Minedance093 Early Access doesn't mean "it's ok to be garbage". Blade n Sorcery has been EA since its launch, yet it looked and played surprisingly good considering the hardware it was on.
@@Synergy.bro slavkas version is SO much better then attack on quest I don’t mean to sound rude but there are not many bugs and it might be that you havnt gotten used to the controls don’t get me wrong it’s very hard but it’s so much better then attack on quest in literally every way except for the multiplayer feature
One thing I'd like to add to the "normally they don't add Early Access games to the main store" technically Blade & sorcery has been in Early Access for 5 years and just recently the PC version finally got the full release and the quest version Nomad will also get the full release sometime later this year
@@leodanysperezreyes1145 yes it will some point later once they alleviate any bugs on the PC version then they'll work on nomad and hopefully after that they'll consider making a PS VR2 Port
@@leodanysperezreyes1145 Almost everything isn't as good as the pc version, it's sort of a nonpoint, especially when it comes to mobile VR. I was genuinely surprised it even came out on Quest 2, let alone looked (or played) as good as it did. (also never thought it would get mod support on Quest) I will say though with every update, the performance got worse and worse and imo, it's (at its current state) playing the worst it ever has on Quest. There has been a bug in the game (for OVER a year) that (50-70% of the time) won't allow you to put your weapons on your hip (they just fall to the ground instead), and it's forced me to stop playing cause it's so GD frustrating. If I had a great pc and a wireless connection that could do it justice, I'd be 100% behind the pc version, but I don't. Cheers.
A lorry load of "LOLZ" for your efforts. To be fair, I do think the Quest 3 is a lot more capable than the visuals on display here... and even the Quest 2 at a push. An example being the game, Resist. I mention that game because you're whizzing around skyscrapers like spiderman while shooting droids so it's a very loose comparison to the gameplay in Titan. Every gamer wouldn't say no better visuals but I'm most intrigued to see what reviews say about the actual gameplay. Especially as it was one of those games that they kept showing adverts for in the build up to the release of the Q3. Then it just seemed to vanish off the radar. I was surprised to see it suddenly reappear today.
the issue i have with this early access after they delayed the game a year is price. This feels like the studio may be running low on funding to finish the game. Its a year past when it was supposed to release its a bit too late for an early access that looks this rough. ive played alot of early access titles and this one has me concerned
the game world seems extremely empty, some titans are much worse than others, they added other types of useless weapons and nothing canon to the attack on titan manga/anime, this legend camera function in the cut is honestly horrible since we want to see realism and speed, in addition to the character having no arms.
@@kcadventures1454 the announcement of the game was made 1 year and 7 months ago, it was supposed to be released last year but was postponed, attack on titan is a big franchise so there is no excuse for it to come out like this, especially with the batman game that looks like it will comes out amazing, so it's a shame that the game comes out in early access with quest 2 graphics (that's if there are no improvements for quest 3 at launch).
If you buy the early access version, will you have to buy the v1.0 upon release? Or will v1.0 end up being free for those who had early access? I don’t suppose I’d mind if it was $14 for the first 2 chapters if it’s a mission based game with no exploration outside of missions. $28 is the most I’d be willing to pay for the first 2 with some exploration outside of missions. Like the same areas available in the console game that’s explorable out of missions, that being the central hub area, the barracks, teaming ground, etc. and maybe have an option to go into the training mission with no timer or objectives so you can just chill with people and take out the fake titans, figuring out the team dynamics.
Why use my fangame's odmg in the thumbnail ? I don't want my game to get associated with this mess , especially in a way that goes against AOT lore (attacking armored titan with blades) this is down right disrespectful and sacrilegious to AOT .
Finally got news about it. Honestly I don't know how to feel about it, I want to like it but I hope it turns out good. Right now it just looks like a slightly more polished Attack on Quest which had to pause development BECAUSE of this game. For the price of the early access though i will definitely try it since even if it doesn't turn out great it's not a big cost. Not sure if I like how it looks but that's probably because of the original concept trailer.
I don't understand why they are using Commodore 64 video footage though. and I'm absolutely SICK TO DEATH of developers releasing unfinished games and labelling them 'Early access' Just FINISH the DAMN GAME!!!
I just hope they add flips and rolls as a setting for the slavka players, as well as an option to either adjust or turn off the slowmo nape slashing. I think the graphics are fine, personally, a little underwhelming, but they fit the vibe of the anime.
Hey this game doesn’t look as good as other aot vr games but most popular games sucked when they released so maybe this one is like them only god knows
I rlly want the full release price to be free. It may or may not be free but everyone knows that warly access cost more than full release so hopefully its free bc im a brokie
what’s with the graphic hate? The graphic is fine. They already had dismemberment going on too and that’s a really good direction. What I worried is how odm is going to feel
I don't think people hate the graphics well actually maybe they do but not like I am surprised this was made when quest 2 only existed now we hope quest 3 upgrade changes all that ngl
If they had had VR in the 50's parents would use this clip as to why the govt needs to protect the children. "Flying around giant naked people! Elvis, comics, where does this madness end? Think of the children!!!" ;-) Sorry, this game looks too funky for me. But for others hope you enjoy it.
This looks very promising. I’ve never really watched the show but this looks rlly cool. I won’t really say much on the graphics front since the game probably looks better in headset (like blade and sorcery nomad) I just hope it gets a quest 3 upgrade.
I’m going to support by purchasing the early access and maybe a lot of people support it and provide feedback to the devs so they can adjust it and make the corrections needed for that 1.0 update.
This looks AWFUL. We all know they're just trying to collect as much 4.99s as they can and then fade. They know it looks crap plus its an insult to quest users. I didn't spend 500 plus on a headset just so I can play ps1 graphics type games. Why are Meta even bothering enhancing their headssts if they're allowing games like this in their stores.smh
even for someone who watches the show, this just looks like grindfest, with no plot. Like if someone made a breaking bad game, and it was just making meth in an RV, over and over and over again.
The Quest 2 and 3 are capable of much better visuals. Games like this is what turns people off of VR. I'm pretty forgiving on VR graphics, but this isn't it. It is just making people think standalone VR is still stuck in the Quest 1 era when the Quest 3 is PSVR tier if not better.
I recently upgraded from PSVR and can say unequivocally, that Quest 3 is lightyears ahead of PSVR. And that's not a dig on PSVR either. I loved my time with it, especially when paired with the PS5. It's really not even comparable, though.
@@frozenninja4030 That is good to hear. I only used the Quest 2 and 3. I was mostly talking with graphics. Overall the Quest lineup is the most convenient and value for price headset in my opinion. I wish Sony supported the PSVR2 more to give the Quest 3 more competition.
@@Drstrange3000 Totally agree. Sony seemingly pushing PSVR2 to the side is a big reason I went with the Quest 3 instead. More competition in the space could only be a good thing.
This trailer is a disgrace to the VR gaming industry. a famous franchise will attract the eyes of ordinary people and they will see THIS...💀 It would be better if they didn't even release it
Wait...what? $4.99? Oh no! So much for depth or story. I was already expecting the quest-level of graphics, but bro...incomplete and early access?? Ugh. ..and dont get me started on that "trailer" they made. That was horrible. No excitement generated whatsoever (and I'm the guy who thinks Japanese anime games will help the VR market: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VSbC6ry9OXw.htmlsi=2Gj_Oa0m0-VSA4Rj ) . Who's running the marketing at Meta!!!??? Hire me!
