Fun fact, recent DNA testing quite reliably determined the Huns and their current most related descendants in Central Asia (who would have guessed). In Europe these genes are not found anywhere except for a small percentage in the Hungarian DNA which poses a question:what happened with the Huns? Where did they go?
The rest of them ended up north of the Black Sea, mixing with the Turkish peoples. Modern Hungarians only have a tiny percentage of Hun DNA that still remained in the area.
Look up the battle of Nedao. I imagine all the animosity the huns built while conquering eastern Europe for 80s granted them little mercy when they became weak and fractured.
Aymara Fan socially slow person the comment wasn’t about the hunnic empire it was about the tribes predating them wanting wine and girls (wives) as tributes. Stating that in a normal social urban environment such as LA nothing has changed and men still want the same. Do you understand ?
@Justin Rolland Ahh Okay I know what you mean now, also thought it was creepy since I am autistic and was wondering how you knew that, but yeah Los Angeles men can be comparable to that.
The core of a difficult problem can, in Danish, be termed "there the hound is burried" (der ligger hunden begravet). This is thought to have been a saying "there the Hun is burried", a Hun being so scary a person that even his grave is a problem.
Last night I felt a sleep, thinking on the Huns history and told myself, "Tomorrow I'm gonna look up some history on RU-vid about The Huns" Funny how you throw out a video of the Huns the next morning. Thanks
It’s amazing how so far back on the other side of world, and how the events from other side of the world many years prior somewhat caused the fall of the Western Roman Empire. History is like a tale of ripple effects, all causing one major event, on top of another.
@ You can say the same about the eastern roman empire. But the real cause of the fall of the W. roman empire is because of the goth and vandal. W.R.E could survive for another 200 years or more if both didn't attempted to sacked and pillaged their cities including the grain basket of the W.R.E that is carthage(this is done by the vandal).
@@sskspartan Really amusing how the primitive western propaganda still works, after so long time. Nothing common with the propaganda free scientific and archeological facts...
@@sskspartan Are You implying that Atilla was not an Asian looking Man based on a coin/medallion that was from the 19 century and made by Italians LOL. There were no first hand depictions of Him but Atilla was an Asian as far as the description goes. And we all know that the Huns were Asian/Turkic culture
@@michaelralte8195 you are correct, more white washing... it stated that attila definitely looked different from any of the German/ Italian people in the region
@sfg gh No... I most certainly sure he wasn't black , but definitely mongoloid/Asian most definitely.... no a white man like movies are history books calm... full of lies... an dont get racial on history
I think the reason Attila did not take Rome is: His people were nomads. They did not want to manage an Empire. It was easier to leave the Roman Empire mostly intact and extract a tribute every year. As well as lunch a raid once in a while. At least that's what I think the plan was.
@@ObjectiveMedia You are correct in some respects; the Romans tried some very shameful methods to get rid of Attila... there was actually an assassination attempt by the Eastern Roman Empire to off Attila, and it could have easily been successful if the Romans were a bit more subtle. Also, the Romans were just as willing to kill off their subordinates if they got in their way, so yeah, from a certain point of view, the Romans were kinda barbaric, just in a different way.
It's crazy how Atilla brought the Romans down to their knees and could've easily changed the course of human history had he sacked Rome (which he certainly could of)
Originally it is Attila with two T but in Turkey we name our children after him wih two L as Atilla. Probably we do it because using double L at the end is making pronunciation way more easier in modern Turkish :))
@@EpimetheusHistory Huns were Turkic.7 of the 8 largest encyclopedias in the world say that they are Turkic.for example Harvard,Oxford,Newworldenclopedia,Cambridge,Enclopedia,Liverpool universty press and stanford universty.Sorry, this issue is not open to discussion. For example Hunnic Empire was the empire of the Huns. The Huns were a confederation of Eurasian tribes, especially Turkic ones, from the Steppes of Central Asia. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hunnic_Empire ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Huns included Asiatic peoples speaking Mongolic or Turkic languages who dominated the Eurasian steppe from before 300 b.c. www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/anthropology-and-archaeology/people/huns
@@hannibalbarca2928 Huns were ancestors of Kazakh and other central Asian nations. Cause they also mix of mongol and turk and arab ; were nomads and speak turkic languages and have traditions related with horses. And name of Atilla relates with river Edill ( at ill) which situated in west part of Kazakhstan
Atillas destruction of the Burgundian Kingdom is the origin of the nibelungen saga, an epos that is the German equivalent to Homer`s odyssey. Also a major inspiration for Richard Wagner and the early German national movement.
That's why Annenerbe was so crazy about HUNs and they technically admired HUNs secretly.Openly it was not possible due to their racial ARIAN supremacy shit.Very interesting point,BTW
Puje Js Ancestors of mongolians may have lived under the Hunnic rule but hunnic federation was mostly consisted of Turkic peoples as well as the ruling dynasty
Attila is not a name, it"s a nick and means 'daddy', Bulgarian 'tati'. His real name is Avitohol and he was with mixed blood. Attila spoke fluently Latin and Gothic but wrote with runes. That's why he was considered ignored by the Romans. The old Greeks also considered the Romans ignorants because they did not write in Old Greek.
Xiongnu is the modern day mandarin pronounciation of the chinese characters for hun while the cantonese pronounciation (a much older chinese language) is literally hungno
Correct. Huns didn't have time to write due to constant moving (hence nomadism) and depended on oral history. The only writers of their histories, culture, and way of life were their enemies.
I find it so incredibly interesting how often this sort of story has repeated itself throughout history, essentially until the invention of gunpowder. Scythia, the Mongols, the Huns. In North America after the Pueblo Revolts introduced horses on the continent, the Comanche, Lakota, Cheyenne, etc. Civilizations throughout history had no answer for the mobile horse archer. They either had to buy them off, or wait until infighting broke up the various tribal coalitions. It was a nearly perfect weapon of war.
It's kinda part of why the chariot dominated warfare for a time, as it was basically the same thing, but easier to master. Unfortunately, it was also significantly more expensive and less effective overall
the tribes of the americas ya all call of.." native" hailed from ancient lumeria...or mongolia..where is today asia.and turkey! and stretched all over africa as well
i read that Attila accepted Pope´s offer of peace, because his army got hit by some sort of plague and so he wasnt able to continue his campaign anyway. also regarding the cutting of the face of infants, ive read that it was roman desinterpretation, however huns cut their faces in funeral ritual (and xiongnu did it as form of punishment)
@@konradvonschnitzeldorf6506 wow, yeah... My English is not the best, it literally means whip. I thought scourge means something like plague, because of Warcraft... I will now delete my comment in shame.
I don’t know what happened but in that time period I don’t see Atilla’s newlywed surviving very long after he randomly dies of a nosebleed on his wedding night.
I know maybe some people will get mad at this but hey, what an ironic thing is mass migration through history. > Turks origin (based on other Epimepheus video) was a migration from the east. > Germanic tribes unity and maybe one of the mixed origin of an European identity was caused by Germanic refugees fleeing from war. > English colonial nations were formed by refugees migrants as well. > But why it's XXI century and people still think mass migration is something alien to them? Europeans throughout history were migrants lol (both my parents families were European migrants here in Brazil as well haha)
I've been listening to lectures of one russian historian specialicing on nomads, so i want to add: 1) While huns were xiongnu, even though they were harsh, they had developped culture, which they lost during their flee, becoming barbarians, people used to imagine 2) qin didn't really need a wall at the moment to defend from nomads, but to give people so much work, that they wouldn't have time to revolt/draw attention from inside problems to outside problems. Ironically, wall motivated nomads" Chinese are building wall, THEY MSUT FEAR US, LET'S RAID" May be exaggeration, he works in the museum, so he must keep people entartained
Pure speculation on my part, but I believe the Qin emperor wanted to remove the nuisance of any remnant armies left over from other states that could be a problem after unification. In the same way, it was convenient for Japanese defacto military rulers to send unruly lords and samurai to Korea, where they might win land.
More correctly, was the zhou, yen and qin kingdoms who builded the wall, and the first emperor connected the walls as one.. It was after the first emperor of han dynasty who got trapped on the bai den mountain, and the xionnu became outrageously raiding the south.. And the purpose of the wall was simple, 1. For a farming nation and technology back then, was impossible to live in North where the crops don't growed even if they successfully taken the lands, it is useless for a farming nation 2. Compared to building a wall, war costed much much more, and that's no guaranteed of winning, after han wu emerpor(4th emperor of han dynasty) defeaded the xion nu the dynasty had serious financial issued which took years to recovered, on the other hand, means the politicians income decreased, that's why most of the dynasty's politicians or advisors don't wanted to launch war
Attila stopped his invasion of Rome because his brother died so he retreated , the Pope took credit for the favorable turn of events and later claimed that St. Peter and Paul appeared! yeah, right! Rafael later paints this scene with Leo X as Leo the 1st.
Attila the Hun was born in Pannonia, a province of the Roman Empire in Transdanubia, Hungary. He was descended from a nomadic tribe known as the Huns, who had originated in Central Asia, and begun conquering areas of Europe in the 2nd century CE, including the area north of the Danube where Attila grew up.
The fighting style of the Huns matches the Mongolian groups such as the Khitan and the Jurchen in Manchuria and the Mongolian grassy steppe south and east of Lake Baikal and the wild Tatars in southeastern Mongolia and the Gobi desert.
Cuz they were all related through marriages or bloodlines.. and have always lived close with each other for centuries.. Turkic and Proto Mongol-Turkic tribes formed many empires from far east (including south-east) to north-west.
The Hun and the Mongols were the same people. Hun was the term used by the Europeans to call them, Xiongnu was the term used by the Chinese to call them, but they were in fact the same people that were the original people in the central Asia steppes. The word mongol probably was a more recent term used to call them.
@@b0leg23 the Mongols included many different tribes of the steppes peoples. The Huns were in the steppes during the Chinese Han dynasty. The Mongols were from the same steppes about 900 years later. In any way, they were related.
@@Haijwsyz51846 why don't you stop talking so speculatively and give a concrete proof to back up all the talk about mongolian huns? You can't because their language is Turkic, in all cases. Yes Mongols likely were a part of the confederacy but the lead tribes and the dynasty never were
Later came dry cough, some minor fever, big headache 7/24, loss of taste and smell, diarrhea, pain in lungs in front and the back. He failed to ask her, did she dine on live bats earlier or not.
I feel like the Pope probably begged and pleaded with Atilla. Probably no bribe, threat, or miracle, but more a desperate plea for mercy and probably quite a few recognitions of his greatness. Atilla always struck me as a guy who knew he held all the cards and just kind of went with the flow rather than having some master plan of empire.
Huns discovered 19th century. In ottomans tax books 16th century there is a lot of people named Attila, Atilla, Tarkan in Anatolian Türks which they have not know reading nor writing only verbally.
Hun Fact: the White Huns or Hethalites still exist today and are the Pashtun Tribe called Durrani who before the 1800s were called "Abdali" or Heptali in Dari language.
MIDKNIGHT FENERIR The name Hephthalites originated with Ancient Greek sources, which also referred to them as Ephthalite, Abdel or Avdel. To the Armenians, the Hephthalites were haitali, to the Persians and Arabs, they were Haytali or Hayatila (هياطلة), while their Bactrian name was Ebodalo (ηβοδαλο).[4] The hepthalites lived in what is now known as Afghanistan. And the Abdali are a modern tribe living there today with recorded history going back to the 7th century. So if you want to call that bullshit then you’ lol have to explain why. Strange how only iranic people still used the name Abdali(hepthalite), sarmastani(sarmatians),Ossetians(Asses) and Alae(Alan’s) and sakazai(Sakas) yet Turkic people today do not....I wonder why. Haha
@MIDKNIGHT FENERIR The hepthalies last settled in what is known as afghanistan where they live to this day. Same with Mongols whos empire stretched from Korea to Eastern Europe but the core still lives in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia. The same way the Hepthalite empire was all over northen india and pakistan but the core still lives in afghanistan. Fun Fact Afghanistan means land of the horse masters from Afga(Assa/Aspa)+Kan/Gan(lord or Master)
This is the first report that mentioned that the pope was responsible for saving Rome from Attila . I read that he rode out by himself , on a white horse , with is best bling , bling on & impressed Atilla enough for him to leave , amazing ! great video & very accurate young man !
If there ever was a wide scale scourge in history, it’s the steppe nomads; The xiongnu, Huns, mongols, jurchen, manchurians, and probably several other tribes.
@Sayat Serikov and were are you living now? probably not in the land of your ancestors. and probably not even among other people with the same ancestors.
@Agi D I read them all and no, they share the same root, After huns broke up, turks searched for new lands to live after defeating china, so moved to central asia / Kazakhstan sides, So mongols stayed on asia while uyghurs replaced huns. Other turks moved to Europe, and established Hunnic Empire. Others moved to Anatolia and estabilshed Seljuks, Kazakh Khanate, and hungary. Mongols stayed as they were at.
So a lot of people were asking what ethnicity the Huns were before this video, remember, they were NOT ethnically Homogenous, most of them were of mixed ancestry.
The Roman Empire fell, but never went away fully. The Emperor melted into the Pope. You ever wonder why Washington D.C. has a 3 star flag? It is also outside the U.S.. Vatican City is also outside Italy, and so is London outside of the U.K. .
The "Magyars" were Huns, who returned in the 9th century into the Carpathian Basin. The Avars were also called some kind of Huns by western Europe at that time.
@@Hunkiralyfi Észre vettem hogy bármennyire is próbálkozok/unk elmondani a valós eredetünk másoknak egyszerűen itt a youtubon az embereket nem érdekli nem olvassák ezen kommenteket, nem reagálnak rájuk. Volt egy videó Trianonról amit vagy százezren megnézték én írtam is alá olyan összegyűjtött idézeteket amiket az akkori politikusok mondtak és kifejtették bennük hogy mekkora igazságtalanság volt. Már több mint egy hete írtam de az emberek nem válaszolnak rá, nem nézik meg, a tények nem érdeklik őket. Őket csak az érdekli, köti le ha az ilyesfajta videók alá valami általuk viccesnek gondolt szöveget, mémet beírnak, mert azt sokan megnézik, like-olják, reagálnak rá.
@@materakoczi2519 Igen, értem, és igazad is van. Az embereknek nem az igazság számít, mivel azt hiszik, hogy amit tanítanak az iskolában, vagy rájuk erőltetnek a médiában, az az igazság. És amíg az igazság hivatalos nem lesz, addig az emberek nem is fogadják el (többségében). És mégis meg kell, hogy cáfoljalak... Nem az a meglepő, hogy nem érdekli az embereket az igazság, hanem az a meglepő, hogy nem támadnak rád a magyarellenesek. Vagyis a "nulla" nem rossz eredmény. Én ahhoz vagyok szokva, hogy a magyarellenesek minden hozzászólásomat igyekeznek semlegesíteni a válaszaikkal :-) Hát, kemény. Mert mit lehet arra felelni, hogy állatnak, meg mindenféle agyalágyultnak neveznek? Nehéz ilyen "érvekkel" vitatkozni. Legfeljebb annyit lehet válaszolni, hogy aki ilyet ír, biztosan az.
@@materakoczi2519 Engem érdekelne az a bizonyos hozzászólásod. Szeretném összegyűjteni a Trianonról szóló nyilatkozatokat. Mert olvastam már párat, és - bizony - sokat elárulnak az igazságból.
I have heard that Attila wasn't raised as rough as his ancestors or even probably his grandfathers. I thought he was co opted into roman oligarchic society and was raised relatively luxuriously by the standards of the time
The Great Wall of China was primarily an offensive structure, not a defensive one. There's a great video on Strategy Stuff channel which explains this in depth. I'm not trying to nitpick or be a jackass, but I'm sure a lot of you are interested in this subject and you should check out Strategy Stuff's RU-vid channel.
I am from a former hun confederacy. I am kazakh from Argyn tribe, which is mix of aryans and huns and there it gets the name, ar for aryans and gyn which is former ghun, or even earlier hun.
@@Ahmed-iam Perhaps the word 'ghun' is just another version of 'kun,' that's what the Cumans of Hungary are called. Supposedly the kun are the descendants of the hunni...
Сказочник. У аргынов гаплогруппа G, твои предки со среднего и ближнего востока. Как вы в состав казахов попали - загадка. Но вы пришли с юга и сравнительно недавно, при Чингизхане о вас слышно не было в наших степях. Скорее всего, вы присоединились к нам после создания Иль-ханата Хулагу. И так как гены южные шустрые смогли хорошо устроиться.
@@DarkKhagan it is like two siblings, one is not from another, but both have the same root, and are similar. From what I understand the huns' descendants in europe are cumans and in asia are mixed and so are called Arghuns or Arghyns. Like in Tatar, Turkish, Crimean tatar or uzbek along Kazakh ethnicities (nations). But, majority is in kazakh nation. I guess some of people who stayed in Europe are called cumans, those who went to asia are arghuns/arghyns.
9.15 As far as i know Atilla had ruthlessly raided northern italy to make an example. But northern italy was where almost all the food was grown , so he couldn't feed his army for a long siege. Just giving what i know.
Olcay Alp Bayram lol don’t mind the assholes above, they can’t even distinguish Turkish from Arabic. “Alp” and “Olcay” are clearly of Turkic origin lmfao.
really unprincipled barbarian roma, the romans tried some very shameful methods to get rid of Attila... the Romans were kinda barbaric, just in a different way.
Being that our only physical description of Attila is a second hand account of the a short man, small eyes, thin beard and flat nose "evidence of his origins" and the Huns have origins in East Asia, I have no idea how people why people think he was white. That's the most stereotypically Asian looking white man I've ever heard of. If he was white, then how would those features be evidence of his origins? He would've "contrary or uncommon for his origins". I Hear Hungarians saying Attila was white because Hungary is named after him, but it sounds a lot more likely that the Huns conquered the region of Hungary and named it after themselves because why not and keeping the name as feared as the Huns would do well for your people's image and martial prowess. Hungarians sure don't look short, small eyed or flat nosed to me, not very evident of Attila's origins. I know people will invalidate that source since it is second-hand, but considering the Huns are descended from the Xiongnu and we have no other description, I'd like to be convinced otherwise.
Attlia was not turk...Jordanes provided the physical appearance of Attila. “Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and swarthy skin, showing evidence of his origin.” This is not a typical feature of the Turkic people but rather the Mongolic features of East Asia.
I am not fully informed about the subject. But, as far as I know, the continuation of the Huns in Asia, even in Chinese sources, are the Gökturks. Huns in Europe also come from Central Asia. therefore, we Turks see the Huns as the Turkish state. In terms of physical appearance, Turks exhibit different physical characteristics since they spread over a wide geography. For example, Turks in Central Asia are slanted while we Oghuz Turks in Turkey are not slanted. therefore, not all Turks have the same physical characteristics.By the way, if we look at the language used by the Huns, it is very close to Turkish. You can read it from this resource:www.quora.com/Are-Huns-Turkic
@@hakan7295 Huns, Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics. Give those Huns real credit instead of constantly being whitewashed by the western media and Euroccentric academic circles.
The kidarites and hephtalites are dynasties of xionites (iranian name for the remanents of the northern xiongnu) who ruled regions with mainly iranian or indo-aryan population (Sogdia, Bactria, Punjab). The europeans huns are xiognu who decided to emigrate further west.
@@unknownmf2599 the word turk didnt came into existence for 100s of years after huns they were your ancestors but they were not turks they were the huns
@Shakanaka Omg! You can read? I used the term european huns to refer to Attila's huns, but specify that it originated in the xiognu, or do you not know that the xiognu were originally from the eastern steppes? Also, I never referred to they look.
L Maquiel Kidarites , White Huns and Xionites were all Iranic peoples Attila Huns are unclear peoples with no connection to White Huns The White Huns were Iranic peoples the White Huns are generally held to have been an Eastern Iranian people speaking an East Iranian language.[37] The Hephthalites inscribed their coins in the Bactrian (Iranian) script,[38] held Iranian titles,[38] the names of Hephthalite rulers given in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh are Iranian,[38] and gem inscriptions and other evidence shows that the official language of the Hephthalite elite was East Iranian.[38] In 1959, Kazuo Enoki proposed that the Hephthalites were probably Indo-European (East) Iranians as some sources indicated that they were originally from Bactria The Ephthalitae Huns, who are called White Huns [...] The Ephthalitae are of the stock of the Huns in fact as well as in name, however they do not mingle with any of the Huns known to us, for they occupy a land neither adjoining nor even very near to them; but their territory lies immediately to the north of Persia [...] They are not nomads like the other Hunnic peoples, but for a long period have been established in a goodly land... They are the only ones among the Huns who have white bodies and countenances which are not ugly. It is also true that their manner of living is unlike that of their kinsmen, nor do they live a savage life as they do; but they are ruled by one king, and since they possess a lawful constitution, they observe right and justice in their dealings both with one another and with their neighbours, in no degree less than the Romans and the Persians[44]
I think the Huns stopped their campaign against Rome is because there was plague ravaging throughout the countryside. Attila didnt want to risk him and his army being infected by the disease.
I think Attila did'n take Rome for the same reason as Hannibal; i don't know exactly what but there is something in the city of rome that seemed to discourage conquerors from trying to take it, perhaps the size of the city or the size of it's population...
@@LuisAldamiz I did't say it was impossible I said it was discouraging, Hannibal did not give up the war after deciding not to besiege the city of rome neither Atilla, they may have thought that the cost (personnel, logistics, time...) would not be worth it.
You didn’t explain who the Huns were. The Huns were Turks. The Great Huns were established by Teoman Han in 220 BC. And his son Matun Tanhu/Mete Han took over in 209. The capital was named Ötüken. Hohanyeh ruled the eastern Huns, and çinçin ruled the western part in eastern Türkistan. Attila ruled the western Huns. The Names Teoman, Mete and Attila are still used in today’s modern Turkey.
Turks just like to claim other people's history... Hun DNA.. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics.
@@Chce_269 Jordanes provided the physical appearance of Attila. “Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and swarthy skin, showing evidence of his origin.” This is not a typical feature of the Turkic people but rather the Mongolic features of East Asia.
@@Chce_269 Huns, Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics
I think you forgot to mention the Avars who dominanted the Pannonia after the Gepids(may...maybe),they were a nomadic tribe who flee from the Gokturk's attack.
@@irontamgha8276 They fled from the gokturks because the avars were a western sub-branch of the rouran kaghanate, that is why the gokturks attacked them. I do not believe that when the magiars invaded Panonnia there were still avars, their state was based on a avar elite who ruled a large majority slavic population. The bulgarians annihilated them without problems...
@@irontamgha8276 Actually hungarians/magyars met the avars, but the relationship was qite difficult. After the country became christians Steven chased away a part of the avars, who fled to the East. Another part took christianity and they were sent to the borders for fulfilling guarding duties, just like the szekelys. So the avar heritage can be found only in szekelys, not hungarians.
When the han dynasty was first fighting the xiongnu the war of the heavenly horses happened in baktria ,a diadochi kingdom of the former great alexander empire, about horses
Huns are Turkic the Metehan ''Oğuz Kağan'' (Xiongnu) is in our myth according to turkic myth : Ay Kağan (Moon Khan) has a child who face is sky and mouth is flame hairs and eyebrows are black eyes are hazel. When he get his first mothers first milk he wanted raw meat, wine and soup after 40 days later ge growth and walked. In Ötüken forest there was a rhino who eats meat and metehan ''Oğuz kağan'' fought single and beat it. When metehan was praying sky gone dark and a light came out it was brighter than sun and moon. In this light there was a girl with spiloma bright like a north star on her forehead when she is smiling Gök Tengri (god) was smiling with her too when she is crying Gök Tengri was crying with her. Metehan liked this girl so much and married with her. She gave birth 3 sons Gün(Day), Ay(Moon) and Yıldız(Star). Once upon a time Metehan while hunting he saw a tree middle of the lake. In the tree hole he saw a girl with sky eyes more sky than sky, hair is wavy like a river and tooth bright like a pearl. Metehan fell in love with this girl and they married. She give birth 3 sons again and they were Gök(Sky), Dağ(Mountain) and Deniz(Sea). Metehan (Oğuz Kağan). Oğuz gave a festival and he said: Im your khan Lets get bow and shield Etc. Etc. After this festival he sent mails 4 directions of world and he said: Im khan of uyghurs and i must be khan all of the world i want obedience from y'all if you do this i take their gifts and u become my friends if u dont than i will crush them and you will my enemy, then i will fight with you and crush them so hard. In these days Altun Kağan on the right side gifted Metehan(Oğuz Han) so many goldens and precious stones and he did what khan said and become his friend. Urum kağan on the left side with a lot of soliders and a lot of cities. Urum Kağan wasnt listening to the Metehan and he didnt did what he said. Fight was close they were at the ice mountain he maked his tent and sleept when night becoming daytime slowly a light like a sun came in the Oğuz Kağan's tent a male wolf came out the light he has sky fur and said :Oğuz! U want to fight with urum. Oğuz! Im going to walk in front of you After this Oğuz and his warriors get their tents and they followed the wolf. Wolf stoped at Black Mountain near to the İtil Müren. They fought Oğuz Kağan won the war and get Urum Khan's khaganate and his rights and he and his warriors followed the wolf and they came the itil river man of the Oğuz's Uluğ Ordu Bey built a ship fron the trees. Oğuz liked this invention and he gave the name Kipchak(Khazaks, Kyrgyzs) to the Uluğ Ordu Bey Im so sleepy its almost daytime and i didnt slept i will finish this tomorrow thanks!
@@user-um8zt8xs4i nope, you are wrong. Oghuz is a term used for Turkic tribal confederations. For example, the Göktürks had the Toquz-Oguz in the east, above China, while Turkmen Oghuz lived in Transoxiana. These 2 'Oghuz' groups had nothing to do with each other. The Toquz-Oguz are the ancestors of the Uyghurs while the Turkmen Oghuz are... ancestors of the Turkmen. Also, Ogur people are called Ogur because their Turkic is the LIR Turkic and all the other Turkic languages are SHAZ Turkic. Meaning, what our words have the letters SH and Z, theirs was L and R respectively. So, Oguz becomes Ogur. Onogur is also a combination of On and Ogur, Oghur and and Oghuz actually means: we are arrows (confederation). So actually, it is oq (without the uz of 'we are'). For example, the On-Oq was also a Turkic tribal confederation. So, the Onogur people are tribal confederation of the ten On-oq confederation of 10 Turkic tribes. So, your argument is invalid. Also, to further mindfuck you: look at the tamga of the Bulgars and the tamga of the Oghuz tribe that founded the Ottoman empire = IYI It is exactly the same. Next time, buddy, don't ever talk without reading my history, EVER AGAIN.
@@EpimetheusHistory Woah now hold on, the hunnic empire stretched to the Altai and tian Shan mountains as they had been before their expansion beyond the swamps of the Aral Sea according to them. Keep in mind the wei shu mentions the Alans being at the Aral Sea and the Ostrogothic empire comprised of many tribes like the Turkic athals. Epimetheus, your map is wrong. What about their conquest of the tribes to the east like the sorosgi or the RAID (not conquest) of Persia 440 ad according to Priscus!
It was a copying failure made during writing a new copy chronicle. U in Buda might have read as 'le'. Anyway, our capital city is not called as Bledapest at all!
