Huns: The Origin 

In 2 minutes keep up the good videos.

I love how you have byzantine labeled Roman Empire

How about the origins of Magyars ( Hungarians ) next time? :)

Awesome

Battle of Karansebes.

@Il Principe well the archaeological findings suggest that the people who live within and around huns were living like huns. because of that some archaeologists mistakenly identified some germanic burial sites as hunnic burial sites. this suggests that huns were feared or respected or both during that era. about the revolts, only when they see a weakness people tend to break away from their oppressors. that is the reality of all times in history.

That’s got to be the dumbest comment in the history of RU-vid.

Russians the worst nightmare for the Turks and the Germans

@Silviu Florin your expecting alot from a guy who's nation name is Turkey

@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 because russians despise the Turks and Russia is the only nation that obliterated the Mongols . Mongols could never destroy russians they at most made them subservient but never could conquered it . Russia wanted the legacy of the Byzantine empire all by itself and never liked anyone who challenged them that's why they fought the Bulgars

@@cosmopolitanbay9508 It was a reference from Skyrim but whatever...

@@cosmopolitanbay9508 It wasn't my reference and this guys name is literally "Imperial Dovahkiin" and also who the fuck doesn't know Skyrim.

We're the children of Skyrim and we'll fight all our lives. When Sovengard beckons everyone of us dies...

I bet Hunnic archers aimed for the knee

@@cosmopolitanbay9508 the name Hungarians came from ONOGUR means 10 OGURS

Yes Goth were also related to the Hunas

@@ghanvedsingh8946 Related? In which way? The Goths were a Germanic tribe, probably from the south of today's Sweden, of which, after dividing into western and eastern splinter groups, the Ostrogoths sided with the Huns while the Visigoths became Roman foederati.

Ghanved Singh Goths were not related to the Huns bro, if anything they were mortal enemies

Do you know that story of Mahabharata it was between cousin brothers only

If I remember correctly the Gepids were among the Gothic tribes. Idk this isn't directly combating your common but clarification helps

When describing the great Atilla the hun, the romans had this East Asian description; "He was indeed a lover of war, yet restrained in action, mighty in counsel, gracious to suppliants and lenient to those who were once received into his protection. Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and swarthy skin, showing evidence of his origin." The Great Atilla thoroughly conquered Germania, but the roman empire was not yet in reach due to early passing. Though the germans were scared of the huns and forced to flee from them (they ended up revering him and putting him in their mythology LMAO), it ended up being that the germanics were forced to fight the easier (in decline) enemy, by dealing the end to western rome once and for all.

@@myrnaa1077 Ironically (considering he is thought of as the bogeyman) what allowed him to succeed was his restraint and strategic thinking. Brutality will only get you so far, and he knew when to scare the shit out of people and when to win them over by more subtle means

Too cool🔥

@@myrnaa1077 the Huns were from the area of Mongolia / Northeastern China, the pronunciations of Xiongnu were *hoŋ-nâ in Late Old Chinese and as *hɨoŋ-nɑ, we can definitely see where the name is from

The name of the first king of Hunnu was tumenshanyu. There are many people named tumen in Mongolia. Hunnu is also a Mongolian word. DNA analysis was also done on many graves of Hunnu people from Mongolia. It has been confirmed that 68.8% are similar to Mongolians. Also, Luut city of Hunnu was found in Mongolia. Luut is the Mongolian word for dragon in Mongolian. It has also been confirmed that the appearance, culture, traditions, and lifestyle of the Hunnu people are similar to those of the Mongolian people today.

Great reference

The Huns are the prototurks.

I think it is too similar to call it similar.

@@ganizhunis910 no

Delger Khangai that may be true but in those times there isn't a distinction between Turks and Mongols. In all the empires they built, other one is also included.

Same here man Headphone buddies

Huns, Turks and Mongols have Scythian origins according to Byzantine records (from the article "The Byzantine Turks"). There is no record of Huns ever being wiped out or disappearing from Eastern Europe.

its probably why they beat the piss outta people.

"STOP. TALKING. SO. LOUDLY."

I thought he said they didnot drink while driving.

That and constantly losing to Celtic, you're right it's s hard life for your average hun. But still at least they have it better than their wee cousins the mini Huns.

No it doesnt, Drinking and riding horse and wherever you go in grassland that is most fantastic thing in the world.

No its not, its inju/inji

attila means gold in monglia

Misykat Rahman inji means pearl, name of mother is İnci which is literally same.. munjuck is boncuk in modernTurkish and it was moncuk also literally same ant it means little drop, little ball like inci-incik. So both of these terms used in every Turkish and Turkic dialect in modern and old. It is also same in Uzbek, Kazak, Uygur etc.

张衡 Atil/Itil is the name of Volga river in Turkish and in all Turkic dialect, Atilla means itilli in even modern Turkish meaning from itil river/from river.. there is literally very old Turkoman tribe called as Itilli/Attila.

@@mmarmy-d6l It is boncuk in Turkish. Monşaq in Kazakh.

That, or that the norse borrowed tales from their germanic neighbors.

you gotta check old turkic alphabet, somehow its runic , and those runes are lookin alot like norse runes. wonder how did we get those

@@mercianthane2503 Asia Huns: Turkish/Turkic Europa Huns: Siberian , cermen, arab,Mongolian

No Attila is tTurkic word. Attila means : equistrian , from itil. And others

@@_berat.ugur_3089 yes and Atle is a germanification of the word when the scandinavians had contact with the huns in the merovingian period.

My popcorn is ready. Let the battle commence

They where Turkic

@@ahamedihamiyun5927 they were cockic

@@ahamedihamiyun5927 and so it begins

@@ahamedihamiyun5927 turkic people are made up of many different races and people.

Merhaba kardeşim. Türkiyeden.

Can I get some potassium

Hey from Nebraska! live well bro

Hello Borat

And a hello to you too!

@@idgafatall1562 like you never lie about your life to make sound better

Dont you dare compare divine spaca marines with some barbaric huns who tore down Rome itself you fucking idiot.

@@Ace-id3ky Necrons>Chaos>Nids>Eldar>Imperium>Tao Space marines are basically Hun level to be honest.

I haven't heard about space marines for decades...👍

@@idgafatall1562 >enter argument >state all parties are wrong >refuses to clarify or explain

Tenger is applied to the skies which is blue. If Hungarians apply it to the sea which is also blue. Interesting.

@@VusalMusayev-s9w You know, when the Huns were in Mongolia, they saw no sea (other than some salty lakes maybe). Perhaps when they reached Black/Caspian Sea they just named the sea tenger. We Chinese translated Tengri into "长生天", which means "the eternal/immotal sky".

Kazakh Tengri

@Hungary #1 Hungarian tenger is from the Bulgar language and is related to Kazakh tengiz, Turkish deniz, which means the same: sea. The correlation is R-Z: 9 in Turkish is dokuz, in Chuvash (the only surviving Bulgar language) toxur (x=kh), Hungarian ökör means OX, in Turkish it's öküz

@@VusalMusayev-s9w no, it's related to kazakh tengiz, turkish den(g)iz, oğur = oğuz (R=Z). Hungarian is not Turkic but borrowed zillion of words from Bulgar and Khazar

Kebabman The Kebab-giver he ruined Rome’s whole career

he had enough Roman oppression of gamers so he came from asia to save us

@@barsnack7999 Who are Magyars

@@Righteous1ist Hungarians ! Hun= Hungary

@@ggarai3042 Wrong. Hungarians are not huns but magyars.

Suyash Bhagwat great game -

Same here.... AoE nostalgia... and killing of bleda in the hand of attila

@@alraziosmany It's such a great game man, I grew up with that game.

I still play AoE2 and there's a really great community in steam

@@AcZe1188 I'm going to buy it, think they're releasing AoE 2 with new graphics and such.

huns are not proven to be turkic and they were more likely yeniseian.turkic mix

@@valt8025 central asia so turkic

@@_berat.ugur_3089 hard to say modern day Turkish and Kazakhs do not looked the same

@@JYTheAviator LOOK OF COURSE DİFFERNET! OGUZ TURKS ( SO WE ) GO IRAN OLD TİME. AND MİXED SOME.

@@Atilla963 genetically modern turkish are closer to greeks and armenians tho.....

And how they spell hungarian?

I am Chinese and I love history. The first time I knew about the Huns I instinctively thought they were connected to the Xiongnu(匈奴). But I might be wrong.

@Yung cash register A.K.A Lil Broomstick A nuk ngjan me shume si hunde ajo fjale? Fjala Hunna, them.

@@zoltantakacs5001 In Chinese, 匈牙利 or Xiōngyálì Your name (Takacs) is Hungarian (Magyar) right? Beszélsz magyarul?

That looks corruption of Zion (xion in Chinese) they must be the Jewish tribes allienced with other non state actors of central asea who most probably came with Alexander the great from various parts of Persian empire and Greece when thrown out of power became state less n roamed around in step lands of central Asia

Just saying: there is never a straight line between the so-called ‘white’ and ‘Asian’ people... no one was ever pure and everyone constantly moved around... today’s narrative of ‘race’ comes from the centuries’ old colonial construction in attempt to subjugate the colonized... even the idea of ‘Europe’ and ‘Asia’ was completely man-made, putting countries like Russia and Turkey in deep ambiguity...

@@nehcooahnait7827 he is white asian because he is mix of Mongol and Turkic cuman ! Cumans were blonde Turkic people.

Sa Ba I think this is wonderful that there is still a tradition not out honoring the newborns but the ancestors all at once per se..so much gets lost..time honored traditions esp those w/such powerful intent should’ve been the ones to ensure were passed on..

Half Asian half white ? do you mean Kypcak Kuman Turks ?? Mongol Army % 85 Turkic cos mongols never ever ancient race..or got population to make ARMYS build empires..Got good Khans and commanders short of time..And turkic tribes followed helped them..Thats it..in the END other Turkic Tribe Mamluks pwned their ASS..

My Sarmatians originated in khazastan thousands of years before lol

Less talking more raiding

Is that a warband reference?

@@we1rdfuk It's almost harvesting season

That’s a nice head you have on your shoulders

@@mobileslug9603 march 2020 harvesting season

bruh, turks didnt even originate back in the times of Atilla.

@@kluts4137 talking about proto turks we didn't exist out of nothing don't talk stupid

Turks didn´t exist in those times. And Attila itself is a Germanic or Gothic name (Atta= father).

@@patrickhauser588 check out the physical features of the attilla and talk later, does it look like you're stupid

@eretna beyligi No man you are so stupid, honestly. Stop hearing Turkish Propaganda. Attila comes from the Germanic (Gothic) name meaning father. Attila became a predominant name in Hungary because when the Huns were beaten by the Romans and the Germanic warriors, they fled to Hungary. Most remained there. And in Turkey many were named Attila because many believed Turkish Progpaganda that Attila was an ancestor of Turkish peoples. Alexander is a Greek name for example, but Russians also claim to be the inheritants of the Ancient Greek and Romans. People are believing such rubbish sometimes..it is incredible. And of courese in Hungary they say Attila is a Hungarian name ;) To make the Propaganda Puzzle perfect

*Atleast it cant get any worse* 😂

yes

Gonna be China next lmao

Europeans: *after Mongols leave* "phew, well, at least the worst is behind us" *Timurids enter chat*

@@lionelhutz5137 and then the Ottoman Turks entered the chat and boy is it getting crowed. Xiong-Nu: 4th century B.C.-2nd century B.C. Huns(Xiong-Nu part 2): 370A.D.-453A.D. Mongols:1206A.D.-1380A.D. Ottoman Turks: 1299A.D.-1923A.D. Modern Turkey(Possible revived Ottoman Empire): 2020 A.D.????

and in turkey

What a suprise. The most commonly used names in Turkey: Atillla, Metehan, Teoman.

this is because modern nationalism re-invented those names

Some of you said that these names are common in Turkey and a few other examples. To the question, was it always common in Hungary or just recently became a popular name? Yes, it was always common, and its considered a very old name here. There have been many great and leading figures in Hungary called these names. The Huns were a mix of different ethincs groups, part modern Hungarian, part modern Turkish, etc.

@sneksnekitsasnek Well there have been people called Attila since the foundation of the Hungarian Kingdom (1000 AD) and even before that. As I just wrote in my other comment there are historcal figures in Hungary's history called this. Attila as a name got especially popular at around 1800 and then reaching its highest point around 1960-1970 when it was the 6. most common name in Hungary. So as said it was always popular, but it got even more so in recent decades. Its still very common today. As for the name Elek it was much more popular back in the time. The further back you go in history the more common it gets. Nowadays its not that common anymore, as more and more parents choose the names which have a western origin and are just made to sound more Hungarian. There is also a smaller town called Elek in Hungary btw.

Thank you.. True My freind

Where did this bullshit came from? Havent heard of it anywhere at all, can you give us sources? The byzantine classified everyone having alliance with abbasids as arabs or simply the infidels/anti christ. The only people that knew seljuks were orginally turks are arabs and persians whicu themselves recorded their languages, tribes and culture. You can simply see that by searching لغة الترك on google.

@@balporsugu2.0 Firstly they were allies with the sassanids against the hephthalites in which they defeated them and divided their state among themselves, the gokturks wanted to trade with the romans via the silk road in which the shah of persia (khosrow) declined and responded with (i control the silk road and your products will be bought my us and then sold for them, not directly). The gokturks were unhappy with that response so for the conclusion wanted alliance with the romans but eventuslly were crushed by the sassanids in the gokturk-persian wars (2 wars to be exact). The romans claimed to be allies with them but never responded during the war and left the gokturks vulnerable for defeat againdt the sassanids. Heres the thing, the romans called them saka due to knowledge about scythians (which were not turks anyways) but just titled them that. The seljuks were called turks (and only that) not huns or sakas or anything other than turks, arabs and persians called them that because they knew them, the romans claimed them as seljuks or caliphate army duringnthe battle of manzikert. They started calling them seljuk turks later on during seljuks of rum (in anatolia) hope this clears everything out.

OwnTrick There are arabs that live in turkey but Turks are not Arabs.

LOL. Turks are not Turkic!!! Turks of today are arabs! Old turkic that used to be in Turkey have mostly Disappeared !

Because they were from the same region as Mongolians...Huns, Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics.

@@altinbardhi it's not true. they believe tengrism

@@altinbardhi different race but Turks and Mongols are They lived together for a long time, for example Genghis Khan's army was mostly Turkish Mongols were also a minority in their own empire and yes, after a certain time, there is a mixture. Turks and Mongols in Asia are similar to each other.

@@_B-Butters_ Mongols didnt live with turks turks is just neighbor country. After the establishment of the Mongol Empire, the Mongols had a small population and need soldiers and began to occupy neighboring countries to get soldiers. It did not mean that they were all Turks.China Russia and many other countries

@@suldeesuldee6989 Turks were nomads and you may have seen Turks with shaved heads, they lived with the Mongols and were influenced by their culture.

@UCBbnuCP8POOnKSINsOk7pMQ yea I agree this document..monghols are not turk as genetic...but their lifestyle similar because of geographic and cultural occupation..

Turks=Centeral Asians. Turkish people=Anatolians conquered by Turks. Go to Kazhkstan and they look nothing like Turkish people.

@@MrBsct No. Turkic: central asians like Özbek, Türkmen ... Turkish: Anatolian Turks. All of them is Türk.

@Arda Gezik yea I readed academical books about origins of turks most of hungarian danish or other historians agree about it

@@MrBsct bro u r speaking nonsense

+Skurtavus Grodolfus *Sad Epimetheus noises*

@@retregratotherversrsentre7727 Ahhh man Epimetheus is fantastic, totally forgot about him. Poor sod :(

do not forget bazbattles :)

@@liveforever141 and history marche, history matters and history time

You just created a comment thread where people are going to drop thier favorite history channels, and then arhue with other people about other history channels.

Xiongnu was the homeland of proto-turks. Then those nomadic people started their own Age of Discovery after their split into multiple small Hunnic khanates. Those who were not in favor of the Hunnic split, started to migrate westward and mixed with asian scythians(who had the mongoloid type of look and were named "saq"), then they also started to explore persia, caucasus, Edil river(volga river) and eastern europe. All of their migrations were not just te migration, but was like first exploration expeditions. Similar to how europeans discovered new world, Hunnic nomads discovered Europe, and started their expansion into lesser developed europe. Attila and the other Hunns before him were the conquistadors of nomadic people, who started to subjugate european folks. Because european hunns were the small part of the hunns across the entire eurasian continent

Basically you are right, the early Huns in Asia were likely to be related to Scythians, Turks, Mongols, and Han Chinese. The Scythians provided the nomadic way of life, the Chinese provided organization and technology, and the Mongols and Turks provided most of the people, possibly including the language of the Huns. This is just one of the more reliable theories, the museum and the data are more convincing.

@@ee_wehealtogether han çinlileri mi? koreli ve japonlar ile türkler arasında bile bağlantı kurabilirsin ama han çinlilerini nereden bulup bilgi olarak buraya yazdın. kesin olan şey çinlilerle orta asyalı türk kavimlerin asla karışmadığıdır!

@@erdoğantatlı Orijinal karışık olmayan Türkler Asya'dan geliyordu. Türk kavramı ortaya çıktığında, Ashina Tumen'in Türk Hanlığını kurması muhtemelen MS 6. ila 7. yüzyıllar arasındaydı. O dönemde Türk olarak adlandırılanların, daha önceki Wusun'ların ve az sayıdaki Hunların (M.Ö. 1. yüzyıldan M.Ö. 1. yüzyıla kadar) torunları olma olasılıkları daha yüksekti. Han Hanedanlığı'nın soyundan gelen bir kurt ve Han Çinlilerinin müttefiki olarak Hunları yendi. Ancak aynı göçebe yaşam tarzı, Hunların (Asyalılar) ve Wusun gibi İskitlerin ve muhtemelen diğer küçük kabilelerin, Türkler adı verilen yeni bir rejim altında birleşmelerine olanak tanıdı. Bununla birlikte, ilk dönem Hunları aslında ilk Han Çinlileri ile yakından ilişkilidir. Hunlar, Sarı Nehir'in üst kesimlerindeki Hetao bölgesinden kaynaklanırken, Han Çinlileri, Sarı Nehir'in orta ve aşağı kesimlerinden doğmuştur. Farklı üretimlerden dolayı insanların sayısı daha fazladır, çünkü Hunlar göçebeliği İskitlerden öğrenmeyi seçerken, Han Çini diğer insanları entegre ederek çiftçilik ve yerleşimi tercih etmiştir. hayat yerleşik tarıma dayanıyor. Öncelikle sığır ve koyunları yiyecekle evcilleştirmelisiniz. Çevre kötüleştiğinde otlatmaya çıkabilirler. İlginç bir örnek vermek gerekirse, Çin tarihinin ilk hanedanı Xia Hanedanlığı olarak adlandırılıyordu. Xia'nın eski telaffuzu büyük, görkemli veya siyah anlamına gelen Gra'ya benziyordu ve Kara da aynı anlama geliyordu. Bir diğer ilgi çekici gerçek ise Çin'deki Aşina Türklerinin soyundan gelen pek çok kişinin aile isimlerini SHI olarak değiştirmiş olması ve artık Han Çinlisi olmalarıdır. Tarih bir ayrılma ve yeniden birleşme sürecidir. Çin'e gelerek müzeleri bizzat görebilirsiniz. Han Çin'inden ve Xiongnu'dan ortaya çıkarılan birçok kültürel eser vardır. Aşırı milliyetçilik tarihin gerçeklerini kaçırmanıza neden olabilir.

@@erdoğantatlı Xiongnu, Türklerden daha eski bir kavramdır. İlginç olan, SHI soyadını taşıyan birçok Han Çinlisinin Ashina'nın soyundan gelmesidir. Demek istediğim, otlaklarda kalan Xiongnu kabileleri daha sonraki Türklere katıldı, ancak daha sonra Ashina ailesi gibi onlar da Han Hanedanına katıldılar. Xiongnu, İskit kültüründen derinden etkilenmişti, ancak Xiongnu, Han Çinlileri gibi Çin'in Sarı Nehir Havzası'ndan geliyordu. İlk Çin hanedanı Xia, gra'ydı, evet Kara'ydı, yani görkemli, büyük ve siyahtı.

same for me, just a few days ago i thought "aw man it would be nice if kings and generals had a video abou where the huns came from and what they did"

I thought I was alone before I scrolled down to read the comments !

Same, I played Total War Attila for the first time in a while yesterday

Tbh i think about the huns every day 😳

Our energy is heard and cherished!

Hitler and Napoleon agree with this comment.

Nomads can mobilize huge armies. Every male is also a soldier.

The Russians disagree

Not a bane anymore, LUL.

@president camacho the bottom line is that the Russians unified all the lands from the baltics all the way to the Pacific

Türkiye'den esenlikler

Always welcome to Danube Bulgaria you who are the people descended from khanasubigi Kotrag.

@Cyprus İs Turkey My friend according to some historians the Bulgars, the founders of Old great Bulgaria, Danube Bulgaria and Vologa Bulgaria and few more little not very known countries spoke oghuric turkic languige. There god was Tangra. When they conqure the slavic people and mix with them, the elite spoke turkic. I'm not gonna go into the Irano-sarmatic or any other version of the bulgars here.

True descendants of Huns, the Chuvashians.

@@kila200 Sarmats are not Iranic though, it is proven.

no

​@@miui0882how no

Kami Attack ahh I remember that day. My steam powered bronze spiders tore across the battle field ending the Huns.

@@heronofalexandria91 thanks for starting the industrial revolution in the 1st century👍

Brian Williams is that you?

Henricus Silvanus I also discovered the secret to eternal life (don’t tell anybody)

@@heronofalexandria91 okay i keep it

In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, suitable to predict biogeographic ancestry, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent the power/military elit. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry east Eurasian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly un-admixed Asian characteristics.

Welcome aboard!

😅HUN might be KUN wich means SUN , i think huns not mongols they r ogur turks. Decendants of huns are Chuvash and Kazan tatars.

@@siyacer What language?

@@ragnarlodbrok1012 Incestors of Huns are Mongols, Kazakhs, Kyrgizs and Uyghurs...

Beautiful

Thats right. Xiongnu and Huns were a mixation of nomadic people, it didnt matter what races it contained

In older Chinese dialect xiongnu was pronounced Hunnu

Utopian yeah something like that. Different romanization may also spell it like Hsiung-nu... X may also be pronounced as /h/ as well as in ‘México’... Hong Kong would be Hieung-Gang in Cantonese and Xiang-Gang in Standardized Mandarin.

Turkish as in turkey or in turkstan

Yunanlı yanlış kullanımdır hocam. Hintli gibi.

@@mertcoskun7382 Ama gene aynı sonuca çıkıyor Yunanistan''lı'' , Hindistan ''lı''. Bende Çanakkale ''li'' yim :D Ama Ordu'lu arkadaşım var lu örneği vermek için yazdım :)

It is smilar but origin göktengri mean blue sky

In Turkey have very local word; "Tenger tos" which mean turning insight out/my life destroyed/punished from god etc. Old villagers using a different situations.

@Mr Doggo if they are descendant why was feudal anarchy in Hungary in the XI. century?

@Mr Doggo yes, .. and they killed each other

Hunarians most certainly mingled with Huns a lot but they're more related to eastern-european peoples, like Finns (the most), Balts and Slavs.

@Haroon Abdul Majeed He said that figurative. He meant that he will rain death

Man could he fart!

@@oghuzkhan6136 "He meant that he will rain death" Not enough then. What a loser.

Said Turcophobic! Attilla was a Hun! Fool

@@yumani_ Huns were not Turkic. This is Panturkism propaganda.

Aynen knk o

I think so

Abulghazi Bahadur, khan of the Khanate of Khiva (1643-63), told of the Ergenekon Mongolian creation myth in his work, 17th-century "Shajara-i Turk" (Genealogy of the Turks). So it is Mongolian legend.

@@focusontheargument genetically? This is a misconception about Turkey turks. Turkey turks are, genetically, mix of central asian turkic people and native anatolians like hittites, greek and armenian genes are lower than people believe so. Even if it wasn't not all turkic people are from turkey you dumbass

@@focusontheargument bro even in one generation outer-looks can change a lot

feelsgoodman Unfortunately turkey teaches a lot of bullshit about turkic, mongolic, tartar history which is sad cuz its actually really interesting

@@affentaktik2810 i wouldn't call it bullshit, what they taught us is true to a great extent

@@affentaktik2810 I think you're telling us a lot of bullshit too considering you have no degree regarding turkology you with your superficial knowledge don't talk like you have a doctor title sit down take a seat bitch

@TheEnforced then tell us Where is attila from?

Enlighten us pls

They WERE the mongol (proto mongol, but close nuf)

Wrong one

Turks are white nation but mongols are yellow .Turks are brekisefal but Mongols are dolikosefal. We have similar mythology and culture

Not Mongols, mostly Turkic tribes. Xianbei people were Mongol and they destroyed Huns.

@@terrificsoprano5025 hell yeah

Turco-Mongolo-Hungariano-Bulgarian

@@sbernesy3977 And one Turco-Mongolo-Hungariano-Bulgariano-Sino-Japano-Englando-Franko-Braziliano-Egypto-Americano Espresso for me please

There are 6 centuries between Mete Khan and Attila. Both great leaders and scourge of empires.

@@vonclausewitz8558 actualy hes name is Mao-tun(probably Baghadur which mean courage/soldier/hero) we translated hes name Chinese sound and call him Mete.

Sertan Kay evet biliyorum :) ama son of Modu Khan demiş, değil. Edit: grandi görmemişim o zaman problem yok, haklıdır :)

Turks didn´t even exist then. Turks began to exist in 550 after Christ.

Genghis/Tengiz/Cengiz etc doesn't mean the "sea" in Mongolian. The source of that title is highly debated and one suggestion is that he got that Turkic name and Han/Khan (ruler) to signify he is the ruler of everything, but there is no certainty. Also Oguz Khan epic as you said is an epic and there are many variations of it and none of them are certain, even if he actually existed. While there is a historical link with the Huns and Pro-Turks/Turkic tribes, it's not proven that Huns are in fact Turks

@@shakrooph The event is not the fact that the epic is real, but the fact that the Huns are mentioned in the epic. Huns are Turkish, Attilada is Turkish, this is indisputable. culture language war style everything is compatible with turks

@@merd209 indisputable is a very bold claim for something that is heavily disputed. I'd be happy to check your resources for a concrete evidence. Everything you mention to be "compatible with Turks" is plausible to relate Turks to Huns but it could be that they all were a part of the Hunnic nation along with other tribes and had heavy influence on each other. It could even be that population wise Turks were more dominant and could have had more influence but it's very difficult to pin point the origin. As a similar example, for decades many scholars from Turkey and around the globe had a theory that Turkish and Mongolian were in the same language group but then the theory got debunked and it was accepted that there is a heavy influence over each other due to living in close contact for a long time but not enough structural connection to suggest they form the same language group. Again there would be substantial amount of culture and language similarities with Mongolians but it wouldn't be valid to say Turks = Mongolians. Also again it's only a variation of the epic that it's about the Hun leader Mete and Atilla is not a direct descendant of Mete.

@@shakrooph Anca bu şekilde münasip bi tarafınızdan tarih uydurarak kendinizi avutun

Yet none of them are related to Attila or the Huns!

In Hungary the name was introduced in the 19th century by orientalist fashions. In Turkey the name was introduced in the 1930's by the turkish reform. So originally neither of these countries had that name.

@@davidbence485 wrong atilla is a name used in turkey for thausends of years the huns where turks

@@davidbence485 Attila the Hun was of the Dulo clan. The Dulo clans later created Magna Bulgaria, then Danube Bulgaria, then Volga Bulgaria, some say that also the Chuvash and the Balkarians are heirs but I don't know if they are really descended of the Dulo clan, a tribe led by a member of the Dulo clan Alcek also migrated and settled in Southern Italy.

@@kemalsurmeli7722 Turkey is barely 100 years into existence, even ottoman empire started around 500 years ago.

let's dance

The Huns and the Turks are different, but both spoke Turkish languages. When the Huns weakened, they replaced them with Goktürks (Turks) in the Altai Mountains, and the first ethnic group to rule most of the Eurasian continent emerged. However, that rule will disappear in about 30 years. Turkey soon split into east and west. In fact, the legend of the origin of Turkish wolves and the titles of kings Kang and Khan are inherited by later Mongolia.

@@narihira572 Dude believe me, I know my ancestors.

aptal :D Tengri inancı panteistiktir.

@@DimitarFCBM 😠huns 🇹🇷

Altin Bey Qazaqstannan Turk bauyrlarğa Salem 🤘🏼🦅🇰🇿♥️🇹🇷🐺🤘🏼

@Donat Rahmat, ammo mani profil rasmi Turkiston bayrog'i :)

​@@altinbey5831 Basmachi movement flag

62🤙🏻🇹🇷🤣aleyküm selam

@@kubat552 you already know brother ;)

U feel the battle field with u feet ahahah damn nice

Throat songing does not belong only Mongols. Other nomadic tribes such as Huns (today we know them as Turkic people) does throat singing as well

Its one of my favorite Total War OSTs

THat's Turkic though not Mongolian.

HUNS are Turks . They are not mongols. You false know

That's true. Atil in old Turkic languages meant to strike or fearless.

Volga is Ijil Murun meaning Same River in Mongolia. Atilgan is replica of Mongolian word Adilhan which means Same. I wonder if today’s so called turkish people who look like arabs or french still use the word adilhan or ijilhen to say when two things are same. Turkish Mongolians call the flower the same Tsetseg. But today’s turks are not what turkic was in the days where we shared the same word to call a flower. Turks chose different religion Allah but we Mongolians stayed true Shamanist kept Shamanism alive for 4000 years until even to this day.

​@@tuguldurlkhagvadorj8331 You sound like the typical Mongolian I've come across online. I don't understand your intention, but it seems like an insult to me that you compare us to Arabs or French. Nothing personal, sorry if i am wrong. But know that if you say this to an ordinary Turk, they will take it as an insult. Now I will prove to you that we are not Arabs or French. The word you wrote as "ijilhen" is probably the word we use as "itilen" meaning= "pushed". Atilgan = Atılan = Being thrown at, or the one who jumps forward. So being pushed and thrown are essentially similar. The word you use as "Tsetseg" is written as "Çiçek" in us. Its pronunciation is "Chichek". Doesn't it mean anything to you that the two words you gave examples are in today's Turkiye-Turkish? We were already Ottomans(Ataman) 500 years ago, the westerners gave the name Turk. They called the place we live as Turkia. Because although we have forgotten, we are Turkish. They know better than us for sure. Westerners have a habit of recording history in writing. We didn't have this. We carved some things on stones or somewhere else. But it was never enough. Today, some Turks hate you (for fighting against Islam) and some sympathize with you (like me) because your pastoral lifestyle reminds us of our ancestors. Not everyone is "from the city" in Turkey. It certainly has its equivalent in Mongolian. In Turkish, two different groups are defined as Urban and Villagers. (Köylü-Şehirli / Obalı -Şehirli) I think this debate has existed since the beginning of history. Villagers are more dependent on Customs (Töre-Tigir) . Urbanites are more likely to assimilated by foreign cultures. There are still many people who live pastoral life, keep livestock and keep horses in Türkiye. I don't want to get into a religious debate with you. I just want to explain some things. We are not all Muslims. And many of us live by blending Islam with Tengriism in our own way. The name of our ancient god is "Tengri". We were never shamans. Shamans were common people in Asia. The real Turkish follows "Tengri". It has no gender, lives in the sky (In universe). Oghuz kaan deported the shamans to the east, to present-day Mongolia, just as you said. This is how the Arabs sold their religion to the Turks. They said that Tengri and Allah are similar. If you read the history a little bit, you will understand that not "in fact" Turks have become Arabs, but that Arabs and Iranians have become Turkish, and even the caliph was a puppet of the Turks. These events took place during the Seljuk period. Selcuk bey was actually a Tengriist. It was the yabgu of the Oghuz confederation. After they became Muslims, they established a great empire, they did not do anything different from what your ancestors wanted to do (red apple-golden apple-the unreachable goal-world domination.) Because in the time of Oguz Kaan (some say that he was the Great Hun Emperor), there was a belief that the Turks dominated the world and this should be experienced again. You saw and recognized the remnants of the Seljuks as the Harzemshahs. But I don't know if they give information about Turkish history in general in Mongolia. You tell me about common ancestor and history. We Turks know that we are descended from a common ancestor with the Mongols, or at least close enough to be called cousins. Today, when I watch the Mongolian festivals, when I see the wrestlers, it is difficult to distinguish them from those in my own country. When you speak your language slowly, I can understand some sentences. First explain why your great khan of half Turkish origin killed the Cuman-Kipchaks. They had a completely different phenotype than you, but your commander, Subutay, also knew that they were genetically close to you. This is something I am particularly curious and sad/mad about. Turks and steppe people have never had a single ethnicity. The Turkish image you see in the TV series, I'm sorry, but it existed in Mongolia 2000 years ago. It is true and natural that our phenotype has been influenced by elements such as Greek-Slavic-Iranian-Arab. In the work named Cami'üt-tevarih, written by Reşidüddin Fazlullah between 1304 and 1316, dedicated to İlkhanlı Han Olcaytu Han, the author of the book explains the concept of Türk, based on their dispersal over a wide geography, that the Turks were Oghuz called Turkmen; After stating that Kipchak, Kalaç, Kanklı, Karluk and others belonged to them, and that their dialects were close to each other, he also noted that there were differences among all of these Turkish tribes due to the conditions of the places they lived. In addition, he brought the Turks directly from the descendants of the son of Noah, in accordance with the conceptions of the period. The reason for this is that the Oghuzs were very influential in the Ilkhanid country at that time. So, can you explain why you look like Chinese? If only you've read the Orkhon inscriptions in Central Asia!

Atilgan does not mean aggressive in Turkish; gullible is more apt translation of the word, root the word of which, is the imperative, "ATIL" ; means , jump, go forward! No connection with the word aggressive. Aggressive in Turkish is " BASKICI", originating from BASKI, means PRESSURE, and, baskici, is the one who pressurizes.

@@tuguldurlkhagvadorj8331 Mongols and Turks were not Shamanists, they were from a religion called Sky Goddess.

they were partly Turkic but not in general

@@SantomPh today's europe hun is hungry but hungry don't accept this

Ja en iran alans en ostrogods. Oll wos in huns army. En meny mår

Iven rajput ar konekdet to nomad pippol.

Türko-Farsi Stoner brother ,phisical features can be effected by living in a different geoghraphy too long and Turcic origin is made of nomad people live in different parts of central asia.Some lived in far north central asia , some lived in north china,some lived beside khazar sea ...

I dont think so. Foreigners could not understand the religion of nomads. An example Arabs to called "no religion" for non muslim/Zarathustran/Budhist/Manichaean/Jews/Nasturi christ Turkic peoples.

Romans regularly assimilated religious beliefs and practices from other groups, it seems unlikely they would have assumed someone has no religion simply because it's foreign. In fact they seem to have believed that all religions were legit and feared the gods of other religions as much as they would have feared their own gods.

No Romans had a multi god religion

@@ericlanglois9194 True, but in the pre-Christian Roman polytheistic religion, religious tolerance only existed as long as your religion did not threaten the Roman State or the Emperor. I.e. Druidism, Judaism (60s-70s AD) and Christianity (before 320s AD).

By that time (451AD) the Romans were thoroughly Christianized. "No religion" meant pagan or animist.

Not Turks lol

@@xshandy5812 Not anatolians for sure.But they were turkic as hell.They were genetically closer to Todays Tatar and Turkic people. Huns were mainly caucasois and noticeable e.euroasian

@@hardcoreblackpilled8699 you're deluded...The Russian anthropologist (1960s) provided the ethnological details of the skulls and the skeletal remains when visited the Hunnish and Avar cemetary sites in Hungary and Romania. Most of Hunnish elite leaders had a striking resemblance to modern Manchurians and the elite Avar skeletal remains with central Mongolians. He has also noted that the most of calvary remains were either intermixed or homogenous. Overall, it had a higher Turkic related remains. What’s interesting about his report is that all the elite/leader skulls were purely Mongoloid/East Asian.

@@NubiansNapata Huns are genetically close to turkic people you really know nothing about genetics. Kit Number: Z877352 Using 1 population approximation: 1 Uzbeks_Behar @ 19.425154 2 Uygur_HGDP @ 21.672058 3 Hazara_HGDP @ 22.073757 4 Altai_Rasmussen @ 28.551811 5 Tajiks_Yunusbayev @ 34.069836 6 Mongol_Rasmussen @ 35.748421 7 Chuvashs_Behar @ 36.614235 8 Tuva_Rasmussen @ 40.378925 9 Nogais_Yunusbayev @ 41.091053 10 Turkmens_Yunusbayev @ 41.519257 11 Brahmins_from_Uttaranchal_Metspalu @ 42.571957 12 Buryat_Rasmussen @ 43.169353 13 Burusho_HGDP @ 45.135288 14 Selkup_Rasmussen @ 48.268383 15 Hungarians_Behar @ 48.855988 16 Oroqen_HGDP @ 49.116463 17 Pathan_HGDP @ 49.225063 18 Yukagir_Rasmussen @ 49.730164 19 German_Dodecad @ 49.755596 20 Mordovians_Yunusbayev @ 50.026592 Using 2 populations approximation: 1 50% Chuvashs_Behar +50% Hazara_HGDP @ 14.079445

@@NubiansNapataLol they werent pure mongoloid at best they had 45 east euroasian.That guy was more european than your whole bedaquin ancestry Admix Results (sorted): # Population Percent 1 North_European 26.69 2 East_Asian 23.38 3 Siberian 21.44 4 Gedrosia 17.61 5 Atlantic_Med 4.91 6 South_Asian 2.63 7 Southeast_Asian 1.98 8 Sub_Saharan 1.37

Of course. The huns took over part of France and raided on the Roman's 2.

The same with Mongols. They took over Russia, China, hungary, and Poland. They were on their way to France and England when they back tracked.

@@brianticas7671 the history of humanity is so interesting. People are always migrating.

Xiangnu themselves were already mixed due to Indo European migration into Mongolia. Even today Mongols(!) have 9% "European" genes in them. Read this very interesting paper based on CHinese sources and genetic studies of ancient Xiangu

donkey fitting. The Mongolian word originated around 1200 and has no connection with the xiongnu. The Turks, who migrated from the forests of Northern Siberia to the north of Central Asia and China, established the xiongnu state. Today, the date of Oğuz Kağan's accession to the throne is shown as the foundation year of the Turkish Armed Forces.

Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics.

Let me guess, you're from Turkey? You have nothing to do with actual turkic nations.

@@handsdown3521 Yes, one more ignorant European, yes go ahead, tell me I'm not Turkish, Greek, Persian or Arab, what are you going to lie about? Huns are Turks, many historians accept this and know this and ignorant European I am telling you. Only the western side of Turkey is 70% Turkish, 30% Greek gene, but Central Anatolia and East 98% Turkish so don't tire yourself out and tell others your lies.

@@handsdown3521 He's right. The Xiongdu, Huns, Mongols are all Turks from Asia. They are Asian Turks. The Mongol's ancestors fucked Rome.

@@handsdown3521I’m Kazakh from Kazakhstan and Turkish people it’s our brothers and they also part of great Turkic nation.

Huns=east asians...The Xiongnu from Mongolia/Manchuria predates the Huns in Europe (as they showed up 200 years later from the northern borders of China). Many scholars have debated for years and many now are in a agreement that they’re the same confederacy who have reached Europe. The Russian anthropologist (1960s) provided the ethnological details of the skulls and the skeletal remains when visited the Hunnish and Avar cemetary sites in Hungary and Romania. Most of Hunnish elite leaders had a striking resemblance to modern Manchurians and the elite Avar skeletal remains with central Mongolians. He has also noted that the most of calvary remains were either intermixed or homogenous. Overall, it had a higher Turkic related remains. What’s interesting about his report is that all the elite/leader skulls were purely Mongoloid/East Asian.Huns, Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics.

Distance to: MNG_Xiongnu_Central_Asian:DA41 0.06108399 Tatar_Siberian 0.06231494 Nogai 0.06282693 Uygur 0.06548345 Karakalpak 0.06585332 Hazara 0.06614142 Hazara_Afghanistan 0.07146758 Tubalar 0.08132082 Uzbek 0.08210203 Bashkir 0.08566547 Kazakh 0.09118132 Shor_Mountain 0.09178028 Shor 0.09363371 Tatar_Siberian_Zabolotniye 0.09606831 Shor_Khakassia 0.10848495 Khakass 0.11646646 Yukagir_Forest 0.11889523 Kirghiz_China 0.12013174 Kirghiz 0.13261421 Turkmen_Uzbekistan 0.13623327 Tlingit 0.14055425 Kazakh_China 0.14074878 Mansi 0.14114272 Turkmen 0.14551228 Khanty 0.14809688 Khakass_Kachins Distance to: MNG_Xiongnu_Central_Asian:DA38 0.06855033 Tatar_Siberian 0.06925119 Uzbek 0.07192976 Bashkir 0.07292202 Hazara_Afghanistan 0.07777367 Uygur 0.08059425 Hazara 0.08332238 Nogai 0.09622928 Karakalpak 0.10318042 Tatar_Siberian_Zabolotniye 0.10606315 Tubalar 0.11011445 Turkmen_Uzbekistan 0.11764581 Turkmen 0.12223570 Kazakh 0.12239900 Shor_Mountain 0.12286107 Yukagir_Forest 0.12563648 Shor 0.12597342 Shor_Khakassia 0.13202128 Tlingit 0.13398359 Tatar_Lipka 0.14369369 Udmurt 0.14459824 Khakass 0.14501118 Tatar_Crimean_steppe 0.14503753 Bahun 0.14774430 Mansi 0.14886521 Besermyan Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA80 0.05533515 Bashkir:BAS-120 0.05990198 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 0.06118980 Bashkir:BAS-029 0.06465388 Bashkir:BAS-091 0.06518414 Bashkir:BAS-046 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA74 0.04317297 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 0.04340329 Bashkir:BAS-029 0.04508405 Bashkir:BAS-034 0.04571997 Bashkir:BAS-005 0.04634817 Bashkir:bashkir3 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA73 0.04519389 Bashkir:BAS-120 0.04615025 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 0.04817514 Bashkir:BAS-046 0.04964376 Bashkir:BAS-091 0.05188906 Bashkir:BAS-006 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA72 0.04298365 Bashkir:BAS-120 0.05147676 Bashkir:bashkir9 0.05193652 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 0.05398420 Bashkir:BAS-091 0.05418873 Bashkir:BAS-096 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA69 0.06131625 Uzbek:495_R02C02 0.06246982 Turkmen:TUR013 0.06295519 Bashkir:bashkir9 0.06305724 Bashkir:BAS-120 0.06540455 Uzbek:495_R01C01 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA66 0.04941760 Tatar_Siberian:STA-112 0.04992166 Bashkir:BAS-034 0.05030198 Bashkir:BAS-005 0.05069029 Bashkir:BAS-046 0.05109507 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA65 0.06441883 Bashkir:bashkir8 0.06454222 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 0.06584960 Bashkir:BAS-034 0.06666736 Bashkir:BAS-120 0.06779641 Nogai:NOG-125 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA54 0.04048207 Bashkir:BAS-005 0.04305749 Bashkir:bashkir3 0.04403622 Bashkir:BAS-034 0.04726006 Bashkir:BAS-029 0.04823834 Bashkir:bashkir8 Distance to: Hun_Tian_Shan:DA52 0.05372036 Bashkir:BAS-120 0.05740290 Tatar_Siberian:STA-126 0.05805683 Bashkir:BAS-029 0.06147907 Bashkir:BAS-091 0.06291138 Tatar_Siberian:STA-112

Some Mongolic kids are very jealous about great Turks history🤣🤣🤣 Most of mongolic peoples living under the China and Tungusic peoples for 400 years😹😹😹🤣🤣🤣

Khitans were not Mongolic people who ruled weak mongolic peoples🤣🤣🤣

Biz menen 🇰🇬✊

Öd tenri ayşar kişi oglu kop ölgeli törimiş demiş atalarımız. Ancak Türklük hiç bir zaman son bulmayacaktır. Tanrı Türk’ü Türklüğü yaşatsın.

Mohammed Alkenani j2 is not Arab. It’s ancient Anatolia/northern Levant/northern Mesopotamian. It’s spread all over the Mediterranean etc

@Mohammed Alkenani don't mix your history with ours

@Mohammed Alkenani j2 is highest amoung the Chechens. j2 and j1 are related and split from a common ancestor. Btw, 1/3 or half of African American males have the western European haplotype but that was because of rape. Does not make them white btw.

@Mohammed Alkenani 15 to 20% east asian is not a little bit but actually considered significant. Certain provinces do average that range and 1% of Turkish people are over 20% which is the size of a medium usa city in terms of population. Not every Turk is "barely Turk" but most are ( most are not Turk in genes)

@Mohammed Alkenani some provinces in turkey do average 15 to 19% east asian, mainly in the southwest, one in the black sea and one in the northwest. For reference, check Keanu Reeves who is 1/5 east asian but still enough to tell. There ARE Turkish Turks who ARE actual Turks but like i said, they are not the majority and NEVER WERE. They just were the minority as the most powerful group in anatolia. Today, all ethnic Turks are mixed between caucasoid and mongoloid from the yakuts, altai to all the way in Turkey and so on. If they say they are Turks, then let it be.

you clearly haven't been paying attention... it might also have been a deer

By the time the Huns where at Rome's doors, The Empire was already broken and a mere shadow of it's former power now, having to ally up to create even a standard size army to fight, having to pay people to keep them from raiding rather than though sheer fear of there power, the two Roman Empire's of the 5 century AD where just a fraction of Rome's old power without the Roman fighting spirit. to be honest since the smash up of 376 ad by the Goths the Romans never where same even when they did get back on there feet for a little while they where never the same again. no longer able to absorb crushing losses and keep rolling like back in the days of Scipio and Caesar or Trajan. The eastern Empire did regain some of that fight and spirit back near the end of the 5 century and in the sixth Century made a good attempt of regaining past glory and retook Italy up to Rome for a while and North Africa.

Mrs. O'Leary strikes again!

Roman Empire grew too big, and do not have the armies to support it. In the end, they resort to axillary troops from the Roman border and bride their foe with gold and goods. Attila attack the Roman came much later as Roman have been bribing the Huns for almost 3 decades, believing the nomad will collapse itself because of infighting, as the case for Alan, Germanic tribes and the goths.

@@RomanHistoryFan476AD the taking back of italy, North-africa Weakend the empire and Made the Loss of the Balkans to the slavs possible.....

Now this sounds interesting, first time I'm hearing about it

@Grant Willis ha, you can be poverty-stricken and attend a UK university, believe me.

@Grant Willis oh no, not really, it's more down to the fairly broken student loan/bursary systems we have here. Woe betide if you if your parents fall into the wrong salary band. Not low enough for grants, not high enough to be able to independently support you. Brexit's not an issue at all.

Turks would claim the sun is Turkish...Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics.

@@NubiansNapata soso dude, i don't understand what you mean, my native language is not english, i use translation. If you explain exactly what you mean, I can discuss it with you in detail.

Turks claim everyting😂😂😂soon they claim adolf hitler

Orgo 2003 lol

huns were turkic change my mind

@@heisenberg9699 1+1=2 change my mind.

Modern day turkey is a disgrace to their ancestors.

@@turcoslav9942 are you kidding me 1+1=3

@@lewisw3436 That's a bitch of a task,unless you play a faction from the opposite side of the map.

"Enemy general is dead" "This is your day"

@@d0kana520 😅😅

Everybody who plays total war Attila hates the shit out of the huns

:D

probably... 'cause I don't have a clue what you said....

​@@yllbardh He says "In the previous video, Hungarian people told they were not related to Huns... let's see what they're going to say now"

@@Batumtlİngilizce Açıkladığın için teşekkürler.

@@Euzuner41 rica ederim kardeşim.

No his name is not edil.

@@mustafaziyaakgul3331 It's true Attila's name came from Volga River's Turkish pronunciation.

@@Umtb2 no it's not true. Check bulgar rulers lineage. İt's avitohol not Atilla.

@@mustafaziyaakgul3331 I will check it. Thank you

@@4FYTfa8EjYHNXjChe8xs7xmC5pNEtz For those hater comment, I want to say: Congratulations! Your brain successfully fucked by Jews, and a joker called Cohen! LOL..

They were the most probably decendents of hettites

Hater 9/11 A Persian/Mede tribe.

@@aydnmesuttorun8397 They were classified as saka which are eastern iranian tribe with similar language to other iranian tribes. They are not unknown because we literally have records of them and information with evidence in iran and even abroad by many scholars, hell even the greeks recorded them with their culture, language and ethnicity. Even arabs have information about them.

@@aydnmesuttorun8397 Well, scholars argue about scythians and other eastern iranians having different culture than the mainland but the language is mostly farsi influenced just like kurdish, tajik and pashto are understandable to a common farsi speaker. Dont get me wrong friend, there are words and meanings that are different in these languages than farsi but mainly understandable for eachother, for example cyrus the great wrote letters to the scythians proposing tumyris in persian, the scythians were nomadic and could understand their own language only, thats how the greeks communicated with them during alexander's era and recorded them as saka tribe.

@@mustafaziyaakgul3331 Can you understand turkic kurgan yourself? As in can you read it? Ofcourse not, thats archeologists job. The only thing turkish want is to be legitimate as of now, thats why you see turks trying to claim ancient civilisation such as the huns, scythians and hettites, to claim roots in anatolia and east asian land as originally theirs. I mean, nobody can accept having raped mothers and blood thirsty fathers right?

Avars and conquering Hungarian nomadic groups arrived into the Carpathian Basin from the Eurasian Steppes and significantly influenced its political and ethnical landscape. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent military leaders. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry East Asian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Mongolian Buryat populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly unmixed East Asian characteristics.

No

@@NubiansNapata I'm a historian and that's true. The Huns are mostly Turks and Mongols. The Huns are a community derived from Central Asia. Don't mislead people

Jacky King hummus is a delicious Mediterranean dish thats the hummus i know

Hun is barbar from chinese language

First Hun Emperor was Teoman but he married a Chinese princes which triggered his son Mete Han/Oghuz Khan and he made the 10x system army with archers and then killed his father and stopped the Chiense infulence.

In what language

The only Hummus i know belongs in a pita inside my belly.

They might have had Scythian mixture too.

THEY WERE MONGOLS

​@@rennor3498 No. Zero.

Xiognu are not Chinese. They are what we call Asian Huns in Turkey. They were Turkic, but the European Huns came after, and were more like a mixed confederation that adopted the cultural heritige of the Asian Huns. European Huns both were and were not Turkic.

@@ardagurbuz6924 Isn't Xiongnu a Chinese word? I don't think we actually know what the Xiongnu called themselves but it's a fact they were Altaic not Chinese.

@@mongke7858 Xiongnu didn't keep records, so yes it's basically what the Chinese called them, they probably called themselves something else.

@Noah Pritchett / The handsome apologist no hun were turkic

@@scourgeofgodattila579 That has zero meaning

@The Celtic Apologist thats dumb

@@Lipton3373 It does but you just don't want to see it.

Turks were already in central Asia. The majority of Turks belonged to the xiongnu state, some of them were in Central Asia. we migrated to central asia from the northern forests of siberia.

The ancient Chinese had a governing hierarchy that allowed them to organize such enormous projects such as the building the great wall. That's why they could raise such enormous armies, that's why they could drive the Xiongnu people away. The Europeans did not have that kind of hierarchy, and for the Huns fighting the ancient Chinese then the Europeans was like playing multiplayer first and then switch to single player campaign

yeah i read that the normads were at their weakest right after winter as their livestocks and horses will lose weight because there would be no grass for them to graze during then and so the best time to attack them is right after winter.

@@johndoe123xyz I mean the Europeans at the time had a pretty complex governing hierarchy in the Roman Empire. The Huns just happened to attack when it was already in its downward spiral and they just helped speed it up. Had Attila invaded during the time of Trajan or Constantine it would’ve been different.

​@@nathanfrancis9411roman government at that point of history were puppet emperors ruling the countries in the interests of monopolists. That was the main issue of rome since lower class, slaves and middle class were suffering from corrupted rome

Quattro salti in padella? Ma ora vado a comprare delle patate saporite.

@bigbrain457 Matilda of Canossa was the last member of the noble house of Canossa of Tuscany, she was (not officialy but on fact) the queen of north Italy at the beginning of the XI century. Her life it's intresting because it's similar to the story of Sansa Stark from Game of Thrones (and for coincidence she also phisically resembled her for the informations that we have today), her life when she was a child was happy and wealthy, this end when her father is killed in a cospiracy, and all her brothers die for various reasons (for the most part ilness); she was obliged to marry a man she didn't love. After the death of this she become with a diplomacy alliance with the pope the vice-queen of Italy and in exchange she promised tto defend him from the political and militar intrusion of the emperor of the holy roman empire. She have defeated two emperors in battle for twenty years commanding personally the army, and one time humbled the emperor making him kneel for three days in front of her castle. Ancient Ligurians were the most ancient italic population, they lived in the actual region of Liguria and in southern France and south Piedmont. They origins are mysterious because they didn't know writing. They story it's intresting because even if they were an italic population they were similar to the celts (physically and culturally) for they influence in north Italy, on fact on 700 B.C circa the Celts arrived on this region and teached the lavuration of metals to ligurians, on fact the helms of the ligurian warriors are similars to the celts countreparts. Ligurians fighted also like mercenaries for other nations, in particular for Carthagine: the royal guards of Annibal it was composed by ligurians, moreover during punic wars ligurians tribes were allied of him. They were the last italic population conquered by Romans. Excuse me for bad writing, english it's not my mother tongue and i'm dysgrapic

@@Dorya9 mi raccomando invita Buster Keaton sennò si offende! ;)

@@quattrosaltiinpadellaconbu7143 This is an amazing part of history that I didn't know of! Thanks for sharing. Hope Kings & Generals will make a video on her life in the future.

@@agrippina1411 thanks to you! it's awesome sharing real little known stories of own countries with people from all aroung the world! ;)

When it actually didn't happen in Scandinavia...

west germanic mythology, not norse. Main part of the story is at the Rhine.

@@user-rj9wj8vd4s in Turkey we used the term Tanri (Tengri) for God.

Well, key in "Tengri Heaven", and you will find a song related to your ancestry. And enjoy it.

Tengri means god in Turkish also we said it as Tanrı. In Gok Tengri, Gokk means sky. Also write as Khukh/Gok/Gök Tengri. Gok Turks come from this.

Yes, and a king of Huns, called Dengisik, it means the sea, from Turkic language.

Tengri is meaning sky. We called Tenger (ТЭНГЭР).

Hungary comes rom Ungri or Ugri and their language is related to Mansi.

You go from "the whole world knows this" to "the world does not know..."

Can you plz tell me more about gok turks

@@peace-hd7bm It is a Turkish state that ruled in Central Asia and China between 552-744.

The Tengri Khan from China will protect you. Go to Wikipedia and search “Tengri Khan/ Khan of heaven”.

@@mutton9622 beacuse everything on wiki is %100 true

@@behruz5231 nahhh, i just provide a source. just it. Gokturks used to call Chinese emperor "tengri khan" or "khan of heaven". aka"天可汗"。

Turks who believed in ALLAH defeated the Turks-Mongols who believed in Tengri and stayed in power for almost 800 years by the grace of ALLAH.

@@digitalboy4415 yes of course that’s why. Such a dumb statement.

The Huns did a fair amount of damage, but even Attila was defeated a few times by the Romans. The Huns entered Northern Italy, but then left after a talk with the Pope. They never even got near Rome, unlike the Visigoths and Vandals who had previously ransacked through the empire who both sacked Rome and established long lived kingdoms on Roman territory that would exist for a few more centuries.

@@TheDirtysouthfan those same group of people fled from their homeland because of huns

Turkish ancestors are Arabs and Mongols.

@The Rational Rifleman All mass graves are being investigated by DNA tests. And all the graves belong to the Turks. 66% of Van's population was massacred by Armenians. Christian Turks, prays to Turkey. If there was justice in the world, the Circassian massacre of the Russians would be condemned by everyone. In 1864, Circassians, a people of Caucasian origin in Eastern Europe, were deported in a major operation, killing 1 million Circassians. This is literally an ethnic cleansing. Genocide. But nobody knows. Even if Turkey 3 million Circassians live, act like unaware of the incident.

@The Rational Rifleman As for the issue, the Armenians actually live in and around Adana. During the Ottoman period, the Armenians rose to the Grand Vizier. We lived a friendly life. But Europeans have broken our friendship, they tried to destroy Turkey. Then they left. Still today, Europe is trying to destroy Turkey. Today, Europe is still coming to the Middle East to benefit from oil. . Europeans value money more than people.

@The Rational Rifleman We had no problems with the Kurds. But you, "Kurdistan," you tried to disrupt our relations with the Kurds. But this time you failed. I have many Kurdish friends and they love Turks very much.

@The Rational Rifleman We do not judge people according to their religion. If we wanted to do something like that, Ottoman it would have converted all the Balkans to Islam. But we approached with tolerance. We did not interfere with people's religions and traditions.

D: turk power!

The Chinese know the Xiongnu best, because the Chinese have the most contacts and wars with the Xiongnu. All Chinese almanacs record all the culture, food, customs and religion of the Xiongnu. During the Han Dynasty, the Xiongnu were defeated and half of the Xiongnu tribe surrendered to the Han Dynasty. , so the Chinese know the Xiongnu best. The Chinese also know the Turks, because the Turks originally lived on the prairie in northern China. They were defeated by the Tang Dynasty during the Tang Dynasty and fled to Europe. Moreover, many Turks also surrendered to the Tang Dynasty and served the Tang Dynasty, so the Chinese know very well about the Huns and Turks. If you want to know about the Huns and Turks, asking the Chinese is the best way to know, because there are a lot of records in the almanacs of each dynasty in China.

@@miui0882 That's what I meant. We cannot say Chinese Records were objective. It was not because we were rival so it was quite normal but as I said it gives so much information about Huns and their origins.