Author Vikram Sampath on Savarkar, RSS, Cow Worship, Meat Eating, Hindutva then & now | Barkha Dutt 

Wonderful.

and many many more..but a bigoted news trader like burkha wont see it.

Spot on. Indian across all religions have role models we look up to that belong to different religions. APJ Abdul Kalaam is one of the many role models that followed Islam. However the so called liberal media which pretends to care about muslims by calling them minority. It is an insult to muslims and other religions. If it was not for the vote bank media will not even concern and there will not be any appeasement politics. Buddhists, Jains SIkhs Jews others are far less but no one from thos communities every uses the minority flag. Strength of India is in our diversity and respect for all citizens that follow the rule of law and put the country before religion. Religious freedom will only exist if country is secure.

KK Muhammed too he deserves so much respect from hindus.

Prodigal son will always be remembered as a britisher bootlicker so is the RSS...

I agree with u totally

Kuddos to anchor for back slap on 2nd view of this genius writer of World on Kashmir. Nicely given back Barkha...Good job !!

She didn't answer to that question😂😂😂😂😂 and there she got her own answer

😂😂😂true

This is what annoys me. I respect her for what she believes but her arguments are complete bs sometimes.

burqa is blind by her arabic burqa....

@@adityajoies What she indulges is defined as "Chala" in Nyaya (or vaisheshika) shastra. I.e. speak something that appears to be related at the outset, but is not. The goal of "chala" tactics is to disrupt the train of thought of the opponent, or to disrupt the attention people listening to your opponent have. So she is willing to appear as an idiot propounding BS, if the end result is dilution of her opponent (i.e. anyone not buying into a Nehruvian view)

@@adityajoies j

Wonderful views Sir!

Very well expressed. Just like how I felt too.

Excellent observation

Even I felt the same...very well said

I don't why your commentary is more on Barkha and less on Samapt who actually was being interviewed. is it your own bias

Why you are watching this anti india and anti hindu channel pls watch jaipur diloge

@@adityatripathi3107 Jaipur dialogue is actually anti India

dave buddhibhrast kartil, apan adun rahayche...

Unfortunately his caste is his undoing as Meem Bheem, Christian politics demonised him though it's he was jailed for 27 years. His caste lost political relevance hence he as well. Under congress written history all Hindu Mahasabha, RSS etc leaders not only sidelined but also demonized. Syam Prasad Mukherjee presence in the first cabinet, Savarkar before independence itself shows their prominence in national movement but completely ignored by Nehru deliberately. It's all about himself and Gandhi.

@@SR-fs2fd what was he doing in Europe bro? Why would he go there for honeymoon?

your mind was manipulated with to deliberate be confused with.

And indira gandhi had Hridaynath Mangeshkar summarily removed from All India Radio for singing that song. Anyone saying anything positive about Savarkar or RSS were punished openly. And the press did not even cover such stories. That's how Freedom of Expression came alive and democracy was born under 70 years of congress rule.

Devil dutta

Who's who do you mean!? This statement applies equally to both of them.

@@Skywalker-zs9tf it is the person who is asking the same questions that she also asked in her previous interview just to pander to her following

@@Skywalker-zs9tf How and from when does the word intellectual apply to Barkha? She still believes that the Kashmiri Pandits were driven out because they were exploiting the poor and hapless Kashmiri Muslims. Not to mention, her highly "intellectual" and detailed reporting of the Kargil war divulging IND's positions, and she still continues the same, reporting from cremation grounds, while being so aware and vocal about her own rights and freedom.

@@Skywalker-zs9tf she has her pockets filled with narrative.

@@Skywalker-zs9tf why wasta time here if you see both as biased?

It is Barkha who brought this Sanghi man to track from Hindu -Muslim ideological blabbering and asked him to stick to Sawarkar. Any well read man can be a scholar.But that does not wash his prejudices and ideological fixations.

Vikram is an apology for scholarship like all right wingers are

@@gangadharhiremath7306 any well read man can be a scholar right. Similarly any well read woman could be an anchor. And that’s what Barkha is , just a left inclined news presenter.

@@sivaramanmudaliar9728 seriously?

True, very biased n no substance from the interviewer. Her focus on mercy petition was jarring for me.. the battle continues.

Pls watch jaipur diloge

Mard / himmat vala hi veer savrkar pr likh bol sakta hai !

@Goblin and when will our left guys understand this?

@Goblin people actually think that donkey cares for India. Idiotic. First I thought he was a good critic, turned out to be an idiotic leftist.

He is right now researching about Tipu Sultan

All round study ! Great no doubt !mr vikram samptji 👍👍!

Jadunath Sarkar has written a fantastic book on Aurangzeb . You can refer that

Fatva a aalmgiri from jypur dylog 👍👍!

All hail hyder Ali... But why he attacked RANI CHENNAMMA?

Riddles of Hinduism will be condemned by the Brahminical mindset society who are cowards like Savarkar.

@@kevincastelino3209 @Kevin Alex is this comment of yours some kind of cryptic clue we are suppose to unravel?

@@kevincastelino3209 ur totally off tangent like the host who's paid to drum up a wrongful narratives which has been totally demolished hearing this discussion.... grow up Alex the culture in this country is beyond narrow ideological mooring as my way is the highway....

@@kevincastelino3209 that's my fear for Hinduism that even we don't get abrahamised with sanskrit names that we get so blindly opinionated that we shut all shutters of our mind and talk like you . I am sure you also call people "bhakt" , consume news as per your own bias and believe in Aryan invasion theory which now became Aryan migration theory and soon to be Aryan tourism theory 😂

@bharat pandit I think it's lil bit of first one but dominanted by market and marketing . Good marketing by Vikram that he could outshine taboos (to far left) through brand Vikram and far left will become irrelevant if they don't serve the center left ( majority in india / bjp voters) hence marketing . Ultimately champagne socialites have to make enough to get their champagne 🥂

Shows how being first badass journalist as she has marketed herself, doesn't help here.

If you think a close-minded SheGu was descriptive, imagine how horrible Burkha is.

Watch his interview at Carvak Podcast, that one is the best

Totally agree with you....it's always the same with her. Kudos to Vikram for his calm level headed answers. I'm sure he wishes he could stuff a plate of beef down her throat😂 Poor guy just wants to talk about his effing book for goodness sake.

Agreed

Nice for a Muslim to say that I feel sir! The buried debris of the past becomes an obstacle to love in the present.

Healing can’t be done when you keep on scratching the wounds

@@zeenatahmed990 lol, how can you scratch the wounds when leftists are hiding the wounds.

@@zeenatahmed990 secularism is greater than religion and anyone who disagrees with this is the reason for the wounds

Haha.... her heart is churning like hungry stomach

For lack of evidence Savarkar escaped

@@nonvinkeregopalakrishna2363 or may be just a false accusation in the first place..I think people like you who have least bothered to read the man simply want to manufacture evidence to support your terribly biased view of him😏which has unfortunately been internalised by many due to mainstream media and political speeches

@@nonvinkeregopalakrishna2363 no evidence idiot

It's called indoctrination. She has to defend her "faith" at every turn.

@@marshallmendonza partition was the best thing happened ( excluding all the pain and suffering) for india

@@marshallmendonza Did Savarkar also do Khilafat movement where Muslims showed they cared more about Turkey than their own supposed country? GIve me a break.

@@Dariusdagr8 Please understand what the topic is all about. Then comment.

@@marshallmendonza Fact is that Gandhi/Nehru agreed to partition while Savarkar opposed it. That's the reality you have to live with.

Karma Ayurveda

*SURELY*.

I wonder if the Thapars, Guhas or Habibs could have ever survived if not for the Congress govt's patronage

@@avishekbhattacharjee812 no chance. They were leeches who had a Faustian pact

At least 30-40 are now operating in the country. We might only see about a dozen of them on the front, but more are there, and more are in the making! We must do our part I feel to empower our poor in the meantime, and enable more strength and confidence for the poor.

All sanghis r sawarkar Asking apology is the common fact of all sanghis

@@ameenameen4833 Don't downgrade Savarkar by comparing him with a sanghi, It's like saying Mohammad is same as any other Muslim😉😉

@@dengxaoping5031 Ok sorry but sawarkar was a head sanghi who started era for asking apologies so many times written letters to British government for release him frm prison , that following now also by his followers. Am not mind watever u r saying abt our lovely prophet He is the best and greatest of human history Check - THE HUNDRED

@@ameenameen4833 I didn't say anything on Prophet , I was just giving an analogy. And I'd encourage you to see on RU-vid what VIKRAM SAMPATH (the guy in this video) has said about the "apologies" written by Savarkar. It would be best if you read the biography itself. You should see the videos of Vikaram on Savarkar with an open mind, I bet you'd change your stance on the current politics.

😂🤣😂

🤣🤣

@@sid2173 😂😂😂

haha jon snow ? arya here

@@aryastark879 Oh my Sister 😭😭😭

@@aryastark879 are you still playing with needle ?

Thousand times. Yes,that needs to be asked thousand times to those ideological stooges of Sawarkar. Lazy? For her age, you can't do one hundredth of what Barkha is doing.

True. Same questions. I was expecting something new apart from this political jabs.

@@singhnaveen5694For those who are a bit more than average readers,not much can be gained from these so called scholars. Five letters of Sawarkar pleading mercy are in the public domain.His role in the killing of Mahatma is in public domain. His silence against British after release from prison till 1947 is known to every one.All his stories big and small,pre and post Andaman are known to us. No doubt Sawarkar is an enigmatic personality but nothing new is brought out by the admirer "scholar". Mr.Sampat is simply soft peddling the personality of a dark person whose ideology he is subscribing to.

@@gangadharhiremath7306 Gangadhar, clearly you are one of those who wants the 1950s, 60s and 70s version of history to be frozen in stone. An actual structure built in stone was brought down; so, you better understand and appreciate the mood of the nation - I can't say if we want reconciliation, but we definitely want the truth. Vikram Sampath's book is a great service in the cause of looking for and finding the truth. The Truth shall Triumph. It always does.

@@sukhbirnaidu4360 You are asking me to decide about the TRUTH based on the present Modi controlled mood. Thank you for your suggestion.

Can you really blame them? Entire careers were made out of selective retelling of national history and continually-divisive victim narratives by leftists and Islamists.. Going as far back as the now-disproved "Aryan Invasion/Migration theory". Those ultra-erudite souls don't have any choice but to stand by their theories and publications, even in the face of undeniable facts, truths and new discoveries/proofs to the contrary. Pathetic.

Every one knows everything about Sawarkar.It is what we pick,what we highlight and what we ignore that makes us whether we accept or reject that person. Vikram Sampat does not know any thing extra.From the very out set,he is a lover of Hindutwa and hence tries to justify everything about Sawarkar. Therefore it is more important to discuss the ideology of that person than the personality. *Sawarkar was a dark intriguing secretive personality and his ideology for India was supremacist,divisive and not acceptable.* Rest all is beating around the bush

@@gangadharhiremath7306 please provide us with verifiable evidence of this. Not anecdotal evidence or personal opinions.

@@suen3634 Dark: Involvement in Gandhi assassination(Kapoor committee report 1968). Secretive:His refusal to even make eye contact with Nathuram Ghodse,let alone speak,during the trial of Gandhi's assassination.Numarous accounts and book on this hugely public event of Indian History are testimony to this. It is said that the Harsh years in cellular Jail,enduring torture,insult and seclusion for almost 14 years,made him bitter, paranoid,suspicious as well as bigoted. For the confirmation of above statement you may have to read beyond hero worshippers like Vikram Sampat.I can't provide you an immediate list of books. Please search. Divisive:His Hindutwa ideology which is in the public domain is an open proof of that.

@@suen3634 Your demand is funny.How can I provide "verifiable evidence" without relying on the accounts of some ppl who wrote about him?What if you call them as mere hostile observations? Today we see the top two leaders. Both are secretive and dark for me. How can I provide verifiable evidence without relying on other's accounts?

Well articulated analysis Sir! But you are bang on when you say that he should be a speaker for the right! He expresses so fluidly, so well, and without malice and anger :)

Does " revisionism'" happen in science? I thought it was always used in the pejorative science for ideologies and in this case for history. I note that a number of analysts in other academic disciplines, are beginning to use the historical. At the moment, Law rules ok,? Economics has had its day. Historians are taking on the mantle, to find a corner in which to park themselves as futurologists and capture the limelight. Was the interviewer playing the devil's advocate,as one would expect her to do so? I hope interviewers do not become publicity agents. They are here to probe and enlighten. Seeking the truth? Every historian has a bias. This author and the subject he writes about, could only gain all this publicity, as it has a friendly political persuasion. . ,

She exposes herself with such interviews 😂😂😂

So what do you want? Make a new hero out of Savarkar?

@@sarbajitghosh5244 new hero, Sawarkar was and shall always remain a Hero. Even if nin compoops like u think otherwise

@@stack7340 What makes you so apprehensive about whether someone thinks otherwise about your hero? Actually I am not intetested in a larger than life picture of either Gandhi or Savarkar. Nor am I interested in pitting one against the other. What provoked me to write the initial comment was the remark on 'Abrahamic' and 'Indic'worldview. First of all, it is an altogether wrong way of thinking-- highly tentative speculation. Secondly no civilization in any of the continents could remain totally insulated from other civilization. As if we haven't been enriched at all by the Mughals or the Pathans!

Savarkar's Portrait is there in Parliament Central Hall now. In the new Parliament Building, there shall be a STATUE.

@@sarbajitghosh5244 Savarkar's Portrait is there in Parliament Central Hall now. In the new Parliament Building, there shall be a STATUE.

this is an effort to rewrite the history devoid of facts anbd contexts. Just as bhakts do. Bhakti is necessarily faith based and not reason based.

@@1ahmed2 he is not writing books out of thin air . He is giving reference and sources. Try to accept alternate thought as well you may or may not like.

Yes. True. Let’s not loose this voice. We have acquired this after nearly 900 years of suppression.

@@wingsoffreedom4292 alternate thought is not something a person would even listen as the guy listens to a 1400 year old book every day.

@@1ahmed2 like your quran?? Which faith based with zero facts

Exactly. Anand Ranganathan is often a better articulator than all of BJP's spokespersons combined.

@Jitendra Singh Except that 'Patra' is hardly to be pitied. He's a shameless, failed doctor who knows his importance is only because he's chanting Modi's name all the time, and he's been rewarded for that sycophancy. He's the BJP's equivalent of the darbaari of the Congress.

I am not fan of Patra bt Still we definitely need sambit patras ,coz different people need different language

The right needs a Sambit Patra to counter a Rajdeep and a Vikram Sampath to counter a Batkha

@@atul1024 He's a good man. Heart and soul definitely in the right place. Let's acknowledge that.

Her version of history is true... You can omit other history. She doesn't care. Her ego is so huge...her forehead melts in it

True..:) She thinks she is too smart and nobody would notice this :)

Exactly, wish Vikram had responded. "BARKHA , there is your truth and then there is actually what happened..."😀

@@THIAGARAJAN1965 😂

If she wanted to do that with the ruthlessness you've imagine about her, she wouldn't have him in the show at all.

@@cauliflowerhead2735 how else would she be able to claim to be neutral.

Savarkar ko sach me samjhenge to jhuth bolne ki likhne ki jaruri hi nahi kabhi !

We all 👍👍!

Just the facts and related context.

Both Savarkar and BJP are douchebags

Bjp did harm to the image of Hindus. Today to outsiders Hindu - means cow worship, riots, mobs etc. Not much different from Taliban.

@@uncleputin6219 Kuch to log kahenge - logon ka kaam hai kehna - what did these outsiders do for Hindus ?

@@Suresh_Kamath Yet people like you go and watch videos on Savarkar and put trolling comments - have a life loser!

@@MandarJoshi I didn't watch this video as Savarkar is a douchebag. Just like I do not need to watch any video to call Hitler evil. I subscribe to MOJO stories for other interviews not for repulsive creatures like Savarkar.

@@yahiyafirdous Have you read the history properly ? It was Muslims who said identity of Muslim will be in danger and that is why they need to form a country. Read when and why Pakistan resolution was passed by Muslim League. What was Iqbal's role ? What was Jinnah's role? Why Direct Action DAY was called on 16th August 1946?

@@yahiyafirdous ak Pakistan mila tha na name of a religion..see Pakistan is now Terroristan instead of Jannat..Islam is not a religion of peace😅 at least Soudi Law granted women new freedoms now..

@@yahiyafirdous madrasa jana band karo or actual Universities jana chalu karo

It's not thought, it's reality. Congress was created by Britishers to avoide violent backlash and end of British rule sooner than later by these revolutionaries. Congress put Ghandi as a shield to blunt the wrath of revolution to save their skin. And ultimately it was fear of being butchered by INA of SC Bose that promoted them to leave India.

@@ganeshuniyal7367 So r u implying that Gandhi and the non violence was an idea to blunt the revolutionaries and fool the people to say we will achieve independence one day... just like what political parties say " garibi hataoo" --> they want poor people so that they can be in power for perpetuity.

Also think of this. In fact Vikram ji talked about this in his talk at Carvak Podcast. Congress called themselves as moderates and others as Extremists. If we use a different nomenclature. And say Congress were loyalists while others like Savarkar, Bahgat Singh, Sachindranath Sanyal, Bose were Nationalists.

@@mrityunjay1055 can't equate Bhagat Singh's nationalism with Savarak's

@@srikk9 Well depends. I have used two broad classifications. Moderates & Extremists. (I am not going into nuances) Anyone who was talking with Britishers over the table, forming governments, briningin reforms, forming pacts,etc were moderates. And those who supported armed revolution, wanted to instigate mutiny within the British Army were extremists. Based on these definition, I can club Savarkar & Bhagat SIng together.

Yes. I too observed.

She changed the topic

Lol, she started claiming he wants Allahabad to be changed which he never claimed.

Barkha, like all libtards, calls spade a spade only when the spade is lying on the neighbours backyard. Not calling spade a spade isn't her problem, or the problem of her entire cabal. Inconsistency, double-standards, cherry-picking, dishonesty are the main diseases they are infected with.

I want to see where burrqa will go if she becomes a refugee?

Infact his much talked about 7 social sins that appeared in Young India were of a Christian priest Frederick Lewis Donaldson. His views of morality came from an Abrahamic lense and not Indic one.

I tend to agree. He dis short term good but long term damage to India and Indians. He twisted the thought process of a whole generation of educated and uneducated Indians and we are still paying for that. West deified him to suit its own purpose. A billion strong pacifist nation professing Ghanaian ways suited its colonial and neo-colonial agenda.

@@bharatpandit4796 what was the damage again?

Very few Muslims go beyond religion to nation and nation alone. Like Dr. Kalam.

At least they don't kill humans... what kind of logic or religion is this that you kill a human being for an animal.

@Chota Pandit Exactly! Nobody likes them.

@Shubham Upadhyay Why eating beef is wrong? The whole world eat it.

@Chota Pandit What you said is fake news. Even for argument sake it is accepted that cows were being smuggled, one cannot justify killing a human being for smuggling cows. Are there no laws in India that deal with smuggling or theft. The bigger question, why Hindus impose their beliefs on others. Why should others not eat beef if (some) Hindus want to worship the silly cows?

@Chota Pandit That is a total whitewash and a blatant lie to say it was poor people to lynched cattle traders. My friend there are organized Gau Rakshak vigilante groups roaming streets in north India. There are all kinds of intimidation, extortion, and killing of innocent cattle traders. Modi himself is on record talking about such gangs. He blames these vigilantes and you are blaming him. There is a lot of issues in what you say, if it really are poor who are lynching, then in other words you are saying India has no rule of law. There no slaughter houses where cows are slaughtered. Its only buffalos. Lol, the ancient craze of Indians with fair skin extends even to animals too. That is why they could not bring themselves to worship buffalos for its black skin. You see the depiction of horses in Hindu mythological paintings, you will never see a black horse. Anyways, that's beside the point. And you did not answer why others should be stopped from eating beef. You talked about ISIS and Taliban in your previous post. Tell me how is it different when Taliban forced people to keep beard and wear hijab in Afghanistan and Hindu extremists forced people to not eat beef. How is it different when Taliban blow away the status of Buddah and Hindu extremists demolished Babri Masjid. There are clear parallels. Extremists of every religion are different sides of the same coin.

It's a business adjustment between 2.

Haha... True Shankarji! She is quite something

That's the Savarkar effect. Savarkar be like, "I'mma pissing liberals even after 75 years😎"

@@acharya8959 Exactly!

Bruh literally ur wish become a real event on india today conclave..😂😂

I think there is an India Today conclave discussion where Rajdeep (host) constantly interrupts Vikram and Shashi (guests) with his ramblings and biases. You can check that out.