Awesome Panoramas -Guide To Anamorphic Panoramic Photos Feat. Sirui 35mm T2.9

Подписаться 55 тыс.

Просмотров 7 тыс.

50% 1

The Workshop: www.helsinkiphotoworkshops.fi
☕️ Support my channel: www.buymeacoffee.com/sulantoblog
Get a copy of my zine: www.blurb.com/bookstore/invit...
0:00 Intro
0:39 Why Anamorphic
1:09 Not Expensive
1:35 My Set Up
2:07 What Gear Do You Need
2:28 How Wide
3:23 Camera Settings
3:42 Anamorphic Support
4:02 All Manual
4:21 How To Shoot
4:49 Anamorphic Flare
5:23 The Workshop
5:49 Post Processing
6:09 Horizontal Stretch
6:48 My Workflow
7:15 The Sirui 35mm T2.9
7:31 Size and Weight
8:06 Min Focus
8:17 Distortions
9:19 The Adapter
9:37 Anamorphic vs Other Methods
9:47 Stitching
10:39 Cropping
11:00 Anamorphic
11:39 Dedicated Lens
12:13 Panoramic Future
13:05 Anamorphic Is Panoramic
Subscribe also to my monthly newsletter and get a free preset and camera profile that you can use with LR or PS (ACR). Of course you'll also get my best picks of the latest in the camera and photography world. sulanto.fi/newsletter/
My camera gear, these are affiliate links to Amazon:
Ricoh GR3: amzn.to/3k8UATp
Ricoh GR3x: amzn.to/3DB4Puc
Sony A7IV: amzn.to/3BshuwT
Sony 24mm F2.8 G: amzn.to/3nVqy6y
Sony 40mm F2.5 G: amzn.to/3xGm49E
Sony 50mm F2.5 G: amzn.to/3BQxNBw
Sony ZV-1: amzn.to/3qVgo7H
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 G2: amzn.to/3DKPsPN
Sirui ST124 tripod: amzn.to/3BuXc5P
NiSi Vario ND: amzn.to/3bGLFUy
Topaz apps: www.topazlabs.com/shop/ref/722/
👕Get something to wear and support my channel at the same time👕
teespring.com/stores/sulantob...
My name is Matti Sulanto, I'm a photographer based in Helsinki Finland.
My Instagram: / sulantoblog
My website: sulanto.fi

Опубликовано:

6 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 43

@gregs4163 Год назад

Interesting video! Thanks for the info, I may try this process in the future.

@mattisulanto Год назад

Thanks. Give it a try.

@erichstocker8358 23 дня назад

Would it not be easier to first stretch the photo and then edit? Because when stretched to correct size one would have a better view of the details of the photo.

@mattisulanto 23 дня назад

That's a great idea. I don't remember what exactly I said in the video because that's a while ago😀

@thorstenjaspert9394 3 месяца назад

It would be great if the camera manufacturer offered an anamorphic lenses lineup themselves with autofocus. The disadvantage is that the cinematic aspect ratio is not Standard at printing services. If it is available you pay more for non standard aspect ratios. The same issue is finding a frame.

@MikeC2K10 2 месяца назад

Is the horizontal flare correctible? Could a lens maker produce an anamorphic lens without the flare? I know Sirui coats some of their lenses to offer different flare colors, blue, amber and silver. But could it be eliminated? Informative video, as always. Thanks!

@mattisulanto 2 месяца назад

Thanks. The horizontal flare is one main reason to use anamorphic for video/movie. That's what I understand anyway. I guess it would be possible to get rid of it too.

@ruuddirks5565 Год назад

Like many of my comments; it comes down to the use of the photo. For most people cropping or stitching will be sufficient. Of course, it is different if you concentrate on videos.

@mattisulanto Год назад

Thanks for sharing.

@Ekirea Год назад

Is there any way of digitally reaching the FOV like the Widelux panoramic camera has (about 140˚)?

@mattisulanto Год назад

Many cameras and every phone camera has the panoramic mode.

@juhavuorinen6305 Год назад

Perhaps rent the new hasselblad x2d 100c when needed, could be good for panoramas, 11656×8742 16bit 15stops dynamic range, that is pretty big image with lot of info in it, if you just crop that to your liking.

@mattisulanto Год назад

Thanks. That is one option.

@megatryn 6 месяцев назад

The Fujifilm GFX series has built in panorama mode and share sensor with the Hassy if I´m not mistaken.

@MrNiceBoy123456 Год назад

What if you fix the distortion in lightroom first before you desquezz it?

@mattisulanto Год назад

The problem is, like I tried to explain in the video, that there are two opposite distortions in the same photo. You can fix them in Lightroom.

@MrNiceBoy123456 Год назад

@@mattisulanto Thank you for the reply!

@thorstenjaspert9394 3 месяца назад

Could the distortion be fixed by a lens profile?

@Lordvader330 Год назад

You would think Peter would let you use his studio while you’re moving. Lol.

@mattisulanto Год назад

It's not his studio, he is sharing it, so it's not that simple and I would not want to go there every time I want to film. Besides, this will be over soon anyway😀

@vicibox Год назад

I find it all too much hassle. I have been taking anamorphic panoramic street photos since 2016 when I cropped my Leica X frame and my jaw dropped (that Photo is my RU-vid banner). Now I just use an ordinary medium wide prime and crop it; what I see is what I get. It started with an experiment. I asked myself what is our natural field of view; I never believed it was a 50mm. So I stood way back and took a photo on my phone. Then I sat down and noted the edge of my field of view. The result shocked me. When I measured it on a computer it was exactly anamorphic. I crop to 4K monitor size 3840x1600 (6000x2500 for art show photos) but also sometimes an XPan crop. If I want wider I take a few shots and stitch using the amazing Hugin program. I soon had my first show "The Panoramic Street". It is now my main format usually using my Sony A7II with Zeiss 35mm f2.8 sometimes a Samyang 24mm f1.8. Have fun.

@mattisulanto Год назад

Thanks for sharing.

@johntravena119 Год назад

When you say What is our natural field of view? do you include peripheral vision? Our peripheral vision isn’t in focus. I reckon the idea is that 50mm is our natural field of view in relatively sharp focus.

@vicibox Год назад

@@johntravena119 all of our field of vision is in focus; we don't see an optical image in focus of a certain size size even though our lens has a field of 45mm square. Our sight is a scanning system like an electron microscope, it has infinite depth of field all in focus. The visual field is set by your brain not the lens. Don't take my word just because I am a physicist, do the experiment yourself but, be honest, don't pander to what you have been told. Photography is full of nonsense like this like dynamic range. The eye for any situation has 10stops, we don't see into shadows and highlights without accommodation.

@johntravena119 Год назад

@@vicibox Don’t we scan though because the center of our vision is in much sharper focus?

@vicibox Год назад

@@johntravena119 no, think of your eye producing a sharply focused point and then building up the image by sticking many points together. Your centre of interest is what gets most attention and your brain pretty much fills in the stuff not scanned well. We evolved as hunter gatherers so we are interested in a wild field (are there lions sneaking up on us) and less above so we produce a wide flat field. We think we see a solid image but we dont; the brain makes up what it cant actually see. Of course if something is way out of focus for the eye lens then your eye will not resolve it and your brain can do nothing to make sense of it.

@markkupaasky Год назад

I don't get it. 1. Why don't I just use 14 mm lense on full frame and crop up and down? 2. When you scretch squezed anamorphic horisontally by a factor of, say, 2, photoshop developes a-r-t-i-f-i-c-i-a-l-l-y 50% more pixels! Not good! I could as well just streatch myy 14 mm file twice as big at both directions, crop it, and get as many horisontal pictures.

@mattisulanto Год назад

I was trying to present anamorphic as one more OPTION. You can crop to your heart's content, of course😀

@RobertLeeAtYT Год назад

No, generally the resolution loss is less severe than cropping, for the same output framing. First, the cropped version (from standard, spherical optics) means having to use a correspondingly wider angle lens. So the resolution loss is not just from the horizontal squeeze of the anamorphic but vertically as well. Second, the anamorphic squeeze loses resolution only for the highest frequency scene details, roughly at about whatever the squeeze factor is. Scene details already below this are reproduced faithfully at the unsqueeze. Play with this on graph paper and you'll see why. Anyhow, this is all academic. Current cameras all have so much practical resolution that it just doesn't matter. This is especially the case if you're targeting social media for the output.

@oneeyedphotographer Год назад

I haven't seen particularly wide anamorphic lenses. I suspect that the TS-E 17 would match that 35mm anamorphic lens in every respect and then some, after some cropping.

@Anatol19066 Год назад

Correct me if im wrong but you will get jpeg only, not raw/dng when transferring from LR to PS. Not a big deal but still..

@dagkaszlikowski8358 Год назад

You can squeeze vertically if you wish to achieve the same effect. I've been using tons of anamorphic lenses both in moving pictures and stills and I don't see any bad things happening. Using a wide angle lens isn't the same because an anamorphic lens of focal length X and squeeze factor S behaves vertically as X but horizontally as X*S, creating interesting visuals an X spherical lens can't.

@RobertLeeAtYT Год назад

Hmmm.... Lots cheaper than an XPan.

@mattisulanto Год назад

Yes, much cheaper. You can buy many anamorphic lenses for the price of one XPan + lens😀

@dust2guy285 Год назад

Anyone mention you look like an older version of Team Liquid Elige?

@mattisulanto Год назад

I have no idea what you are talking about, but I hope it’s nothing bad.

@albertzhager7852 Год назад

To get a panorama, you don’t need any special lens at all, it’s enough to even take a few frames with your hands and then stitch them into a panorama. The main condition here is that the lens has minimal distortion and, of course, you need to be able to edit spatial distortions in Photoshop.

@mattisulanto Год назад

Did you watch the video?