Тёмный
No video :(

B&W 606 S2 Anniversary vs. Wharfedale EVO 4.1 Soundtest 

Audiophilesdoteu
Подписаться 23 тыс.
Просмотров 10 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

21 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 8   
@tudordoru5388
@tudordoru5388 Год назад
As I can tell from this recordings, Bowers & Wilkins 606 S2 have greater clarity and transparency, and Wharfedale evo 4.1 have greater delicacy and more naturalness. Personally here I like more the warmer tonality of Wharfedale
@adrianzatko4018
@adrianzatko4018 Год назад
Wharfedale sounds better to my ears. Sounds more balanced than b&w. However b&w sounds more spacious.
@chopinbad
@chopinbad 11 месяцев назад
Jak dla mnie to dźwięk Wharfedale jest bardzoej muzykalny i cieply niz B&W. Do malego pomieszczenia wybralbym Wharfedale, ze wzgledu na umieszczenie portu bas refleks.
@peterbaugh51
@peterbaugh51 7 месяцев назад
B&W grates my ears... Really, could they be any brighter? Not realistic at all. Guess I am spoiled with Elac Reference. Warfdale is not bad. But not very natural either. Strings and piano are tough to reproduce on any speaker. That is, if you actually know what real instruments sound like... I have played over 30 in my life. I know which speakers and amps sound realistic. Yes I own B&W also. Dont use them much. Older ones sound better.
@claudiochiarini9793
@claudiochiarini9793 3 месяца назад
Wharfedale.
@mjak993
@mjak993 7 месяцев назад
utterly pointless, the entirely different placement of the speakers invalidates any kind of meaningful comparison.
@zizzinpuss
@zizzinpuss 2 месяца назад
Are you actually being serious?
Далее
Wharfedale Evo 4.2 & B&W 706 S2 Comparison Review
28:47
When A Gang Leader Confronted Muhammad Ali
11:43
Просмотров 7 млн
Italians vs @BayashiTV_  SO CLOSE
00:30
Просмотров 3,9 млн
5 DUMB THINGS Audiophiles Believe!
10:07
Просмотров 242 тыс.