Baby Reindeer producer says Fiona Harvey is a convicted stalker 

If this was the story of a middle-aged MAN, stalking a young woman, we'd be asking why he isn't in prison and how can we get tougher laws.

if the man were the perpetrator we wouldn’t be having this conversation

she outed herself, if it was Male on Woman, none of this convo would be going on….

This is bullshite. Sent from iphon

Forget Fiona Harvey we need to know who ‘Derrien’ is ffs

Why all this sympathy for this nightmare of a woman who has all but acknowledged she was the stalker! And was before and since, ffs man

I actually don't see the problem here. If they did this documentary style - they'd likely use names. Like the Tinder Swindler. They anonymised everyone in Baby Reindeer. 99% of people couldn't be bothered to try to figure out who these people are - I certainly couldn't. Gadd made a thoughtful, artistic piece to heal. Then Fiona comes out saying it is about her (Despite "not watching the show"). To me, my big take away from the show was how complex humans are - how victims return to their abusers - and how things aren't black and white. I thought it was healing and thoughtful. Fiona for some reason thinks she should be financially compensated for this show? Which is odd lol. "I committed a crime against you. You've made art about it. Now compensate me" lol - get WRECKED.But clearly a lady that needs some help - needs to stop stalking people. I do find it weird that people are saying it was easy to find her identity - but they can't seem to find these police records? That Netflix says exist. So it'll be interesting to see how this all comes out in the end.

Hold stalkers accountable. Stalking is a CRIME!!! Stalkers lie because they know full well what they are doing is WRONG!! They are hoping the public is both sympathetic and gullible.

Crazy this has gone to parliament so quick

I. believe everything points to 'Martha' wanting to be identified after Netflix for the very reason of stirring up problems for Netflix and Gadd and to make money. All her speech and actions are pointed at coming out after the series (not the Ed show) and to claim she has been erroneously used in order to get money.

Richard Gadd has said from the beginning that the court and prison parts were fictionalised for the show to bring closure to it. There are interviews that can be found online of him clearly saying this. He said that he didn’t bring charges against her but that he took out a restraining order against her. Piers Morgan , the rest of the media and Netflix wouldn’t have had to look very far to find this out, I found it out easily. Richard Gadd is covered as he said parts were fictionalised. Netflix aren’t covered and may end up getting sued a lot of money because they wrote on screen This is a true story. If they had written based on a true story or inspired by a true story they would be covered£, but they didn’t, so they aren’t.

Let us not forget, she is now stalking Neil Sears who wrote the article for the mail online. The same paper she is suing. Plus she is harassing Piers Morgan.

Karma is a b*tch. When you stalk someone, sometimes your life doesn't go smoothly afterwards.

WHY exactly, are we coddling a narcissistic convicted stalker? Producers can’t control what the public will do. She does seem to be enjoying the attention, which is really the goal now isn’t it? 🤨

I had a stalker & its very scary. She even broke into my house. I met her over a dating site only had one actual date. one time I knew she was on the way to my home & thought my best course of action was to just go out. went to the pub with my next door neighbour. hours later walking home i had a premonition & asked my neighbour to walk ahead & see if her car was in cul de sac came back & told me not only was her car on my drive she was sat on my front room!

A victim has every right to tell their story without concern for the person that victimised them. The real person that Martha is based on is not more relevant than the victim. Any support she requires should come from her healthcare provider not her victim. If it was a woman telling her story would they have this much care for the man? Not even when the woman is lying do they care about the harm the man experiences. Such bs.

The UK is falling apart at the seams, and this MP prioritises a Netflix series discussion? Is this this a burning issue for his constituents?

No I think it was evident to anyone with a working brain that this was FICTIONALIZED. She came out on her own. Even if discovered she could've kept her mouth shut not she's exactly as portrayed so it's truly based on a true story

Tiger King, Dahmer, Baby reindeer are all twisted tv shows.

She’s a narcissist !! She is so “ upset “ that she is loving every minute of it and going on Piers Morgan to lie her butt off. I hope she wins money from Netflix because the woman who tried to help her by giving her an internship and was subsequently stalked and harassed for years is going to sue Fiona and win !! Fiona doesn’t have a reputation or a career so how could Netflix damage it ??

Apparently she was served with an interim interdict by the courts for a previous stalking case which is probably what he is referring to. This notion however that the show has to be the "truth" is a nonsense anyway. The writers changed the story to make it harder for people to identify her. It was done for her benefit but shes too clueless to understand. She has yet to decide if she is the woman in the show, because she has also denied it, or what if any incidents took place she "agrees" with. She wants to go to court but cant even decide on her version of reality to stick with for a court case.

Why don't they just present the evidence to the public that she is a convicted stalker...?

He can tell his story but must tell it 100% truthfully if it's positioned as such. Netflix can't have it both ways and should be held accountable if they didn't check facts

He wanted the STALKER to be given support?? WTF!

Netflix, we have a problem here

At the end of the day Richard is a victim and his stalker was convicted. Why should criminals be protected from the truth especially as a second time offender.

What is overlooked is that Donnie Dunn’s character admitted to leading her on because he was lonely and liked having her as an audience. Not many women react that way toward a male stalker.

Many people forget that Richard Gad was the victim.

She was found in like 10 seconds, so I call BS on the “protecting the people involved”. While what happened was terrible, it’s also decades ago and according to the Series she was convicted and went to jail. The reason our courts exist is to punish people for a crime. Once that punishment has been applied, their debt to society has been paid. If every crime was a lifetime sentence, why bother having the court system at all?

All of these are getting out of hand. It seems the internet people are as worse as Martha

Netflix should just let this blow over. She didn't have to go on Piers Morgan's show. She effectively outed herself and has previous concerning behaviour revealed by a Scottish lawyer.

I feel this is such a double standard. If it were a man stalking a woman, certainly the man stalker would get away with it. They wouldn’t even believe the woman.

Richard was using heavy drugs, so how can anyone take his word for anything remotely truthful.?

I mean… anyone can look up her convictions when offering her a job… so her own life was ruined by her actions. if someone told the truth about her… its not something they wouldn’t soon find out. Tbh I wouldn’t have even thought of looking her up if Pierce Morgan hadn’t brought her on his show… so espentially she’s also defaming herself and all I got from everything is that the actress who played Martha did a FANTASTIC job at portraying the real life person.

What she did was wrong, no doubt about it. She was exploited, that's not right.

It tears apart your feeling of saftey and so many other pieces that make us a normal grounded human being.Stalkers need to have harsher penalties imposed.The damage it does to the person being stalked is unrectifiable.

You can petition the Court in the UK to seal your records after you have served time. Same thing in the States. Its entirely at the discretion of the Judge.

I know personally of a male friend who is being stalked by an aggressive nasty woman and he’s quite at his wit’s end

As a former police officer there are concerns here.. how did the police not act on 41000 emails, hundreds of hours of phone calls, stalking at work, assaulting the victims partner (with witnesses) and having been well known to police as stalking mps, healthcare workers and officers themselves? There's something not right here. I mean I watched the interview with piers Morgan and it's clear she's a sandwich short of the full picnic but really???

I’m sure they have tons of evidence to that effect

How is everyone missing the point? Where is the conviction?

Although a fan of Baby Raindear, I do feel that Netflix should have used a different actresse to play Martha . No one that has a striking resemblance to the actual stalker.

A convicted stalker suing a streaming channel for depicting her as a convicted stalker......you couldn't make it up. 😂😂

What was the name of the court case, the name of the court, and the prison, please?

She's not a convicted stalker...

This is wild.

I think they should have done more to change the comments as that was how people found her. But she also came forward and has lied on interviews

This link for full hearing is not the link to the full version of this inquiry to parliament please link correct one thanks

Prove she been convicted of stalking him. Cos if you can't. She gonna take for every penny

No duty of care

he should not have played himself.. by doing so made it extremely easy to find the other parties

Why do they keep protecting these criminals...

He doesn’t say she’s a convicted stalker. Clickbait. I never get why creators do this. You instantly lose trust with your audience when they see that you’ve lied. Don’t get it.

Crazy or not she needs to have some credit 😵‍💫

He’s the guy from the Zoom with his cat.

No one identified the rapist! She isn't convicted! Show the public her criminal record, as nothing has been found! You can't say that without proof!

What about the rapeist???

It is SO great that they made her look and sound exactly like the real woman so Richard would be ok. What a weasel they guy talking is.

wheres the proof of this conviction?? also... Gadd has said they made that part up and he had never reported her soooo. here there be lies lmao

Amazing how she changed her name

I’m yet to see proof of her convictions, stop all talking about it and show us the proof, if not Netflix need to lawyer up.

What I dont understand is if this woman is so concerned about having been identified, why put yourself out in the public forum instead of just going to ground, right ot wrong.

What is happening to the woman is very very wrong... very ver

I saw her interview with Pierce Morgan and she's clearly disturbed. She kept contradicting herself which would make one think she's an habitual liar too. Donnie being raped and abused by Derrian was hard to watch. Why would Gadd put such a an intimate and demoralizing action out there for the world to see and make up a story about Martha stocking him. It doesn't make sense. I think there is truth to the story.

I get she’s mentally ill. But we name the stalkers that follow celebrities around and invade their space, even if they are mentally ill too. In this case I think he did her a favour by protecting her identity. As long as he didn’t slander her, which to the best of my knowledge he didn’t (stating the parts that were dramatised and those that are not), then it’s his fair game to use his story of stalking anyway he sees fit.

He says the person Martha is based on is a convicted stalker. So he's either refuting reports the character is based on Fiona Harvey or he's accusing Fiona Harvey of being a convicted stalker or he's just lying.

Netflix exec "says" the Martha character is a convicted stalker in real life, but provides NO PROOF. #showreceipts

i find this very confusing. in most interviews they all say she was never convicted but here they say she was ???

Select committee MP got ripped apart

Has he presented his 41k emails and 100 or so voicemails? She's taking legal action, so it's going to come out eventually.

Am I misunderstanding something here or are politicians discussing a TV show? Taxpayer money well spent as usual.

Why is it horrific abuse of the stalker all the time rather than the character Darrian? Makes no sense but keep harassing the old lady 👵

I loved it perfection

Was she ever convicted? Anyone know?

Its Richard gadds story but that doesn't mean its the truth. This is a very private story. Feeling sorry for all involved.

fyi going to jail isnt BEING convicted either. So she has a case.

where was the convicted stalker mentioned?

ALL BS.

Is this the full video ?

This producer is nutts

every woman I know has been stalked at one point or another...NOW we are simply happy to be done with it and we arent lazy talentless comics who need to make a buck..THIS is harassing her and it was a very long time ago so whatever happened should have been over with. I hope she gets billions...this is defamation and slander.

Surprise surprise 😳

Team Richard

If the story is true, then why haven’t any RU-vid creators found court documents to prove that Martha aka Fiona, is a convicted stalker as the show claims? Why didn’t Netflix say it’s based on a true story, or that it is a dramatisation of a true story? Other shows do that all the time. I’m starting to question if any of it was a true story. There’s no video of him having a meltdown on stage, as the show portrays either 🤷‍♀️ So if he didn’t have this moment on stage that was posted on RU-vid, as the show depicts…what else NEVER actually happened in this so called TRUE story?! 🤔

Has she been charged and convicted- and gaoled???! I hope Fiona sues their pants off!

People need to focus on the rapist! And leave Fiona alone. People found her, she didn't find them. I like her. It was 2014 this all happened.

Fiona outed herself she tweeted some of the emails she sent herself online she is a narcissist and craves attention im still unsure about if she was convicted or not but she is def wanting attention at the min and thats what the type of person wants badly,i really hope richard does another interview but i think he has no intent on ever seeing that woman again as its her way of getting back in his head

Stalking against men ignored by most. IF she indeed is a convicted stalker then cannot see a problem

She is not a victim nor do I believe has mental health issues. She chose to confirm her identity and is now monetising it. There is no discussion of duty of care. They never named her. How is it that we are again victim blaming. This was a painfully honest account of what happened to this man I very much doubt he would lie about a conviction

If a man was a convicted abuser and stalker and was found similarly, there would be no cover up for him.

Ok, which is it? Is she a convicted stalker or not? Because Richard’s now saying she isn’t

she said hey its me so she asked for it , and im just waiting to see morgan as next victim .

That woman is terrifying

It's FICTION. Not Documentary.

Netflix made millions....exploting peoples pain

I know someone that works for Camden council. They claim that their tradespeople allegedly refuse to return to her flat as she’s quite difficult.

Also how funny John Nicholson pretending he gives a damn about women 😅

Did they actually show proof she was convicted??? I haven’t seen one iota of proof that she has.

I recognize that guy from the “Rocco put your tail down” cat video

Do not like this slimey Netflix exec...and his answers are pathetic