Back-to-back CANNON RUSHES in Pro StarCraft 2! 

Bro hear me out BIG SHIPS!

Not, if this cannon rush against you

A void ray/dt follow up

Carriers vs BCs

Given the way this season is going, I expected a "Cyclone" alongside one of those 3. My current ask would Queen, Cyclone, Bane.

Here you have it. You are that comment

You my friend have stepped into destiny. You are the chosen one.

He Is CHOSEN!!!

IN THE TRASH WHERE IT BELONGS

You’re it ! Everyone upvote this guy. He gets to be the hero of today

did you two ever meet in person?

Where is it? I kinda missed it and now curious, can you give a timecode or maybe just a recap?

@@ko71k52 47:34 - He's (one of the) Donny Vermillion in Memes of Liberty. (Hiding behind fake glasses.)

@@DanStaal thanks!

He usually casts the top 5 players in the world and he says many times the gap between top 5 and top 20 is huge. for ex losing an oracle for 2 kills is a bfd and the top protoss players wont make that mistake for him to comment on.

There are some mods. Also check out the StarCraft evolution videos.

a new race would complicate balance too much the devs have talked about this... the original game was designed around the terran campaign vs zerg, protoss vs zerg has its own balance issues as a result... adding a 4th race just ruins everything

@@italicxd 14 years and you tell me developers discussed this and say "a new race is gonna imbalanced the game" - This shows ignorance and laziness. I got married twice and the game is older than 2 of my kids. So I call it BS.

You cant even make a marriage work and you expect them to incorporate a new race on an already massively successful game? My good sir you need a reality check. Go back to whatever you were doing, this community doesn't need your arrogance.​@rumar4u

@@rumar4u honestly the ignorance and laziness seem to be coming from you... starcraft 2 is THE best balanced RTS game in history with 3 races. To sacrifice that just to appease some casual such as yourself who doesn't even play the game, that would be career suicide! Not to mention financially there's no way they could get a budget to develop that on a dead game. If you want more races go play other RTS games. There are so many reskins of SC2 that you can find one with 12 races.... they have talked about a stacraft 3 with 6 races but it has long been canned and doesn't appear to ever be happning.

And decorated the tree with zerg guts. Love it!

I've noticed it too, having watched sc2 up to 2019-20, and watching it again this past month. But i think its an ilusion, caused because they have to try to up their game to compete against players like serral, maru, clem and maxpax. They have to play faster and take more risks, cut more corners, try to multitask more, etc. I remember a Stephano interview in 2017/18, when he was just one of the pack of b tier euro zergs like lambo and elazer, and had some good moments especially vs protoss, but would lose any high level zvz. In the interview he said his present self was so much better than his 2013 self, where he dominated the non-koreans and did well against top koreans, that it would be no competition if both versions had to play together. And the diference was the speed of the game, how much more he had to do to compete in the present then, that it went beyond his comfort level where he could play without mistakes.

I get the same feeling, when I see Loki host a game of these "pros", I feel like I am watching a highschool football game, and not the NFL.

It is built on a custom engine. Hearthstone was the first game where Blizzard used another engine which was Unity.

Blizzard made their own for this game

I mean, they are good friends and even "steal" eachothers titles and thumbnails once in a while, at this point it's kinda part of the course.

Ah yes, as brilliant as Lowko suggesting you simply out-micro and out-macro your opponent simultaneously and you will win more games. Protoss has 2 fairly reliable openings. Terran can 3M and 2 of those units guaranteed scale to late game, so any "overinvestment" isn't an issue. Both also have more reliable vision of what enemy is doing early game - while zerg must rely more on inference. Zerg also needs to adjust their plays and more often their response to their opponents. While terran and protoss can fend off similar aggression more efficiently and without having to commit to dead-end tech like roach/ravager or mediocre baneling. Meaning, the balance is such that if protoss and terran don't mess up massively compared to zerg, they efficiently reach late game. And unlike the past, there's no zerg army that can stand toe-to-toe to terran or protoss death ball. So they're forced to split them up. But it's late game with most resources mined, so trading zerg army for enemy eco doesn't mean shit. Meaning, zerg has to split up army vs enemy who can just roll through everything you have while trading away small bits to stall out zerg splitpush distractions. Serral is the only one who can reliably do this vs the highest level.