No video :(

Ban on Nonviolent Felon Gun Possession Ruled Unconstitutional

Подписаться 78 тыс.

Просмотров 9 тыс.

50% 1

Ready to take the next step in your self-defense journey? Check out how the nation’s best Legal Defense for Self Defense® coverage can help you prepare for the worst: www.uslawshiel...
Hit the subscribe button above and connect with us on social media to get the latest videos and content just like this!
RU-vid: / uslawshield
Facebook: / uslawshield
Twitter: / uslawshield
Instagram: / uslawshield
Pinterest: / uslawshield
The information in this video is solely an overview intended to provide general information and should not be considered legal advice. All rights to this work are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means without prior written consent. U.S. LawShield® is a Legal Defense for Self Defense® Program, not a law firm. Membership in the U.S. LawShield Legal Defense for Self Defense Program is not a guarantee of any particular outcome. All legal services are provided by independent third-party program attorneys who are part of the Program. Visit www.uslawshield.com for terms, conditions, restrictions, and insurance licensing information.

Опубликовано:

22 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 42

@timparsons3229 Месяц назад

im 60 due to a 35 year old half an ounce felony. They say I can't own a gun. Yet I can get a security license in Tennessee to do security on UT campus. So the Judge thinks im Good enough to protect his kids on campus but not mine at home.

@markschneberger5521 2 месяца назад

THE US SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO PUT THESE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS TO SLEEP ONCE AND FOR ALL!

@turtletruth Месяц назад

The Supreme Court does not want to answer the 2-A question because non-violent felons would have their rights returned...

@Commasoncommqs Месяц назад

A lot of these judges are funded by private prison institutions. Lessing there loads of inmates lessens there campaign donations and “gifts” Clarence Thomas just got caught lying recently on his taxes about these “gifts”

@TeW33zy 20 дней назад

@@turtletruthThe U.S. Supreme Court already has it on they docket

@bwill3597 5 дней назад

The SC just threw it back to the 9th circuit because they don’t want the pressure of ruling on it.

@Commasoncommqs 5 дней назад

@@bwill3597 Fr? No way💀

@l-h-1131 2 месяца назад

How come US Lawshield doesn't have more video's weekly. I'm a member and would want to see more video's about anything involving Law's, membership , training or just a weekly newsletter.

@HerrinSchadenfreude 2 месяца назад

It would be awesome if these would just come up in my feed when something happens that actually changes something. It's 25 videos all talking about the same cases at the same point of the process.

@bigshady7875 Месяц назад

These types of channels are nothing but click bait

@dhlee4646 2 месяца назад

Law updates, training for certain legal scenarios, breakdowns explaining laws, explaing how your lawyer system works, we want it all. I'd love to be more informed

@gene5856 2 месяца назад

Thanks for making it Clear it not Nationwide yet as Law

@gothivore277 12 дней назад

Judge Benitez sits on that bench he’s probably the most pro 2A judge in the country and he is worthy of and deserves a seat on SCOTUS if he desires it

@blazefamily9717 Месяц назад

1 st it should not matter if a person mad mistakes in his or her per. If they did what ever time then they should be aloud to have their rights back, ITS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT for all American. Personal i feel what we are doing to crimes is being decimated at people with a record. They should have right to protect their family their self and the right to hunt for food. ( But they have to pay taxes not Right give all felony their right s back)

@desertweasel6965 6 дней назад

I don't agree. If a person has a past of being spontaneous and violent then they should be prohibited from owning firearms. If it's non violent then, yes, the rights should be restored.

@loghomemaintenance 2 месяца назад

So does this mean you will now insure claims if the claimant is a felon in possession?

@michaela6147 2 месяца назад

Good question

@Merc399 2 месяца назад

no, its means its going to the supreme court for them to decide, then if they decide in our favor (im a felon) individual states will immediately pass their own laws defying that decision, then someone will have to challenge one of those state laws, then THAT legal dispute will have to slowly make its way up the courts to the supreme court, AND the supreme court will likely reject the first on some sort of standing clause (pretty average) which will mean the whole process will have to start over again but eventually. We're looking at 3-15 years realistically 3 years would be if god himself came down from the heavens to speed things up lol. we'll probably both qualify for expungement before we see this ruling through

@chrisbelcher5320 2 месяца назад

Politicians break laws all the time, the courts have rules against the continuation , since these judges were sworn in. The rights are thee for a reason, but somehow, these judges are allowed to take rights away? The problem, is that these are very few people who actually protect the people’s rights!

@christopherdekonstrukt444 Месяц назад

I was advised back in the 80s by a paralegal who told me I could own a gun with a nonviolent conviction however he was only expressing state of residence law. In 1989 I was arrested by ATF for lying on a 4473 and convicted in federal court in 1991. Once bitten twice shy, if this goes through for all nonviolent felons I'll get certified documentation from a legal authority about my eligibility before attempting a NICS check and filling out another 4473.

@thediddy8117 7 дней назад

So how do i go about doing what he did I live in Indiana and i have a nonviolent federal felony conviction and I want to my rights back

@DelectiCorpus День назад

Name of the case!!??

@KrisRogers-ue3nu 2 месяца назад

States have a process for both nonviolent and violent offenders to obtain rights to possess a firearm. However, it has to be granted by a Judge through a hearing. My Judge said he is not giving anybody that has had a previous gun charge gun rights. He approved many others and I was denied. Hire an attorney and you still may have to try twice.

@journeyman378 2 месяца назад

Some states go out of their way to make it difficult or in some cases impossible.

@wyattparker1279 Месяц назад

florida has a pardon board to restore gun rights but there is no money set aside to operate since 2000, so that is useless

@journeyman378 Месяц назад

@@wyattparker1279 exactly, no funding.

@michaelcastaneda4135 Месяц назад

Boosie just beat his gun case

@michaelcastaneda4135 Месяц назад

Boosie had a drug case and gun cases

@xratedcivicturbo Месяц назад

I believe I was denied a fier arm because I have a traffic ticket for eluding the cop when I was 17 just truning 18 I'm 44 know I have not have any more problems with the cop would I be able to try and get one

@turtletruth Месяц назад

UNITED STATES MARINE: (From Boy to Man/Husband/Father, to Grandfather) 50 years ago was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI ... (Simple pullover arrests!) All offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY. After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) the return to civilian life (Honorable Discharge) was difficult... Can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old United States Marine regain his gun right for family and home protection after 50 defenseless, prohibited years based on nexus with 18USC(g)(1) (g) It shall be unlawful for any person- (1) who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year; When DUI arrests have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never rightfully be "eternally abrogated", ever! - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)

@CarlosIowa 2 месяца назад

But, but, but, The NRA said FELONS get guns anyway? Isn't all this redundant? And unnecessary? 😂

@whoknowsidont.5147 Месяц назад

OMG. WOW. I PRAY I HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT MY WIFE DAUGHTERS DOGS DOMICILE. RIGHT NOW I CANT. MARYLAND MY MARYLAND. STILL SCREWING THE POOR MAN AND WOMBMAN

@CarlosIowa 2 месяца назад

And ... if The Right of the People .... aren't children people. Can they have firearms too! 😅😅😅

@journeyman378 2 месяца назад

Can children vote?