This is an interesting opinion, as there are a LOT of actual lawyers that have put out videos and in those videos, they have stated that if you are a member of either GOA or 2AF, you are covered.
I own a Springfield Armory AR15 Saint Edge with a brace. It was legal when I bought it a few years back and it is going to stay in my possession as it is, and neither the ATF or any other government agency is going to take it or tell me how I can use it. I'm fed up with government and as far as I am concerned, I should be able to possess whatever type of firearm I want. That includes full auto or a suppressor and without paying for some unnecessary stamp.
Is it still the legal opinion of US Lawshield that the injunction on the brace rule does not apply to GOA & FPC members that reside outside of Texas? Pretty much every lawyer I’ve seen on RU-vid seem to opine that it applies to the members of those organizations nationwide.
G.O.A. sent me a letter written on their letterhead, dated June 17th, with my name and address on it, stating I was covered in the preliminary injuction. It's an admissible document.
As a member of US Lawshield for many years, I'm saddened by the facts that most if not all of you don't seem to get that the constitution says nothing about accessories, I on the other hand have paid a small fee and have many tax stamps for SBR's and Suppressors and can enjoy my SBR's unmolested cause I'm legal, but you crybabies all over the internet sadden me because you DON'T want to follow the law and pay 4 the tax stamps which is all you need for most NFA stuff duhhhhhh!.
You seem to be unfamiliar with the rules of the NFA. As an NFA item, you cannot transfer it, transport it to another state without atf approval. Your kids cannot inherit it. You may be willing to let government agencies control your life, but most of us are not. So please, spare me the crybaby comments. People fighting this are patriots.
