Although the British accusations of cowardice on the Dutch side were overblown, since the Dutch stormed a strong entrenched position and since most troops had fought well, there was also some unhappiness in high Dutch command about their performance. You see; Dutch infantry had a name to live up to. During the Wars of Louis XIV Dutch infantry was considered the best in Europe. During the Nine Years War an English officer asked himself why this was the case: "We have a common notion, that this sang froid, or Obedient Quality in the Dutch, is owing chiefly to their Nature, by their having a greater Proportion of Phlegm in their constitution than the English, by which their minds are not so soon as agitated as ours. But I look upon this way of reasoning, to be a rather plausible excuse for our own neglect, in not bringing our men to the same perfection of discipline, than the product of any natural cause in the Dutch. But, allowing that nature does contribute something towards it, yet, it is evident, Art has the greatest share, since their troops are generally composed of different nations." This was proved in for example the Battle of Malplaquet, were the Dutch, despite suffering very heavy casualties, kept assaulting the strong French positions in perfect order. Although the cowardice accusations were thus overblown; Malplaquet stood in stark contrast with Fontenoy. Cronström, the Dutch commander of the 2nd division, who had also been part of the Dutch army that had fought at Malplaquet, wrote that "these troops are not like those in the previous war" and Waldeck questioned were the "famous old Dutch courage" had gone. These conclusions led to an extensive training of the troops and they performed better at Rocoux, and even recieved praise.
@@Raadpensionaris The quality of the troops of all sides is always dificult to make out. The Dutch fought very brave at Rocoux. We always have to take in account that a high proportion of "Dutch'" were Germans including generals and for example many Bavarian batallions which performed a lot better at Rocoux then they did in their own cause in Germany some years before.
To be honest, the Dutch never came close to the ridgline/trenches, but that was not for lack of trying. Main problem was that there was little or no co-ordination betweenj the Allied Left (Waldeck) and Right (Cumberland)......Then the attempt to ease the problem by assaulting Fontenoy village was a) too little too late and b) again too uncoordinated
Finally, a channel that prefers the first British empire and the first half of the long 18th century like I do. Who's not going to look at everything as a lead up to either the American or French revolutions. They weren't, history didn't know that They were going to happen. I love the long 18th century and especially the first half The most. The Nine Years War to the Seven Years War, but the Wars of Succession and their American theaters are my favorite. Great channel. Keep up the good work.
Vous n'imaginez pas à quel point je suis heureux de trouver une chaine comme la votre. Je suis passionné par l'histoire militaire du XVII/XVIIIe, mais je n'ai jamais vraiment trouvé de contenu de ce genre jusqu'ici. Sachez qu'un français vous remercie chaleureusement pour votre travail !
@@aafitzy A lot of irish regiment had french recruits. Probably half. As the original regiments were created in the 1690' so the losses were replaced by locals ...this means french soldiers .
@@oliviervece6121The best lies like yours has always a partial truth within it . Thank you for the this fine example to prove this point . You may or perhaps not be aware that extensive recruitment for the Irish regiments in French service continued throughout the 18th century in Ireland. Very often the local magistrates in Ireland wee glad to be rid of such men who could cause much disturbance and trouble at home and so turned a blind eye to this. Happy to help 😁
@@conlaiarlawell he was right … most of the men were French after the first years. It’s the same story again and again in the French armies with foreigners. They join for money or cause and Rouen a regiment then after the first men perish they are replaced by locals.
Well done!! In a landscape devoid of vids on these wars and campaigns, Field Marshal is a breath of fresh air. Animations, artwork and narration were outstanding. Can't help but think if your army is "pragmatic" you're doomed to lose. A bad plan made worse by lack of coordination and communication was the plan or so it seems. Absolutely outstanding. Worth the wait and looking forward to the collab with Warhawk too. Cheers from Tennessee
Lack of discipline as well on the Dutch part, as soon as the French fire, it caused utter chaos while with the British, they took the gunfire then retaliated with disciplined volleys
@@bloodrave9578 But the Dutch assaulted in front of three redoubts and two fortified villages, while the British went around Fontenoy in open field. You cannot expect infantry to march head on fortified positions.
@@bloodrave9578 I don't remember any general in musket area winning this kind of battle. Assaulting field works bled Swedish army at Poltava and French army at Borodino.
@@FieldMarshalYT Awesome! I'm glad that you're covering this conflict. In the same way that de Saxe is a forgotten commander, the War of Austrian Succession is a forgotten war. It gets overshadowed by the Seven Years' War and, to a lesser extent, the War of Spanish Succession.
And the pragmatic army, specially the british infantry was better than the french at this time as show by the initial victory of the british guards on the french ones. De saxe understood this and make cumberland manouver in a position where he was flanked and cannot win
The Duke of Cumberland was recalled to England to put down the rebellion of Bonnie Prince Charlie who sought to overthrow the Hanoverian Dynasty and restore the Stuart's claim to the throne. He won a victory at Culloden and his harsh reprisals earned him the nickmane the Bloody Butcher. Scotsman to this day still consider him nothing less than a War criminal. I hope one day you do a video of that battle.
Oh because the Scots were so innocent 😂 give me a break, Scotland were slaughtering whole English towns and cities and taking thousands and thousands of English slave's long before the tables turned but that fact is conveniently missed out by the fake victim's of nothing. Pathetic biased trash again.
Well done for this video, very accurate and detailled animation. Very easy to understand the whole manoeuvre. I have just one remark: the unit size sign on the "NATO type" unit symbols (here battalions for the infantry and regiments for cavalry) shows the direction the unit faces... so here the french army seems to face west instead of facing the anglo-dutch army. Anyway, thank you very much for this great video.
I find it amazing how much you have improved. It makes me happy to see that your channel is in good health, considering the amount of views and subscribers. Keep the good work!
For a very long time, the French fought practically alone against coalitions of European countries. They were during these decades the best military power !
The best military power doesn't lose over and over again. The French lost in North America...to the British. The French lost in Africa....to the British. The French lost at sea....to the British. The French lost the Austrian war of sucession...to the British The French lost the Spanish war of sucession....to the British. The French lost the Napoleonic wars...to the British. But apparently, to the French, it's them that are the best and not Britain. 🇬🇧 💂♂️
@@JustAnotherDayInEngland I think yout job devoted is to spread ignorance 😁 The British were kicked our of the US because of the French The English and their allies lost the Nive years war on the battlefield to The French ALONE It was the British and their allies who lost the Austrian war of sucession on the battlefied to the French ALONE The British and their allies lost the war of the first coalition on the battlefield to the French ALONE The British and their allies lost the war of the second coalition on the battlefield to the French ALONE How the French lost in Africa while , they had the same colonies as the British The reality is that the English have never been able to fight the French alone, they have always needed many allies - France was the most powerful nation on the battlefield for two centuries and the British have never been capable of such an achievement.
Absolute excellence! Fantastic animation, narration and great writing! I admire the length of the video as well! De Saxe made some brilliant decisions. A nice watch, and the best one so far!
I enjoyed this video. The combined use on narration, graphics, and pictures brought this battle to life. I lived in this area of Belgium for six years and familiar with many of the towns and villages mentioned. I wish I had your videos then, so I could the battlefield.
Im going to be making my collab with Warhawk next. It will be up on their channel. After that Im doing a couple WSS remaster videos and then I will probably continue the campaigns of maurice de saxe
Dettingen is interesting to us Brits in that it was the last battle at which the King lead the army in the field. Although much maligned. espescially by many Scots, Cumberland was a very good organiser and both he and General Wolf went a long way to improving the British soldiers lot.
S.Besley😂 ! You're a genocidal Saxon - Hun ! "Butcher Sausage ", post Culloden wished to send all Jacobite clans to certain death in the West Indies ! Learn your history, you misconceived, misbegotten to human😂ity Cunt !
Very cool to watch this channel grow, not just in terms of subscribers, but in the quality of the video and presentation of the subject matter as well. It is also heartening to find a RU-vidr willing to cover this often overlooked period of history. Hats off to you, sir! If I had to give a reccomendation, it would be concerning your audio - sometimes words are cut off in mid sentence or in the beginning of the sentence. Other than that, two questions: what topics do you plan on covering in the future and could you make a habit of making some community posts with book reccomendations? I am very interested in the long 18th century (edit: although anything starting from the 15th century works as well), specifically military and diplomatic history, but am having a hard time finding good books (other than on Napoleon).
Thanks I learned a lot about mid 18th Century warfare. The French defence was far too strong, the Allies were uncoordinated and careless. The French got the upper hand on both flanks and inevitably, were able to counter attack in the centre. The Allies needed to put more in the woods, win their right flank and neutralise the French cannon positions. Also exploit the gap in the French right of centre, in between the village fortress and the French cannon battery. An Allies column attack there, instead of their broad line attack, would’ve caused disarray and panicked the French. The Allies could then exploit the opportunity, to attack on the other side of the village, to neutralise the other cannons facing the centre. Simultaneously making the centre push, to pin down the French line, or force them to withdraw, as they did so. Then the Allies could’ve supported their centre on both flanks and minimised their casualties from the French guns. This would’ve prevented the French organising their general counter attack and enveloping the British square column. The Allies also didn’t deploy their cavalry at all. They should’ve been used to support and assist the flank attacks, to maximise the chaos for the French and prevent them regrouping to counter the Allies flank attacks. This way the British would’ve had a lot more left to give and been able to press onwards, instead of going defensive and finally retreating. Also the Allies/British pulling back their cannon line was the stupidest blunder of all. They should’ve been used to blast the Frenchie’s second line, to protect a possible retreat and as a rallying point for a retreat. This was a very strange battle, almost as if the Allied commander knew they were going to lose from the start. Literally every move the Allies made was absurd. Even asking the French to shoot first was insane. The French knew they had the longer term advantage. That’s why they told the British to shoot first and King Louis XV didn’t withdraw. “A scene like Againcourt.” - Not really, they had longbows at Againcourt, not muskets.
Wonderful work showing detailed research on the battle and preliminary moves. Well composed and clearly explained. Good quotes and detailed positions of every regiment throughout much of the battle. A source of inspiration for a wargamer looking for a new battle to build a new collection and play. Unfortunately, I could not find a reference list. Could the authors recommend some good book source(s) for all those details? (Not a long bibliography, please: just a couple of best books one could delve into).
Really good animation. There were two other great battles between the Pragmatic army and the French afterwards, Lauffeld and Rocoux, will you be covering them as well? (they are also victories of Saxe). I had family who were in a regiment that traces its heritage back to Fontenoy (Pulteney's). Dettingen is worth a look aswell as Osprey has published a book in the past few years that challenges some of the notions about it (IIRC the cavalry duel may have been more important)
Very nice use of contemporary pictures for the commanders. Pfaffenhofen had little to do with the peace of Füssen. The death of emperor Charles VII was a lot more important and the unwillingless of the French to send more troops to Bavaria. Besides the Hessians refused to fight the Austrians effectively. It would be nice if you would go similar in depth as you did for the WSS. You will find a lot of information on my blog about the campaigns in Germany.
Excellent video with great graphics. As an Irish man who had heard very little about the Wild Geese it was very interesting to see them featured in the battle.
Hey man. Really great job. You'll probably want to revisit this for the graphic when you have more experience, but the content is great. This, I believe, is part of the First Silezian War - a not very well related subject on Yt. Do you plan on doing some more on that conflict? (No general things please - what you did now is perfect). I'm a phantom viewer myself, but this deserves a like and subscribe.
I have no plans to cover the Campaign of Frederick the Great atm. However House of History has a few videos on it with very high production quality. Expect a slight upgrade in the graphics with future videos as well.
We will never forget our Irish soldiers ie the "Wild Geese " who fought and gave their countrymen their pride back after the loss of their culture and country after years of oppression in Ireland 🇮🇪.
Pathetic hating on the British or English by fake victim's 😂 Ireland for hundreds of years before the tables turned were slaughtering whole English towns and cities etc and took hundreds of thousands of English slave's but that fact is conveniently missed out by the Irish who are not victims. It goes both ways cupcake and your little victim card has expired anyway. I demand you apologize for the atrocities the Irish did to the English Scotland and Wales were no different too but only want to remember what suits their little feelings. People like you are ridiculous and pathetic.
Big Picture British lost the American colonies with the exceptional help of the French pre the Revolution , a revolution which should have happened in England but aristocracy too embedded. FINALLY IRELAND IS AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY PART OF THE European Family net contributor unlike some in the UK longing for the empire again.
@@sandrabrowne2350Dont forget the Irish in Washington's Continental Army. Check out the role played by Irish Admiral John Barry in the fledging US navy in the American War of Independence.
Thanks for the very clear narration and detailed units naming. I wonder how infantry could resist cavalry charge repeatedly, in this time preceding the formation in squares? Probably command and control of cavalry was poor (hence the multiple spontaneous charges), the regiments charging headlong instead of outflanking infantry.
It was less than a month between Cumberland defeating the Highlanders and his humiliating defeat by Saxe. Cuimhnígí ar Luimneach agus ar fheall na Sasanach!
"Messieurs les anglais, tirez les premiers" "Messieurs les maîtres, ajustez vos chapeaux et vos rubans de queue, nous allons avoir l'honneur de charger"
Very informative and well narrated, as well as animated. Not too interpretative, although I think supposed "overconfidence" is not quite accurate. Of course any general can perceive of defeat. The Pragmatics were skillfully misled in part, playing on seeming weakness. I don't think they weren't aware of the French capacities, which had been proven so many times. Confidence is a good thing, arrogance is not. Cumberland's attack on the center had a touch of the latter, perhaps... but got far bc of the former. There is no "over-confidence" (trust in what is there), there is arrogance (assuming something that isn't factual).
The most peculiar of alliances! The 'Pragmatic army' is a euphemism for irrational. The British Hanoverian Kings were certainly competent but it was a shame European attitudes were not more enlightened. Especially in America values were evolving and nationalism had become more sophisticated and, thanks partly to Thomas Paine (1736-1809), populist.
I guess it comes from my relatively modern perspective. To me, it just seems odd that so many have to die for the petty squabbles of Kings and Queens. This kind of thing hasn't stopped with the decay of Monarchism, however.
@@metarus208 Anglo French war 1158-1189 Angevin war of succession 1199-1204 Poitou war 1224 English invasion of France 1230 Saintonge war 1242-1243 Guyenne war 1294-1303 War of Saint Sardos 1324 Hundred Years’ War Castilian civil war 1351-1369 War of the roses 1455-1487 Mad war 1485-1488 French Breton war 1487-1491 League of Cambrai 1508-1516 Rough Wooing 1542-1551 Italian war 1551-1559 Anglo French war 1627-1629 Anglo Dutch war 1665-1667 Franco Dutch war 1672-1678 Nine years war War of Austrian succession American revolution War of the first coalition War of the second coalition War of the third coalition War of the fourth coalition War of the fifth coalition
It was regular at this time for officers and soldiers to serve in multiple different armies. National identity and nationalism stepped aside for loyalty to Monarchs.
British Infantry are incredibly formidable. It's a testament to De Saxe that he could beat them not only on the defensive, but on the offensive as well (Rocoux, Lauffeld)
@@luffyh7193 So far the current plan is -> 1862 Dakota War on Warhawk's channel -> Battle of Chiari Remaster -> Siege of Barcelona ->Another Remaster -> 100 Days Campaign
Hi, I drew the picture you used in your thumbnail, just wanted you to know if you ever want to ask to use some of my art this account is where to find me.
Your map is not correct, Lille, Tournai and Leuze are on the same line; whereas on the map you are using Tournai is much further downstream on the Escaut.
The mangled mispronunciation of placenames and surnames, often with the wrong syllables stressed, too, is painful to listen to. You can't even get the Scots name "Campbell" right!
