I went with the CX-50, can’t understate how outdated the RAV4 interior feels in 2022 especially with that infotainment system. Lack of power passenger seat too was a big negative for me too
Toyotas in general look outdated. The fact that not all RAV4 trims come standard with LED Drl’s is proof. Hell even the base Equinox and Terrain trims come standard with Drl’s.
I went with the RAV4 hybrid to save fuel, be durable and reliable and quiet ride and have great resale. And it has everything I need and nothing I don’t.
We were close to choosing the Rav4 but when I saw the CX50 on a local lot-it was like love at first sight!! The Mazda looks beautiful & DRIVES beautifully!! She's the whole package! We love it! (Aimee)
Everything is relative with different features/characteristics more or less valued by buyers. I've found the best approach is to do one's homework, narrow it down to 2-4 vehicles and take them on the longest possible test drives back to back. I did that with the CR-V, RAV4, Rogue, and CX-5 in 2016 and 2021. I bought the 2016 and 2021 CX-5 without hesitation. Not one regret; both brought a smile to my face on freeways and winding mountain roads. Those driving/handling aspects are highly valued by me. Space and mpg are way down on my list. I can't wait to drive the CX-50--I just sat in one on the showroom when I recently had my CX-5 serviced. I'm pretty certain it will be my next vehicle in ~2026 after any bugs get ironed out and a Signature trim is available.
I had a test drive cx5 2023 premium,it’s amazing,when I get in the driver’s seat it’s so comfortable,love it,negotiates the price hope can get it some under msrp price
I like both the Mazda CX 50 and the Toyota Rav4, but not everyone can afford the top trim. could you please compare the basic models for those who don't want to break the bank to afford a new car.
Just got a CX50 select. No hud, no heated or power seats or power lift gate. Good few frills family car. Most of the good features of a Subaru outback without most of the drawbacks. Fit and finish is much higher than anything else in the segment I drove while shopping.
The LOWER TRIM Mazda CX-50's are really good cars. I was gonna buy a mid tier 50 but splurged and went for the leather, bigger wheels(which look fantastic on it), upgraded stereo and the heads up display. The cooled seats are something I found I love too much now too. Other than those things you can get a nice cx 50 for like 29-32k.
Proud owner of a new CX-50 Premium Plus Turbo in Polymetal! I test drove an RDX Advance/A-Spec, RAV4 Prime and coming from a 2018 BMW X3 3.0. Chose the CX50 because it came the closest to BMW's performance and handling. Great low end torque and power and very fun to drive! Love the premium interior materials and features. RAV4 Prime felt outdated and cheap despite all the efficiency features of the PHEV. RDX was not as impressive as I was expecting especially coming from BMW. Very happy with it!
proud owner of a sand cx-50 - similar cross shopping too. I also drove the subaru outback wilderness edition. The cvt really killed that for me. Land Rover Discovery Sport was the only model maybe better than the mazda, and its 10k more OTD and poor reliability ratings.
@@differencemaker242 It’s quieter than the RAV4 and comparable to my X3 so no. I will say I removed the roof racks due to wind noise however, I’m very particular to noises. I have a “thing.” Probably would be fine for anyone else.
I would go with the CX-50. I currently own a CX-9 GT and rented a Toyota Highlander Hybrid. While the Highlander was more fuel efficient, the CX-9 is DEFINITELY more fun, the interior is much more luxurious, and it is much better in the snow.
Hey CC, so glad I guys did a review between the two. The rav4 has always been my favorite since this gen came out however the CX-50 has it beat in style, tech and luxury. If I were shopping in this class I would get the CX-50.
For the money, the CX-50 got my vote. I'm glad I picked it - you feel like you're in something much more expensive. Whilst design is subjective, the quality, and ergonomics of the Mazda cabin are a lot better than the Toyota. I didn't like the Rav-4 much when I drove it, however the fuel economy is hard to argue with. The Mazda in real-world driving gets about 20 - 25MPG around the city (LA) and with fuel prices... it's a bit brutal. However, for a car to go on road trips and to transport friends, the Mazda is a fantastic car. A note on the speakers - whilst they both product good sound - the Mazda system can go full volume without distortion or vibration from the rest of the car - making for a really pleasing a crisp experience. I found the Rav-4 had panel vibrations and higher audio sounds. So if you like loud music, or are a bit of an audiophile - then the Mazda is the clear pick.
In my humble opinion, I think you guys did a great job comparing both cars and even when Toyota's RAV4 has a better fuel effiency figures, I would go for the Mazda CX-50. I love it!!! The color, the interior, the performance and all makes me go buy the Mazda!
That was a tight race & substantial review. The styling & handling of the Mazda wins for me - but the RAV4's cargo space & efficiency would make it more practical ultimately.
2022 RAV4 cruiser. My wife gets it down to 4.5 litres per 💯. Comfortable Quiet Looks great. My 2023 edge will be mine next week. Never touch a Mazda again. Fool me once shame on you.
Even though the Rav4 hybrid has more fuel efficiency, I would still pick the CX-50. Once the CX-50 hybrid (with Toyota's powertrain) comes out on the market, it's going to blow the competitors away.
It already blows away competition quality wise but it will take a decade or more to catch up to the brand recognition. I'd prefer to avoid hybrid systems and continue to improve combustion technology.
@@brasshound4442 in terms of efficiency, internal combustion engines are pretty much maxed out. Hybrid systems help to get the best possible efficiency out of the gas internal combustion engine while helping it to last even longer. It's a win-win is basically every regard.
Like both but when I went to test drive both, the Mazda dealership was selling for sticker and the Toyota dealership wanted $5,000 over sticker. Went with the Mazda.
I like the short, forthright story. Reminds me of Dave Chapelle stand up when he compared the story telling styles of men vs women. It was the special he did in San Francisco around 2000 I think.
Thank you very much for the video! I really appreciate the direct split screen comparison between the two vehicles features. I test drove the turbo CX-50 recently and it was very enjoyable to drive. One important feature that you guys left out is towing capacity. As someone that enjoys camping and owns a teardrop camper I need a vehicle that has some towing abilities which rules out most vehicles in this class. Unfortunately many vehicles in this segment sacrifice power for fuel efficiency which takes away from there overall utility...
The points given to Mazda on having a wireless apple and Android should be 1, also on head on display 1. These are very important technologies in modern day vehicles. One love from Nigeria 🇳🇬
Thank you for posting this video. I'm in the market for a new vehicle and have my list narrowed down to the cx-50 and the Rav4. I think a fair comparison would have been between the cx-50 GT Non-Turbo (or premium plus non-turbo) and the Rav4 Limited (non-hybrid). The price of these two vehicle trims is comparable. Of course the fuel efficiency of the hybrid will be much better than a turbo engine and an unfair comparison. Plus the 12-14 month waitlist for a hybrid Rav4 is insane. When comparing the 2.5L gas engine fuel efficiency in both these vehicles the Rav4 is slightly better but not significantly. According to Consumer Reports, Mazda has ranked top manufacture for reliability for the past 2 years and getting better. We finally decided upon the cx-50 for our next vehicle. Luxury, comfort, technology, modern style, handling, and leather were big factors. Plus the manual passenger seat with no height adjustment in the Rav4 (other than in their top trim) was a show stopper for me. Come on Toyota, get with it. I couldn't get in the passenger side of the Rav4 without hitting my head. I'm a long time Toyota customer and have absolutely zero complaints about their reliability and service, great vehicles. Even though the cx-50 is a new vehicle in the Mazda line-up, it's not new Mazda technology (other than the panoramic sun roof). Mazda is coming out with the CX-50 in hybrid in the near future sourcing Toyota hybrid technology built in the same plant as the Toyota. That would be a neat comparison that I'm looking forward to. I don't think you can go wrong with either of these vehicles, pros and cons for both, it's just that the cx-50 checked all the boxes for me.
20" wheels on the Mazda are a negative, not a positive. They're louder, reduce fuel mileage, ride stiffer, are much worse off road, and require more expensive tires. I'd take away a point from Mazda and give that point to the Toyota. Also, this Mazda has direct injection and a turbo. The Toyota has both direct and port injection, and no turbo. It will last longer than the Mazda, and won't suffer from the Mazda's carbon buildup. Vastly better resale value, as well, particularly the hybrid variant. Reviewers need to start mentioning the direct vs port injection/turbo vs non-turbo differences when comparing competing models to Toyotas. Long-term reliability matters to a lot of buyers.
@@smok3sho587 When does a family-hauler crossover ever require more acceleration than the relatively quick Rav4 Hybrid already provides? On the flipside, crossovers always need to get gas. They always need to run reliably. They almost always get re-sold eventually.
I am putting a deposit for a non-turbo Mazda for that reason - don't need towing, just regular driving, so no need to pay more in mat particular situation. So Mazda CX-50 doesn't lose if you consider the non-turbo option
I would pick the RAV-4 .... more cargo 15 cubic ft more ...... 15 mpg better than the CX-50 ..... 18 inch wheels ..... better for dirt/gravel roads. I feel that the Toyota will hold up better over time !
Both are good cars, below are just my honest thoughts 1. RAV4 has a lower price than CX50 2. RAV4 has considerably higher per gallon mileage than CX50. RAV4's mileage is 41/38/40 vs CX50's mileage 23/29/25. City/Highway/Mixed (This is a considerable saving in Money in the running cost) 3. More luggage space in RAV4's 37.6 Cubic Feet vs CX50 's 31.4 Cubic Feet 4. Toyota provides the first 2 years of Free Service but Mazda doesn't
I love both of these vehicles! I would get the Mazda for myself and the Toyota for my wife because she doesn't like sporty driving anyway lol. It's a win win.
I feel like an off-road test would be important for this comparison as the CX-50 was also designed with that in mind. Also, I would be interested to see if the RAV 4 could hold a roof tent and what the weight rating. Mazda said the CX-50 can hold 3 people in a roof tent.
If those are things you regurarly do, I would probably go with the Rav. But, I think it's fair to say the most people will not be die-hard off roaders. If you need something with a relatively good ground clearance while handling rough roads, the CX50 can deliver with a touch of luxury.
Same here, I just got my CX 50 here days ago and when I look at it in that beautiful red color and those beautiful wheels I just kind of go Gaga over it!😂😂
@@eleanormassaro5195 3 weeks now for me but all black. The Black looks so good. There is purple, blue and green flakes in the paint and on a sunny day it pops. Gonna get a ceramic coat to help preserve the beauty of this paint job.
I just got a premium plus non turbo cx 50. I love it. I'm not a speed demon so I didn't really need to spend another 3k on the turbo and I am getting 31 mpg which is fine for me. This is now my 4th Mazda. 2 were when they shared parts with Ford and those weren't great but since Mazda is all in house now they are fantastic vehicles.
Before choosing a CX50 you should consider the following: 1. The GT’s 20” rims and standard Goodyears (Canada) cannot be considered an off-road tire. Hopefully it works in winter but you don’t have much tread depth. 2. This is no competitor to a Subaru product as there is no suspension travel, little ground clearance and a metric tonne-load of plastic under the Mazda (can you find the oil filter DIY’s) 3. Fussy interior: Beautiful sure but it marks so easily and that surface around the shifter is hard to clean and scratches easily. 4. How do you clean the heads-up display that sits in the well in the dash and do you find the display in the glass distorted or clear? 5. Don’t count on great mileage and oil change intervals seem to be more frequent. 6. Body: so many crevices to trap sand and salt over winter = early rust potential? Just wondering (had literally miles of weather strip components) 7. Rear storage: Disappointing! The problem is the roof height. If you travel with small family consider bringing empty luggage to the dealership. You may find a CX5 works better as luggage can stand vertically back to back. Try it! 8. Purchase experience: Maybe this is happening every where but freight and PDI seems greatly inflated and acting like a surcharge. 9. Ergonomics: Not bad. Glad to see some buttons but the stitching on the steering wheel isn’t smooth, spokes are awkward and grip width at the 9 and 3 position aren’t good. You might agree after 500 miles. 10. Seats. Be sure you are ok with the Mazda designed butt-floss. This is weird and should be changed mid-production. Seats are hard. Bolsters are very hard. 11. Look hard at the CX5 before you buy the 50. 12. Outward visibility is poor due to the tall door sills and low seating position.
I'll go with the CX50 just for styling alone. The Rav4 with its irregular angular lines has no design flow at all and don't let me start on the wheel wells, why would you design square openings for a round tire?
My thoughts precisely, only positive of the rav4 is the hybrid option but I can't get past the ugly body styling...may wait for the CX50 hybrid that will be undisputed top of class pick.
I prefer the Mazda, and I'm a lifelong Toyota owner, though my parents had Mazda and Toyota and I've always liked them both. I just ordered another Rav because of the hybrid option. Once Mazda comes out with a hybrid, I'm likely going to switch.
Nice one. You were brave enough to do this comparison. I expected the Mazda cx50 to win with even more points. The Rav4 is good but nothing to tickle a engaging driver. I also think gas mileage shld not have been compared because a turbo engine compared to a hybrid is like comparing apples to oranges. Overall nice review
If you are going to compare the engines in any respect, you have to compare the gas mileage. The Mazda turbo is so much more fun to drive but it's at the cost of fuel efficiency. It wins in one area and loses in another. It's a trade-off that is properly reflected in the scoring.
Should have been compared to the RAV4 edge. But can’t get one. There is a reason why there is a waiting period. Good damned good. You can get a second hand Toyota that practically looses little value as it ages. Can you say the same for other brands? Mazda cx5?
The CX-50 suit my driving needs way more than the RAV4 with it’s the more modern design, luxurious interior & power. & unlike before it’s now got bigger passenger space than the RAV4.
The big advantage that the RAV4 has is its hybrid options. Fuel efficiency is a big deal and Mazda has lagged behind the competition in that area. However, the CX-50 is supposed to have a hybrid option using Toyota's technology in the future.
Yeah Mazda never really cares about fuel economy that much. It's not its thing. People don't buy Mazda for fuel economy or room for that matter. It's for the handling and cool factor.
Mazda is a lame brand. It has always lagged behind and their engines were known for blowing up after 100k.. They should compare it with a Chevy SUV. I don't know anyone that would buy a Mazda they're just considered crap in comparison to Honda and Toyota..
The fuel economy is still pretty good though for the power the engines give. Ive gotten loaned a mazda3, 6, and cx5 and I got over 40mpg on the Mazda3, 36 on mazda6 and 34 on the cx5.
I think the Adventure Trail RAV4 may be better comparison for both gas models… But in this case, yes Hybrid RAV4 wins handily in fuel economy. However, CX50 wins handily for style & driving dynamics…
I've been waiting 7 months for my Rav4 hybrid and there's a cx-50 GT non turbo available rn at the Mazda dealer near me.... it's gorgeous and I'm torn between the two.... 😫
Great comparison !! Tough choice especially with current gas prices. I like your scoring system too. Looking forward to your review of the ranger Raptor when it arrives.
I think the mazada looks and drives better, but the rav4 got that sweet fuel economy and more utility space. Mazada more fun to drive, but rav4 more practical. Dammit.
I drove the CX-50 yesterday. It compares better with vehicles like the Acura RDX, Lexus NX, Buick Envision and Lincoln Corsair more than a Rav 4. The fit and finish, style, and driving dynamics really punch above it's class. I'd love to see a comparison of the CX-50 with the RDX or NX.
For me it is CX-50 all the way. 3" wider, 3" shorter and same ground clearance means more stability around turns. Also, I can load items on the roof much easier. I don't care for the black cladding on either vehicle, however, the Rav4 is chunky and doesn't flow right. I test drove the CX-50 2.5 turbo and wished it had more getup and go, like Genesis 2.5T. Otherwise, I liked many things about it. If I plan to stay with ICE, this will be my next vehicle for the price. But my intent is to pursue an EV or at least a PHEV for my type of driving.
If I were to go with the cx-50 I would go with the non-turbo engine and I would make sure about the seat comfort because other testers have complained about the top trim level seats that look just like the one you're driving. Turbos use more gas and when they go bad they are expensive to replace. I believe Mazda gives you a choice of non turbo but not sure if that is true for the top trim level.
Very few are willing to settle with turbos because of gas prices and others just want to wait for the low end version because that what they can afford and some like the hybrids. Wait til all of it variants are at dealerships and check the monthly sales from there.
You guys don't understand how to measure decibels. The Toyota was almost 3 decibels louder than the Mazda, which means it was about 21% louder. For every db change, you get about 7% increase in subjective loudness. I think Mazda should have won that one.
We've owned both and by far we love the Mazda CX-50. If you have a passion for cars and driving then there's no comparison, the Mazda wins but if your focus is fuel economy then the Rav is the winner. In addition, the Mazda is by far better looking and has a premium vehicle appearance. The Rav is a bit nerdy inside and out!
You forgot to mention that the new Mazda turbo engines are burning oil in crazy way so maintenance will be higher for the mazda in general because mazda is known to repair more during the life time of the vehicle
Great video as usual! Both are great vehicles. I've always been a Toyota guy as most vehicles I've purchased so far have been Toyota/Lexus (all sedans). Not sure if I'll ever upgrade to a crossover in the future, but the RAV4 would be my top pick as of now (one of my co-workers is saving up for one), but I would also check out the CX-50. Another one of my co-workers is looking to replace his 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser soon as he recently test drove a CX-50 & liked it in some ways, but he may wait for the new 4Runner.
If Mazda can come out with a hybrid or electric version of the CX-50 I will buy it instantly. I know the CX-60 exists and the CX-70 is coming to the US but the CX-50 looks the best and has everything you could need.
They are next year and I beleive it is a rav4 electric motor. They share a production line in Alabama and have a somewhat partnership with Toyota. Hell I just bought my 50 through Mazda finance but it's actually through Toyota finance.
I currently have an ancient 2013 Audi allroad Premium Plus that, while it lacks a lot of the tech features of any new car - 1) has long been paid for, 2) is solid as a bank vault and hasn't really given me any problems, and 3) still makes me turn around to look back at it in a parking lot. I haven't even really been inspired to trade because I haven't seen anything on the market that I like better than my allroad. But there's a VERY high likelihood that I'll be trading the old girl for a CX-50 Hybrid whenever it comes out. We also have a Mazda MX-5 RF in the house and my parents had a 2018 CX-9 Signature that was gorgeous and I was lucky enough to be able to drive it from NY to NC after they first got it. I have to give props to Mazda and their "close-to-premium" trajectory. They're nailing it. The RF is a blast to drive and looks amazingly beautiful and the CX-9's interior was on par with my Audi. And as hard as it is to design a sexy full-size SUV, they managed to do it with the CX-9. Sure, the doors don't quite thunk as solidly as a German car's, and the Audi feels like there's an extra layer of insulation slathered everywhere underneath everything, but damn, Mazda is really putting out some compelling upmarket goods. Someone below said they traded in a BMW X3 for a CX-50 PP and that doesn't surprise me at all. Mazda is definitely putting themselves on the radar of premium car buyers. Plus, I work in the design world and they just can't make an ugly car (same as Audi, IMO) which is sadly the exception these days, and that's very important to me. I think the CX-50 is their best effort yet. So come on already with the Hybrid and take my money. Please...
The telluride is way better in just about every way. The Highlander may sell more, but best selling doesn’t equate to a better vehicle. The Highlander has way too many compromises
If you want the best of both worlds, go with the 22” Hyundai Tucson hybrid limited. - More tech than both the RAV4 and CX-50 - gorgeous 10” fully digital gauge cluster (and when you use either turn signal, it’ll show a live camera view of your blind spot in the gauge cluster. I use it all the time and love it.) - large 10.25” fully touch widescreen (no need for dial) - digital key (can use a key card or your smart phone as a key to unlock/lock and turn on engine. No key fob needed) - Remote parking (can use buttons on key fob to move the car forward or backward out of tight parking spots) - Best warranty of all brands: 5 year bumper to bumper warranty. 10 year powertrain. 3 years complimentary maintenance - Plenty of cargo room and interior leg/head room for its class - Very stylish unique exterior with modern LED DRLs hidden into the grille (the grille itself is LED lights). Rear has an LED light bar, mustang-looking tail lights, and the rear wiper is neatly tucked and hidden underneath the spoiler. - Modern interior with a Tesla-like white/gray interior color option, ambient lighting, cooled and heated seats, heated rear seats, pano roof, leather, soft touch materials, etc. - Excellent driving dynamics especially in sport mode. Hybrid drivetrain and steering feel very responsive. Impressive acceleration. - Oh, and best of all. You get all of this for FOUR THOUSAND dollars less than the RAV4 and CX-50. I paid $38k for mine.
@@rockinggator969 I get that. However at this point, if you’re buying a brand new Hyundai or Kia (2022 or newer), and if that vehicle has been recently fully designed or an all-new vehicle, then you should be safe. They also have the 10 year warranty of course, and the free maintenance which is nice. I’m also a firm believer that as long as you take care of your vehicle, drive it properly, and for maintenance- take it in to the dealership who of course specializes in every aspect of your particular vehicle and usually knows how to catch any issue well ahead of time, then 99% of ppl shouldn’t have any major issues with their Hyundai or Kia. Remember, every brand has their lemons. Every brand has recalls. And every brand falls short in some way. But one thing is consistent with the Koreans- they are absolutely killing it in style, tech, and value. Unparalleled value for the features you get. And I don’t want to miss out on having the best possible features (and even driver safety tech) for my budget. So I’ll always choose the Korean brands
@@eBikify I hear you. We will need to wait a few years to see if the new engine and transmission design isn't a problem. I am not willing to take that gamble on 40k USD. I don't like the idea of me and my car going up in flames because of poor design.
I’m looking to retire my 2014 Mazda 6 with 220,000 miles on it and going strong. I will be sticking with Mazda. I have been amazed by the quality of car they make and the maintenance has been affordable and Mazda service is top notch. ❤
I love mazda and toyota for diff reasons. Both are dependable for the most part. Toyota is just the king of reliability and resale. Mazda looks good and handles better.
I just fell like Toyota has a lot of catching up to do. I was interested in the Rav4 Adventure but lack of power and underwhelming performance from the higher end AWD killed ot for me. Tired of the cvt and poor power in my Crosstrek. Looking to trade it for the CX-50 Meridian
Lack of power in the Rav4 hybrid? Compared to what? Do you plan to track it? There's also the Prime version, right? It makes me wonder how people find the instant torque and overall power of the Rav4 hybrid to be underwhelming. Are you comparing with a Porsche or X5 M?
Loved the split screen comparisons, but you missed 2 important things, the moonroof on the cx50 opens half way... wth, not even the entire way like every other car, not sure about the rav4. I heard the rav4 passenger seat is manual, but mazda offers power for both driver and passenger. I tested both cars today, including the cx5. Cx5 felt like I was driving the mazda 3 sedan. Rav4 felt the same way, but the mazda had more torque. The cx50 was shorter and felt heavy with steering and accelerations. But the wireless Apple and Android, power passenger seat, moonroof, MPG is gona be a deal breaker for me. I tested the xlr premium rav4 and cx50 gsL
I got myself a cx50 last 2month ago. It's the best decision I have made. Car drives so smooth. CX60, the hybrid version is out . I wil certainly trade in my car for it.
@@haze1123 and the cx50 has wireless Apple and Android auto. Just say where you want to go and boom its on your screen... Go buy that rav4 and be like the rest of the sheep...lmao..
Would go for the RAV4 Hybrid with AWD three motors (two electric one front and one rear) - can't beat that smooth electric take off torque around town.
I must admit that I have never liked the look of the RAV, it is extremely boxy and many strange angles in the exterior. Also, interior is much more good looking and clean style in the CX-50. Overall, the Mazda looks much better in my opinion. And drives much better also.
I think you did a good comparison but ended up choosing 2 vehicles that are totally different in their segments... a hybrid model Toyota with a 100% gas engine Mazda. I think you should have compared the Mazda with the regular Rav4. Not the hybrid model. IMO
this is a GREAT comparison guys, but one thing I always keep in mind when shopping for a vehicle is the availability of aftermarket parts and resale value, for that I would award +2 points for the RAV4. keep up the excellent work!!!!
I know the Mazda headlights are LED but they don't look like they would light up the highway all that well. Did your test driving include any driving after sunset?
Funny how much love the cx50 gets over the rav4 on here, talk is cheap. In reality, the people actually spending the money overwhelmingly choose the rav4 and the sales figures prove it. For me, as a Honda fanboy, it's hard to beat the value of a hybrid rav4 in any trim.
Very hard to compare them since they are very different in terms of their target audience. Better score for 20vs18 inch ... not really, quite the opposite. Allowing the option for 20 is fine, but forcing you it's not. Some people drive outside the main road too...and there you need a thicker tire / smaller rims
They’re both good choices. Though I’d prefer a manual over an automatic, I’d take the Mazda’s 6 speed over the Toyota’s CVT offering any day. I’d also suspect the Mazda to have superior driving dynamics and better handling characteristics. Any old way you cannot go too far wrong with either the Toyota or the Mazda. The CX-50 (I believe) is made in USA, the RAV4, I don’t know - however with Toyota buying a fair chunk of Mazda stock (7%?), I’d not be surprised if they’re already sharing assembly lines, or soon will be. BTW, 3dB in noise level is actually quite substantial. I’d like to test drive these back to back.
