@@redaug4212if Cold War is related to black ops 3, I don’t believe call of duty ww2 is related to vanguard because there is no way 💀 (maybe because of D-day)
@@jermyemyemy I'm wasn't talking about canon. I'm talking about the lack of historical accuracy. This game is what set the precedent that it's ok to turn WWII into a Marvel movie. Vanguard is just the logical conclusion.
@@redaug4212 yea well, the first avenger (captain America) literally fought some over advance Nazis and fought the red skull dude so I’m not really sure if it’s really close to a marvel movie. Besides, it’s more like they made vanguard as like some type of little side story for other characters but with shitty accuracy. Cod Ww2 was second Best But WaW is the most accurate.
My Great Grandfather Served in the Army as a 1st LT after being Drafted, he Fought in WW2 and he was at the battle of the bulge and after all that he's Served In Korea.
in a video game its weird but in real life countries give and sell each other weapons and materiel. Like Chinese troops in German helmets, Soviets in American tanks, Americans using British rifles etc.
@@AFGuidesHD i have zero evidence of Lee enfield used by American troops in Ardennes, as you know the springfield was the regularory sniper rifle, so there should’nt put the Lee enfield it break the immersion And I’m not sure but sniper rifle was not common in American troops in the battle of the bulge It was used in Italy campaign or Germany
It's impressive set of skills which (presumably) were needed from pilots of that era. Identifying enemy planes from tonns of angles, leading to target considering sight technology in that time was quite primitive (presumably because no modern computing) compared this day, watching out friendly fire, watching out not being shot in quickly changing X-, Y and Z angles and same time managing flight and fire same time. Into mix when you have to take count of care of fuel, ammo etc. With my ADHD-brains I just gotta respect those Sebastian Ahos of a people being able to compute so many variables in such short periods perfoming so well.
In the 2024 to2030 that have the ww3 which said in vavishya malika. Jai shree ram ❤❤❤❤...... You all people read this my comment and remain that i tell in comment. In hindi,maha saggram hoga har taraf lass hoga. In nepali,maha binash hunxa gatatatai manxe ko sarir hunxa. Jai shree radhekrishna ❤❤❤❤❤..... All people who don't believe that in 2024 to 2030 have the big war than the ww2. Jai shree krishna ❤❤❤❤..... Sanatandharm ❤❤❤❤..... Hindu ❤❤❤❤.....
The thing these movies and games always get wrong about military tactics and things of that ilk is the the "compression" of personnel and action. In reality it is alot more spread out, especially in a defensive perimeter like these guys were set up in and they were down to about 60-70% strength of forces (because of KIA and wounded) which meant their positions/foxholes were REALLY spread out and not right on top of each other. So much so that companies which have to tie in to brother companies on their flanks, were getting totally seperated. The gaps in the defensive lines at Bastogne with the 101st were BIG and enemy were wondering right thru, not even getting spotted by american forces. I know this because I was in the 101st in the late 90's and we had to study these battles. These scenes with enemy right on top of each other, which the COD games ALWAYS do and get wrong, is simply far off from the truth.
@@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire he walked through the campaign when it came out and uploaded it, which was way back when i was in grade school, ya silly dude
24:10 Call of Duty 2 memories. Poor Germans, they just wanted to avoid the invasion of their country by destroying the last bridge over the Rhine and continue avoiding the Allied bombing, but it couldn't be. I think this is the best part of the game, because it is the most realistic. I hope that one day there will be a German campaign and with other Axis countries. It would be great to fight from the other side.
Ive always wanted to see what it must’ve felt like as Americans and Brits scream call-outs to one another as they advance. And the propaganda the officers would tell the soldiers so they’d continue to fight.
was expecting world at war with this game ... but it was just so toned down I felt depressed after playing it because it was so ... bland the campaign quite literally held your hands through the missions, there wasn't a speck of difficulty
Because it just feels like yet another entry in the way too long to list boatload of WW2 FPS games that have been made since the turn of the new millennium.
Uses a band of brothers screenshot as a thumbnail: 👎 Doesn’t say the game is call of duty in the initial title: 👎 I thought this was gonna be some new game or something, booooooo
If you mean that it's better than 2023's MWIII, then that's correct. However, if you mean that it's better than 2011's Call Of Duty Modern Warfare 3, then that's not correct.
There's just something different about WWII's graphics that make it look timeless from the other entries. Really wished they've given a little time to research the historical accuracy of the guns because that stripper clip reload on that enfield is whack, how'd he put that there with the scope on the way?
I'm actually very sad as I've finally finished the WW2 Campaign today and the ending was probably the best one out of the 2 I've played ;-; (Yes, I have only played to Call of Duty's)
only call of duty would be so ignorant to give the main character a british rifle when historically the nearest british soldier to the bulge was hundred if not thousands of miles away.... dumb
![BATTLE OF THE BULGE | Realistic Immersive ULTRA Graphics Gameplay [4K 60FPS] Call of Duty WW2](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
