Battlefield 1 Vs Battlefield 5 - No HUD Immersion comparison 

Give a beer to this man

HOW ABOUT BACK TO BASICS BUT WITH NO HUD AND MORE REALISTIC?

No hud, standard issue rifles and i creased bullet damage to 125%

Bf did go weird after Bf1942. There are so many arcade elements like UI handholding, points/ribbon popup, gadget unlocking/leveling, and spawning on squadmates, that I'm put off from buying any of the new ones :(

@@Viljarms don’t worry there are rising storm 1,2 hell let lose post scriptum squad arma that will satisfy your need of a realistic game battlefield now is trying to make casuals happy with imbalanced weapons easier gameplay just to appeal to the kids and trying to drain their mother credit card

Yeah that’s my main gripe, bfv just lacks the grit and atmosphere of 1. I didn’t really care about the female characters because battlefield has never been the most realistic or historically accurate game (look at all the infantry machine guns in 1 for example) but the over the top ridiculous character skins and overall toned down atmosphere really killed the game for me. Just felt like a lot less passion put into the game

I'm just pissed they didn't include the eastern front in it

Suez and Sinai desert theme in bf1 tho

@@zeeonnn never really liked suez that map felt ehhh..... kther's is a hell yeah. I would prefer iwo jima over suez even pacific storm. Is it only me ? That map felt very "tight" idk i dont like the feeling playing that map.

@@last5902 yeah it felt small, suez isn’t my favourite either I just stayed in the lobby for the music

mas bacalhau nao

Deixa o portuga em paz po XD

@@c.g.s.s.7641 vou chorar

@@c.g.s.s.7641 bacalhau é um presente de Deus à minha nação

@@danoninho5880 gloria!

Bf1 gives you the feeling of war but not WW1 more like an alternate history steampunk world war

I would say BF1 is more cinematic and polished. Maybe even realistic. Not completely historically accurate in the details which imho doesn't matter because it simply looks and sounds too good for a FPS and that brings additional value to already very good gameplay. Some war movies are also not historically accurate but they look and sound good and give us the feeling we are in the middle of the intense battle.

@@romanrat5613 a steampunk battlefield with fantasy setting would be cool and with guns like from the order1886 like lighning guns

@@kjakob realistic? Bfv was definitely more realistic, as the guns were actually (mostly) representative of the era

@@romanrat5613 you missed my point.

Indeed, imagine fighting in stalingrad or kursk, or storming the beaches of normandy, with all that gritty and immersive atmosphere. If only...

I really liked the historical tidbits and narraration throughout bf1. When the French general on fort de vaux says "the republic of France will remember you always" (its somthing to that effect) you FEEL that. The generals and voice acting/narration in bfV just don't do it for me and I can't really say why.

@@BigWheel. the campaign VA work is really good especially on the German campaign but if I'm being honest it felt like whatever they had planned for multiplayer on V felt unfinished, as if they were forced to release it in 3 months just after they finished the campaigns and needed a multiplayer ASAP. All the core stuff felt extremely rushed even if you could say it was Battlefield, the VA work for multiplayer didn't have the same impact (do look into how they recorded the BF1 chatter! It's very interesting) and the fact that the British in-game are an amalgam of like 4 different factions (5 until they added Americans properly) really says a lot. Even if the writing was shabby in a lot of the stories, they have a lot of visual, audio, and feature work that checks out plus interesting mechanics like skiing. Almost a jarring difference compared to multiplayer.

@@ainaras33 me and my boi would talk about that but they never delivered, BFV had the potential of being a badass WW2 game but they fucked up

Fluffed? They just make things look more lifelike

I don't understand. Did he body block someone from getting inside and and end up making them die to the explosion or the fact that he survived the exploision?

I love it when the blimp blows up as there's explosions everywhere, tanks going over trenches and breaking through walls, not to mention a plane going overhead as your pushing the objective.

@@Kurokubi look at the floor

@@Omar12831 I'm looking... but what am I looking for? 🤔 I noticed the person trying to run inside initially (which is why I mentioned body blocking) if that's what you're referring to

@@Kurokubi I think he means there was a tripwire bomb lol

Except you know for the fact that half of the soldiers are women

@@Bowseefuss101 if there had been a French resistance faction, that would've been totally appropriate. But you're right

@@Bowseefuss101 Thing is, even if it wasn't accurate representation of women during WW2, it still made a hell of a lot of people research the actual women who fought during the war which isn't a bad thing.

@@n8zog584 yeah if they added a Eastern front or french resistance dlc the womans would fit perfectly because actual womans were recruited into the red army

@@Bowseefuss101 "Half of the soldiers are women" is 100% up to the player base. Dice just gave you the option, just like some women in wars choose to fight for their country or their freedom. If you then go and play one is players choice, and if half of them choose women it's what they did, not what Battlefield did. They don't have to play as one, and there is no ratio or pressure to play as one. If that is such a huge problem for your "immersion" in a video game maybe go search for other games without women or ask yourself if it's not you who is the problem here.

However, we must remember that war is not always the scenario we see in the films, the scenario in many battles could be during the day and similar to BFV

​@@luisgamevlog7294true. it's not like the weather is always cloudy and gloomy when there's a war.

I think it's more of the filter on tip or color grading. It's raw, oppressive. Even in the desert, it still had that feeling but not as dark. BFV feels brighter and more saturated. Doesn't really feel dreadful.

It's pretty great. Only thing that ruins it is all the hackers

@@ltlrenati im on xbox so there are no hackers there🙂

@@ltlrenati no hackers on PS4

@@ltlrenati Just play in private servers, i recommend Old Grumpy Men, it's one of the best ones.

imo, post scriptum has the feeling of ww2.

Blame EA for not giving enough time to dice .

@@PrasathMGM dice had plenty of chances to actually make the game immersive. It's not about time. Bf1 launched in 2016 and bf5 launched in 2018. The graphics were improved slightly on bf5s behalf. 2 years is long enough to produce something that players like. It's not about ea "not giving dice enough time" it's about dice adding women to a ww2 game. It's about dice adding only 2 nations out of most of the world. It's about them re using weapons from bf1 for historical accuracy but add women to a ww2 as I said before. It's not EAs problem for dice making a lack luster battlefield

@@clubbtech4431Its also about time .Women inclusion criticism is a weak critic .if the game was good ,people gonna buy it anyway . Remember bf4 was in a very bad issues at 2014 .it got fixed by Dice LA to make it good .Then people buy it and it’s a commercial success afterwards .In 2017 Dice was making Star Wars battlefront 2 ,which was a good game . Actually Dice has two projects -BF6 and BFV .But it had started making BF6 from 2017 after battlefront 2 immediately and dice told EA ,that it will take nearly more than 2 years to complete it . But EA , after watching the great success of BF1 ,they insisted Dice to do a game quickly . So dice stopped BF6 and made BFV . Because Dice was thought that it can make BFV easily because of their lot of copy paste stuff from BF1 will be taking place on it . However EA provided a less than 10 month time period . That’s why the game released in content less state and plays like a mobile version . Adding to this , the marketing was a disaster . However EA ,after the failure of BFV ,they now understand that time is essential to add lot of content and well polishing of the game . That’s why they give lot of time for BF6 .COVID-19 was also a reason for BF6 time rise .The dice development team was also in great fatigue during 2016 to 2018 time period. As They don’t get any help from Dice LA ,because it was busy at bf v ‘s updates.

@@PrasathMGM oh so you work at ea and dice .now and know all their exact plans. I'm honestly not going to bother with you.

Over saturated? Feels kinda empty at some points

Bf1 is not realistic

@@lemonke1709 more realistic than bf5

@@miairuha u sur cuz the only main weapons in ww1 were bolt actions

@@lemonke1709 it's a game not everything is accurate

every shooter have incredible immersion comparing to that disastrous pile of dung. The main problem i have with BFV are the weapons... they feel, sound like bb guns and you need 20 hitmarkers to get a kill. That's when i dropped it and got back to BF1

@@doge79 play hardcore servers

@@roskcity ...I don't think they even have hardcore servers for V. Some emulated it but were custom and aren't really consistantly there.

@@doge79 yeah the 2019 TTK nerf. It's slightly better than it was after that nerf, but man it was a game ruiner. It basically takes 25% more bullets to kill (approximately since it differs slightly per gun) but it used to be basically double right after they nerfed it. iirc early post-nerf took 12 bullets out of the 20rnd mag on the FG-42. Pretty sure they lost half their player population for that ttk change since it took them over a month to make it slightly more reasonable.. Might partially be one of the reasons they bailed on the game.

2042 feels like a new-age unforgiving war that brings new threats different from wars before it. As well as it's a callback to BF2142. Kaleidoscope feels like siege of Shanghai mixed with no man's lands similar to trench war. The doha qatar map is great too. The glacier map is decent

Is the community still on? I downloaded 5 and think I chose the wrong one lol

@@jehwhite1582 there is not a lot of people that play the game but it is worth to check out.5 is also very good but if you are looking for a more realistic game bf1 is the choice

Yes absolutely. The first time i played online was on Passchendaele and i had almost PTSD after the game ended XD The atmosphere was just so intense and immersive...

@@jehwhite1582 the community is insane rn. Not a single dead lobby. Compare that to bf4 currently

Sorry to burst your buble. A lot of voices do not come from players. Like, when I am riding a horse alone in the middle of a desert, I hear my squad leader as if they are right next to me when they issue an order. Or I hear pre-battle speeches even when I spawn as a pilot as if the speaking officer sits in rear seat. You can also hear other soldiers telling you to comeback when you are deserting, even if you are the only player in the server. Truth is, most voices are just placed into a place certain distance away from you. Those voices do not come from players themselves.

I'm with you there. BF1's gameplay is obviously very fun, but BF5, with the inclusion of the reinforcement stuff squad leaders can call in makes the gameplay very dynamic and interesting. Also, nothing beats the feeling of getting a big multi-kill with a V-1 rocket

Same here BFV gameplay is just faster, that's why I like it more.

kitchen

" Realistically fun "

yeah, looking at battlefield v reminds me of far cry.

Its the colour pallette. BF1 on the most part used a lot more dramatic colour mix , combined with the top tier atmosphere

TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY MOUTH

Battlefield was never cinematic and bf5 is about as chaotic as the rest of the modern bf games.

@@Deranfan tell me you've never played battlefield 1 or any battlefield game at all lmfao

I do prefer bf1 immersion

Ww1 was more brutal and more about trench warfare so I mean yeah it’s gonna look a bit more deadly

@@two_chromosomes3838 I think he's talking about the quality of the game overall

I honestly think they are about equal. I think the gameplay is fractionally better in BFV but the fact that women are in it brings it back for me. Rightly or wrongly, women didn’t fight on the frontlines.

@@cyathoris7530 none of the guns used in bf1 ever met the frontline, but no one is bothered. The team mates you never paid attention to being female isn’t going to kill you, they’re not even distinct.

And BF2042

Not really. Bf5 outclasses bf1 in every way, especially in the lighting department.

@@Deranfan except in details gunplay lighting tone destruction and bf5 basicly looks like they just slapped a colourfull filter

@@Deranfan lol are you being serious?

It's because battlefield 1 has a dark filter to hide the bad quality of some textures.

exactly

its not racist but its not historically accurate. People plays battlefield for the historically accurate world war gameplay. There shouldn't be females on WWII Pacific frontline. While there are some / A lot historically inaccurate things on BTF1 but hey its At least still better than BTF5

For sure

Exactly

Yeah fr

@Kiefer Angelo R. CAELIAN for the SJWs. And they paid the price for it too. Bfv sold only about half as many copies as bf1. They should take heed on the consequences of their actions (literally telling their fans not to buy the game if they dont want females). Dont threaten your fans, its equivalent to biting the hand that feeds.

Their screams are pretty disturbing.

BF1 sounded better. Honestly, that’s the main issue, BF1 knew exactly how it wanted you to feel and while graphics are one thing, sound design is often extremely underrated. The game feeling came due to this very feature, a lack of weight, of emotions and it wasn’t even that big of a deal in comparison to the overall shooter market but BF5 had to go up against BF1 and while it certainly looks very well, some maps in BF1 are better put together, and more importantly, why should you play a game that has some minor technical improvements when you could just switch to CoD for an entirely different beast or even just stick with the OG BF1.

Having played both of them, Battlefield 1 feels more immersive. It has the little details that 5 doesn't. Explosions were toned down by a lot so everything is less visceral. The sound is reduced, as well as the screen shake radius and damage. The danger is gone unless a direct hit. Also the communication by player characters are lacking. The commands, the cries and screams of pain. Plus the move speed

Are the servers up for 1? I downloaded 5 and think I chose the wrong one lol

@@jehwhite1582 They're in a weird state but they're up on PS4. The map rotations are weird as fuck though. The list is a bit smaller on PC with less map diversity but they're still there. If you ever get on, I do recommend Operations. Especially on French maps. Breakthrough and Grand Ops are the more mediocre and dumbed down spin on it in 2042 and V. Nothing beats a close Operations game, though. Those clusterfucks at the end where everyone is dogpiling the final objective, everything is exploding, and the end-round music kicks in is 👌 especially on Verdun which has probably one of the best map atmospheres of the franchise.

Ashame I can’t get battlefield 1

@@wickxd9929 how do you mean?

@@OcEaNmAnTaKeMeByThEhAnd well I am only 16, no credit card and no way my mum will buy it for me. Also I live in Australia and from what I heard there are zero multiplayer servers in Australia

@@wickxd9929 You can always play the European servers. Best of luck tho.

@@fz7091 yeah I guess but the ping goes through the roof.

It used to look super good but the community whined about visibility so they added distance haze

@@zendrive-4904 exactly

English?

BF1 with the Russian gameplay you if you choose the sniper class, you’ll have a woman character

@@jasongongora9477 Which is homage to something that actually happened historically. BF5 they stuck women in everywhere just because 'muh equality'. If you're going to try and portray strong women, do so by focusing on actually strong women in history and their stories - not just shoehorning them into places where you think it'll make them look strong.

Its not that big of a deal

Facts bro, Battlefield 1 was pretty ahead of its time with those graphics and optimization

Not battlefield style, that would take all the fun out of a multiplayer game

@@javalicomesquizofrenia Allowing melee to be viable by making it 1hk would take the fun out of it? Why? Many games have 1hk melee, and nobady complains. R6s, Isonzo, Beyond the Wire, Foxhole, Battalion Legacy, the Screaming Steel mod for Day of Infamy, I could go on and on. Jumping right onto an enemy and dealing 55 damage with a hit, and then being smged to death is not balanced.

@@epistimonkapetaniosyou expect a flimsy little knife stab to instantly kill a full hp person

​@@MonkePog. Yes. Attacking with melee is a high risk-high reward action. And the fact that it's not a 1hk makes it unbalanced, and makes melee almost useless.

Well it's realistic, there were bombardments 10x that size in ww1

it's the artillery called from special flare gun

@@metallc0re infiltrator on rupture?

@@rafzax5104 he prob meant infiltrator kit

So what was it lol

I had those feelings in bf4 too. After i tried bf1, i instantly like it and i bought it immediately

Same thing happens in BF2042 🤦

@@SenatorMorbstrong That doesn’t make it like BF1

I mean, in BF1 you can just look at someone's running animation and know what class they are.

@@chazzerine7650 but your not focusing on how they are running your focusing on shooting them

absolutely

i agree..

Bro battlefield 5 created by ea

@@mrnobodymr8002 :)) EA just a publisher not developer. DICE is the one who created this game, not EA.

@@NguyenTran-mf9gj that fact many dice talent leave during bf5 development lmao

@Kyaru Momochi Ok? It's just a game man

@Kyaru Momochi Sucked for you maybe, I personally enjoy it. And I do feel like I'm in WW2 when playing it. Not everything needs to be 100% realistic.

@Kyaru Momochi There are no black soldiers on the German side in BFV. Who fucking cares anyway? It's a game. Battlefield has always been a fantastical shooter.

@Kyaru Momochi There were female soldiers, not to the extent that BFV portrayed but they did exist. Open a history book. And it died from mismanagement. It sold 7 million copies in the first few months meaning they made 420 million dollars and there are still tons of populated servers. None of this matters because Battlefield has always been a fantastical shooter that takes creative liberties. Stop being upset at women and minorities in video games by calling it a "minority scam", it's pathetic.

in bf5 there are wommens you can choose your uniform , whats that ?