Battlefield V Live gameplay testing out the new end of round matchmaking which is hotly debated right now. Is it SBMM or not? Let's play and discuss! Become a member to join the exclusive Discord - / jackfrags
Sorry I had to cut this one short. Not much that can be done about that. Hopefully the next game actually has a functional anti cheat. In the mean time, reply to this comment with your thoughts on the new end of round matchmaking. What have your impressions and thoughts been on it so far? Let me know !
SBMM won’t work in the Oceana region because there is only ever one breakthrough server. What’s gonna happen, always get kicked into an empty server? Might work in Europe and America but just doesn’t make sense here.
@@xthelegionargamingx6030 But is SBMM even needed? No, it isn't. A better solution is to rebalance teams between rounds based off of team size, not based off of skill. And if new players join a server, they should automatically be sent to the team with less people. This will mean you often join the losing team if you choose to join a server, but you will know that teams will be balanced on both teams at the start of the next round.
I think all games are doing this because of new players which is Fcking annoying tbh because I think you should be plunged in the deep end and learn the hard way and if you put enough time get good at it, every industry is becoming so soft and I’m hating seeing gaming coming to that now too :(
@@JustinLT212 exactly I got absolutely destroyed when I picked up BFV but I kept grinding and now I'm pretty good at the game. I knew that if I played more I would improve on the game and that was enough motivation to keep on playing
Bf3 and bf4s system was shit. Every game badmins abused choppers to stomp other team and re balance the newcomers into other team in conquest matches,and yes... IGLA's were banned
One of the exhausting things about this game was definitely that you were going to get pummeled for the first 2-3 rounds no matter what. Then you'd be on the dominant team until you left.
Because of the pandemic, the servers are really laggy on the weekends. Probably because the servers are really being taxed right now. I played yesterday and everyone on my squad was experiencing it as well. RE: SBMM, I hate it. COD does it and it's stupid. I remember some time ago hearing someone from Respawn comment that SBMM is the future of gaming. If that is true, I will stop gaming altogether.
Depends on the type of game man. Honestly Warzone would be an absolute bore without SBMM and all the people who complain about it are the exact demographic who would leave after two weeks without it. Battlefield on the other hand is about goofing around and a sandbox experience so its understandable why you wouldn't want it, but its far from the bane of video games.
@@bluey7520 It's not SBMM that makes Warzone better. It's the style of the players on the server. If you ever played COD in the past, you would know that many COD players camp more than in any other gaming community. Have you ever played Battlefield? There are far fewer campers in BF than any COD game. I've played COD since COD3 came out. So, I've seen the difference over many years.
IMO all they they need to do is make it so that if one team controls all the flags, the losing team gets a spawn of some OP item. Assuming the next game in modern, they can just make it an AC130. Would be tough to balance a mode like rush though, but that's really not such a problem anyway.
thank you, Jack. I learned in this video that I'm a "meme-er" in Battlefield. sad to hear about your struggles with live streaming. I've enjoyed your content in the past and I'm glad that you've come back in my queue through Warzone. take care!
A random question, which bf has the best movements overall? Bf4, bf1, bf5? What I mean by best is which one did the community like the most? Im worrying already for bf6 lol. I really wanna it be like bf4 in terms of movement.
What the hell has happened to this game ? Newbies level 2 on top of the leader board with rapid fire and know exactly what to do ffs . This is done as a game . It's been well hacked .
Why doesn't it just reshuffle the 64 players within the server based on previous round(s)? Half a team is "good" players, half the team is "less good" players. That seems like it would be so much easier to manage and would keep engagements between teams diverse and interesting.
For conquest no skill based matchmaking is needed battlefield is fun that way because as said you can meme sweat chill not always have to play at your highest skill level on other modes it would be pretty good
Do you think I should get Battlefield Five? I like the Battlefront games but I've never played a Battlefield game. I'm thinking of getting it after I get BF1 for free on PS5. Does anyone think its worth it?
Personally, I use the server browser to carefully plan the maps I want to play using the map rotation feature. Now with this new method of balancing from BF, I’m just gonna get random and likely shitty maps. I will not play hamada again
Hi Jack, i like that you still make BF content, thanks! SBMM in Battlefield is not what BF represents so let's hope Dice understands that. They will. And about that team balancer, i don't know was it coincidence but all the 3 games i played it kicks me on a other server and put me in a different squad. And every time my squad mates was clearly lower level/skill players. So was the team balancer trying to tell me that i need to carry these squads?
I think it's ok, some breakthrough servers are mind crushing when your entire team have a negative KD, It's not enjoyable. As for conquest, even if you lose you can still enjoy the game and find a gunfight here and there without getting killed for rushing.
A better idea would be to just have teams balanced according to player count between rounds, and if new players join the server, they automatically go on the side with fewer people. I think most of us in the community have never wanted SBMM.
Santa’s elves & lady were murdered by polar bears while he was delivering presents. The day he got back to the North Pole was the day he picked up a rifle.
Fa Mulan bruh I'll be fighting for just one objective while my entire squad is chilling at the back sniping. I've done that myself before but when the entire teams getting squashed can put in some effort
31 PEOPLE ON YOUR TEAM!?!? dude I’ve never really cared for games that look and play like this, but PVZ GW and Fortnite were good, but now I feel like this is just like the next freaking level
I absolutely hate the new matchmaking after battle system. Countless times has my squad and I gotten moved to a server populated with 15 players. Then we have to leave and wait in a queue just to get into a new game that is actually populated.
imo the game is overall better than BF1. Every system in this game is better than in BF1. Even though BFV has less content it still hits more than BF1 does.
@@Finnishmanni there’s no way lol, BF1 had some of the best DLC maps, you get a way better atmosphere in BF1, it feels like chaos and there’s actually a war going on, BFV didn’t seem to deliver that chaos to me, imo
Hey DICE, I do NOT want skill-based matchmaking AT ALL in Battlefield games. However, I do want a team balancer that helps make sure the number of people on both teams is close to the same. People should only be able to switch teams if the teams will have a difference of 4 or less people after the switch, and teams are rebalanced in between each round to make sure there are an equal number of players on both teams. Additionally, if you choose to join a round in progress and there is a disparity between team player counts, you should automatically be put on the team with less players. Yes, this will cause people to join the losing team many times. However, they can rest assured that at the start of the new round the two teams will start on equal footing, based on player count and NOT on skill. If you want to make competitive modes that is ok with me, but the base Battlefield experience has never been nor should be one where everyone is a tryhard of the same skill.
"Oh this gun? This is the liberator, you just get one shot and then you get to watch this cool rel- GUNNED DOWN BY LAWS OF PHYSICS WHICH DICTATE THAT DEATH MUST OCCUR IN RELOAD
@@onejediboi no it was because to show the progression of the war like panzerstorm took places in Belgium which in 1940 invaded during the blitzkrieg (also IRL the brits didn’t fight there so I don’t know why brits are complaining anyway) same thing goes with twisted steel but in 1944-1945 the liberation of Belgium began after the liberation of France so dice wanted show progression of war and balancing the us team so they won’t just have 1 western front map
Crossplatform is something you must be abel to disable on console, most console plebs dont want to play againt the PC master ace. But its a good feature if you can choose yourself
The whole idea of the server browser is that you get to choose where you wanna play. Having them doing the matchmaking for us is an unnecessary and stupid idea
I know it makes it longer, but I wish you’d let us watch the full game play; rather than cutting out scenes & conversation...makes it hard to follow & not as enjoyable to watch with all the jump cuts. Not a complaint, just a request. Much love, Shelbie =)❤️🤍💙🇺🇸
@@michaelhowe8674 I did it micheal on Xbox one not the new Xbox and couldn’t find a Sever that was filled every server had 1/64 in them so I got back on BF4
