Robi Wac Pan dobra robote ,zali i smutek ze przeszywa moje serce ze ja sam na emigracji nie dam rady a zdrugiej strony oko nacieszyc szabla i Polskim rynsztunkiem podnosi na duchu ....
Thank you for this video. Since viewing it, I’ve been using my 3’ and 4’ staffs in like manner. I think your bayonet method makes for a good stick self defense method as well. I hope you post more videos.
It heavily depends on the type of bayonet. Old style triangular bayonets were forged one face at a time; sword bayonets were made like, well, swords; and modern knife bayonets are just combat knives with bayonet lugs and muzzle rings.
Stuart McDermid Seems to be based on an early 19th century French manual off which this one was based on. www.64thill.org/drillmanuals/mcclellans_bayonetexercise/part01.htm
I have a question about historical warfare. During battles, soldiers often wielded swords while simultaneously holding a musket with a bayonet attached. Were there manuals or guides on how to effectively fight in this manner? In the video shared, it seems to focus solely on bayonet fighting! :)
I don't think so, but one never knows. There might be some manual hidden away in some library or personal collection. Also I don't think it would have been necessary, since it would have been pretty obvious. You just have this long piece of steel and wood in one hand, and a short hanger on the other. The bigger threat would have been the bayonet at the end of that long musket. The short hanger would have just represented a secondary threat. Given the nature of the methods of fighting between the late 17th century through the 18th century up to the early 19th century, the bayonet was a form or type of pike or spear. The hanger sword carried at the side by soldiers was a secondary weapon in case the musket was lost or dropped in favour of the sword. The advantage lay with the bayonet's long reach over the enemy. We today get most of the misunderstanding due in part to Hollywood depictions in film. Also because we don't fully understand its use and the practice of it is no longer popular. Except in Japan where it still lives as the art of jukendo and tankendo. I think the Macdonald academy in Scotland practices some form of bayonet and hanger fencing. Maybe take a look in their channel and ask around...
Aaaaaalbo możesz pociągnąć za spust z odległości... A przynajmniej taka była mentalność imperiów świata która doprowadziła bagnet do pozycji ceremonialnej. Nie dziwota, bagnet był stosowany większość czasu w erze wolnej, zawodnej cholernie długiej i nieporęcznej broni odprzodowej. Wtedy móc postawić coś ostrego między sobą a wrogiem było funkcjonalne.
@@gabrielduncan6535. Non credo, ma puoi chiedere a Federico Malaguti...... He's a HEMA instructor and has a RU-vid channel. È un istruttore HEMA e ha un canale RU-vid.
Yes or at least this is what it looks like. Some poses are universal here and well documented. Compare it to this vid: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-SAu4YuiqN9o.html
Dlaczego noga zakroczna jest wleczona/ciagnieta calym cialem az pieta czesto szoruje po podlodze? Czy nie powinno sie wypychac z palcow nogi zakrocznej tak jak w boksie? Zobaczcie tutaj ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-h1gYUSgcfZ4.html
As a u.s. army veteran and HEMA enthusiast, my understanding of it is this. The modern rifle is shorter and thus the use of the bayonet has to be modified for its effective employment. With a longer rifle or a musket like the types of the 18th century, you had the advantage of longer reach. A shorter rifle requires that you get closer to your opponent and use techniques that resemble more the use of a baton or short staff. That's why in the WWII USMC training film you see the Marines being trained like boxers, because boxing was something that was familiar to them. Since boxing along with wrestling was the most common martial art taught to the american military at the time.
