Beat The Fried Liver In 12 MOVES [Traxler Counterattack TRAP] 

What if they take with the bishop and check the king to prevent further from castling

It's true but it's not the point of this shorts. This shorts was just to show a cool little trick to get the chess players hype up about chess and this channel. I mean all of the shorts are the same, cool tricks that are easy to digest

Lots of lower rated players play the fried liver, so this guide is mostly for us lower rated players who are struggling against it. Higher rated players usually go for the Giuco Pianissimo or something more solid.

@@triggerfinger7831 yes. I forget they are useful for beginners who don't need to know all the extra stuff. Still appreciate your work man.

Everyone takes the bishop

@@animATEer everyone below 1400 rating, Yes.

Ya that is the theory behind fried liver, if opponent goes into any counter attack, or does anything weird, you take with bishop

That's why it's better to play proactively and avoid bad gotcha videos like this one. This is not good solid chess.

@@dimitrisionas9566if you memorize the line and they take with bishop it still leads to an equal position

​@@dimitrisionas9566 it's better to know these lines than nothing.

Taking with the knight forks the queen and the rook. So we win either 5 or 9 points of material in return for 3 points of material

​@@NotBlazerMC Not worth the stress A pawn plus a misplaced king is enough advantage 😅 Not always about 'material points'..

@@mofe620do you think low rated players think like this

@@quentinbarker7534 It depends...some might, but the majority won't think like this. If they're able to efficiently convert such "little" advantages, they wouldn't be low rated, I think.

If Kf1 then Qf3 is check, after white king move you can save your rook but it's a waste of sacrifice. Or after you can try Knight F7 which is a fork.

​@@rogueninja6816How are you getting Qf3 check?

@@rockmyworldmusic after black knight f4 check, according to the comment i replied to if Kf1 then Qf3 is check.

@rogueninja6816 I assume that you're talking about checking the white King correct? If the King moves to f1, then the Bishop is still on f2. Since it wasn't captured, there can be no check from "Queen f3." I think what you're trying to say is that if the Bishop sacrifice is accepted then Ne4 checks the King on f2. And if the King retreats to f1, then there would be Queen f6 check. But I'm pretty sure the point the original comment was making was to deny the sacrifice. You would move the King to f1 leaving the Bishop on f2. That's how you beat the counter play.

@@rockmyworldmusic ohh I get it, it was my misunderstanding. I thought the comment was after the knight check. Thanks for the explanation

FRRRRRRRR

Try the Ponziani Steinitz gambit,I use against fried liver and it works 90% of times

Exactly

Then u play Qe7 and d5,have many dangerous attacks.White can easily got destroyed.

The best move for white is to play Bxf7 instead of Nxf7

@@ifbfmto9338 also a good move. However it is not clear which move is better.

Moving the bishop or queen on black allows you to move your king out of check. Yeah you lose castling rights but better than a quick checkmate.

What do you mean bro?it's a check white has to save his king he can't play any other move.

​@@tasdfoeditz white can defend the bishop check with 3 moves Mathematically speaking not taking bishop is more likely to happen than taking it

Resign

@@advayagarwal9929 hardly so, maybe if you are a GM because I think most FM would mess it up. The white king has a lot of squares which lead to forced mate [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "?"] [Black "?"] [Result "*"] 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. Ng5 Bc5 5. Nxf7 Bxf2+ 6. Kxf2 Nxe4+ (6... Ng4+) 7. Ke3 (7. Kf3 Qf6+ 8. Kxe4 (8. Ke2 Qf2+ 9. Kd3 Nc5+ 10. Kc3 Qd4#) (8. Kg4 Qf4+ 9. Kh3 (9. Kh5 g6# (9... Nf6#)) 9... d6+ (9... Ng5+) (9... Qf2) (9... Nf2#)) (8. Ke3) 8... Qf4+ (8... d5+ 9. Bxd5 Qf4+ 10. Kd3 O-O (10... b6 11. Ng5 b5 12. Ne6) (10... Qd4+ 11. Ke2 Qxd5 12. Nxh8 Qxg2+ 13. Ke3 Ne7 (13... Qh3+))) 9. Kd3 (9. Kd5 Qd4#) 9... Qd4+ (9... Rf8) (9... e4+ 10. Ke2)) 7... Qh4 8. Nxh8 Qf2+ (8... Qf4+ 9. Kd3 (9. Ke2 Nd4+ (9... Qf2+ 10. Kd3 Nc5+ 11. Kc3 Qd4# (11... Qg3+)))) *

What will you do if the king doesnt take the bishop?

its already a bad game for black

There are many things white can do here to not go into this line. But Nxf7 is quite common.

Someone did that to me. His king didn't took my bishop at f2. My king was checked, so I moved it and then he put his bishop back at c4. I moved a pawn to d6 to free my bishop and was going to attack his queen. He then moved his knight to f7, saved my queen, he took the rook which I was hoping for because it was more of a distraction to now attack with my knights, queen and bishop and won.

cowards game I play the buschgass gambit

@@slendrio what is that???

You're right haven't seen any refutation for Kg1 either

They wont, thats a stupid move

​@@nm22495You could at least explain *why* it's a bad move instead just saying it's "stupid"

@@nm22495 but it was played against me a few times, what is the response

@@tanelkagan no fork, its so obvious

​​​@@nm22495 Sure, no fork, but it's a free pawn and a check to the king. Not only that, but since the knight defends the bishop it forces Ke7 or Kf8, either bringing the king further out in the open, or blocking the rook, in either case resulting in black losing the ability to castle, either now or later. Let's just look at your logic. You're watching a video which is specifically explaining to you how white taking with the knight (because the fork is so tempting) is actually a bad move, because black can play a line that easily wins. You appear to be fine with that. At the same time the alternative move, the capture with the bishop, which doesn't result in that losing sequence, and which gains a pawn, checks the king and prevents future castling, you argue is "stupid". You've got it entirely the wrong way around, and seem to be entirely missing the point of the video. A move is not "stupid" because the majority of beginners wouldn't play it - in fact it's entirely possible, even probable, that beginners would NOT see the better engine move. If you still can't understand this, I can only suggest you study harder and improve your knowledge. There's nothing wrong with not knowing but being cocky about your chess knowledge when you don't yet possess it is pointless and will just hinder your development. The question as to what to do if the bishop takes was an entirely valid one and maybe GM Smirnov would make a recommendation. I don't have a clear answer but as I say the king is forced to move to e7/f8, so white gains a tempo and it's a question of what they do next.