Believe it or not: An unbelievably hilarious debate 

Even the most religious person I know never says om namo naraayanaye instead of hello 🤣🤣🤣🤣

the way he threw the spell at you in the start... almost had harry puttar vibes.

"I have evidence that I'm the son of my father." Choked on my Maggi. 😂😅😂

😅😅😅 When you can't defend you argument and now you can't accept you are wrong.

Om namo narayanaya Haan

atleast he is willing to debate!! some positivity...

The way he said "om namo narayanay" in the beginning, it sounded like he is complaining about something, angrily...

It was a good one. He is trying sincerely make Vimoh a believer of Vedas - in this process of convincing he converted from a Vedas believer to all faith's believer ;-)

This was actually funny, people are turning really dumb because of sky daddy thirst😢

2:00 "You have to believe that" and then the rollercoaster starts!

People like those: Believe it or not... Let's be blind together 😊 We have different definition of Evidence...

I have had similiar debates with a lot of my friends and now I try to stay clear of these discussions.

Andhbhakt turns into mulla in moment 😂

I really liked the augment you made with logic without being too aggressive Vimoh. Don't know RU-vid recommended your video out of the blue, you gained a subscriber though.

You smoked his ego,the way he asked u what is the evidence that u r son of ur dad😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

We hv to Cross check na baba😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Pehle Vishwas kare fir istemal kare

Nice debate Vimoh ji. 👍 I am Telugu speaking humanist from Andhra state. Today first time watched your video. I liked your debating skills. So subscribed to ur channel. 👍

Bro! How Are You So Calm With Dealing With These People Vimoh!?

Dude you have the patience of a monk! I would have lost it, his push towards his ignorance is so hard and he wants to impose his thoughts/beliefs on you without offering proof of his imaginary fairy tail. The minute he brought your farther and you just slam dunk his argument right there he was dumbfounded... "His mind: Accha DNA karke bhi koi patta kar sakta hai ki baap kaun hai?"😂😂😂 epic comeback!

We need such debates. Thanks man!

Thanks for the comedy before night, 😂

If you listen carefully, you can almost hear his mind crackling up inside 😂😂 truly hilarious

Hahahaha! This went from being stupid to stupider and then climbed into Rajshri productions arena...

Did he just say proof reading & cross checking to belive in God 😂😂😂.

Love you sir from Uttar Pradesh Banaras Hindu University

Something I can watch on repeat

You have the conversations that I avoid having because I couldn’t be bothered. THANK YOU!

And let's say he starts believing in Quran/Bible after they ask him to believe, the books contradict against other faiths, polytheism etc. What will he do then? Whom will he believe? He has to believe whoever gives evidence. And none of them have succeeded in giving the proper evidence.

Jagdeesh Swaroop is dealing with confirmation bias. He has made his mind that if u surrender to vedas it will lead you to god for sure but the same won’t happen with any other religion.😂😂😂😂😂

Man this takes me back to days of youtube when Hitchen and Darkins were popular.

Oh, man this was actually stupid 😂.

Thanks a lot for all of your work. Could you please make a video differentiating atheism and agnosticism.

Dude You're a legend!!😭😭

Hey Vimoh, been watching your videos lately. Wanted to ask this geniune doubt. Is evidence for atheism equally poor? Can mere absence of evidence for theism count as evidence for atheism? If there's a claim that "A" exists, and there's no evidence to back it, does that logically mean that A does not exist or is it speculative as our only evidence for the claim of non-existent of A would be the absence of evidence for existence of A. So can absence of evidence count as counter-evidence? Or the very best we can be is agnostic from a very rational perspective? Cause, when I apply this example in a real life scenario, lets say if my friend makes a claim about the existence of some "25 feet tall man with 6 legs" and the evidence he backs it up with is that he has seen the man or experienced him. I feel pretty easy rejecting this claim thinking it's pure bullshit! But when I think deep enough, my only evidence for rejecting this claim was the non-display of any extraordinary evidence by my friend of his extraordinary claim. So what's the better way forward in being a conclusive atheist vs an agnostic in terms of philosophical rationality? Would love to hear your thoughts (i repeat this is a very genuine doubt)

That was a good one!

What I've come to know is that when we put a logical argument they tend to accept the logic but somehow these guys aren't ready to accept that whatever they have been taught about the religion they follow since their birth which even their parents, grandparents and most of the people believe in is a blatant lie.

HOW DO I KNOW IT IS NOT SCRIPTED.

Satisfactory as f*ck 😭

very well explained ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Thanks vimoh

That om namo narayana got me 😂

Loved this! Btw where do you stream your debates and can you make a video on gender and sex?

Vimoh Bhagban Vishnu ka avtar hain. We should follow the path Vimoh is directing. Jay Vimoh.

I wouldn't have even an ounce of patience to deal with such basket cases

This is the most hilarious call i have heard on this channel lel

Conclusion 🤣🤣🤣

Haha that was funny. It was like he was stuck in an infinite loop

Hey vimoh I always try to keep a rational mindset and thinking and most of the time I consider myself as atheist but as i belong to sikh religion i always got distracted by some points like some of the greatest personalities believe in god..Guru nanak and all the ten gurus believe in something beyond this world..And when i neglect the concept of god a question always pop up in my mind that how so many people including some of the great personalities ever born in world believe in concept of god which is very irrational. And i always have a fear in my mind that what if i am doing something wrong in not believing the concept of god and what if i will fear the consequences later. Concepts like karma and all always give me lot of confusion..Please make a separate video on the concept of karma and please make a separate video on astrology too Thankyou

Most of Vimoh's live streams are seen to either start or end with ISKCON Ads...☠💀

Bhai ko circular argument me phasa diya.

Hindu, Christians, Muslim all thinks that their holy book is written by GOD, but how they know that it is true? same answer: "Because that is what is written in the book".

seriously infected with confirmation bias

By their own claim, had 20000 years to come up with a better argument and circular logic is the only thing they can come up with... So sad.

You should believe it ? That line destroyed the full collection of arguments of the person 😂😂😂

Love you vimoh, you are doing great service.

BIG MIRROR DOES WONDERS!!!

It not necessarily be gullibility but could also be the indoctrination that happens in most cases of the people born and raised in religious households.

What is your opinion on Kushal Mehra of the Charvaka Podcast? A discussion of both of you would be great!

Good job Vimoh sir. Atleast I can use your logics to defend my idiot colleagues.

👌enjoying❤

Fastest debunker of the universe The Vimoh💪😁

Evidence crying in the corner 😂

hilarious 🤣

Socratic method live demonstration 😂😂😂

Not all Charvakas are hedonists. Their central thesis is Bhutachaitanyavaad that says that consciousness is an accidental property of matter. Hedonism is how other schools colour them as.

Belief in a father or great-grandfather and belief in God - aren't really comparable. The existence of a father or great-grandfather is a normal part of human biology and history, something we as a society have a general understanding of and abundant evidence to support, even if we lack specific evidence about our individual lineage. On the other hand, belief in God represents an extraordinary claim that extends beyond the natural world as we collectively comprehend it. If belief in God did not require unique evidence, we would all presumably believe in the same God. Yet, the reality shows a plethora of religions, each with its own unique set of beliefs. This points to the fact that there isn't one universally "right" way to believe in God and underlines the idea that faith is often based on personal experience and intuition. Consequently, extraordinary claims like the existence of a divine being require extraordinary evidence, surpassing anecdotal or intuitive references.

This was so funny 😂😂😂

Oh god I laughed to hard on this.

Its likes Judging food before Eating😎

Just trust me bro

Bro, we should create an Indian equivalent of the "Atheist Experience"!

Can you write book on how to think ❤

It was hilarious

Do you have any fb group or page??

❤❤❤❤❤

Thanks for the laugh, good way to start my morning!😂

Bro was stuck on , " Believe it bro , trust me vimoh " Religion is like a product company , every company says our product is good , the are ecstatic when their product is sold overseas and company acquires monopoly , but they can't accept some other company coming into their ground and overrun their business

Vimoh please shed some light on the topic of 'soul' and 'rebirth' phenomenon said in some religions.

Bro was so desperate to prove his point that he accepted other religions which call his religion a paganism😂😂😂

Fucking hillarious 😂😂

We can't tell the taste of tea or a sweet. You have to taste your self. Once you self realise,no need for you to tell about who is God? who wrote, how Vedas came etc, you know your Father, or up to four or five gerations. But definitely you will not know how your great,great great grandfather came on this earth. So is the vedas. Vedas are whispered by God (akashvani)when rishis performing penance. ...sage vedavyasa interpreted and divided into four Vedas as per requirement. Since Vedas not understood by common man, Upanishad came, then also not understood so puranas came in the form of Stories for common man to understand. Hope you understand. ? 😊

hello sir,I am brahmin by caste and i call myself an agnostic. whenever I go through the atheist community of India I find hate towards brahmins which sometimes makes me feel bad is there any solution to it?

The first line of this guy proved that he's brainless 😂

Once a wise man said foke vedas 🗿

Interested to know what you think of scientism, where science is treated like a religion with blatant disregard and hostility for the scientific spirit of inquiry and skepticism

Well you can't choose your beliefs. Either you're convinced of something or not. Example try believing in santa Claus.

If you surrender to GOD , you will be controlled by someone who controls and defines GOD

Ok

You don't believe in God but according to me you really true spritual person 😂❤

😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂

"surrenderrrrrrrr"

Also, the Rishi's didn't "write the vedas" since the Vedas as Shrutis aka unwritten scriptures supposedly passed down thrown oral transmission. The man debating for the truth of the Vedas doesn't even have the basics of the Vedas correct and this way of transmitting scripture is even worse than writing it down.

Simple logic nhi samajhta..kaun hain ye bewakuf

In my opinion, this is not the best argument to make, because you implicitly concede that the belief is valid if the believer is open to other beliefs, which isn't the case. I would have made the point that blind belief requires the suspension of all logic and reason, the pillars upon which humanity has progressed so rapidly. Thus it's nonsensical to first believe and work backwards towards the "evidence"

हिंदू धर्म के धर्माचार्य जी मातृभाषा छोड़ कर अंग्रेज़ी में क्यों घुसड़े हुए हैं।

I am a believer. But i respect atheism because without strong rational backing, things would become blind pursuit. The argument made about parenthood being taken on belief is valid in my opinion. I think that it is a fallacy of authority to say that one can verify parenthood and actually not carrying out the verification. And I had read about an instance where the DNA tests came out falsely positive because in rare circumstances, it can match the wrong person because they indeed would have the same DNA. Oops! Also, verifying from other sources are also flawed because the ultimate test itself can come out wrong. So any other opinions would be on taken on the fallacy of authority as well. Right? In another clip, a similar point was made on verifying the reality of perception. Just because other people can perceive the same thing, it is not conclusive evidence is the perception being real. It is like pausing an animation into n number off computers and if they can detect the animation, then concluding that it is the reality and the more computers verify, the more reasonable to think that the animation is reality. Thinking deeply would show that another entity other than a computer will differ. But this doors not conclude but take the quest only deeper. And regarding multi religions and their differences, I see them all as pointing to the same God. The so called Abrahamic religions, 3 of major ones, all talk about a deluge which Noah survives and the Hindus too do have the same incident which is the instance of the Matsya Avatar where King Satyavrata was approached by God to tell him the same thing, to build a huge ship and survive a massive deluge, in exactly the same fashion. But this would then only lead to the idea that, then probably all those religions originated from Hinduism. I hope these would be interesting ideas to know.

I have some questions and arguments. Can we debate?

i think jagdishswaroop is a nice person