@@khoaly554 stupid comment, froomes a grand tour rider and possibly the best gc rider of all time, while sagan is a classics rider. Not even comparable
I used to love and support the sportsman, and I bought his book. Now I love the man behind the cyclist even more... Because this guy aims for only two things: winning and have fun on his bike, no matter what
just realized why there are so many attentions on sky " doping " . sky will pull there sponsorship . a disrupted team , and the other teams will have a better chance . you do not have prove at the top level , you only have to create doubt .
The doping in the sky team, can be proved or not, there are rumors that if there is or not, regardless of that, for me is a team, even if it has not demonstrated doping, as soon as any related issue appears , The sky will be deleted from the UCI.
i hope you wont hide when the truth comes out, I was the same fan boy as you back in the days of Banesto and Miguel but its quite clear to me they were cheating even if never caught. Compare climbing times to big mountains and you will find the truth
elton japa Froome is very formule, he alwats need to go as the pulse meter indicates and Nairo is more a type of cyclist for passion, not is very formule, i think it depend on where you see, for example Nairo is now very well and Froome not, but who knows Froome on the tour leaves us crazy, for me they are both good and are totally different
Un grand gagnant..... Un gros dopé, En temps que cycliste licencié sa m'énerve que même en étant dopé et parce que il y a autant d'argent en jeux on le laisse quand même faire le tour de France 2018
no hay caso! no me gusta froome, es bueno pero muy mecánico y siento que no tiene esa chispa del ciclismo de ataques a varios km de meta, demasiada formula y estrategia pero 0 espectáculo.
ginno donoso betanzo A mi me gusta, eso si es muy fórmulas y muy preparao para ganar, pero a mi en el Tour me dio mucho espectáculo no se depende de cada uno a mi me gusta.
