A7s cameras have been regarded as low light kings since they came out. I think theyre often compared (and perform unfavorably) in situations they arent ideal for. They seem best in extreme low light (if you want bright pictures/video in natural light at night or fast shutter for quick movement in low but not extreme darkness). The only fair comparisons seem to be moonlight levels--plus beyond a point, 2nd iso kicks in and dramatically improves the picture.
My biggest problem with smartphone cameras is they can't shoot videos for long in summers in direct sunlight..what is the cheapest camera that can do that even with okayish image quality? Thanks in advance
I do K9 dog photography with stills and fast moving action "agility track" fast dog action. The only one thing that is holding me back from buying the a7R V today, is I've heard that the rolling shutter is horrific. Can you comment or make a video on that topic? Thank you greatly!!!
A fair question! I'm not sure if the native ISO applies the same in photos as it does in video but definitely worth exploring! I typically find 12800 to be too high on any photo camera for making prints but maybe its still good for digital display? Not sure.
I'm wondering if you had the in-camera noise reduction turned on. I have an A7R5 and had it on when taking fireworks pictures earlier this month. I found it works fairly quickly and didn't seem to impact my photos. I don't know if the other two cameras have that setting.
