Best Sony lenses for Sports and Nature Photography? (47 min) 

Since Nature photography is included here. The 90mm Macro should be considered. It’s one of the best macros ever made.

I cant believe i watched whole 45 minutes of the video without skipping a minute of it. THATS CALLED THE REAL REVIEW. THANK YOU.

I’d say you have the best breakdown on RU-vid at the moment. Thanks for that.

Just bought the 200-600. Thank you for your help. I am a hobby photographer and wow did this do a great job of outlining the current lineup.

I thought I was going to skip through this but here I am 47 minutes later typing this, and I'm not even in the market for those two big boys on the right! Great presentation.

As you know Patrick I am not afraid to moan when I don't like a video but this is an AWESOME video. You've really covered so much and its really helpful for those of us looking to invest in Sony kit. Thanks for taking the time to put this together. I still hope Sony launch a 300 2.8 in the not too distant future...

Great and thorough information. My wife and I booked a vacation to Cabo for this October. We realized after watching RU-vid videos about Cabo that we would be well served to invest in a good camera. So after reviewing what's out there, we settled for an a6000. We have been loving learning photography, and of course now it's all about the glass. Thanks for this very useful review!!! God bless!

I got in a bit late on the preorders for the 200-600 but i cant wait to use it on my a6400.

Two weeks ago, I part exchanged my 100 - 400mm G Master + SEL20TC for a 200 - 600mm + SEL14TC. Unfortunately, the weather has not been ideal of late, but I did get out with my A9 + 200 - 600mm for five hours a couple of days ago. What I can state so far is: as a wildlife photographer, the 200 - 600mm matches my expectations and produces the results I had hoped for. I managed to capture a Swallow in flight just above the ground, a Dragonfly in flight, just above the ground, a Hover Fly, in flight at a distance of about 3 metres and a Magpie in flight against a tree cluttered background. Focusing speed and lock on are exceptionally fast and zooming between 200 to 600 is really quick. I have yet to test it out with my SEL14TC or my Kenko extension tubes, but so far I am impressed. I will also have to test it out with my A7III at some stage; but that is not a priority. Top job Sony.

Great quote referring to his 100-400mm lens ‘you don’t want to go to a game with this thing because it doesn’t make you look like a real photographer’ !!!

your content is so great. infomrative, calm, objective opintions....no annoying music. keep doing whatr you're doing and thanks for sharing all your wisdom

Patrick, thank you for making this video. Really do appreciate it.

P M-R, your best vid yet! Packed with insightful information. I felt like I bumped into you at a hotel and we went out to the local watering hole to talk about glass and I walked (stumbled?) home with a bunch of insider information. One of these days I'll switch from Canon to Sony...dunno know if it will be the A7RIV or A9II. But darn you as I always thought my first three lenses would be the Holy Trinity. Now you got me salivating over the 135, 100-400 and 200-600. I guess what it boils down to is what do you envision yourself shooting. As a hobbyist, I shoot every genre, day and night. Thank you for your honest and candid thoughts, both in the video and in the comments. I'm sure once I dive in I'll watch this vid half a dozen times. Actually, I do have a question: in what order do you think they'll make the Mark II version and what about it will be different? Say, the first three MII lenses.

Nice job Pat. Your recommendations have been spot on for me. Sold my last piece of Nikon gear last month. The 100-400 breezed through spring sports and I expect it to do the same this fall. I love lenses that make money every time I pick them up!

You did great with this video. One of the best comparisons I’ve watched for a wile now, I have the 100-400 and love it. The lengthy video was well worth it. THANK YOU

You're prediction was right, the 200-600 is still pretty consistently sold out to this day on both Sony's website and other retailers. Just finally got my hands on one at Best Buy for a good price and I can't wait to try it out. Thanks for the video, great stuff!

I so enjoyed your talk on all the lenses, I'm waiting for my 200-600mm to arrive, at the moment I have an a6000 you mentioned it on your talk, I was wondering to upgrade my camera or will my a6000 be ok?

Really enjoy your videos. Always comes across as someone who knows the product and lot of experience.

For shooting video and photo for professional baseball, would you suggest the 100-400 or 200-600?? Currently have the 70-200 but don’t think it’s long enough.

Absolutely killer video however still has me question what to do. My daughter has been pretty heavy in sports photography both indoor/ outdoor and all types of light situations(highschool and getting into college sports) She currently uses and loves the 70-200 with the 2.8. However realized especially with being on the soccer pitch the long distance is just not there but doesn’t want to loose out on the aperture.she is using a Sony a7iii. Which would you recommend between the 100-400 and 200-600? She does not do much wildlife photography. Thank you!

Awesome video! Curious what sports you use the 135 for? Would you consider the 135 overlap if I already have the 70-200? Camera is A9ii.

Having followed bloggers and vloggers for years it's rare for me to be surprised. But I was here. Even if I'm not half interested in the lenses (I am when I dream but..) Very nice walkthrough. Thumps up and thanks for a pleasant time. Just got the 200-600 btw 🙂

Great work Patrick, I got the 400 f2.8 a few weeks ago and am blown away, super happy with it

Great and very informative video! I just wish there were some sample photos thrown in so we have examples to look at ;)

I’m working my way up there!! Not sure why you didn’t mention the Sony 90mm 2.8 G? Is that better than the 85mm? (I own the 90mm)I just bought the Sony 200-600mm and I love it!!! Debating on getting the 2.0 teleconveter. I also have the Sigma 150-600mm with MC-11, Sony 24-70mm GM, Sony 70-200mm GM, Sony 50mm Zeis and looking into the Sony 135mm. Great video I subscribed and look forward to more content! Thanks

Patrick, your videos have all been an incredible resource for me as an aspiring event/sports shooter. My journey with Sony started with this video. I have probably watched it over 20 times! I've rented the 135gm and LOVED it. I'm trying to convince myself I need that lens (even though I own the workhorse 70-200gm ii). I would love a video showcasing some of your favorite sports images (especially High School) where you used specific lenses to achieve the shots you were anticipating/looking for. My favorite combo for basketball is the 70-200/35gm, however I'd love to find instances where I can use the 135. Thanks again!

I got my Sony 200-600mm delivered here in Shanghai about a week ago. Oh boy, what a performance on my Sony A9. And even when paired with the Sony A6400 this lens shines - this combo works much better than the 100-400mm paired with the A6400. For Wildlife this 200-600mm zoom is clearly a winner.

This video was not confusing at all and went into great details that anyone considering these lenses would want to know. I do have a short question however, I own the 100-400 and also the 1.4 cony TC. Having used the 1.4 on the lens I wasn't exactly happy with the results but I'm wondering if the camera is a factor, I'm using the Sony A7R3 not the A9. I found I'd rather just use the 100-400 and crop rather than add the 1.4 in nearly every situation. Would this be a different scenario with a camera like the the A9? My next body will be the A9 or A9ii for sure. Thanks once again for a very helpful video, liked and subscribed.

Great vid! What would you pick for shooting swimming? To pair with either an A7RIV and A7SIII? I own both cameras and would like to have some advice between these

Not to mention, the 100-400 connected to the a7rii or the new a7riv, going to crop mode you're getting 150mm-600mm at 5.6 (I typically just set the aperture at 5.6 so it stays constant). Of course, I haven't done this yet, but possibly getting the a7riii soon. I am currently doing this with the a7iii, but obviously the file size isn't a large, still usable though!

Great job and very helpful. I have the 70-200 f2.8 and was close to buying the 100-400, but held out long enough for the launch of the 200-600. Throw a question at you. What if you didn’t have the 400GM or 600GM and Sony launched a 500 f4 GM, would that be your “go to?” Of course the rumor mill is the 500 is on the table. Again, great video and thanks for putting in the time to do them.

Great video/info, what are your thoughts with the 200-600 and the a7R lll

Hi Patrick, great video. If you could only pick one telephoto lens would you go for 100-400 or 200-600? I'm leaning towards the 100-400 due it looks like having 100 is much more valuable than having 600... But I see a lot of great reviews on the 200-600 and it's cheaper. It's quite a difficult choice.

Very happy to stumble across this video. I primarily do video/photo for live bands in small venues and have loved the 24mm 1.4 GM and 24-105mm F4 G for that purpose, but as I'm looking to get into college sports I feel like the 200-600 and 135mm are going to make an amazing combo.

This is great, I have been waiting for you to do this. I have 4 of these lens, including the 200-600mm. I agree with your comments about the 100-400mm with a x1.4. I almost did not buy the 200-600mm, but then I see it as a 400-600mm lens and more with the x1.4. Also love the T shirt!

Great work! ....thank you very much! ...just purchased the 200-600 and it is amazing as you say, and at the price point, a no-brainer.

Great video Patrick, you are very kind man!

Just got my A9. Was up in the air on what long lens to get. Had picked the 200-600 and I am glad I did. Pulling the pin tonight. Thanks

A very in depth review. Thank you for explaining them in details along with the experiences of using them

Another great video! I am going on a family trip to Hawaii soon and am planning on shooting some North Shore surfing. I have an a7RIV and was going to use my 20-200 GM with a 2X tele in crop mode to get the range. I am concerned that it still won't be enough so am thinking about renting a 100-400 with a 1.4 tele instead. I only have room for one larger lens in the bag (can't fit a 200-600 ). How do you think a 100-400 with 1.4 X would compare sharpness-wise (etc) to a 70-200 with a 2X for surf shots and general tele use? I'll have a 16-35 GM for my walking-around lens.Thanks!!

Two years later! Excellent video thank you. Most informative.

Great and helpful info as always!

Thank you for taking the time to create this educational video. I'm trying to decide on a lens to shoot High School Varsity football at night. I'll be shooting all of the games from the sidelines. I currently have an a9 with 100-400 lens and 70-200 f4.0. I also have a 1.4x converter. I will be selling my 70-200 F4 for a f2.8 later this week so i can at least use that lens with the 1.4 x converter. I also shoot with a a6500 as a backup. I'm currently budgeted for about 6k and I'm willing to invest in new or used glass providing me the best performance from my a9. What lens should I invest in?

A comparison you missed (although kind of oddball) is the 70-200gm2.8 w/1.4x & 2x TCs vs 100-400gm. With the 70-200+1.4x tc it would be ~100-280f4 and with 2x tc it would be 140-400f5.6. For someone starting out in sports photography (mostly soccer under lights) would you suggest the 70-200gm2.8+ 1.4 tc for speed/light or the 100-400gm for reach? Thanks in advance. And very informative video on everything else.

Great video! I have a specific question on this lenses. I’m starting photography as a business and want to shoot sports mainly soccer including night games. Within the budget for a telephoto lens I got the 70-200 2.8 gm then buying the 1.4x teleconverter (scares me the lack of range) and the 100-400 gm (scares me the lack of light). Really stuck between these or potentially an older canon prime telephoto with adapter even…down the road would love the new 300 gm, but for now, do you recommend any of the options?

I shoot wildlife and pre-ordered the 200-600 almost as soon as it was available to do so. I agree that it will be very popular. I had a Sigma 150-600 C when I shot Canon (and I used it a bit with my a7r3, my first Sony camera) but I found the AF was slow and hunted too much once I switched to Sony and was using it with the MC-11 adapter. So I sold it as part of my switch over. I'm really excited to get this lens, essentially the same as the Sigma with the big added benefit of being a native Sony with more updated tech features. Great vid!

glad I got to the end. one focal length that never seemed to have been made is the Minolta 200/2.8. is there an optic for that fixed prime? by Sony or Zeiss .. ?

Really great video. Appreciate you making it👍🏽

Thank you Patrick. Exactly what i needed. I've been working as a photojournalist, doing lot of sport phoography, mainly athletics. I've been using Nikons, buts since they seem to lost the MILC battle, i've been thinking seriously to move on to SONY system. So you gave me a very good starting point on which leneses i should concentrate on. Thank you!

I appreciate your video, it was very helpful. I do have a question. I usually do a lot more scenery and micro photography with my A7iii but do shoot high school Lacrosse which is usually in the evening and or at night. Right now I am using an APS-C 70-350 (4.5-6.3) and it does fine but would like to purchase a better lens for doing this and be able to also use it for some wildlife. I am still torn between the 70-200 F2, the 100-400 GM and the 200-600G. Do you have any recommendations and reasons to go with one over the other. Most of the time I am allowed to be on the sideline but at away games I may have to pick a spot at one end of the field. Thank you in advance.

Nice! That 200-600 has my name on it :D

Nice one! Anyway i have a question; what do you think to pair 400 2.8 + 1.4TC with Soy A1? Also crop mode in some extra moments could be helpful at those MP...? Thank you!

200600 will be my upcoming gift in the next week

Personally, I bought the 100-400 a few weeks before Sony announced the 200-600. I’m kinda glad it worked out that way because I’d be tempted by the price and the range on the 200-600, but I would probably not like the size and weight. Having rented the 100-400 before I was blown away by the GM resolution, build quality, speed, and even things like the color rendition that seemed better. I think I’m going to get the 1.4X teleconverter for it to make it a 140-560mm f/6.3 to f/8, which isn’t too far off from the 200-600 with a lot note versatility. I’ll be shooting with the 1.4X outside in the sun most of the time anyway.

This video helped so much, after tossing up on what to buy out of the 100-400 and 200-600, I ended up going with the 100-400, I rented the 200-600 and 80% of my shots were under 400mm so figured I may as well get the better lens if it suits me which is also smaller, more lightweight and the extra stop of light is really needed in the UK where is always cloudy when shooting pet parrots in flight. Great video.

Great video and really appreciate going in depth on all these great lenses. I am curious tho…I’m more of a Motorsport photographer than anything, and I noticed you said the 100-400 would be good. I am kind of torn on that and the 70-200 2.8 because I want the solid 2.8, but the extra 200mm would come in handy. What are your thoughts? Also, looking at the Gen 1 70-200 as that is more my price range…using an A7iii.

Wow. Thank you for the depth of this video. I’ve been going back and forth between the 200-600 and the 100-400, and it looks like I’m going with the 200-600! Thanks for all the info! I have the 85 prime (and I think I’ll keep it after watching this!)

Thanks for this video, it's so helpful! Your knowledge and experience came off naturally and you made clear the benefits and purpose of each lens and focal length. I was planning to get the 100-400mm (I used the 70-200 F/4 at the Chicago Air and Water Show and I enjoyed it but wished I had more reach... but I mostly shoot autocross) but your talking about the logarithmic increase every 100mm and the new galaxy of bokeh has me curious about how 400-600mm looks.

Thank you for your video really it help me, I just ordered a9ii + 200600, included 70200GM & 2470GM, Im very happy with my decision 👍👍👍

Fantastic thorough review Patrick! That 200-600 is tempting. I already own the 100-400 which I love so it's tough to part with. I'm leaning towards the 400 f2.8 because with that 1.4 TC, I would be at 560 f4 which I'm good for because I can take the 1.4 tc off and have the option of 2.8. I'm into wildlife photography and there have been times later in the day and early where the light is challenging. As great as the A9's ability to handle low light, I'm currently using the 100-400 with the 1.4 which puts me at f8 :( BUT, IF Sony ever comes out with a 200-400 F4 with a 1.4 TC like Canon has, I would buy it in a heartbeat. Having that ability to zoom back for wildlife is something I enjoy now and I do worry about it. BUT (to contradict myself again), the bokey from an f2.8 or f4 is just WOW! To seperate the background is worth it - especially when my wife has green lit a purchase :)

The 200-600 will be mine as soon as I sell some older gear! Great review!

Terrific video. I am lucky to have most of these lenses except for the 600. I shot lots of motorsports and your comments were very helpful. You mentioned monopods so I am curious which brands do you recommend. Thankmyou.

Thanks so much - great video!! I’m shooting high school rowing, mostly near the finish lines (though sometimes at the midpoint of the race), so as my team’s boat approaches I only see the backs of the rowers - and I don’t see their faces until they pass me. So, I currently use the 70-200gmii or the 200-600mm depending on the venue. After your video, I’m feeling tons of FOMO regarding the two big prime lenses. Should I start saving up for the 400 and/or 600? And, if both, which one should I buy first to enhance my crew work? Thanks!

From what I understand, the motor on the 200-600 is a single linear motor, that of the 400/2.8 n 600/4 have the dynamic twin linear motor?

"If you don't know what I'm talking about, don't worry about it" laughed my ass off there... thanks.. : D

Hi Pat! Thank you for your great insights on Sony especially the 400mm f2.8 and the 600mm f4. I primarily shoot wildlife and nature now although I have shot for the better part of 15 years agility dogs and motor sports racing. I have done both of these professionally for publications and events on a pro level. Now, I mostly lead photo workshops to various parts of the world. My last two workshops I lead were to Tanzania. When not in Africa, I do a lot of BIF at home but I love shooting larger wildlife too. I sell some at local galleries, teach, and do critiques. I shoot with an A1 and an A7R3. Current long lens is the 200-600mm. I would like to move up to the 400 or the 600 but cannot afford both. I have the 1.4 teleconverter already so I can go with the 400 mm f2.8 and the 1.4 for 560mm or the 600mm f4 bare or with the 1.4. I don't typically shoot much above 600mm because I don't like the heat waves unless I can get out early enough. I follow Tin Man Lee and he leans towards the 400mm because of the extra stop of light. I want to focus on better backgrounds and earlier light as well as evening backlit shoots. Your argument for the 600mm is tugging me in that direction. I can't afford both. I was thinking of the 400mm to shoot with the 1.4 so that I could have a more versatile lens when I occasionally shot agility dogs and other arena sports. The hard decision point is that I shoot a lot more of birds and wildlife. Why not the 400mm with the 1.4 over the 600mm? I want cleaner backgrounds with as much amazing light as I can get, that is the direction I want for my art print photos. Thanks for any light you can shed on my choice. David

Phenomenal video, it’s missing sample shots with each lens. I’m curious to know why would someone choose the 100-400 over the 70-200 with a teleconverter? How good is the background blur on the 200-600 at 6.3? Does compression compensate for slow f-stop?

Thanks for your sincere and honest opinions!

A great review!!! I’m still using my Tamron 150-600mm w/ the MC11 and it works, but I’m ready to sell it and the three other Tamron/Canon lenses and get that transition over with. I’ve been holding onto some of my Canon gear just because it was my buddy for a long time... but it’s over. I don’t use the 150-600 a lot but when I do it’s so worth it. With the Covid issue and no live events, I certainly have time to wait for one to be in stock. But I think it’s time to finally let go of the Canon side completely. I can’t see ever going back, and can’t imaging having to replace lenses yet again. Thank you for this review, it was far more valuable than you think.

Thank you for taking the time to make this detailed video. I’m considering the 200-600 for motorsport. I was wondering how good the autofocus accuracy is ? I’m currently using an A9ii and my lens kit also includes a 100-400 GM.

Great video, thank you sir!

I can verify your comments about the 100-400 GM. I shot the moon with an A7R4 and the 100-400 + 1.4x tele and every shot came out - HAND HELD. I had tried this with all my Nikons over the years and rarely had what I considered a good shot. Great video in covering the main points and uses.

I was just musing that I had not seen a PMR Sony video in quite a while and now there's this one! Thanks! Where can I buy a FE>EF T-shirt?

Even though i mainly shoot wildlife, considering how well the tele converters work, i opted for the 400/2.8 versatility over the 600/4. The option to shoot 2.8 is more worth it to me than the 40mm extra (560/4 vs 600/4 and 800/5.6 vs 840/5.6). The 400 is very sharp even with the 2x, and the creamyness/background blur should, at least in theory, be very similar between the two lenses. And its smaller (if you can use the word small for a 400/2.8) Then again i'm not a hardcore birder - probably hard to justify the 400 over the 600 for pure birding :D

Great recommendations thx u. Do you think the 200-600 has kind of a busy bokeh?

Using the 400 on senior portraits. Man…I shouldn’t of watched this vid. I thought I never even needed to think about that bad boy 😂🙌

Thanks Patrick, quick question as I'm starting from scratch with Sony. What body and lens would you recommend for ringside boxing action shots?

Incredibly comprehensive and helped me make a decision on the Sony FE 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 G OSS Lens. Cheers!

Thank you for the detailed review. I love bird photography. I was thinking about whether to buy an a7r4 with FE 200-600mm. Your video explained a lot of the technical terms in easy words that I could easily understand and remember. I dream to buy 600mm one day. I'm not a professional yet. Is it worth the cost? I'm in India and it costs half of buying a house here. I wonder will I ever recover what I pay for the lens and is it a good investment in the long term. Thank you for reading and I look forward to hearing from you.

Using the 1.4 teleconverter with the 70-200 2.8, you lose 1 stop of light. You mentioned that you can shoot basketball. I'm assuming you are shooting college or pro level where lighting is not an issue. I can't use this combination with basketball because the ISO will get jacked up too high. But I'm thinking about this for high school football. What are your thoughts regarding using the 1.4 teleconverter for any high school sport? (basketball, football, volleyball, baseball, soccer). Thanks

Do you still use the Sigma 120-300? How the AF tracking with the MC-11 compared to the native Sony 200-600?

Hi there. I’ve been torn between the 100-400 and 200-600 for air shows with a side of nature photography. I just ordered an A1 so I’m looking for a good companion lens to go with it. Any thoughts on which might be better? Previously I had been using the 24-240 on an A7R2 with moderate success, but I found myself usually at the max of 240 and wanting to go further.

70-300 f4.5-5.6 not included,, wonder why? Though it’s versatile focal length.

Got the 100 to 400 G Master on your recommendation from one of your original videos, have it on my a 6500 virtually all the time. It is a phenomenal lens for Birds, Sports, and even macro photography. I haven't yet put an extension tube on it but would like to try that as well. Thanks for your recommendations and this grade recap. Might have to think about that 200 to 600 for birds.

Hi Patrick, I have been watching a lot of your videos and I have to say thank you for doing this, I start led using a Sony A9 with the 200-600 but at night I was having really bad pictures due to my ISO was to high and the place was very dark as well, I just got the Sony 70-200 so I should be better but I was wonder what you think about Sigma 120-300 2.8, how good would that work with my Sony A9? I also have Nikon d500 and d850 would you recommend it? I really can’t afford the other lenses for Sony they are way too expensive, Thank you in advance

Thank you for your review, it's quite thorough compared to the RU-vid entertainers in my opinion, but it was entertaining to hear you say humping Big Glass! I have the (sony) 200-600 my really first long lens, I need to build up my guns.... feels heavy to hold for more than an hour birding walking around on hike - def needs a mono pod for me... but I wanted to get into nature/birding and wanted to get serious... but I'm wondering if a 100-400 GM + a 2.0 TC or 1.4 TC would be better for weight and versatility. Question: Would a 100-400 using 2.0 TC still pretty sharp? I have read it autofocuses faster w/out the TCs. Unsure how well it would perform with a TC both image quality and auto-focus performance. However based on your review sounds like both TCs are great? Thank you

Own the “street sweeper” Love this lens.Its a powerhouse.

Great information. I am interested in getting the Sony - 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS Optical Telephoto Zoom Lens for NEX-FS700 - White/Black. I will be using it on an a7iii. Will it be compatible?

Mark Smith shoots birds with a 600F4. He really shows what that lens can do. Great video!!! Thank you!

Good video so far. I will finish watching later. I’m very happy with my new 100-400 on my a7riii. For landscapes and travel the 200-600 is too big and heavy.

THANK YOU SO MUCH ! I am starting up as a videographer and shooting for the University of Buffalo football team this season. I use a SonyA7iii and I’m debating what zoom lens will allow me to best capture that amazing images. Sony 70-200 f2.8 Sony 70-200 f4 (more cheaper) Or Sony 100-400 f4-5.6 ?

Thank you for putting this review together. Did you create more confusion? Ah that's debatable but I feel you provided a lot of great info. I currently have the 70-200GM with 2x tele. I'm about to pull the trigger on either the 400 or 600GM. Question, I'm a hobbiest but I like to pixel peep. Living in Park City, Utah I'm given lots of wildlife opportunities. Do I like birds, sure but not my main focus. With that said, knowing I'm ready to burn 12 or 13k, which would you go for??? I don't do sports, more of just a general, ooooh that's pretty let me take a picture kind of shooter with a larger budget than most.

Great review. If you are one of the people giving this a thumbs down, do yourself and everyone else a favor and find a "Glam Rock" or "Hollywood" review written by any of the hosts of CLOWN "influencers" who have never made a dime from photography. This is a great comparison/contrast session on several lenses at different price points for shooting sports from a top class photographer with a great portfolio and resume. Well done as always PMR!

Great video, it actually didn't feel long :) I think another advantage of the 200-600g is that you can go back and forth between 200 and 600mm with a 90 degrees rotation, it looks almost instantaneous and effortless, I think it's a first for a telephoto lens. What do you think?

Thx you for this, felt like you were always making sense

Hey Patrick. I'm kind of late to the party but nonetheless; I have a Samyang 35-150. I'm wondering if I should've opted for the Sony 70-200mm GM instead?

Currently debating between the 135 GM and 70-200 GM for sports photography on the A7C. The 135 despite being a prime is very tempting being slightly more portable. For someone with the budget for only one of those two lenses which would you suggest for sports. I primarily do video on my 24-105, but want a good lens that I can slap on for stills during the game. Thanks! Glad I found this channel as it fits my needs perfectly.

Patrick. How do you think the new 200-600mm lens will work on the new A7RIV?

I’m hoping that Sony will add the XD-linear motor to the 85MM f/1.4 GM Mark ii. Or, maybe they’ll add an 85 f/1.2 like Canon. I love my 85 1.4, but my f/1.8 actually focuses easier in low light.

what would you recommend for shootings action shots of dogs? i do alot of sport work with dogs and like to take action shots. I currently have the a9