Beware of These Words (with Miniminuteman) | Livestream Highlights 

Other videos you may enjoy: PSEUDO ARCHAEOLOGY: WHAT IS IT? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-hnoImxaa69g.html WHY I DON"T BELIEVE IN A LOST ADVANCED CIVILIZATION ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BHeflRtrYUk.html LIES TOLD BY ATLANTIS PROPONENTS ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1dHNq8SURTU.html

I work in a grocery store. And I use the term "oopa" all the time in reference to something that was clearly grabbed by a customer, and put on a shelf in a spot far away from it's regular shelf spot.

For me a red flag is "they don't want you to know this" or "you're out of your mind if you believe"... insert perfectly reasonable believe.

The words "orthodox" and "mainstream" made me laugh out loud. A coworker used to always rant about "mainstream" science, always in the context of ancient history. I finally got fed up with it, and said: "You were totally OK with mainstream science when you needed your coronary bypass. The mainstream is good enough to keep your heart working, but studying the history of the planet- nope, that's gotta be aliens. Pick a lane, because Xenu didn't fix you up. That was just a normal mainstream doctor." I did get a talking to from my boss for losing my temper, but after a few weeks of our local "researcher" being a lot more agreeable, my boss did thank me for the peace and quiet.

"We have been lied to" is a personal favourite. Great co-op guys!

If you first heard about the channel on Joe Rogan's podcast you are DEFINITELY watching pseudoarcheology.

Very nicely done guys I'm glad the grown ups are fighting back against all this pseudo science that seems to be getting far too much media coverage.

One of my favourites......"experts say" but we don't know who the experts are, and "it is thought that" but thought by whom ?

“Theorist” is my favorite. You hear it 100 times on every episode of ancient aliens.

As a big alternative history fan a friend and I had the good fortune to attend a talk given by Erich Von Daniken in London. He even chatted with us afterwards. I could not wait to get home, grab his books from my bookshelf and throw them straight in the rubbish bin. I was cured.

If your car broke down would you take it to a mainstream mechanic? How do you feel about mainstream dentistry? One red flag of pseudo archeology/history is that the author spends a lot of time talking about himself: how people always fail to notice the author's genius, and how they are so able to think outside the box.

"Controversy", "Mainstream (insert science discipline)", 'Repressed, suppressed", "Darwinist, Evolutionist", "Dogma"

I had no idea this stream happened. I would have loved to see it live. Y'all are my favorites.

I love Dr. Milano and Milo Rossi. The young and old minds of archaeology. Both are very good teachers of that world.

Someone needs to start a (satirical) pseudo-pseudoarcheology channel… where they call out the mainstream pseudoarcheologists for publishing popular opinions like the ancient astronaut, but they refuse to acknowledge the “truth” that the pyramids were built by time-travelling ninjas. (They cut the rock with their ninja-chopping action.)

I love this, thanks guys!😁 great video and wonderful collaboration 😊

Big respect to you David for talking about not putting your new ideas to the students you're teaching. I've hated hearing from my friends who took courses in the more academic fields who've had their education hampered by professors seeking validation of their ego or clout in their field by using their students as pawns for it.

"Ancient astronaut theorists believe/theorise bla bla bla" is one of the funniest ways to try to prove something. I've had so many laughs when I watched that show years ago. I was fascinated by that show back then. Nowadays I'm skeptic to all these "alternative archaeology" theories because all of them have only circumstantial evidence. It's so important that there is ppl like you 2 David and Milo keep it up!

My two most favorite archeology/ history channels on RU-vid ❤

My favorite is: "is it possible that ... fill in far fetched idea ..."

Out of place artifacts do have an academic name. They are called intrusive artifacts. That just means someone dropped a ring or something and it found it's way to a place that doesn't fit. I read about a dig in south America recently where the archaeologists found a gold finger ring watch in a layer it should not have been in. When they looked at the back it said Seiko 1977. But our alternative friends love using "ooparts" as a killer argument when the truth of the matter is they turn up all the time for all kinds or reasons.

And I was just about to author a book contradicting mainstream researchers regarding precision-cut oopah evidence from the megolithic era. It may overturn all orthodox concepts about advanced technology before the Great Reset. 😅 Thanks for the great collab. Keep on educating the world.

I look for 'hidden', 'secret' or 'forbidden' when I want a good laugh.

One thing that deserves to be mentioned is that there is a lot more money to be made in pseudo-science than in actual science, which is probably the main motivation for a lot of these people. Like profit margins are a lot higher in de the quackery business than in actual pharmaceutical medicin.

Two of my favourite History RU-vidrs in one Video, nice 😄

I used the library as a child in the 60s. My eyes were opened. Best thing was it was sectioned, Fiction and Non Fiction.

"Megaliths are one of those things that are so easily thrown around" is the most unintentionally wrong sentences I've heard in recent memory...

What saddens me is how totally taken in people get by these unfounded theories. They play on the fact most people just don’t know how the ancients actually achieved what they did. The smug verification on bens face while he was on Joe rogan was so annoying, because Joe would never have on Dr Miano to actually tell people the truth of the matter.

Having been raised by conservative creationists the oop-arts and gradualism/catastrophism are both definitely cross-pollinations between the conspiracy/pseudo-archeology and the biblical creationist camps. And I think one thing that's a bit of an obstacle in counter-acting these sorts of ideas, is that you kinda assume that there's more and less "outlandish" ideas to most of these people, when usually they actually start with some outlandish idea, that glom on other outlandish ideas to that one they start with, without actually being invested in how realistic our plausible those ideas are. Which I think goes into something I, having come out of that kind of environment, see as a potential misunderstanding for you guys. While they are creative, they're often actually almost vehemently incurious. Like the overlap with extreme religious beliefs, cult-like quackery, and racism isn't coincidental, or even just incidental, these people are not looking for answers or "truth" in they way people in the sciences are, they're looking for new collections of information or narratives that support an idea they already regard as central, hence why if the majority of the evidence seems to be against it, they do not, and will not see it as evidence against that idea, but evidence that the people in those institutions are somehow against them, and perhaps engaged in some massive conspiracy to suppress their "truth". Which is also why, because they think that way, they project and assume everyone else "really" thinks that way too. Their presumption is that because they're starting with a belief or assumption, and trying to find facts to fit that assumption and rejecting anything that doesn't, that everyone else is doing the same any anyone who claims otherwise is either self-deluded (if they're feeling generous), or deliberately lying when they claim otherwise.

awesome to see you two guys together!

i totally forgot about this episode, great interview. you two are both amazing. love your channels and work. thank you for posting.

Watch out for those click bait titles....... 'Scientists are terrified of this new Archaeological discovery' 100% of the time, the video turns out to be pseudo (or just plain wacky) Archaeology.

I don't know quite how deliberate it is from all sources, but there is a clear trend of saying or implying things like "the government is lying to you", "the experts are trying to fool you", "experts don't want to admit A" it is all sort of designed to make people mistrust experts or professionals, such that the ignorance of people, or inability to understand or put in the work to understand different fields can be turned into a willingness to listen to the sources of these kinds of statements or implications. it is a bit like stopping someone in the street and giving them back their wallet that they dropped, suddenly with no reason at all you feel like some person is trustworthy, when the fact is that you can't know whether they picked your pocket or found your wallet in the snow. it is kind of similar to that i think, none of these videos actually earn any of the trust they inspire in people, they just give them their wallet back and there we are, they now seem nice and like they are going out of their way to inform people, when in fact it is just a very easy method for stealing peoples attention and trust.

Setting the box in fire. I love it!

I don't want to set the box on fire . . . I just want to start a flame in your heart. The Ink Spots 1938

I’ve been hoping these two would collab for quite some time! Great work guys absolutely loved this livestream!

You missed a very common thing. Watch for "could it be" and phrases like that. They are often used to suggest an idea early on that is later taken as being true for a following argument without bothering to provide and evidence that the idea is true. Another one is the "XXX was able to prove that ..." when the XXX is some other person's name. It is an appeal to authority but in many cases the "authority" is not even a real authority.

I like the idea of the "Megalithic Period" Paleolithic, Neolithic, Megalithic Old Stone Age, New Stone Age, Big Stone Age.

Got no problems with people having alternative theories, but Handcock and Uncharted x, etc are just charlatans praying on spiritually and logically lost

Now this is an awesome collaboration, two of my favorite historical content creators

GREAT to see you two working together - the New MythBusters! Go get 'em guys!

You guys are hitting the nail squarely on the head. In fact, the level of precision with which you guys incise these topics could scarcely have been achieved with the technology we have today. 🙃 Slightly off topic but Q annon frequently pushes the idea that any expert should be able to explain any complex topic, to any half brained individual, in a few sentences, or they really don't understand it themselves. (Einstein says so !) This of course emboldens the segment that may overlap with pseudo science enthusiasts to assume that "mainstream academics with all their fancy degrees don't know everything". Many today have become experts at missing the point. Congratulations on your upcoming wedding Dr. M.

Весели празници и наздраве от България 🍻

Two of my favorite channels together, awesome!

Love your work. Keep going.

I was waiting for this mashup :)

Any thumbnail that has a label, "archeologists can't explain this."

Thank you for the video, this is important. Happy holidays!

I immediately love this collab

I hate that I couldn't make this livestream; two of my favorite channels together!

More collaboration please!

Yes!!! Milo and Dr. Miano!

Very important video. Thank you so much for this!

This is a collaboration never goes wrong

When I was a kid in the late seventies and eighties with an interest in archaeology and history, I picked up Chariots of the Gods in the local library and read it. Thank the gods, there was also a scientific book that debunked everything von Daniken said and I got cured at a very early age of pseudoscience/archaeology. You guys do the same work, thank you! You are saving people from a whole lot of nonsense.

The other thing I notice is they don't reference scientific experiments or method or bring up points that disprove their theories. Like Ghost hunters SAY they are using science to prove ghosts but they never investigate a house that has never been documented to be haunted... as a "control"...

Awesome stuff! Love the content!

Looking into the history of plant and animal domestication is what finally ended any hope I had that there might be even semi technologically advanced, ancient civilizations.

The one who has real knowledge would surely have low or no ego issues 😂

I love the collab! More from both of you soon, please!

Awesome..!! The world needs more collab between you two guys. Entertaining and informative as always. Much appreciated

This was awesome. Please link up with Miniminute Man again!

“Energy” 😂

I was just thinking how cool it would be if Milo was on your channel! Wonderful! Lucky me!

Awesom colab. Love both your channel's

I can be said to be in a middle position between mainstream scientists and pseudo-science. I myself work in the field of architecture and love ancient history. I don't believe in aliens, I don't believe in ancient super technologies, but I do believe that the current timeline of history is poorly understood and it is likely that we will find a lot of evidence that the Bronze Age is much longer. In the 90s, scientists would have ridiculed you if you had said about the probability of the existence of Karakhan Tepe and Gobekli Tepe. The reason for the existence of pseudoarcheology is that science itself often does not allow the development of any theories, and this applies not only to archeology, but also to chemistry, physics, genetics and geology, because scientists say that something is impossible. As one person said, what's the difference between science and pseudoscience? 50 years.

How would they know if it's out of place.

Yaaass!! Love the collaboration!

You two are exactly what we need. David, I gravitated to your videos because you seem like you would be delighted if any of these theories were true.

This was informative. Keep up the work.

I do my own pipe work, because I do not trust mainstream plumnmers.

Awesome to see you and Milo working together, David. I enjoy both of your channels and believe your work and videos are vitally important in this fake news, conspiracy saturated world. Thank you both, from me in Cape Town. Keep up the good work. All the best to you both and may your channels shoot for the stars.!

As a metal head I, for one, appreciated the Bronze Age dad joke on screen

Great conversation!👍 David, to your point about how people think you don't challenge the system. After watching enough of your videos I definitely have the sense that you care deeply about what we currently know, but crave new ideas. You pointed out though, that the ideas have to go through rigger. It is not the job of someone else to be convinced, if your data and evidence is compelling and strong it will do the work of changing minds. Overall I think your style of debunking is extremely effective. You don't attack those who challenge, you ask for more data. Ben over at unchartedX, unfortunately, still seems to think that a very small sampling of unverifiable pots is his smoking gun. He's far too religious, IMO.

Minim vids are great nice to see this colab

This is very useful, and I really enjoy two of my three archeologists of choice working together! Happy 2024 to you all and the ones you love.

Two great archeology RU-vidrs linking up! Love it!

"History Channel" out of the US is one and a pseudo-scientific crap channel. Gotta admire the Prof as he has a lot of crap to debunk.

Pseudo videos generally ask lots of questions but give no answers.

Love it! Dr. Miano and Milo in conversation - what a treat!

They also use the word "experminentalists" in reference to people who try to debunk their claims through recreating techniques said to be pushed by "established" archeology, like SGD making granite plates. Which shows that those people aren't willing to accept anything but what they are proposing.

I know of FUPA, but that probably different artifacts

Can one of you two guys please do a comment/analysis on the documentary 'the primordial code'? It's by a Dutch guy with some 'interesting' ideas

"I'm not saying it was aliens, but it was aliens."

OMG you forgot ancient aliens favorite misunderstood technology...

The last time I heard about gradualism and catestrohism they were purely geological

love you guys

Two of my favourite archaeology content creators!! :)

Antediluvian is one the religious author/researchers like.

Neat to see you both at once!

13:00 reminds me of an important point Stefan Milo makes: if the world was interconnected in ancient times as pseudo-archeologists claim, how come there isn't any prior evidence of genetic mixing of peoples or evidence of non-native food cultivation? Like what occurred when the Spanish reached the Americas--Europeans genetically mixed with indigenous peoples of the Americas and brought crops with them home/left theirs there. If these ancient societies were connected then this surely would've happened in those times too..

Technically writing this comment makes me an Author.

"wisdom keeper" = chief bs artist

Very helpful. We do watch all these channels and it gets confusing. That's why your Shorts/videos are the best. Thank you. Looking forward to more adventures in 2024. 👋

Good recap.

Is it possible, could it be, It looks like you guys know what you are talking about.

You have certainly triggered indian nationalists by putting that indian guy in thumbnail

"I"m just asking questions..." But I refuse to believe anything that doesn't agree with what I already believe.

If an airbrush painting of a hot ancient Egyptian is talking at you in a robot voice, you MIGHT be watching pseudo archeology.

Ben is by far the biggest con man of them all, closely followed by cantankerous ‘author’ and ‘engineer’ Chris Dunn.