Big Waaagh! vs Sons of Behemat | Warhammer: Age of Sigmar Battle Report 

I'm glad someone said this. It was fun watching him having fun.

Thanks so much, glad you're enjoying it!

Glad you're enjoying the videos, the future of AoS is definitely bright, the games in an awesome place!

The Kruleboyz Monsta-Killaz unit!

Ya you can't really see but Mike has a unit of Brute Ragerz behind the Gutrippaz. So he Violent Frenzy's the Brutes and the Brute Ragerz.

Thanks! I forgot about the Brute Ragerz.

ahah

In BW or KB you can count one unit of hobs as battleline for each unit of gutrippaz you bring.

Feel free!

Looking forward for this review!

Yep he claimed 3! The man crusher gardens count as 10 models on objectives

Hey, just a heads-up are you subscribed at the tactician level?.

Not sure. Guess I’ll have to check. Was kinda why I was asking. 😊

I guess I was just a veteran. Didn’t know that there were different levels. I upgraded to tactician.

@@Justin_Koeppel happy i could help

"I won, because I ran away from you into this random battlefield corner"

@@Kinhussar I am new to the game but I disagree. If all the battle tactic were malee focused that would be a disatvantage for magic/shooting army. If all the battle tactic were combat focused you had a convergence between points and damage to units. The multy level strategic thinking comes from a connection between points and combat. 1) You have to score points which is about controlling the battlefield and making specific moves. 2) To do that you need units, so you have to keep them alive and kill those of the enemy in an advantageus trade. If you make the BT converge on the combat it would just be about combat, the game would get simpler and lose strategical aspects.

​@@Strade8 There's a sweet-spot for everything balancing wise. But don't strawman me by making it sound like I want each BT to be "kill a unit". It's not what I've obviously intended to say. There are currently non-interactive, non-counterable, not-requiring-something (aka free) battle tactics in the game, that also don't require tactic, strategy or apprehending your opponent in any way. I - and many people - dislike this, because this game is called WARhammer. Surround and Destroy is an extremely stupid battle tactic for example, especially because it's almost locked for some factions while others can get it for free without a cost (high mobility/teleporting armies/high unit count). The match itself wasn't even a showcase for this, since the players were awesome and it was very fun. Big Waagh is the showcase (in general) though, why current BT system is very lackluster.

Can you provide 8 brand new battle tactics that meet those requirements and are fair to all factions though? Some armies OR lists simply aren't designed to brawl it out with 140 zombies.@@Kinhussar

@@Kinhussar For sure the game can be batter balanced. My vision of the game is maybe different from yours. I see it as a balance between the point game and the fight game. BT get you points, but they can make the fight game harder. Fight limits the options of the enemy but won't win you the point game if you don't score. BT should't be too easy (1-2 is ok if you have more is clearly a problem) and should require consideration of different intereactions. They should't be always counterable because you don't want it to get to a dice roll or a matter of luck. They should't be much about fighting because otherwise the point game and the fight game would be the same and you lose that aspect. Is still WARhammer, but is more complex and less smesh into each other.

STEALING THE INITIATIVE Do not roll off to determine who has priority in the first battle round. Instead, the player who finished deploying their army first has priority in the first battle round.