(2, 3) in R we have (3, 2) in R, but this does not guarantee the relation is symmetric because we have to check for all ordered pairs. In this case the condition for symmetry was violated by the (2, 4), so there was no need to look at the (2,3). If one condition has been violated then it’s not symmetric, no need to check others.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nPE-PfQ8CQ8.html sir, we used (2.2) and (2.3) to check for (2.3) we used (2.2) and (2.4) to check for (2.4) then why are we using **(2.3)*** now