I laughed pretty hard when Bobby initially said that Koreans didn’t have slaves. I’m fairly confident that every single society on the planet has had slaves at some point or another throughout history, even Native Americans. They would take captured people from enemy tribes, and basically enslave them.
@@goodrobot1 Yep, everyone was an oppressor or a savage at some point in their history. No exceptions. To pretend that one group of humans is somehow more historically upright than another is a joke, and anyone who can’t understand that basic truth is functionally retarded.
@@rickrollrizal Bro White People went crazy with their desire for black slaves.... there was a reason for it but it was unnatural thing to do (the demand was really high bcoz of the new found lands).... purposely mass hunting people to ship them off to the new found "discovered" lands. Also people of their own culture treat their own differently then coloniser. Iam not defending the African americans but your point is not really valid , because they had to protest the hell out of protesting in order to get the same treatment as their white counterpart even though the west world clearly banned slavery , their treatment towards the people who once were slaves was not changed. It was about supremacy too. The protest were for racial equality and not just "slavery" .... its not like America pays reparations to black for slavery so its not like slavery holds much point ...its about racial treatment .
@@rickrollrizal Let's not forget that half the freed slaves in the US also owned slaves themselves after being freed in the US. So they didn't have a problem with slavery they had a problem with being slaves but owning them was fine!!
But their slavery was more "you steal, you work for me until I say so" it want race based like the US. I could also be based on POWs, but I could be wrong. It's wrong both ways tho
Happens alot, especially when talking about reperations. As the advocates for slavery are often times ignorant on the subject, and rely on current day outcomes to justify their beliefs
slavery in Korea and the Far East is not the same type of slavery as in the transatlantic slave trade or the Middle Eastern slave trade. as a matter of fact the "slavery" in question has no direct translation into English and the English slavery has a different word in Korea. the slavery in question in Korea is only slavery by modern standards. they are basically the lower class and is socially indistinct from the common and middle class. they have legal rights and can own property, land and even other "slaves". basically a poor person can sell themselves as a laborer to work for room and food.
@@Souvik8680 that's more rights and freedoms than peasants/farmers under serfdom. you have to really bend definitions and realities to merge transatlantic slave trade and middle eastern slave trade to the "slaves" of Korea. all homeless people, and lower wage workers such as maids and cleaners today would fit the Korean definition of "slave".
@@Souvik8680 In Korea, there's two words that could be translated to slaves. One is 노비, which were exempt from taxes, had legal rights to own property, including other slaves, right to marriage and divorce, right to sue their owners, and most importantly, were considered part of Korean society and thus part of the King's duty to protect them. Legally, they held the right to purchase their freedom or sue the owner to gain freedom. The kings encouraged such things because it was a good check on the rich upper class. (and the king needed to collect taxes) The other one is 노예, which describes the slavery in the western hemisphere, where they were treated as utter garbage. These did not exist in Korea. European slaves and Oriental slaves are different.
@Norbert71 u will get ur ego hurt if u are proved wrong, is how u take that hit what matters, everyone has an ego, just take the hit in the face and smile, yep u were wrong, it hurt, now lest keep talking.
@@GameandComedy no it's not just male talk this is how all of my conversations r for the most part and I'm not male, it's just about having a good sense of humor and not taking everything to heart.
@@suzygirl1843 to be fair there’s not really a lot of that at all. even african slaves weren’t just being stolen by other countries to bring back. they were being wild into slavery by african warlords and slavers, and great britain ended up having to blockade africa to stop african slave ships from leaving.
@@mattyice2889 Sure. You have Xenophobia today in African countries but how else are you gonna control an invading force? They enslaved people infringing on their territories for resource management. White people were supposed to be civilized at this point. It's really the HYPOCRISY that people despise about Transatlantic Slavery since they used Christianity to justify their actions. It's devil-ry.
He accepted it but the bigger picture is: every country engaged in slavery for most of their history up until great Brittain but an end to it and started forcing others to as well. Africa still had slaves into the 1900s and last country in Africa didn't ban it till 1981
It's a matter of pride. It comes from different reasons but it seems pride is the currency of the internet nowdays. The more pride you have, the better. That makes for people who'll get pissed off when you tell them they used the wrong "there" and instead of saying "my bad" and fixing it like a grown person they'll lash out at you and call you all sorts of things.
Honestly, even I’d react worse! I mean I wouldn’t be a dickhead like most people, but I’d soooo embarrassed. He clearly was a little but he still managed to own it.
Yea I love how he handled it 😂 he’s so open to facts.. most people do NOT do that.. they’d just be like “well why should I trust what this article says, where did they get this info, I’m the one that’s Korean, etc” just gaslighting & deflecting 🥴 ugh 😩 😂
I love being proven wrong it’s my favorite thing just expect me to fully wring you for that sweet knowledge I didn’t have I’m not wrong often my mom made me learn to read at 3 lol
Totally agree! It's a breath of fresh air to see someone so readily admit that they were wrong when confronted with the facts. We all need to be more like Bobby.
@@CrimzonFT My point is if you chose to actually read it, is blk people are just as guilty as any other race for atrocities. And yet unlike this guy they won't often accept that.
Everyone talking about the "We're scumbags" at the end but the squeaky "fuck bro holy shit" is hilarious, you can hear it registering that he literally could not have been more wrong about that lmao
I love Bobby, but I think it’s VERY true about South Koreans and their god complex. Not only does Bobby think that, but he’s clueless about his culture. No wonder he’s gotten himself into some bs.
I learned about this from my mom. In those days, you were either of a "reputable/royal" bloodline and had a proper first and last name, or you were a slave worker with no real name. The classism was so extreme that if you were a slave, you didn't deserve to have a name as you weren't seen as a human being. Remnants of those times still linger in current society as well. When slavery was abolished, everyone did end up getting proper names for themselves. However, "reputable" bloodlines were still distinguishable from others. For example, if your last name is Lee, based on which city/region it's associated with, people could determine if you came from a bloodline of slaves or not. It's now mostly considered distasteful to judge people by the region associated with their last names, but even 20 years ago, people frequently looked down upon those without "rooted" last names. I recall my grandparents obsessing over that quite a lot. Unfortunately, classism is still a big issue in South Korea.
@@levithebaddest2369 if they had god-complex they never alow them self to be slaves. Korean is complaint to authority. governments loves people who is complaint to authority because they follow orders like a slave. (pat TAX and dont ask questions) complaint to authority is the opposite of god-complex.
Peanut gallery is a very old and very racist term just so you know. If you feel like trying to phase it out if your vocabulary then Background crew works as a super easy replacement when watching videos like this, unsure what you’d replace it with if you use it in other contexts as well cause it’s not really used at all where I’m from so I dunno how much people who do use it say it. Not trying to fight just wanted to be helpful.
@@Zimzum93 Ok, I wrote a full explanation of why you're wrong on this like five times, but my computer clicked off before I finished every time. So Imma keep this short. The term is not racist, it originated from the poor seats in the back of theaters being loud and throwing peanuts at the stage. If you want to be a stickler, it's at most classist. Its original usage refers to unwanted opinions from an audience. It was then further adapted into a general term for an audience, but can still be used both ways.
@@Zimzum93 I don’t think that’s true and I don’t even know where you got that information. The peanut gallery was phrase used in vaudeville to describe audience members sitting in the cheapest seats, often the rowdiest members, who threw peanuts at stage performers and heckled them. It’s likely there were some black people sitting in those seats because of socio economic disparities and racial inequality, but it wasn’t a label for just black audience members. So no. Also I’m black and I’m not even surprised a white woman is trying to tell me what’s racist.
@@KExKE I’m mostly white passing native Australian (here in Australia, people notice that I’m “mixed”, although we don’t use that term much basically if you’re a blakfulla you’re a blakfulla regardless of how much they tried to breed it out of your blood line) and not also not woman, but you had no way of knowing that cause people outside Australia don’t tend to even know we exist or what we look like let alone what we look like if one of our parents is white. The origins of the term peanut gallery were explained to me by a very close bpoc woman friend of mine who is a burlesque/vaudeville-style performer, she explained how it evolved from there and became racist and why she hates it so much and also how it became the origin for the term “nut house”. You can keep using the word if you want and don’t feel like there’s anything wrong with it, especially since today it’s got no racist context, I just know that some people really appreciate knowing that stuff and choose to delete certain words and phrases. You’d be surprised how many native mob here use the American phrase “Indian giving” until they find out what it means and then don’t want to use it anymore.
Great Sketch but to be fair most Germans didn't care about the politics they just didn't want the war reaching their family/hometown Some were so against the Nazi party that they actually started firefights with other German units try to prevent war crimes (look up the Battle of itter Castle)
Seriously 99.9% of any country alive today has had slaves at one point in their history. Sri Lanka says some guy on quora To be honest wouldn't have guessed Korea being the king for the longest. India yeah.
@@ParadiseDB7Dude, I'm not American and I've lost count of times I've had to correct Americans about American history, and from what I've heard the vast majority of History teaching in America is about American history... Which seems pretty accurate from my experience talking with Americans about world history (especially that outside of UK and France, most Americans seems to have some idea of that history but talk about the history of almost any other European country or even more so Asian or Middle-Eastern history and most don't seem to know basically anything)
Thats not even the half of whats funny about it. Most Koreans don't know much about their own history. Ask any Korean Teakwondo teacher about the history of the martial art and they will give you this thousand year old batshiet answer (and it varies too) when in reality it came from a Korean who was adopted by a Japanese Karate teacher who went back home to Korea after WW2 and made his own Dojo. The art was only 70 to 80 years old lol
By the sound of his dialect, he's American or at the very least he was raised in America and probably has no knowledge of Korean history since its something not generally taught here.
@@pliskinishmael7190Taekwondo was taught by ancient Chinese officers to low-level Korean soldiers to attack the Japanese. Modern Taekwondo is copied from old Chinese kung fu movies and Jackie Chan movies with most of its moves. * The ancient Koreans did not have any martial arts.
