Boeing 747 Crash in Bangkok | Miracle in Thailand | Qantas Flight 1 

TheFlightChannel You asked so nicely I couldn't say no. Thank you for your amazing content

The videos are excellent.. Thank you for creating and sharing these videos..

Dear sir, please make a video on 9W 2374, Goa-Mumbai incident.

TheFlightChannel bring the crash GLO 1907. Collision of two aircraft in Brazil !! Embrace of Rio de Janeiro.

I’m a vlogger myself but I’m not aware of the the changes, what are they changing?

luck?

Nah, they are usually at the top of the tree regarding training and safety. Vs> QF 32. However, this was a balls up well and truly. I wonder what the "punishment" was for the crew, especially captain. And interestingly, you can tell by his earlier admonishments that he doesn't have faith in the FO, and is haranguing him. Last thing you need when the pressure is on. Capn was on a bit of ego trip here, and backfired royally.

Heard that too from other sources in aircraft industry.

it's still a severely damaged plane. Quantas really took a risk flying it. They risked the pilots & passengers lives to keep a shining record. Wrong move/high risk. I would never have flown on that plane . Now Quantas is known for keeping an unsafe plane in the air. That speaks volumes.

anna Last, have no fear as for the safety of passengers and crew flying this plane. The engineers working for QANTAS are some of the best in the world, QANTAS just hate to pay them their large salaries. Repairing this aircraft when it should have a write off was only a question of money. The repair itself would have been done to the highest standards as required by the industry, there would have been no shortcuts taken. You may not be aware of this but if a maintenance engineer signs off on a bad repair or deliberately covers up a dodgy repair they can be charged with a criminal offence as well as be fired and never work in the industry again. You don’t need to have faith in QANTAS management but at least have faith in their Licenced Aviation Maintenance Engineers.

as an aussie myself, i would like to confirm that it is a typical aussie response lol

Were yiu on the PLANE with that guy???

that's a typical response from anyone who is sarcastic. Aussie or not.

And you'll find sarcasm is a very common trait here

@@amansandhu2135 I want you to think for a second

And that one that blew an engine, Had pretty much had fuel imbalance, Because of a heavy fuel leakage, wing damage, Fire, Hydraulic Lost, Brake Problems, and etc, Engine failure is a Understatement lol

ALSO that Boeing 747 accident, in which a part of the plane exploded at 29,000 feet, which in turn caused 4 or 5 passenger's oxygen masks not to deploy, as the oxygen tanks also exploded. It was also a Qantas flight.

@@mustafa7248 I just watched a Flight CHannel episode on that like yesterday...Qantas 30.

@@mustafa7248 it wasn't an accident, it was an incident where an oxygen bottle ruptured for no apparent reason... ALL Qantas oxygen bottles were tested and found to be properly maintained with proper and detailed records, including the bottle that ruptured. It was unable to be recovered. It was concluded that it was NOT Qantas' fault in any way whatsoever and that was most likely a manufacturing fault that was undetected - Note, no airline can break open the bottle and find any faults so they have to take quality control and documentation as correct. The bottle damaged the fuselage causing a decompression. At NO TIME was the aeroplane in danger and it was certainly NOT an accident. Neither was the BKK incident. Qantas was not criticized for training, it was noted that a new procedure, although it had been risk assessed did not consider all factors that could happen in a worst case scenario. This incident has been overdramatized to buggery... yes, it was serious but runway overruns happen at the rate of about 1 or 2 a week around the world. Qantas is a very safe and very well managed airline from a safety perspective. This was it's only 2nd overrun in 79 years of operations. Lots of people like to try and cut Qantas down because it has such a good record. Long may it continue to have.

@@Rocket-hb6jh I guess u are an employee of Qantas, at senior management post. Or maybe C-level. I heard Virgin Australia makes similar claims as yours too.

Wow, I'm glad! Thanks

kaits23 actually there was a few fatal crashes when they were still operating propeller driven aircraft.

But it was very minor

Qantas is clean, and they want to keep it like dat

Qantas has had 8 fatal accidents since it started flying. But none since the start of the jet age - about 1970. If you believe that Qantas has never had a fatal accident you are in effect saying "no fatal accidents, at least not since the last one". It just doesn't make sense. It is a very safe airline. But there are many airlines who have flown many more hours than Qantas who have never had a fatal accident. Accuracy and truth are more important than myth.

Ken, I've just re-checked my sources. You are partly right. Overall 104 people have died in 14 Qantas fatal accidents since the first in 1927. Two of these crashes were caused by enemy action in WW2. Qantas is a safe airline and does not need myth or fairy stories to make that point. But plainly the numbers tell the story and it cannot cannot claim to be the safest. Since the start of the jet age many airlines flying many more hours than Qantas are accident and fatality free. My best wishes.

BurgBikers Becuase qantas is one of the cleanest airlines in the world.

Douche Bag Yeah to be Honest!

Technically not a crash, and so QANTAS maintains an "impeccable" safety rating.

ShallowAbyss Yeah!

What do you mean "technically not a crash"? This is an accident in accordance with ICAO Annex 13.

The captain was stubborn an a****** and nobody wanted to keep informing him of changing conditions cuz he wouldn't listen

Typical Aussie bro

That's because @theflightchannel is probably on a realistic flight app thing. The pilots of Qantas are Excellent pilots. Qantas has rarely crashed in the first place, and even if something bad happens, the problem almost always resolves.

Some blame on ATC for not reporting conditions fully but the cockpit action seems to have almost slapstick.

@@ianmoseley9910 looks like amateur hour 😂

No, it was because of Qantas’ configuration or something that was not the original for landing in these types of conditions. If it was Boeing’s configurations it wouldn’t have happened. When the Captain said to go around, the F/O didn’t listen and touched down with full power.

Igamerfellow Thanks man!!

ZIgamerfellow

I worked at QF on this incident. You are 100% wrong. Insurers made the decision that the aircraft was repairable. That is never the decision of the owner. Aircraft was repaired perfectly and paid for by the insurance companies and certified airworthy by regulators and QF. Flew for many years after this. Sorry but you don’t know what you are talking about.

Really - Well that would solve the problem wit out a doubt. Yes, when in an emergency scream and add more chaos to that which already exists. Be sure you make other people upset as well. That will assure a panic situation.

Sachin Tamane LOL, it would be awesome 😂😂 Thanks by the way! ☺️☺️

I do it. (Like before watching, because any new vid from TFC is a good vid)

I'm not blaming him but it looks like the captain was panicking when he realised that the plane landed too far on the runway and then he started to make erratic actions.

There is a difference between god and God (UPPER CASE G to denote a proper noun) Lower case g means any kind of god ( You are forgetting the English you were suppose to remember .. Perhaps you fell asleep in English Class...Wake up now. And finally, whatever happens is meant to happen. It is FATE ... accept it ... Be it good or bad. Consider that had this incident not happened the way it did, there could have been a much worse situation had there been a go around. Are you getting the point. This way the aircraft was damaged, and no passenger fatalities and no injuries. That is all one can hope for. Some of you people are so dense and fail to see that the outcome was not as serious as it may have been.

@@andrew_koala2974 no drama is written in advanced, maybe thats what you tell yourself to accept things , but in reality you create your own destiny.

YOU SHUT UP

​@@andrew_koala2974 "whatever happens is meant to happen. It is FATE ... accept it ... Be it good or bad. " I work in the emergency medical field. We say "fuck off" to your 'fate' every single day. If we all believed that "whatever happens is meant to happen" there would be no medical services, no rescue services, no police, no aviation safety regulation or investigations, no pilot regulation or safety requirements - because hey, people should just accept fate. Anything that happens was mean to happen, right? Woman with cancer? No point treating her, nature and/or God wanted her to have that cancer. Child born with congenital heart defect? We could repair it with surgery, but we won't because clearly she was meant to have that defect. Teenage girl hit by a drunk driver? No paramedics, ambulance, emergency department, or surgery for her massive internal injuries. She'll survive if she's meant to - let fate take care of her. Child drowns? Clearly a higher purpose! Imagine what disaster could've happened if the three year old hadn't fallen into the backyard pool. Death is a reality, part of the cycle of life, and we accept it when it happens. We can't save everyone. But we try our darnedest to stop death and cure illness, and when it does happen we do everything we can to stop it happening again. There is no fate, except that we make ourselves. There is no higher purpose, there are only positive and negative coincidences. That's reality. Having said all that, I fully accept your right to believe what you want. But do us a favour and make sure you've made your beliefs clear by signing a "Do Not Resuscitate" order. If you suffer a sudden cardiac arrest one day, long before you would have had a natural death, I'd hate to violate your deeply held belief by resuscitating you, instead of accepting that it was simply your time to die.

And imagine that was their 1st landing on wet tarmac obviously.

It's not that they don't know how to do a go-around. Qantas pilots are well trained and do a lot more hand flying practice than a lot of other airlines. This was just a series of small lapses of judgement which lead up to the accident. None of the mistakes in themselves were all that dangerous, it was all together that made it an accident. Yes, in hindsight, they probably should have called for a go around when the captain first noticed they were high, but on its own that wouldn't have caused a problem.

Agree with you 100%. It was a comedy of errors, one error after another by these pilots, especially the captain. Landing in heavy rain is a bad idea and then after you declare a go-around you don't change your mind because the landing gears have touched the runway, you still take off and go around. When retarding the throttles, who retards three engines and leave one throttle to full power? Total confusion and lack self and situational awareness. I'm surprised that the aircraft didn't veer off to one side and went of the side of the runway. On a heavy rain soaked runway, it is safer to TOGA then to force a landing where you have no traction or braking due to hydroplaning. These pilots should have been suspended if not fired. Maybe the captain should have been fired and the copilot sent for retraining.

Speaking as a pilot, I agree. I simply cannot understand why the go-around was overruled. Extremely poor decisions by the captain.

Overlord yeah, why would they do that? Panic?

Probably yes. Hard to tell but I'm not a pilot. I have thousands of hours in simulator and I believe that in these conditions when the long landing was obvious the go arround was the only right option.

What baffles me the most is that a captain with more than 15.000 flight hours could make these rookie mistakes. He must have felt overconfident. Why did he want to stop no matter what? Instead of supporting hes co-pilot in the workload and checking the configuration for take-off, he partially took over the controls, during a critical phase and just like that!

Yes, a beautiful land of culture and history. Also beautiful people💞 from cape town, south Africa.

Aditya Thanks a lot man! New episode every Friday! ☺️☺️

thanks bro!

U mean past crash investigations right? Not future ones, we dont want ppl to die

abbyskelYT 😂😂😂😂

Smithonian channel has a program called ‘Air Disasters’ which are true stories of plane crashes and the investigations that follow. It is super interesting how they find out exactly what happened and whose fault it was. They even had the Concorde crash right after takeoff from Paris and traced it to a piece of metal that fell off a Continental Airliner that took off right before the Concorde and ruptured its tires and the fuel tank. Interesting show but I love all the videos on RU-vid

⁰⁰

vid is not a word Einstein.

@@K1OIK It's been 2 years since I posted this comment and how tf was someone able to find it out just to point out an internet slang and call it a non-existent word

@@AmruteshArun tf? is that internet slang too?

@@K1OIK well yes.

Thanks!

Haahha, you oughta try living there for a couple of years!

And man who walks through airport turnstile sideways, is going to Bangkok.

Bangcock*

Hey, why the hell is the devil walking next to me?

@@i-am-that-what-i-am India is mad enough

Then school

TiTLEUP LOL 😂😂 Thanks man

see this is why people like kanye west are running for presidency - y'all ain't payin attention in class, therefore creating a generation of complete and utter idiots, therefore encouraging this type of behaviour

Yeah. These pilots were probably watching videos in class when wet runway training was given !!!

Thank you!!

Typical Gamer Thanks a lot man!

Josh Berith its an accident

@@billymasterofpuppets so they accidentally didnt follow company procedures? The captain accidentally ignored the first officer? The captain accidentally decided to cancel the go-around?

@@samuelwhaley6658 It's an incident and accident. An accident is an unplanned event so crashing a plane is an accident

Thanks man!

I.MPlays

Richard Shiggins, you are partly right. QANTAS changed policy from full reverse thrust to idle reverse thrust only.

2

That video has already been made, mate.

SantiGoma touch-matia cupelli

SantiGoma Darude sandstorm

@Dave Mieze you're right, I didn't know about the "fucking power". Lol

The whole world is built on human error

what??????

wow I have just discovered this ... can amazed that no one else has responded to you, a passenger on this flight! Yes I can imagine it would have been Very weird to have been sitting there wondering, worrying, and probably very much wanting to disembark now!! Also sad to read that you received no apology or acknowledgement. Must've been a really intense experience!!

No.

Dr. Sam Hill why? One of the best crash history, along with great onboard service and rarely any delays. Flown with most major airliners and the only one I’d choose over Qantas is Singapore Airlines.

Safe yes. Best, fuck no.

Thanks man!

What flight simulator software is being used, please?

Jim Jurena , X plane 11

Thanks, I'll look it up.